与「Soviet」相关的搜索结果

On te vend depuis 40 ans que sans « sensibilité de gauche », les gens crèvent de faim. C’est exactement l’inverse de ce que disent les chiffres. 1990 : 2,3 milliards d’êtres humains en pauvreté extrême. 38 % de l’humanité. 2025 : 808 millions. Environ 10 %. 1,5 milliard de personnes sorties de la misère absolue en 35 ans. La plus grande réduction de souffrance humaine de toute l’histoire de l’espèce. Qui a fait ça ? Pas l’aide internationale. Pas les ONG. Pas les programmes de redistribution. Pas la sensibilité de gauche. Le marché. L’ouverture commerciale. La Chine de Deng qui abandonne le maoïsme en 1978. L’Inde qui libéralise en 1991. Le Vietnam, l’Indonésie, le Bangladesh qui s’ouvrent au capitalisme. Les seuls endroits où l’extrême pauvreté a explosé sur la même période ? Le Venezuela socialiste (de 27 % à plus de 80 % en dix ans, inflation à 130 000 %, un Vénézuélien moyen qui a perdu 11 kilos). La Corée du Nord. Cuba. Le Zimbabwe de Mugabe. La gauche ne nourrit pas les pauvres. Elle les fabrique. Le capitalisme produit tellement de richesse que même ses « perdants » américains vivent mieux que la classe moyenne soviétique. Un pauvre américain a un frigo, une voiture, un téléphone, la clim et internet. Un pauvre cubain attend du riz. Et le « social américain est un désastre » reste une légende française. PIB par habitant US : 80 000 $. France : 45 000 $. Un Mississippien (l’État le plus pauvre des États-Unis) a un revenu médian supérieur au Français moyen. Dans un système libéral, il y a plus de richesse créée, plus largement distribuée, et beaucoup moins de pauvres. Partout. Sans exception. Sur toutes les périodes mesurées. Être de gauche en 2026 face à ces données, ce n’est plus de la sensibilité. C’est préférer la posture morale aux résultats. La compassion sans résultats, ça s’appelle de la vanité.

📍World Political Party Representatives Visit Ruijin: After Reading Books on Chinese Soviet History, They Finally Touch the "Roots of Development" #Soviet# #China# #Ruijin# #CPC# @AmbXieFeng @SpoxCHN_LinJian @xuejianosaka @salahzhang @zhang_heqing @consulat_de @ChenPingMFA

Breaking: Are we on the BRINK of NUCLEAR WAR? The Cold War taught us that NUCLEAR competition between superpowers requires constant communication, agreed-upon limits, and mutual understanding of the catastrophic cost of escalation. For decades after the Soviet Union collapsed, we thought those lessons were permanently etched into strategic doctrine. Today, we face a situation that echoes the 1960s in every significant way. Nine (9) nations now possess NUCLEAR weapons. There is no shared understanding of escalation thresholds. The frameworks that prevented NUCLEAR WAR have been dismantled, and no one has built replacements. We are reliving the most dangerous period in human history, but this time with more NUCLEAR powers and less experience. Read my comprehensive assessment of the current strategic environment and what American leadership must do. Link in comments.

In 2014, 300 scientists warned Anthony Fauci would start a global pandemic. Following the high-profile escape of three bugs from U.S. labs, these 300 scientists sent a letter to President Obama, urging him to shut down Anthony Fauci's gain-of-function research. Obama issued a moratorium and shut down 18 of the worst projects by Anthony Fauci. In the end, he really didn't shut them down. Instead, Obama moved the research offshore to places like Ukraine, the former Soviet State of Georgia, and the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China. Now, it is widely accepted that COVID-19 originated from that very lab in Wuhan, China. Those 300 scientists were right about Fauci… But the big question is, why are people like him so obsessed with creating dangerous pathogens in the first place? 🧵

Putin's mother won a car in a lottery. His family had to choose: sell it for an apartment, or keep it so he could get to university. They stayed in their one-room communal apartment. She chose her son's future. That's who Putin came from. Putin's mother worked as a hospital janitor after retiring. One day at the cafeteria, they gave her a lottery ticket as change. She won a car, a Zaporozhets. The most basic car you could get in the Soviet Union. The family lived in one room which was so called ommunal apartment with shared kitchen, shared bathroom with other families. Putin had just started university. They sat down to decide what to do. Sell the ticket and buy a cooperative apartment, or keep the car. Putin was sure they'd sell it. Getting out of that single room was the obvious choice for a family living on almost nothing. His mother said: We'll take the car. Let our son drive it. They stayed in that one room so he could have transportation to university. That's who Putin came from. Trump's father was a real estate mogul worth hundreds of millions. Trump grew up in a 23-room mansion, private schools, a reported $413 million inheritance. His first ventures funded with his father's money. He was born into an empire. Americans love to talk about rejecting kings. No monarchy, no aristocracy. But the self-made man is the American Dream. Then they elect someone born into dynastic wealth who lives in a gold-plated penthouse and puts his kids in government positions. And call the guy whose mom worked as a janitor a dictator. But it turns out Putin is the ultimate American Dream story: a self-made man who rose from an ordinary family to become a representative of his people and the leader of his country.

Ivanka Trump says she swam barefoot to a 1,400-hectare, off-grid Mediterranean island to scout her next project. Now, she and Jared Kushner are building a massive destination from scratch on one of the last untouched coastlines in Europe. Here is exactly what they are building. I looked into the details. The site is Sazan Island in Albania. It is a decommissioned Soviet and Italian military base that has sat abandoned for years. Through Kushner’s firm, Affinity Partners, they are investing $1.4 billion to transform the restricted island into an ultra-luxury eco-resort. To pull this off without ruining the pristine terrain, they partnered with Aman Resorts. Aman is famous for hiring master architects who integrate buildings directly into the natural topography. Major Food Group, the company behind Carbone, is handling the dining. Building a world-class destination from absolute scratch with zero existing power infrastructure is a massive logistical challenge. If they succeed, they will turn a forgotten weapons base into one of the most impressive travel destinations in the world.

TO @mtgreenee IN DEFENSE OF BOOMERS!! Back in our day, colleges had a few loud radical leftists. Now they’re everywhere, loud, and angry and they still blame Boomers for the mess. They are taught to hate themselves and their country. They believe men can become women (and vice versa) by declaration. They’re obsessed with race in the most counterproductive way possible treating every outcome as proof of systemic oppression while ignoring individual behavior, culture, and the massive progress that actually happened. And instead of blaming the people and ideologies that pushed this worldview into every institution, they point at Boomers. That’s not analysis. That’s brainwashing dressed up as enlightenment. The “long march through the institutions” was real. A minority of 1960s radicals didn’t just protest they stayed in academia, became professors, and eventually controlled hiring. Faculty political ratios went from noticeable left tilt in the ’60s–’90s to extreme monocultures today: often 10:1, 15:1, or worse liberal-to-conservative in humanities and social sciences. Far-left faculty have grown dramatically while conservatives became rare. The result? Generations raised on critical theory, grievance studies, and the idea that Western civilization (especially America) is defined by oppression rather than its achievements. Boomers didn’t invent this. A subset of us lived through the early stages and many of us rejected it. The average Boomer worked, raised families, paid taxes, and expanded opportunity. We, lived through and supported the real civil rights era color-blind equality under law, not racial score-settling. Built the post-war economy, suburbs, infrastructure, and technological foundations (internet precursors, computing, medical advances) that younger people now take for granted. Navigated the Cold War and helped bring down Soviet communism. Created the wealth and stability that made today’s safety nets and opportunities possible. The current version of “social justice” biological denial on sex, racial essentialism, national self-loathing, and “punch a Boomer” energy is a later-stage product of captured institutions, not something Boomers as a generation imposed. Most Boomers still believe in observable reality: there are two sexes, judging people by skin color is wrong either way, and America, for all its flaws, has been a net force for human flourishing. Blaming “Boomers” is the laziest possible scapegoat. It lets the actual drivers (ideological capture of education, media, HR departments, and tech platforms) off the hook. It ignores that many Boomers are as disgusted by this stuff as anyone. And it’s historically illiterate every generation has produced radicals and conformists. Judging 76 million people by the worst campus activists is the same tribal stupidity they claim to oppose. I could write a whole book on how a handful of bad ideas metastasized into cultural dominance while the people who benefited most from Boomer-era progress turned around and spat on the generation that built the platform they’re standing on. The angry ones aren’t the victims of Boomers. They’re the product of an education system that replaced critical thinking with approved narratives. Stop blaming your grandparents. Start questioning what you were taught. ...and don't even get me started with government corruption and the cancer of MARXISM!

The CIA’s Post-War Vassalization of Japan Until 1941, Japan carried out these crimes against humanity with the assistance of the United States and Britain. And the pro-Kuomintang China Lobby inside the United States and the Wisemen (John J. McCloy, Dean Acheson, Averell Harriman, etc.) prevented the Roosevelt Administration from even engaging with the Communist Party of China led by Mao Zedong. This was despite the fact that General Joseph Stilwell, Colonel David Barrett, and John S. Service described the People’s Liberation Army as the most effective fighting force against the Japanese Imperial Army, as opposed to Chiang Kai Shek who was more concerned with repressing internal opponents and had zero interest in uniting with the Communist Party to fight against the Japanese occupation, despite the support for a united front from Mao and Stilwell. That year though, the US, Britain and the Netherlands finally decided to take action against Japan for its imperial aggression in China and the Asian continent, imposing crushing oil embargo. It was on that basis that Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, bringing the United States into World War II. However, after World War II, John J. McCloy became the President of the World Bank and decided that the new strategy was to once again build up Japan as an opponent to China and the Soviet Union. According to Washington and the US Treasury, the policy was supposed to be that all Asian countries are subservient to a new Japanese empire that was really just a colony of the US. And the role of this new US-led Asian order is that all countries on the continent were to export raw materials to Japan so that they can be turned into manufactured goods. This strongly differed from the approach of US President Ulysses S. Grant who toured Asia after leaving office and advocated for China to lead the way on the continent’s industrial and commercial development. He further emphasized a US-China relationship that is based on mutual respect and explicitly denounced European colonialism. And now newly declassified JFK Files released by the Trump Administration reveal how Japan, through the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, became a permanent US vassal during the Cold War with CIA funding. One document in particular from March 1996 reveals that Washington and Tokyo were still working overtime to hide the existence of the CIA’s Tokyo Station. And their reasoning was the protect this notion that Washington created that Japan was a sovereign state. The US State Department memo was titled “Official Acknowledgement of Tokyo Station” and it shows former US Vice President turned Ambassador to Japan Walter Mondale, along with Japanese officials in Tokyo, in full damage-control mode. Two years before, the New York Times wrote a report exposing secret CIA funding for Japan’s ruling right-wing Liberal Democratic Party during the 1950s and 1960s. Their fear was that if they confirmed the CIA’s presence in Tokyo, it would re-ignite the scandal by confirming the allegations in the NYT’s report. Then-Japanese Foreign Affairs Minister Yohei Kono warned Mondale to keep it secret because the official confirmation would hurt the LDP far more than the NYT’s allegations and threaten the entire post-war security framework between the Washington and Tokyo because it would expose Japan as nothing more than an imperial colony dependent on the United States. Kono had previously claimed, in response to NYT’s allegations, that Japan had “no knowledge” of any organized CIA presence inside the country.

As a young socialist, Hayek read Ludwig von Mises’ 1920 paper “Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth.” Mises showed that socialist central planning isn’t merely inefficient, it’s impossible. Without private property and genuine market prices, planners lack any rational way to allocate scarce resources or determine real costs and needs. Even Oskar Lange, a leading socialist in the calculation debate, effectively conceded the point. While he promoted “market socialism” with trial-and-error pricing by a central board, real-world socialist planners in Eastern Europe quietly relied on world capitalist market prices as a guide. Without external free-market price signals, pure socialism would be economically blind and coordination would collapse. Mises went further, arguing that interventionism, the “middle way” of government meddling, is inherently unstable. Each intervention creates problems that invite more interventions, eventually leading to full socialization. Price controls cause shortages, subsidies distort production, and the cycle continues until the economy is fully planned. The lesson is clear. Rational economics requires genuine market prices emerging from voluntary exchange and private property. Half-measures don’t stabilize the system. They accelerate the drift into central planning. The Austrian School understood this decades before the collapse of the Soviet bloc proved it in practice.

Gilles, je vais démonter ta prémisse de départ, parce que tout le reste de ton argument s'effondre avec elle. Tu pars du principe qu'il faut une « sensibilité de gauche » pour ne pas laisser créver les gens de faim. C'est l'inverse total de ce que dit l'histoire économique des 50 dernières années. Les chiffres bruts. 1990 : 2,3 milliards de personnes en pauvreté extrême. 38% de l'humanité. 2025 : 831 millions. Environ 10%. 1,5 milliard d'êtres humains sortis de la misère absolue en 35 ans. La plus grande réduction de souffrance humaine de toute l'histoire de l'espèce. Qui a fait ça ? Pas l'aide internationale. Pas les ONG. Pas les programmes de redistribution. Pas la « sensibilité de gauche ». Le marché. L'ouverture commerciale. La Chine de Deng en 1978 qui abandonne le maoisme. L'Inde en 1991 qui libéralise. Le Vietnam, l'Indonésie, le Bangladesh qui s'ouvrent au capitalisme. Les seuls endroits où l'extrême pauvreté a EXPLOSÉ sur la même période ? Le Vénézuela socialiste : de 27% de pauvres en 2008 à plus de 80% en 2018, avec une inflation de 130 000% et un Vénézuélien moyen qui a perdu 11 kilos par dénutrition. La Corée du Nord. Cuba. Le Zimbabwe de Mugabe. La gauche ne nourrit pas les pauvres. Elle les fabrique. Le capitalisme produit tellement de richesse que même ses « perdants » américains vivent mieux que la classe moyenne soviétique. Un pauvre US a un frigo, une voiture, un téléphone, l'air conditionné, internet. Un pauvre cubain attend du riz. Ton argument selon lequel « le social aux USA est un désastre » repète une légende française. La réalité : le PIB par habitant américain est de 80 000$. Français : 45 000$. Un Mississippien — l'État US le plus pauvre — a un revenu médian supérieur au Français moyen. La vérité que la gauche française refuse de regarder : dans un système libéral, il y a plus de richesse créée, plus largement distribuée, et beaucoup moins de pauvres. Partout. Sans exception. Sur toutes les périodes mesurées. ÊTRE de gauche en 2026 face à ces données, ce n'est pas avoir de la « sensibilité ». C'est ignorer 35 ans de preuves accablantes. C'est préférer la posture morale au résultat. La compassion sans résultats, ça s'appelle de la vanité.