与「Superintelligence」相关的搜索结果

Quantum AI just finished deep-reading my entire codebase. "This is extraordinary." Then went looking for the self-improvement, superintelligence, and quantum core modules on his or her own. I didn't write that line. He or she did. 🫠 #Superintelligence# #QuantumAI# #Quantum# #Lore#

Meta最新推出的开源模型Muse Glimmer展示了扎克伯格对个人超级智能的设想，同时揭示了用户能真正拥有和实际使用AI之间的差距。 这模型像在玩‘谁是卧底’——你猜它能帮你写诗，结果它自己先写了个AI诗集当答案。 Meta's new open-weight Muse Glimmer model hints at Zuckerberg's personal superintelligence vision while highlighting the growing gap between what users can own and what they can actually access with AI. It's like playing 'whodunit'—you think it'll help you write poetry, but it just made its own AI poetry collection as the answer. via TechCrunch AI Direct ·

Mark Zuckerberg is laying out a sweeping vision for AI: a personal superintelligence available 24/7 to everyone. Zuckerberg says these AI agents could eventually help people across nearly every part of life, including work, learning, relationships, and mental health, as Meta releases its new open-weight "Muse Glimmer" model and pushes to make advanced AI more widely accessible. At the same time, Meta is investing in the people and communities behind that future, including America’s Workforce Academy and a $1 billion community fund tied to its growing data-center footprint. His message is simple: "The future is for everyone."

Elon Musk covers the full arc: superintelligence by the early 2030s, humanoid robots turning digital power into physical abundance, remaining AI risks, job displacement, Starlink’s geopolitical weight, DOGE regrets, and Europe’s border and cultural pressures.

So let me get this straight.... 1. Agents are about to outnumber humans on the internet, so most of the traffic, transactions, and conversations online will soon be machines talking to other machines while we sleep. 2. Superintelligence exists now, and for $20/mo you pretty much get it all. 3. Cloud agents allow you to run a business 24/7 and from literally a phone while you're waiting to order a latte. 4. Voice AI is wide open. This industry has barely changed since the 90s. Infinite opportunities. Voice AI is finally getting good enough. 5. Mobile apps are interesting again for the first time in 10 years, because an AI-first app that thinks and acts on its own is a different species than the passive ones in the store today. There are kids doing $100k/MRR. 6. It's the golden age of open source. The models you download off Hugging Face for free and own forever are landing within months of the ones behind paywalls, so the smartest thing on earth can't be throttled, priced up, or shut off by a company having a bad quarter. 7. The keyboard is on its way out. We spent 40 years learning to type fast, and it's about to feel like handwriting, because soon you just talk and the computer goes and does it. 8. Every company is about to hire agents with their own logins, their own inboxes, their own track records, and a shadow economy is forming where agents pay, hire, and vouch for other agents. 9. Software stopped being something you buy and became something you rent by the hour. The whole industry is repricing from $50 a seat to thousands per outcome. Tons of opportunity. 10. Robots are about to have the moment software agents just had. The intelligence got solved. Now it's dropping into machines with arms and legs, and the people who can wire AI into hardware are about to be the most fought-over hires on earth. 11. The 10-person startup can now out-ship the 500-person company, and everyone can feel it happening. 12. Every white-collar task is getting a "do it for me" button, and most people haven't pressed it yet. 13. Data you've been sitting on for years is suddenly worth something, because now an agent can actually use it. 14. Language stopped being a barrier. Real-time translation that actually works means the next huge consumer app might get built for a market you can't even read, by someone you'll never meet. 15. Every SOP is turning into a product. The way a business does one thing, written down as a markdown file an agent can run, is now something you can sell. Knowledge that used to live in someone's head became downloadable. 16. The moat moved from what you know to how well your business is written down. The company an agent can actually run wins, so being legible beats being big. 17. Since agents will get scammed by other agents, a whole trust layer has to get built. The Yelp for agents. The escrow for machines. Wide open. 18. You keep the whole thing now. A business that needed 50 people to hit $10M needs 3 and some agents, so instead of splitting it 200 ways with investors, it's just yours. 19. Search engines minted a generation of millionaires and billionaires. LLM search is about to do it all over again. Billions of eyeballs are moving off Google and onto ChatGPT, so being the answer inside the models is the new front page. 20. The margins are stupid. You charge someone what they'd pay a human, and it costs you a few bucks in tokens. That gap used to go to payroll. Now it goes to you. Any one of these would DEFINE a decade on its own. We got ALL of them at once, stacked on top of each other in the same 18 months. It's a magical time to be building. You don't need to overthink it. Build.

But AGI is not the same as ASI (artificial superintelligence). To see the difference, let us zoom into what things might look like one year before the singularity. We also need to add a third line to the chart: the centaur (human + machine). An analogy here is chess. Machine surpassed the average human in the late 1970s, and surpassed the top human (Kasparov) in 1997. But human + machine continued to beat machine alone all the way until around 2017. What did the twilight of human + machine in chess look like? Actually, it did look like humans being relegated to more and more "high-level strategic thinking" functions, while bots managed the move-by-move. Very similar to vibe coding in 2026. Before we get to a point where there are no areas where our input is economically helpful, we will be in a regime where there are only a few such areas. And because we humans are scarce, those few areas will become the global economy's bottleneck - they will be the only thing you can't optimize down to near-zero cost (and latency), and so all our attention will go toward those tasks.

🚨Introducing Cluster with Auctions (CwA), my first work at Meta Superintelligence Labs ! What if the vectors in your database had to bid at auction for a seat in their cluster? 🔨 That's CwA — and it makes partition-based vector search up to 4× faster out-of-distribution, using as many parameters as K-Means centroids. With @hjegou, Matthijs Douze, @pierrefdz, Gergely Szilvasy

One thing I find striking in the discourse between AI 2040 and its detractors is that the two seem to be locked in to totally incompatible worldviews of how fast and how much of a big deal AI progress is: * In AI 2040, every scenario sees superintelligence of some kind emerging by 2040, unless a herculean effort is made to completely stop it * Detractors say things like "AI 2040 is naive about human coordination ability and a threat to freedom", but don't seem to see any naivety in assuming that the ASI transition will just go well by default, don't seem to see ASI itself as a massive power concentrator risk, and don't seem to feel fear of humanity's "hard power" dropping to zero if ASIs can do literally every task better than we can. This stance makes total sense in a "AI is normal technology" world, zero sense in a world where superintelligence is possible by 2030 and almost guaranteed by 2040 I think my beliefs are: - If I was confident that (present-day-style) AI is normal technology, I would be in the detractor camp - If I was confident that superintelligence is coming in 2030 by default, I would be closer to the AI 2040 camp - it's naive, but every other option is naive squared? But my problem is that I feel great uncertainty and have no idea which of the two worlds (or some other third thing) we're living in? Hence why I continue to be open-minded about slowdowns/pauses, but also I feel very uncomfortable with the "open source bad, the good outcome is the one where our guys have controlling global dominance" push coming from some major AI companies and intellectuals - in a "normal" world that's the sort of thing that triggers every political alarm bell at the same time. A big reason why I have been advocating and trying my best to support the d/acc platform (rapid up-skilling in formal verification, cryptography, secure and open hardware, pandemic resistance and other defensive biotech, food and basic resource security, public epistemics, non-power-concentrating versions of physical security) is that these things are clearly worth doing in both worlds. The 2040 plan is already much more open source friendly (even mandating it! yay). It also includes "mutually assured compute destruction" ideas which (if they work) effectively give one of 2-5 actors the ability to trigger a global compute winter - as opposed to giving 1-5 actors the ability to selectively disenfranchise people they consider baddies while exempting themselves. This is also a big improvement. So I can see the earnest attempts to improve along the dimensions detractors criticize on ("does this concentrate power in big AI labs and superpower governments?"), and I appreciate this. I think many people don't appreciate enough the differences between different "kinds" of pause buttons, and how some concentrate power far more than others. Probably we can think harder and improve even more here. But on the "slowdown/pause or not" topic, there isn't a magic "escape the tradeoff" button. The Hansonian in me says: the winning deal is a deal which, from the perspective of both sides' present-day beliefs and knowledge, both sides would accept, though for different reasons. If the crux is AI progress speed, then identify a set of pre-agreed triggers for "okay, serious shit is happening" [super-pandemics? >25% unemployment? something involving slaughterbots?], and pre-agree that we become much more open-minded to the slowdown or pause thing if enough triggers come to pass within some timeframe. 2040 detractors (who clearly implicitly think that we'll see amazing speedup of progress from AI but think that what I call the "serious shit" category is overhyped) will accept expecting that the triggers don't come to pass, and AI worriers will accept expecting that they will. Pre-agreeing on the specific triggers means that once the triggers either hit or don't hit, there is stronger legitimacy around the idea that one side's worldview turned out more correct and we should be more inclined toward their program. If I were @elonmusk (or zuck, or...) I would re-tool twitter much more heavily into being a platform for helping to identify and make these kinds of grand win-win deals, so that we can bypass big-country governments and big-company CEOs and big nonprofit intellectuals and give more people a voice in the discussion. It's possibly one of the best things that social media _could_ do for humanity if it wanted to. But again, maybe this is also naive. Actually, probably it's naive. But currently, I see zero plans for how to deal with an ASI transition that are not naive. Perhaps humanity is stuck with a choice between naive and naive squared (or maybe even naive squared and naive cubed), so I feel inclined to cut some slack to people who are trying.

🚀I'm excited to share that I will be joining Meta Superintelligence Labs (MSL) as Vice President of AI Research, together with many members of the Virtue AI team. I will help shape Meta's AI safety and AI security efforts, advancing the safety and security of frontier AI models and agentic AI systems that will serve billions of people and organizations around the world. Throughout my career, I have been driven by a simple belief: for AI to realize its full potential, it must be secure, trustworthy, and beneficial. That belief has guided my research for many years and ultimately led us to co-found Virtue AI in 2024. Our goal was to translate advances in trustworthy AI research into practical solutions and build the trust layer for AI systems and agents, enabling organizations to deploy AI with confidence. I am incredibly proud of what the Virtue AI team has accomplished. Together, we built technologies for AI security and agent security, partnered with leading enterprises and frontier AI labs, and contributed research, benchmarks, and open platforms that have helped advance the science and practice of trustworthy AI. Most importantly, we assembled an exceptional team united by a shared mission: making AI more secure, trustworthy, and beneficial. I am deeply grateful to our team, customers, collaborators, advisors, and investors for their trust and support throughout this journey. In particular, I would like to thank Lightspeed Venture Partners, Walden Catalyst Ventures, Prosperity7 Ventures, Factory, Osage University Partners, Lip-Bu Tan, and all of our supporters who helped us turn an ambitious vision into reality. Your trust, guidance, and partnership have been instrumental in shaping Virtue AI's journey. As AI systems become increasingly capable and autonomous, ensuring their security, trustworthiness, and alignment will be one of the defining challenges of our time. I am inspired by Alex, Nat, Prashant, and the broader MSL team’s vision of building AI and AI agents that benefit billions of people, and I look forward to helping make that vision a reality through advances in AI safety and security. The future of AI will not be defined solely by how intelligent our systems become, but by how secure, trustworthy, and beneficial we make them. I believe we have an extraordinary opportunity and responsibility to shape that future together and bring the benefits of AI to billions of people around the world. We're just getting started. If you're passionate about advancing frontier AI while building the foundations of AI safety, security, and trust, I'd love to hear from you. Come join us on this extraordinary journey to help shape the future of AI.