与「TAC」相关的搜索结果

Dario looks just like Cesare Borgia. He has been fabricating stories from the very beginning, trying to frighten society, manipulate public opinion, and force the U.S. government to regulate AI. His political allies will then help Anthropic use regulation as a knife to kill open-source models, so they can achieve an oligopoly. To that end, he is even willing to team up with Altman—first eliminate everyone else. The biggest threat to Dario is Jensen Huang, who supports open-source models, and Nvidia is also about to release its own open-source model. The second threat is China’s open-source models. This is why Dario uses the scare tactic that “AI will destroy humanity.” He even wants to turn AI into a religion. All religions originate from fear—they need an apocalypse to terrify the believers. Because the Republicans are vigorously developing AI, the Democrats have turned around and started demanding limits and regulation on AI, using it as a political weapon to attack Trump and the Republican Party. This is the American political-business game. Have you learned it? ---

Dario looks just like Cardinal Richelieu. He has been fabricating stories from the very beginning, trying to frighten society, manipulate public opinion, and force the U.S. government to regulate AI. His political allies will then help Anthropic use regulation as a knife to kill open-source models, so they can achieve an oligopoly. To that end, he is even willing to team up with Altman—first eliminate everyone else. The biggest threat to Dario is Jensen Huang, who supports open-source models, and Nvidia is also about to release its own open-source model. The second threat is China’s open-source models. This is why Dario uses the scare tactic that “AI will destroy humanity.” He even wants to turn AI into a religion. All religions originate from fear—they need an apocalypse to terrify the believers. Because the Republicans are vigorously developing AI, the Democrats have turned around and started demanding limits and regulation on AI, using it as a political weapon to attack Trump and the Republican Party. This is the American political-business game. Have you learned it? ---

T có một câu hỏi khá nhạy cảm muốn hỏi các bạn Trung Quốc 🇨🇳 Năm 1979, Trung Quốc đưa quân tấn công Việt Nam 🇻🇳 với tuyên bố muốn “dạy Việt Nam một bài học”. Một trong những nguyên nhân quan trọng là việc Việt Nam đưa quân vào Campuchia, lật đổ chế độ Khmer Đỏ được Trung Quốc hậu thuẫn. Sau gần một tháng, Trung Quốc tuyên bố chiến thắng và rút quân. Nhưng điều khiến tôi khó hiểu là: Việt Nam vẫn tiếp tục duy trì quân đội tại Campuchia cho đến năm 1989, tức 10 năm sau. Nếu mục đích là khiến Việt Nam thay đổi chính sách ở Campuchia, thì bài học năm 1979 đã đạt được kết quả gì? Hay bài học đó phải mất tận 10 năm mới có tác dụng? T tò mò trong sách lịch sử Trung Quốc, người ta giải thích kết quả cuộc chiến này như thế nào?

一台电脑的装配动画，三个 Claude Agent 做了近八小时。 11月13日，创作者 Mr Tactical 晒出了一段用 Blender 制作的三维主机动画。主机里的零件逐步组装起来，镜头还能贴近内部，展示硬件细节。 按作者给出的记录，参与制作的是三个 Claude Fable 5.2 Agent，耗时7小时41分钟，模型用量按 API 价格折算约138.82美元。这个数字不能直接当成全部制作成本，作者教程中的统计口径也不包含管理 Agent 自身的规划和检查。 他还在评论区附上了自己的制作教程，做法很具体：让 Claude Code 写 Python 脚本，在后台运行 Blender，把模型、材质、灯光、镜头和动画逐项搭出来，再渲染成视频。 其中值得参考的一步，是先别急着输出整条成片。 按照他的教程，Agent 要先做一张目标效果图，再渲染几个关键时刻的测试画面。看看材质对不对、零件有没有穿插、镜头是不是离得太远。修改几轮之后，先出一版低质量预览，确认运动和节奏，再正式渲染。 用代码驱动 Blender，方便的地方就在于：做完后，手里还留着一套可以继续改的三维场景。 某个零件挡住了，换个机位；装配过程太快，放慢这一段；想给客户单独看看内部结构，就沿用同一套模型再拍一条。模型、灯光和镜头都可以分别调整，不必每次重新描述整段画面。 这对产品结构展示、安装说明和机械原理科普，都有参考价值。不过，画面看着像，不代表尺寸和装配关系就一定正确。真要拿来解释产品，还得对照实物或设计资料检查。 想试这套做法，可以先拿两三个零件做一段简单拆装：先把结构搭对，把动作讲清，再往上加材质、灯光和镜头。这样更容易看出，Agent 到底能帮自己省下哪部分工作。

Các bạn Trung Quốc 🇨🇳 ơi!!! Mình là người Việt Nam 🇻🇳. Mình muốn hỏi mọi người một chút nhé! Khi nhắc đến Trung Quốc, người Việt thường nghĩ ngay đến những vị vua nổi tiếng như: Tần Thủy Hoàng, Hán Vũ Đế, Đường Thái Tông, Võ Tắc Thiên, Tống Thái Tổ, Khang Hy, Càn Long… Vậy khi nhắc đến các vị vua nổi tiếng trong lịch sử Việt Nam, người Trung Quốc nghĩ đến ai đầu tiên? Hãy chia sẻ suy nghĩ thật lòng nhé 🙏

Be Jensen: > Asian American Dishwasher at Dennys > Founded $NVDA and pioneered GPU computing > Took an extraordinary gamble in CUDA, despite the company close to bankruptcy risk. > Bet paid off heavily, and Nvidia was there as the infrastructure for deep learning and generative AI. > Spent last 33 years of his life growing $NVDA, and finally saw it become a $5T+ company > Devoted his life to establishing American AI leadership > Started having more influence on policies that Washington conflicted with > Leaks and hit pieces happen all at once around midterms > Washington tries to push out others like Lutnick that shared similar China stances to Jensen. > Forced to resign by Taco Bell and NFL experience board members over unconfirmed Spy accusations + personal relationships. > Huang's leadership then questioned by politicians that ask how $META makes money or how Wifi works. > Slandered by US media that think because Mcdonalds did well under a CEO change, so can American semiconductors like $NVDA. This feels like a horrible joke. Jensen Huang was the pinnacle of visionary tech CEOs and living the American dream. Ousting Jensen Huang will go down as one of most consequential and darkest decisions in recent US history.

Mudwater #3# is starting in less than 9 hours! We did a video on a meta that's forming and gameplay tactics that @md_codes used to win last week's tournament Sign up and create your deck

Dylan Patel says Nvidia’s next CEO has to hold off OpenAI, Broadcom, Google, Anthropic, Meta, Amazon, and AMD chip teams, who are all 'fucking good' “It’s not like you’re fighting, no knocks against Palo Alto Networks, but their competitors are not that amazing, versus Nvidia’s fighting an OpenAI chip team, a Broadcom chip team, a Google chip team, an Anthropic chip team, a Meta chip team, Amazon chip team. These guys are fucking good. AMD. They’re all really good, and all these startups.” “They’re all good. It’s not like they’re incompetent. I think it’s very different. As great as Lisa Su is, she took down Intel, who’s incompetent.” “What is the person who defined a category and created it and kept all the invaders at bay? It’s very different than being second place or making smart tactical business decisions, innovating on something once there’s already a category established. It’s just very different.”

ZEC 大多头 Taiki Maeda 终于扛不住了？ 11 月 12 日，加密交易员 @TaikiMaeda2 表示，已平掉 zcash:native 永续合约多头仓位，但仍将继续持有 ZEC 现货。 值得注意的是，他公布的交易记录显示，过去一年累计盈利约 304.68 万美元，回报率高达 394.92%。 尽管选择退出合约战场，Maeda 并没有改变对 ZEC 的长期看法。他仍看好 ZEC 在 2027 年的表现，认为 Tachyon 有望解决比特币面临的部分核心问题。 更有意思的是，他还自嘲称，这次平仓或许会成为一个「见底信号」。 从高杠杆多头到保留现货，Maeda 的操作释放了一个信号：短期不愿继续承担合约风险，但长期依然押注 ZEC。 连大多头都选择暂时离场，ZEC 的下一轮行情会不会反而因此迎来转机？