与「Worst_Day_Ever」相关的搜索结果

#KANGDANIEL（##カンダニエル）# ＼お待たせしました！／ 11月29日発売の日本第２弾EPタイトルが『RE8EL』に決定いたしました✨ 収録曲＆ジャケ写も公開❣️ 1. Worst Day Ever 2. RE8EL 3. Supernova (Japanese Version) 4. SOS (Japanese Version) ご予約は👉 #RE8EL#

The gaming news site TheGamer shows their double standards again by publishing an article about the new game Neverness to Evernes claiming the game is already being turned into the ultimate “gooner game.” They criticize how some players use the first-person camera to focus on female characters in suggestive ways. The same site also ran a story calling the Resident Evil Requiem character Leon Kennedy “a hot uncle.” Journalism is getting worst every day

the worst part of a grocery run was never paying. it was everything happening in my head before that. the running list of what i'm out of. what goes with what. the nagging feeling i'm forgetting something, which i always was. that quiet mental tax that hit every single time and that nobody ever names. Go in the @gopuff just deletes the whole layer. it already knows my habits, the time of day, what i tend to buy. so it builds the cart, i tweak one or two things, and it's on the way. the exhausting part wasn't the shopping. it was the deciding. and the deciding is just gone. you don't realize how heavy it was until something carries it for you. crafted by @Gopuff with SpaceXAI

MrBeast just issued an ultimatum to the entire airline industry. He will only fly on planes with Starlink. MrBeast: “Oh, this has an extra one hour layover, I don’t give a fuck. They’re Starlink.” Not a preference. A hard filter. Longer flights. Worse routes. None of it matters. MrBeast: “Bro, I’ll sit in the back of the plane if it gives me Starlink. Like I really don’t care.” Most people hear that and think it’s about a content creator who can’t unplug. They are completely missing what is actually happening. MrBeast runs the largest media operation on Earth from a phone screen. He measures friction in frames and milliseconds. In his world, connectivity isn’t a feature. It is the operating layer beneath every decision he makes. And he will accept the worst seat on the aircraft to stay plugged into infrastructure that didn’t exist five years ago. But the airline cabin is the smallest part of this story. The real shift happens where the asphalt ends. MrBeast: “You can put a Starlink on the top of your car.” They mounted a dish on a roof in rural Africa. Four hours down dirt tracks and grass roads. No cell towers. No grid. No infrastructure of any kind. Perfect signal the entire ride. MrBeast: “Starlink is like literally magic. It makes no sense.” It makes perfect sense once you see what Musk is actually building. Not a utility company. Not an ISP. He is collapsing the distance between a human thought and the full width of human knowledge to zero. Everywhere on Earth. Simultaneously. For ten thousand years, intelligence was local. A brilliant mind born in an unconnected village had no way to reach the collective. No way to build on what came before. No way to be found. The potential didn’t die. It simply never ignited. Starlink changes that at the level of the species. MrBeast: “What will definitely, guaranteed happen is no matter where you are on the planet, you’ll be able to have high-speed internet thanks to Starlink.” That is not a convenience upgrade. It is a phase shift in what a human born anywhere on Earth can become. Every child with a connection inherits the full intellectual output of civilization the day they open a screen. We are not upgrading a network. We are converting a planet of isolated minds into a single thinking surface. MrBeast: “There’s no doubt that it’s going to fundamentally progress humanity in unfathomable ways.” And the loop closes with the real objective. The revenue from a billionaire rerouting his flights feeds the exact same engine that funds the frontier. MrBeast: “Someone’s going to go to Mars thanks to SpaceX. Like I really do believe that.” Starlink is not a side project. It is the funding mechanism for the most expensive physical objective in human history. A constellation of satellites harvesting the economic attention of an entire connected planet and converting it into the propellant required to push consciousness beyond Earth. The species is funding its own escape velocity. We spent ten thousand years separated by geography and copper wire. Musk didn’t fix the wires. He made them irrelevant. And in doing so, he didn’t just connect a species. He built one that no longer fits on a single planet.

TO @mtgreenee IN DEFENSE OF BOOMERS!! Back in our day, colleges had a few loud radical leftists. Now they’re everywhere, loud, and angry and they still blame Boomers for the mess. They are taught to hate themselves and their country. They believe men can become women (and vice versa) by declaration. They’re obsessed with race in the most counterproductive way possible treating every outcome as proof of systemic oppression while ignoring individual behavior, culture, and the massive progress that actually happened. And instead of blaming the people and ideologies that pushed this worldview into every institution, they point at Boomers. That’s not analysis. That’s brainwashing dressed up as enlightenment. The “long march through the institutions” was real. A minority of 1960s radicals didn’t just protest they stayed in academia, became professors, and eventually controlled hiring. Faculty political ratios went from noticeable left tilt in the ’60s–’90s to extreme monocultures today: often 10:1, 15:1, or worse liberal-to-conservative in humanities and social sciences. Far-left faculty have grown dramatically while conservatives became rare. The result? Generations raised on critical theory, grievance studies, and the idea that Western civilization (especially America) is defined by oppression rather than its achievements. Boomers didn’t invent this. A subset of us lived through the early stages and many of us rejected it. The average Boomer worked, raised families, paid taxes, and expanded opportunity. We, lived through and supported the real civil rights era color-blind equality under law, not racial score-settling. Built the post-war economy, suburbs, infrastructure, and technological foundations (internet precursors, computing, medical advances) that younger people now take for granted. Navigated the Cold War and helped bring down Soviet communism. Created the wealth and stability that made today’s safety nets and opportunities possible. The current version of “social justice” biological denial on sex, racial essentialism, national self-loathing, and “punch a Boomer” energy is a later-stage product of captured institutions, not something Boomers as a generation imposed. Most Boomers still believe in observable reality: there are two sexes, judging people by skin color is wrong either way, and America, for all its flaws, has been a net force for human flourishing. Blaming “Boomers” is the laziest possible scapegoat. It lets the actual drivers (ideological capture of education, media, HR departments, and tech platforms) off the hook. It ignores that many Boomers are as disgusted by this stuff as anyone. And it’s historically illiterate every generation has produced radicals and conformists. Judging 76 million people by the worst campus activists is the same tribal stupidity they claim to oppose. I could write a whole book on how a handful of bad ideas metastasized into cultural dominance while the people who benefited most from Boomer-era progress turned around and spat on the generation that built the platform they’re standing on. The angry ones aren’t the victims of Boomers. They’re the product of an education system that replaced critical thinking with approved narratives. Stop blaming your grandparents. Start questioning what you were taught. ...and don't even get me started with government corruption and the cancer of MARXISM!

This week, I'm releasing a 2-hour conversation with @saylor - Chairman at @Strategy. Michael grew up on US Air Force bases in Japan, New Zealand, and Nebraska, earned a scholarship to MIT to study aerospace engineering, started a company at 24, took it public on Nasdaq in 1998, and then watched his personal net worth collapse by $6 billion in a single day before the stock fell another 99%, leaving the company three days away from bankruptcy. In 2020, Michael found Bitcoin and has ever since made it his life's work to buy as much BTC as possible. In the last 6 years, Strategy has purchased more than 843,000 BTC. We talk about: - Should you really mortgage your house or your business to buy BTC? - Does Michael still believe that "there is no second best"? - "Sell the kidney if you have to but keep the Bitcoin", really? - Why watching MicroStrategy go from $333 a share to $0.42 completely changed his relationship with risk - How is mum played a huge role in his life's success - Why MIT was way harder than building a multi billion $ public company from scratch - How Strategy went from near-bankruptcy in 2001 to owning more than 843,000 Bitcoin in 2026 - Why Michael bought some premium domain names in the 1990s and how he made tens of millions flipping some of them - Michael's great Apple bet in 2012 - Discovering Bitcoin in 2020 and understand monetary scarcity at 55 years old - STRC, the "passenger plane" - Why working hard is the worst advice you can give anyone in the AI era And much more... Podcast out this Thursday!

I am reaching out to the @X community for advice with the likely risk of sharing TMI. I have been sufficiently upset about the whole matter that I have lost sleep thinking about it and I am hoping that this post will enable me to get this matter off my chest. By way of background, I started a family office called TABLE about 15 years ago and hired a friend who had previously managed a family office, and years earlier, had been my personal accountant. She is someone that I trusted implicitly and consider to be a good person. The office started small, but over the last decade, the number of personnel and the cost of the office grew massively. The growth was entirely on the operational side as the investment team has remained tiny. While my investment portfolio grew substantially, the investments I had made were almost entirely passive and TABLE simply needed to account for them and meet capital calls as they came in. While TABLE purchased additional software and other systems that were supposed to improve productivity, the team kept increasing in size at a rapid rate, and the expenses continued to grow even faster. While I would periodically question the growing expenses and high staff turnover, I stayed uninvolved with the office other than a once-a-year meeting when I briefly reviewed the operations and the financials and determined bonus compensation for the President and the CFO. I spent no time with any of the other employees or the operations. The whole idea behind TABLE was that it would handle everything other than my day job so that I would have more time for my job and my family. Over the last six years, expenses ballooned even further, employee turnover accelerated, and I became concerned that all was not well at TABLE. It was time for me to take a look at what was going on. Nearly four years ago, I recruited my nephew who had recently graduated from Harvard and put him to work at Bremont, a British watchmaker, one of my only active personal investments to figure out the issues at the company and ultimately assist in executing a turnaround. He did a superb job. When he returned from the UK late last year after a few years at Bremont, I asked him to help me figure out what was going on with TABLE. When I explained to TABLE’s president what he would be doing, she became incredibly defensive, which naturally made me more concerned. My nephew went to work by first meeting with each employee to understand their roles at the company and to learn from them what ideas they had on how things could be improved. He got an earful. Our first step in helping to turn around TABLE was a reduction in force including the president and about a third of the team, retaining excellent talent that had been desperate for new leadership. Now here is where I need your advice. All but one of the employees who were terminated acted professionally and were gracious on the way out (excluding the president who had a notice period in her contract, is currently still being paid, and with whom I have not yet had a discussion). The highest compensated terminated employee other than the president, an in-house lawyer (let’s call her Ronda), told us that three months of severance was not enough and demanded two years’ severance despite having worked at the company for only two and one half years. When I learned of Ronda's request for severance, I offered to speak with her to understand what she was thinking, but she refused to do so. A few days ago, we received a threatening letter from a Silicon Valley law firm. In the letter, Ronda’s counsel suggests that her termination is part of longstanding issues of ‘harassment and gender discrimination’ – an interesting claim in light of the fact that Ronda was in charge of workplace compliance – and that her termination was due to: “unlawful, retaliatory, and harmful conduct directed towards her. Both [Ronda] and I [Ronda’s lawyer] have spoken with you about [Ronda’s] view of what a reasonable resolution would include given the circumstances. Thus far, TABLE has refused to provide any substantive response. This letter provides the last opportunity to reach a satisfactory agreement. If we cannot do so, [Ronda] will seek all appropriate relief in a court of competent jurisdiction.” The letter goes on to explain the basis for the “unsafe work environment” claim at TABLE: “In early 2026, Pershing Square’s founder Bill Ackman installed his nephew in an unidentified role at TABLE, Ackman’s family office. [His nephew]—whose only work experience had been for TABLE where he was seconded abroad for the last four years to a UK watch company held by Ackman—began appearing at TABLE’s offices and conducting interviews of employees without a clear explanation of his role or the purposes of these interviews. During this period, he made a series of inappropriate and genderbased [sic] comments to multiple employees that created an unsafe work environment. Among other things, [his nephew] made remarks about female employees’ ages (“Tell me you are nowhere near 40”), physical appearance (“Your body does not look like you have kids”), as well as intrusive questions about family planning and sexual orientation (“Who carried your son? Who will carry your next child?”). These incidents were reported to senior leadership at TABLE and Pershing Square. Rather than being addressed appropriately, the response from senior management reflected, at best, willful blindness to the inappropriateness of [his nephew]’s remarks and, at worst, tacit endorsement.” The above allegations about my nephew had previously been brought to my attention by TABLE’s president when they occurred. When I learned of them, I told the president that I would speak to him directly and encouraged her to arrange for him to get workplace sensitivity training. The president assured me that she would do so. When I spoke to my nephew, he explained what he actually had said and how his actual remarks had been received, not at all as alleged in the legal letter from Ronda’s counsel. I have also spoken to others at the lunch table who confirmed his description of the facts. In any case, he meant no harm, was simply trying to build rapport with other employees, and no one, as far as I understand, was offended. Ironically, Ronda claims in her legal letter that TABLE didn’t take HR compliance seriously, yet Ronda was in charge of HR compliance at TABLE and the person who gave my nephew his workplace sensitivity training after the alleged incidents. In any case, Ronda, as head of compliance, should have kept a record or raised an alarm if indeed there was pervasive harassment or other such problems at the company, and there is no evidence whatsoever that this is true. So why does Ronda believe she can get me to pay her nearly $2 million, i.e., two years of severance, nearly one year of severance for each of her years at the company? Well, here is where some more background would be helpful. Over the last two months, I have been consumed with a major family medical issue – one of my older daughters had a massive brain hemorrhage on February 5th and has since been making progress on her recovery – and I am in the midst of a major transaction for my company which I am executing from a hospital room office next to her . While the latter business matter is publicly known, the details of my daughter’s situation are only known to Ronda because of her role at our family office. Now, let’s get back to the subject at hand. Unfortunately, while New York and many other states have employment-at-will, there has emerged an industry of lawyers who make a living from bringing fake gender, race, LGBTQ and other discrimination employment claims in order to extract larger severance payments for terminated employees, and it needs to stop. The fake claim system succeeds because it costs little to have a lawyer send a threatening letter and nearly all of the lawyers in this field work on contingency so there is no or minimal cash cost to bring a claim. And inevitably, nearly 100% of these claims are settled because the public relations and legal costs of defending them exceed the dollar cost of the settlement. The claims are nearly always settled with a confidentiality agreement where the employee who asserts the fake claims remains anonymous and as a result, there is no reputational cost to bringing false claims. The consequences of this sleazy system (let’s call it ‘the System’) are the increased costs of doing business which is a tax on the economy and society. There are other more serious problems due to the System. Unfortunately, the existence of an industry of plaintiff firms and terminated employees willing to make these claims makes it riskier for companies to hire employees from a protected class, i.e., LGBTQ, seniors, women, people of color etc. because it is that much more reputationally damaging and expensive to be accused of racism, sexism, and/or intolerance for sexual diversity than for firing a white male as juries generally have less sympathy for white males. The System therefore increases the risk of discrimination rather than reducing it, and the people bringing these fake claims are thereby causing enormous harm to the other members of these protected classes. So what happened here? Ronda was vastly overpaid and overqualified for the job that she did at TABLE. She was paid $1.05 million plus benefits last year for her work which was largely comprised of filling out subscription agreements and overseeing an outside law firm on closing passive investments in funds and in private and venture stage companies, some compliance work, and managing the office move from one office to another. She had a very good gig as she was highly paid, only had to go into the office three days a week, and could work from anywhere during the summer. Once my nephew showed up and started to investigate what was going on, she likely concluded that there was a reasonable possibility she would be terminated, as her job was in the too-easy-and-to-good-to-be-true category. The problem was that she was not in a protected class due to her race, age or sexual identity so she had to construct the basis for a claim. While she is female and could in theory bring a gender-based discrimination claim, she reported to the president who is female and to whom she is very close, which makes it difficult for her to bring a harassment claim against her former boss. When my nephew complimented a TABLE employee at lunch about how young she looked – in response to saying she was going to her 40-year-old sister’s birthday party, he said ‘she must be your older sister’ – Ronda immediately reported it to our external HR lawyer. She thereby began building her case. The other problem for Ronda bringing a claim is that she was terminated alongside 30% of other TABLE employees as part of a restructuring so it is very difficult for her to say that she was targeted in her termination or was retaliated against. TABLE is now hiring an external fractional general counsel as that is all the company needs to process the relatively limited amount of legal work we do internally. In short, Ronda was eminently qualified and capable and did her job. She was just too much horsepower for what is largely an administrative legal role so she had to come up with something else to bring a claim. Now Ronda knew I was a good target and it was a good time to bring a claim against me. She also knew that I was under a lot of pressure because on March 4th when Ronda was terminated, my daughter had not yet emerged from consciousness, she was not yet breathing on her own, and my daughter and we were fighting for her life. I was and remain deeply engaged in her recovery while at the same time I was working on finishing the closing for the private placement round for my upcoming IPO. Ronda also knew that publicity about supposed gender discrimination and a “hostile and unsafe work environment” are not things that a CEO of a company about to go public wants to have released into the media. And she may have thought that the nearly $2 million she was asking for would be considered small in the context of the reputational damage a lawsuit could cause, regardless of the fact that two years of severance was an absurd amount for an employee who had only worked at TABLE for 30 months. She also likely considered that I wouldn’t want to embarrass my nephew by dragging him into the klieg lights when her claims emerged publicly. So, in summary, game theory would say that I would certainly settle this case, for why would I risk negative publicity at a time when I was preparing our company to go public and also risk embarrassing my nephew. Notably, she hired a Silicon Valley law firm, rather than a typical NY employment firm. This struck me as interesting as her husband works for one of the most prominent Silicon Valley venture firms whose CEO, I am sure, has no tolerance for these kinds of fake claims that sadly many venture-backed companies also have to deal with. I mention this as I suspect her husband likely has been working with her on the strategy for squeezing me as, in addition to being a computer scientist, he is a game theorist. My only advice for him is to understand more about your opponent before you launch your first move. All of the above said, gender, race, LGBTQ and other such discrimination is a real thing. Many people have been harmed and deserve compensation for this discrimination, and these companies and individuals should be punished for engaging in such behavior. Which brings me to the advice I am seeking from the X community. I am not planning to follow the typical path and settle this ‘claim.’ Rather, I am going to fight this nonsense to the end of the earth in the hope that it inspires other CEOs to do the same so we shut down this despicable behavior that is a large tax on society, employment, and the economy and contributes to workplace discrimination rather than reducing it. Do you agree or disagree that this is the right approach?

llama.cpp at 100k stars now that 90% of the code worldwide is being written by AI agents, I predict that within 3-6 months, 90% of all AI agents will be running locally with llama.cpp 😄 Jokes aside, I am going to use this small milestone as an opportunity to reflect a bit on the project and the state of AI from the perspective of local applications. There is a lot to say and discuss and yet it feels less and less important to try to make a point. Opinions about viability of local LLMs are strongly polarized, details are overlooked, the scientific approach is lacking. Arguments are predominantly based on vibes and hype waves. One thing is clear though - local LLMs are used more and more. I expect this trend to continue and likely 2026 will end up being one of the most important years for the local AI movement. I admit that I didn't expect the agentic era to come so quickly to the local LLM space. One year ago, the available models were too computationally expensive for doing long-context tasks. There wasn't an obvious path towards meaningful agentic applications. The memory and compute requirements were huge. Last summer, with the release of gpt-oss, things started to change. It was the first time we saw a glimpse of tool calling that actually works well within the resource constraints of our daily devices. Later in the year, even better models were released and by now, useful local agentic workflows are a reality. Comparing local vs hosted capabilities at a given moment of time is pointless. To try put things into perspective: - We don't need frontier intelligence to automate searches and sending emails - We don't need trillion parameter models to be able to summarize articles or technical documents - We don't need massive GPU data centers to control our home appliances or turn the lights off in the garage I believe that there is a certain level of intelligence we as humans can comprehend and meaningfully utilize to improve our working process. Beyond that level, access to more intelligence becomes unnecessary at best and counterproductive at worst. I also believe that that level of useful artificial intelligence is completely within reach locally and it has always been just a matter of implementing the right software stack to bring it to the end user. With llama.cpp, I am confident that we continue to be on the right track of building that software stack! The llama.cpp project is going stronger than ever. With more than 1500 contributors, the project keeps growing steadily. From technical point of view, I think that llama.cpp + ggml is the only solution that actually makes sense. That is, the software stack must run efficiently on every possible device, hardware and operating system. The technology is too important to be vendor-locked. It has to be developed in the open, by the community, together with the independent hardware vendors. This is the only right way to build something that will truly make a difference in the long run. I won't try to convince you about what is currently and will be possible with local AI. We will just continue to build as usual. I am confident that after the smoke clears and we look objectively at what we have built together, the benefits will be obvious to everyone. Big shoutout to all llama.cpp maintainers. I feel extremely lucky to be able to work together with so many talented contributors. Every day I learn something new and I feel there is so much more cool stuff that we are going to build. Also, I am really thankful that the project continues to have reliable partners to support it! Cheers!

Well, it’s the last day of 2024. This was a very chaotic year for me, and to be honest it was really hard at times. I was forced to find a new place to move with short notice, my PC broke down and I had to replace almost every single part, but the worst of this year was my voice slowly deteriorating in real time, super noticeable to my older viewers…it’s scary and something I’m still trying to deal with and waiting for my doctor to assess it. But even then, I want to look forward to the future and I hope that 2025 would go easier on all of us…”I hope it’ll be a better year” as I hoped every year prior. I want to also see all the positives that happened this past year amongst the negatives because there WERE times where I was really happy, and it’s all thanks to my basement, the ones holding me up this whole time. I must be pretty heavy right 🤭? 2024 had its ups and downs like every other year, but through it I met some new people who really shone a light in my life when I needed it most. Thank you for supporting me when I was at my all time low (and still may be tbh — please cross your fingers with me for my voice problem 🥺). I hope 2025 will be kind to us!! Happy New Year Eve! My stream is actually still LIVE & ongoing atm 🥰 so if you don’t have anyone to countdown with, would you care to share some of your time with me? I’ll be more than happy to be there to go into the New Year together with you. 🤍