与「alchemy_of_souls」相关的搜索结果

[#Moment_H#] 📸 주말마다 #서율# 덕분에 세상이 깨끗하고 환했다🍂 항상 큰 사랑과 힘을 주신 황도들🍑🧡 배우 황민현 과 드라마 <환혼: 빛과그림자> 를 사랑해 주신 시청자 여러분 감사합니다☺️ #황민현# #HWANGMINHYUN# #환혼# #환혼빛과그림자# #alchemy_of_souls#

[#Moment_H#] 📸 황도들 🍑🧡 주말마다 감당해야 되는 일이 생겼어 🤭 천재 귀공자 #서율# 🍂이 드디어 돌아왔다✨ <tvN 환혼 : 빛과 그림자> 매주 토일 밤 9:10 방송 ⚔️본방 사수⚔️ #황민현# #HWANGMINHYUN# #환혼# #환혼빛과그림자# #alchemy_of_souls#

It is with a heavy heart that we announce we are winding down the Botanix network. This decision is the hardest one we have made in four years, and we want to share the reasoning openly because the people who backed us, built with us, and used what we shipped deserve more than a quiet shutdown notice. First off, an immediate practical consideration for the Botanix community: please withdraw your Bitcoin and other assets before July 9th, 2026. When we started in 2022, the pitch was simple enough to say in a sentence: bring real utility to Bitcoin. What that actually meant in practice, and what we have spent nearly four years building toward, was more ambitious than that sentence made it sound. We were trying to build a Bitcoin-based blockchain that could find genuine product-market fit as a platform for Bitcoin applications, without using token incentives to drive growth, manufacture users, or simulate utility. Almost every chain that has launched in the last cycle has reached for the same playbook (issue a token without PMF, engineer the incentive surface, point at the resulting metrics), and we did not believe this route is a viable strategy in the long term. We wanted to know whether a Bitcoin chain could earn its users on the strength of what was built on top of it, the value it brings in the market with Bitcoin itself as the only meaningful economic primitive in the system. And we built it. The Spiderchain went live and stayed live, a year of mainnet operation with one hundred percent uptime and zero security incidents on a genuinely novel cryptographic architecture. We built Dynafed, a dynamic federation that turned the Spiderchain from a static multisig set into a rotating, decentralized one, the technical milestone that most people in this space said could not be built on Bitcoin without compromising trust assumptions. Twenty-five million transactions, two hundred thousand wallets, and tens of millions of dollars in assets moved across the chain, every single number of that earned organically without a token, without airdrops, without points programs, or any of the manufactured-demand machinery. Chainlink, Morpho, GMX, Dolomite, Fireblocks, Alchemy, Galaxy, OKX Wallet, all integrated. We shipped a Bitcoin neobank with BINK on iOS and Android, with self-custodial email login for Bitcoin (something that had never existed before), native Bitcoin yield, and the lowest borrowing rates against Bitcoin anywhere in the world, all of it downstream of owning the infrastructure. The point of saying this is not to argue with our own conclusion. The protocol works, the product works, and our team and ecosystem worked in concert to do exceptional work. We have run this experiment in earnest, with a working protocol, real applications, and a serious team, for over a year on mainnet and nearly four years in total. The honest answer we have arrived at, after living inside it every day, is that it did not work, at least not in this market and not on this timeline. We want to share what we think we learned, with the caveat that some of this is conviction and some of this is still suspicion, and we would rather be transparent about the difference than pretend to have clarity we do not have. The first thing I've had to sit with is timing. Bitcoin utility, making Bitcoin programmable, productive, and integrated into real financial activity, isn't where the real world users sit right now. The conversation is still on Bitcoin as a reserve asset, on its monetary and political positioning, on base-layer conservatism. Those questions are upstream of the ones a Bitcoin L2 needs people to be asking. I still believe Bitcoin gets there, but belief in the destination is not the same as being able to predict when, and nobody can. It's also possible the destination never materialises at all, and that Bitcoin's role as a reserve asset is simply where it settles. If that's true, there will never be a market for what we were building, and no amount of time or capital would change that. The second is the token question. We intended to eventually launch a token. We saw it, and still see it, as a genuinely new form of equity, something closer to an IPO than an airdrop, to be done when you reach product market fit and the moment is right. That moment never came. What became clear over the last year is that the market largely stopped rewarding even the more considered versions of that playbook. Token launches across the board have broadly underperformed, and those that did go to market with tokens haven't seen the outcomes or PMF that the model is supposed to produce. The third lesson is about where DeFi demand on Bitcoin actually lives. For most use cases that exist today, lending, yield, leveraged exposure, WBTC on a mature general-purpose L2 is genuinely sufficient. Users have voted with their behaviour, and the verdict is that the trust assumptions of a wrapped representation on Ethereum are acceptable to almost everyone who wants Bitcoin-denominated DeFi. Decentralisation matters to people in principle and in conversation; in practice, when something cheaper and easier is in front of them, they use it. The security case for a dedicated Bitcoin L2 is real, but it only matters for a narrower band of applications than our thesis required, one of the clearer lessons this market has taught us. The fourth lesson is structural. The on-chain economy is consolidating around venues that own the user relationship: Hyperliquid, Robinhood, the major CEXes, and now TradFi participants absorbing an ever-larger share of attention, flow, and revenue. Convenience and institutional credibility win, every time, as soon as they're available. As retail participation thins, that concentration only deepens. We were, and still are, believers in decentralisation, but the current direction of on-chain growth is running through distribution, and any team building base-layer infrastructure today is rowing upstream against that current. We were no exception. The fifth lesson is the most concrete. Both of the above played out directly in our economics. The users we attracted were primarily using Bitcoin as a store of value for yield, a legitimate use case, but not the high-frequency transaction volume that drives fee revenue on a network like ours. BINK was our answer to that: a Bitcoin neobank designed to bring daily usage of BTC and stablecoins on-chain, driving the transaction volume the network needed. It was the right strategic instinct, and one we never got the chance to fully test. BINK only landed on both app stores in the last few weeks, a product that by its nature could only be built once the underlying infrastructure was proven and live. When users choose the convenient option and economic gravity pulls toward distribution, what's left on a decentralised infrastructure layer is a user base that costs more to serve than it generates. Infrastructure costs are what they are, and the fee income never came close to covering them. If you would like to see how we were imagining a Bitcoin future and what we have been working on since September, feel free to download BINK and give it a spin: it’s a full-fledged self-custodial Bitcoin Neobank with email login, one click borrowing, a Lightning integration and more. App store: Play store: This UX is where we think Bitcoin is ultimately heading towards although it feels too early. You can use invite code 1SD31R, but remember to remove your funds by July 9th. We could keep going. We have chosen not to, however, because continuing past the point where additional time stops producing additional learning is not conviction, it is something that looks like conviction from the outside while corroding into something else on the inside. We would rather stop now, with integrity intact and resources available to take care of the people who took a chance on us, than push the experiment past the point where it still has something to teach us. Reminder: Please withdraw all your assets by July 9th. After this, the federation will sweep the remaining Bitcoin. Any other assets or tokens on the network from then onwards will unfortunately be unrecoverable. After this, the federation will sweep the remaining Bitcoin. Any other assets or tokens on the network from then onwards will unfortunately be unrecoverable. To our investors, who backed a thesis that was harder to defend than it should have been, to our partners who built alongside us and bet pieces of their own roadmaps on ours, to the developers who deployed on Spiderchain, to our users and the BINK community who showed up for something experimental and stayed, and most of all to the Botanix team who shipped a genuinely novel system with rigour and care and who made every hard day worth the difficulty: Thank you, more than the words available here can carry.

Just a heads up, I've uncovered a bot farm with dozens of accounts used to spread disinformation about $SIVE in the past few days. This illegal campaign likely stems geographically from Asia. As these accounts were used to do marketing for the same Asian projects like Alchemy Pay. Or bought brand new bought X accounts. All of which have no activity, but have an abrupt shift in timeline to repeating false claims about selling $SIVE positions and telling others to sell. With some getting caught using AI prompts to create a negative reply. This will be passed along to the SEC for investigation given there's certain traceability logs available. While the regulators investigate, maybe not a good idea follow along false bot farm advice.

There have been a lot of crazy many-camera rigs created for the purpose of capturing full spatial video.  I recall a conversation at Meta that was basically “we are going to lean in as hard as possible on classic geometric computer vision before looking at machine learning algorithms”, and I was supportive of that direction. That was many years ago, when ML still felt like unpredictable alchemy, and of course you want to maximize your use of the ground truth! Hardcore engineering effort went into camera calibration, synchronization, and data processing, but  it never really delivered on the vision. No matter how many cameras you have, any complex moving object is going to have occluded areas, and “holes in reality” stand out starkly to a viewer not exactly at one of the camera points. Even when you have good visibility, the ambiguities in multi camera photogrammetry make things less precise than you would like. There were also some experiments to see how good you could make the 3D scene reconstruction from the Quest cameras using offline compute, and the answer was still “not very good”, with quite lumpy surfaces. Lots of 3D reconstructions look amazing scrolling by in the feed on your phone, but not so good blown up to a fully immersive VR rendering and put in contrast to a high quality traditional photo. You really need strong priors to drive the fitting problem and fill in coverage gaps. For architectural scenes, you can get some mileage out of simple planar priors, but modern generative AI is the ultimate prior. Even if the crazy camera rigs fully delivered on the promise, they still wouldn’t have enabled a good content ecosystem. YouTube wouldn’t have succeeded if every creator needed a RED Digital Cinema camera. The (quite good!) stereoscopic 3D photo generation in Quest Instagram is a baby step towards the future. There are paths to stereo video and 6DOF static, then eventually to 6DOF video. Make everything immersive, then allow bespoke tuning of immersive-aware media.

Your dedicated on-chain scanner is live! I spent the whole night reverse-engineering the entire launchpad contract with AI, and finally managed to decode all the data. Tool overview: 0️⃣ The dashboard is split into two sections: top and bottom. 1️⃣ Top section: Left: real-time trade feed Top right: internal market cap leaderboard Bottom right: external market cap leaderboard 2️⃣ Bottom section: Internal and external trades are grouped by token. How to use: 1️⃣ The original frontend is basically unusable right now because the RPC is overloaded. 2️⃣ My dashboard also can’t afford some insanely powerful RPC yet. 3️⃣ So you’ll need to get your own RPC from somewhere like Alchemy and plug it in. Format example: Happy trading! @altdotfun @HyperliquidX @tradexyz

你的专属 扫链工具上线了！ 花了一晚上和AI一起逆向了整个launchpad的合约，终于解析出来了所有的信息。 工具介绍 0️⃣整个面板分为上下两部分： 1️⃣上半部分： 左侧是实时的交易流 右上是内盘市值排行榜 右下是外盘市值排行榜 2️⃣下半部分： 内盘和外盘的交易按照token分类 使用说明： 1️⃣原版前端因为RPC过载什么东西都加载不出来 2️⃣我的面板现在也没有钱买超级屌的RPC（有老板看到欢迎赞助） 3️⃣所以你需要去alchemy等地方获取你自己的RPC填入 格式类似： Happy Trading！ @altdotfun @HyperliquidX @tradexyz

錬金術科の制服。もう少し記述を整理したいです 服装部分のプロンプト alchemy student outfit, lab coat, leather apron, multiple utility pouches, tool belt, goggles around neck, rolled-up sleeves, fingerless gloves, pleated skirt, socks, loafers, glasses, holding potion #AIイラスト#

Now listed on @BNBCHAIN's payments page alongside Binance Pay, Alchemy Pay, AEON and others. AllScale is the only self-custody stablecoin neobank on the list. One stack: checkout, payroll, invoicing, payout, cards with more to come. Funds land in your own wallet.