与「andR」相关的搜索结果

梯子推荐大全，大家收藏下来，防止需要时到处找： 💻 Windows / Mac（电脑端） 👉推荐：Flclash、Bettbox、Clash Verge Rev、V2rayN、Clash-party、Clash-sparkle ps：我个人用的是v2rayN，非常丝滑，注意ClashX已经停止代码更新，不要使用，怕泄露个人资料。 🤖 Android（安卓端） 👉推荐：Flclash、Bettbox、Clash Meta、Flyclash、NekoBox 🍎 iOS和iPad 👉 免费推荐：Nextin、Clashmi、Karing、Hiddify 👉付费推荐：Shadowrocket（小火箭 - 2.99刀） 🖥️ Mac苹果电脑（单列） 👉Shadowrocket （2.99刀）App Store；Clash Verge， V2rayN，自己去找安装包下载。 ps：Mac我直接用的是Shadowrocket，跟ios手机共用就行，付费一次永久使用。软件下载链接我放评论里面了 👇

别划走，这份专属福利专为你准备🎁 · 限时福利大放送：会员额外时长等超多惊喜，现在体验即可解锁 · 极速稳定连接：告别卡顿、高延迟，给你丝滑的全球网络体验 · 全平台完美适配：Windows/Android/Mac，一键连接全球，随时随地畅享高速网络 福利名额有限，先到先得！

💥有消息说：Google Pixel 6月的安全更新，可能会直接跟 Android 17 正式版一起推出来。 Android 17 这次主要是开始“卡死”每个 App 的内存上限：系统会按手机 RAM 大小，给每个 App 设个使用上限，一旦超过就直接杀进程，不再等到整机内存不够才清理。 ✅好处就是手机更稳一点，卡顿和发热会少，多任务体验也更顺。 ⚠️但代价就是，有些内存管理做得不好的 App，可能更容易被直接干掉，甚至闪退。

仔细考虑，AI 手机的定义和难度从来都不是硬件或者软件。而在于各个互联网厂商之间都想自己掌握入口，于是对于外来者十分警惕，不轻易开放权限，甚至严加管控权限。 想真正做到全场景以 AI 为入口的手机，最有希望的可能是互联网大厂自己下场。首先就将自家生态接入，再采取兼容路线让抵制的其他厂商按照传统 Android 方式运行。潜移默化地去实现最终的 AI 手机。 还有更好地办法吗？

Washburn! Went to work! @IchabodFTBL thanks @CoachSharpWU and @RoppWeston for the invite. @CoachWhiteDB1 @JGonzalesJr10 @806hsscmedia @CoachJonWard @AndrewAppl12733 @benjamingedan

It is with a heavy heart that we announce we are winding down the Botanix network. This decision is the hardest one we have made in four years, and we want to share the reasoning openly because the people who backed us, built with us, and used what we shipped deserve more than a quiet shutdown notice. First off, an immediate practical consideration for the Botanix community: please withdraw your Bitcoin and other assets before July 9th, 2026. When we started in 2022, the pitch was simple enough to say in a sentence: bring real utility to Bitcoin. What that actually meant in practice, and what we have spent nearly four years building toward, was more ambitious than that sentence made it sound. We were trying to build a Bitcoin-based blockchain that could find genuine product-market fit as a platform for Bitcoin applications, without using token incentives to drive growth, manufacture users, or simulate utility. Almost every chain that has launched in the last cycle has reached for the same playbook (issue a token without PMF, engineer the incentive surface, point at the resulting metrics), and we did not believe this route is a viable strategy in the long term. We wanted to know whether a Bitcoin chain could earn its users on the strength of what was built on top of it, the value it brings in the market with Bitcoin itself as the only meaningful economic primitive in the system. And we built it. The Spiderchain went live and stayed live, a year of mainnet operation with one hundred percent uptime and zero security incidents on a genuinely novel cryptographic architecture. We built Dynafed, a dynamic federation that turned the Spiderchain from a static multisig set into a rotating, decentralized one, the technical milestone that most people in this space said could not be built on Bitcoin without compromising trust assumptions. Twenty-five million transactions, two hundred thousand wallets, and tens of millions of dollars in assets moved across the chain, every single number of that earned organically without a token, without airdrops, without points programs, or any of the manufactured-demand machinery. Chainlink, Morpho, GMX, Dolomite, Fireblocks, Alchemy, Galaxy, OKX Wallet, all integrated. We shipped a Bitcoin neobank with BINK on iOS and Android, with self-custodial email login for Bitcoin (something that had never existed before), native Bitcoin yield, and the lowest borrowing rates against Bitcoin anywhere in the world, all of it downstream of owning the infrastructure. The point of saying this is not to argue with our own conclusion. The protocol works, the product works, and our team and ecosystem worked in concert to do exceptional work. We have run this experiment in earnest, with a working protocol, real applications, and a serious team, for over a year on mainnet and nearly four years in total. The honest answer we have arrived at, after living inside it every day, is that it did not work, at least not in this market and not on this timeline. We want to share what we think we learned, with the caveat that some of this is conviction and some of this is still suspicion, and we would rather be transparent about the difference than pretend to have clarity we do not have. The first thing I've had to sit with is timing. Bitcoin utility, making Bitcoin programmable, productive, and integrated into real financial activity, isn't where the real world users sit right now. The conversation is still on Bitcoin as a reserve asset, on its monetary and political positioning, on base-layer conservatism. Those questions are upstream of the ones a Bitcoin L2 needs people to be asking. I still believe Bitcoin gets there, but belief in the destination is not the same as being able to predict when, and nobody can. It's also possible the destination never materialises at all, and that Bitcoin's role as a reserve asset is simply where it settles. If that's true, there will never be a market for what we were building, and no amount of time or capital would change that. The second is the token question. We intended to eventually launch a token. We saw it, and still see it, as a genuinely new form of equity, something closer to an IPO than an airdrop, to be done when you reach product market fit and the moment is right. That moment never came. What became clear over the last year is that the market largely stopped rewarding even the more considered versions of that playbook. Token launches across the board have broadly underperformed, and those that did go to market with tokens haven't seen the outcomes or PMF that the model is supposed to produce. The third lesson is about where DeFi demand on Bitcoin actually lives. For most use cases that exist today, lending, yield, leveraged exposure, WBTC on a mature general-purpose L2 is genuinely sufficient. Users have voted with their behaviour, and the verdict is that the trust assumptions of a wrapped representation on Ethereum are acceptable to almost everyone who wants Bitcoin-denominated DeFi. Decentralisation matters to people in principle and in conversation; in practice, when something cheaper and easier is in front of them, they use it. The security case for a dedicated Bitcoin L2 is real, but it only matters for a narrower band of applications than our thesis required, one of the clearer lessons this market has taught us. The fourth lesson is structural. The on-chain economy is consolidating around venues that own the user relationship: Hyperliquid, Robinhood, the major CEXes, and now TradFi participants absorbing an ever-larger share of attention, flow, and revenue. Convenience and institutional credibility win, every time, as soon as they're available. As retail participation thins, that concentration only deepens. We were, and still are, believers in decentralisation, but the current direction of on-chain growth is running through distribution, and any team building base-layer infrastructure today is rowing upstream against that current. We were no exception. The fifth lesson is the most concrete. Both of the above played out directly in our economics. The users we attracted were primarily using Bitcoin as a store of value for yield, a legitimate use case, but not the high-frequency transaction volume that drives fee revenue on a network like ours. BINK was our answer to that: a Bitcoin neobank designed to bring daily usage of BTC and stablecoins on-chain, driving the transaction volume the network needed. It was the right strategic instinct, and one we never got the chance to fully test. BINK only landed on both app stores in the last few weeks, a product that by its nature could only be built once the underlying infrastructure was proven and live. When users choose the convenient option and economic gravity pulls toward distribution, what's left on a decentralised infrastructure layer is a user base that costs more to serve than it generates. Infrastructure costs are what they are, and the fee income never came close to covering them. If you would like to see how we were imagining a Bitcoin future and what we have been working on since September, feel free to download BINK and give it a spin: it’s a full-fledged self-custodial Bitcoin Neobank with email login, one click borrowing, a Lightning integration and more. App store: Play store: This UX is where we think Bitcoin is ultimately heading towards although it feels too early. You can use invite code 1SD31R, but remember to remove your funds by July 9th. We could keep going. We have chosen not to, however, because continuing past the point where additional time stops producing additional learning is not conviction, it is something that looks like conviction from the outside while corroding into something else on the inside. We would rather stop now, with integrity intact and resources available to take care of the people who took a chance on us, than push the experiment past the point where it still has something to teach us. Reminder: Please withdraw all your assets by July 9th. After this, the federation will sweep the remaining Bitcoin. Any other assets or tokens on the network from then onwards will unfortunately be unrecoverable. After this, the federation will sweep the remaining Bitcoin. Any other assets or tokens on the network from then onwards will unfortunately be unrecoverable. To our investors, who backed a thesis that was harder to defend than it should have been, to our partners who built alongside us and bet pieces of their own roadmaps on ours, to the developers who deployed on Spiderchain, to our users and the BINK community who showed up for something experimental and stayed, and most of all to the Botanix team who shipped a genuinely novel system with rigour and care and who made every hard day worth the difficulty: Thank you, more than the words available here can carry.

关于AI 的内容越来越多，但真正值得长期关注、能持续输出高质量内容的博主其实并不多 给大家分享几位我一直在关注的 AI 博主，风格不同，但都属于长期看下来很有价值的类型（排名不分前后） 1. @dotey（宝玉老师） 中文圈里比较扎实的一位 经常分享 Prompt 工程、AI 工具工作流以及实际应用经验，内容偏实践，信息质量也比较稳定 2. @karpathy（Andrej Karpathy） 前 OpenAI、Tesla AI 成员 讲复杂问题的能力非常强，经常发布长线程和教学内容。想真正理解 AI 底层逻辑，很值得关注 3. @rasbt（Sebastian Raschka） 技术向干货非常多 从 LLM 原理、模型架构，到微调和代码实践都有覆盖，适合喜欢动手和深入学习的人 4. @simonw（Simon Willison） 我很喜欢的一位 除了分享各种 AI 工具，他还会持续记录自己的实验过程、踩坑经验和解决方案，很多内容都能直接借鉴 5. @jeremyphoward （Jeremy Howard） fast Ai创始人 他的内容更强调实践和项目驱动，不会停留在概念层面，对想把 AI 用到实际工作中的人帮助很大 6.@Suu766 （Suu) 我自己也在持续分享AI工具使用、Agent工作流和web3结合的实用干货 主要是保姆级教程和真实踩坑经验，适合想实际操作的朋友 很多时候，与其每天追热点，不如找到几个靠谱的人长期跟 把他们过去的帖子、文章慢慢看下来，收获往往比刷几十条资讯更大 欢迎评论区交流，也可以分享你最喜欢的Ai博主，大家一起学习

OpenClaw 官方安卓版也来了。 这其实是一个很明显的信号： AI Agent 正在从“程序员玩具”，一步步往普通用户设备里走。 以前你想跑 OpenClaw，多少还得懂点本地部署、Gateway、环境配置。 现在 Android 端上架 Google Play，手机也可以变成 OpenClaw 的 companion node，有摄像头、麦克风、位置、通知这些移动端能力之后，Agent 能做的事情会比桌面端更贴近日常场景。 当然它不是单独运行的主程序，还是需要配合 OpenClaw Gateway。 但方向已经很清楚了： Agent 不会只停留在浏览器和命令行里，下一步一定是进入桌面、手机、聊天软件，最后变成你每天随手就能调用的个人助手。 #OpenClaw# 这波安卓版上线，算是又往前推了一步。