注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「demographer」相关的搜索结果

demographer 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 demographer 的内容
🚨ANOTHER CITY FALLS: DOWNTOWN CHICAGO SEIZED FOR ISLAM While our leaders obsess over Europe’s slow death, Chicago is being captured right now. On June 25, 2026, thousands of Shia Muslims took over downtown Chicago streets for their annual Ashura procession. Not inside their mosques. They seized public streets in the heart of the city a sea of burqas, black flags, and men rhythmically beating their chests in mourning for their prophet. This is not quiet prayer. This is a public show of force and total commitment to their ideology. Chicago already has over 100 mosques. Yet they still flood downtown, shut down streets, and perform their rituals openly in the name of “justice”, the same “justice” that ultimately means Sharia. This is the exact same pattern we just saw in Dearborn: public dominance, demographic replacement, and zero interest in assimilation. Chicago’s streets now belong to them for the day. Soon it will be permanent. We are losing one American city after another to Islamic supremacism while our politicians and media pretend it’s only happening across the ocean. Dearborn. Chicago. Minneapolis Patterson Hamtramck Houston Detroit... Next? Wake up! This is not immigration. This is conquest by inches, and they are no longer hiding it.
显示更多
0
737
6.7K
3.2K
转发到社区
🚨ISLAMIZED DEARBORN: THE POLICE FORCE IS BEING TAKEN OVER Dearborn Muslim Police Chief Issa Shahin stands proudly in front of a Lebanese flag and openly boasts about transforming his department. He praises his “Arab American” police force, now 45% Arab (up from just 3%). He celebrates hijabs being respected even when facing the justice system. He closes most speeches with “Hamdullah.” He brags about his strong, proud Palestinian wife and admits he has been actively recruiting to make the force more “representative.” The goal is clear: 100% Islamic control so the city, state, and eventually the country live under Sharia. This is not diversity or community policing. This is the deliberate Islamization of American law enforcement. When the police chief himself pushes religious accommodations and demographic replacement while ending speeches in praise to Allah, you no longer have officers protecting the Constitution. You have Sharia enforcement in uniform.
显示更多
0
112
1.5K
854
转发到社区
Candidates in the upcoming US midterm elections are stepping up outreach to crucial Latino voters, considered one of the swingiest demographics in the American electorate
显示更多
“‘Social justice’ is simply a quasi-religious superstition… which we must fight when it becomes the pretext of coercing other men. And the prevailing belief in ‘social justice’ is at present probably the gravest threat to most other values of a free civilization.” — F.A. Hayek The Henry Nowak murder, the Pakistani muslim rape gang report, and the political response that followed are the perfect illustration. True justice is individual. It exists only to protect a person’s life, liberty, and property from aggression. The same clear rules apply to everyone, regardless of skin color, ancestry, or group grievances. No special treatment. No collective score-settling. Social justice and “collective rights” do the opposite. They turn an inconvenience or conflict involving one person into a supposed crime against his entire identity group. The state then feels entitled to bend procedures, evidence standards, and equal protection to “protect” the narrative of that group. This is how you manufacture a two-tier system where some individuals are worth more than others depending on which demographic box they check. The dying man gets handcuffed while officers entertain the killer’s racism claim. Facts become secondary to group identity. That is the destruction of justice. Tribal collectivism dressed up as morality. Hayek saw where this road leads. Britain is already on it. Reject the mirage before the rule of law collapses for everyone.
显示更多
0
5
44
12
转发到社区
Robot nation: China’s bid to beat its demographic decline
The open society and its enemy, Soros. While he named his Open Society Foundations after Karl Popper’s “The Open Society and Its Enemies,” his project stands as a philosophical inversion of everything Popper defended. Popper’s open society rested on critical rationalism, the recognition that no one possesses final truth, that institutions must remain open to criticism and piecemeal reform, and that democracy functions as a method for removing rulers without bloodshed. He rejected historicism, the belief in iron laws of history that justify sacrificing present generations for a utopian future, and warned that such thinking inevitably produces closed, authoritarian societies. Soros has repurposed the label to advance a grand project of engineered demographic transformation. Through mass immigration, multiculturalism as official policy, and diversity mandates that prioritize group identity over individual merit and assimilation, his foundations actively dissolve the cultural continuity and social trust that make rational criticism and incremental change possible. Popper understood that openness requires a stable framework, a shared language of reason, basic cohesion, and institutions citizens feel they collectively own. Soros treats those foundations as obstacles to be overcome in the name of an abstract, borderless openness. The concrete results are visible. Parallel societies that operate under different norms, public spaces where debate on the scale and selection of immigration is treated as illegitimate, and the rise of identity based hierarchies that close off dissent in the name of equity. These are certainly not expansions of the open society, but new forms of closure, tribal in character, enforced through institutional capture rather than overt dictatorship, yet hostile to the very critical spirit Popper placed at the center of civilized life. Philosophically, Soros replaces Popper’s falsification and humility before reality with a new historicism, the conviction that global multiculturalism and open borders represent inevitable moral progress, and that resistance from actual existing communities constitutes the new enemy. The machinery funded in the name of openness does not test its own assumptions against evidence, it suppresses the questions. Those who still value the ideal of an open society should read Popper on their own terms. They will find that Soros has not extended the open society, but has supplied its most sophisticated contemporary enemies.
显示更多
0
348
6.8K
1.7K
转发到社区
Nobody voted for this. The same supranational elites shouting “save our democracy” are ramming through a globalist agenda of open borders, mass amnesty, and demographic replacement that no European population ever approved. Because to them, democracy never meant rule of the people. It means their rule. No different than North Korea claiming to be democratic because the dictator supposedly speaks for the will of the people. You’re only allowed to vote on trivial issues. The decisions that actually destroy a civilization like who enters your country, what your culture becomes, whether your nation even survives, it all happens without your consent. You’re not in charge. You’re being ruled.
显示更多
0
32
424
129
转发到社区
Hey @TheView, i’m challenging you to bring me onto your show. You spit nothing but falsehoods and misinformation in this entire clip. You might be “following this case now”. I’ve been reporting and investigating this case for over a year. FACT CHECK: A “jury of your peers” does NOT mean the jurors have to be the same race as the defendant. You confidently claimed that because there wasn’t someone the same color as the defendant on the jury, it wasn’t a jury of his peers. That is 100% false. A jury of your peers means a jury selected from the community and judged by fellow citizens. It does NOT mean every juror has to match the defendant’s race, gender, religion, age, or background. If that were true, every defendant would be entitled to a jury custom-built to mirror their demographics. That’s not how the legal system works. The Constitution requires that juries be selected from a fair cross-section of the community. It does NOT require that the final jury contain members of any particular race. The idea that people can only fairly judge someone if they share the same skin color is not only legally wrong, it’s an incredibly racist way of viewing the justice system. Also, Karmelo was NOT 130 lbs. But clearly you don’t get your info from anything other than racist social media influencers instead of the documented FACTS. And the AUDACITY to say “he was the only black kid under the tent”?! A large portion of the witnesses who were UNDER THE TENT who TESTIFIED AGAINST KARMELO were BLACK! I am FLABBERGASTED by the outright lies you just spewed!
显示更多
0
773
14K
2.7K
转发到社区
“We’re here to fuck all the white girls and fuck the government. We’re over here to breed, we are going to take over.” That’s what one of the Dewsbury grooming gang rapists told his victim. Not poverty. Not “cultural misunderstanding”. Not random crime by “Asians”. This was muslim men operating with a clear religious and racial ideology. White non-Muslim girls were “slags”, “trash”, and “kuffar whores”, fair game for grooming, gang rape, trafficking, and beatings. Muslim girls were “pure”. White girls deserved it. Some perpetrators quoted scripture and framed their actions as religiously justified superiority over infidels. When the government repeatedly sides with the ideological rapists over its own children, when it betrays fathers and communities trying to protect their daughters, don’t act shocked when people lose faith in the system and take matters into their own hands. This is demographic and cultural conquest. An existential attack on Britain enabled by the very people sworn to defend it. The absolutely filthy anti-white, anti-Christian racist Mehdi Hasan calls the Casey report and the whole push for truth “bullshit.” The rapists’ own words in court and the girls they destroyed say otherwise. Denial this loud only confirms who’s still protecting the narrative and why.
显示更多
0
1.8K
60.5K
20.9K
转发到社区
🚨 Elon Musk just said the quiet part out loud “People call this fake? Look at Ilhan Omar. She was literally voted into power by a large group of people from Somalia living in Minnesota. That’s REALLY far from Somalia.” This isn’t representation. It’s demographic capture. We are not turning America into a communist hellhole. SEND HER BACK.
显示更多
0
176
33.9K
6.5K
转发到社区