OpenAI just ordered 100,000 Blackwell GPUs from NVIDIA. A Chinese developer put one of NVIDIA's $3,999 desktop AI boxes on his office desk and ran the same robot simulator the big labs train on $50,000 racks.
The demo was a single empty cube floating in an empty world. Fifty frames per second. He posted the clip with one line. Is this how home robotics starts or is this an expensive toy.
The clip went viral the same week NVIDIA shipped the second batch of Sparks to developers. 1.8 million views in 72 hours. Every American hardware engineer shared it as proof you could finally own the rig. Every Chinese commenter left the same Mandarin reply: pause at 1:42.
Pause at 1:42. Ignore the empty cube on the screen. Ignore the FPS counter. Look at the memory readout in the top bar. 2.4 GiB used. 87.4 GiB available. The cube is sitting in three percent of the memory.
The empty 84 gigabytes of memory was not headroom for a future robot scene. The empty 84 gigabytes was already running.
ColdMath. $138,168 profit. Joined November 2025. Bio: Edge Compounds.
He had not bought the Spark to train robots. He had bought it because robots were the only workload NVIDIA shipped a 128 gigabyte chip for. The slow memory that ruined the box for real robotics was perfect for what he was actually running. Twelve hundred ensemble weather simulations in parallel.
Robot training needs fast memory because every frame is a step in a training loop. Weather ensembles need huge memory because every city is a parallel simulation that does not talk to the others. The Spark's chip is six times slower than a gaming card. It is also five times larger. The trade off only matters if you know what you are running. He knew.
Wellington 16C on March 28. Tokyo 16C on March 20. Every city in the wallet was a city the ensemble had simulated three hours before the public forecast posted.
Comments turned into a detective board. Someone slowed the clip to 0.25x. Someone else compared the wallet's trade timestamps to the timestamps the public forecast services updated their data. Every trade landed during the three hour gap. The Spark had been catching it.
Six months ago a 14 year old in Shenzhen pushed an AI agent to GitHub. Judges said no real world application. 3,100 forks later. The developer in the office cubicle had been one of them. He had wired the agent into the Spark the same week NVIDIA shipped his box.
The empty cube was not a benchmark. The empty cube was a screen saver running while the agent occupied the other 84 gigabytes.
The Isaac Sim install was not the project. The Isaac Sim install was the proof he could justify buying the box on company expenses.
The question about whether this was a real tool or an expensive toy was the only thing in the video designed to be answered by the audience.
He was not a Chinese developer testing whether home robotics had arrived. He was the first developer to figure out that the box NVIDIA had marketed for the wrong workload was the cheapest weather simulator on the market.
The clip is at 1.8 million views. The forum thread is still arguing about the six times memory penalty. The Spark on his desk is still running. The wallet is still hitting cities the public forecast services have not updated yet. The cube is still floating in three percent of the memory.
The country with the better robotics demo has the smaller wallet. The dev with the wrong tool for the job has the bigger one. He just had to install a robot simulator for one afternoon.
显示更多
At Meta, 90% of my coworkers were Chinese, and non-Chinese were routinely excluded, disadvantaged, and targeted for layoffs. 6 out of the 7 layoffs I observed targeted non-Chinese despite non-Chinese being the vast minority. Certain orgs like ads and MRS are notorious for being Chinese dominated. I think Americans would be outraged if they knew that their own citizens were getting marginalized and laid off at their own companies, while Chinese promote themselves up, conquer entire orgs, and reap millions.
Imagine if Huawei in Shenzhen had entire orgs and leadership chains completely dominated by Japanese people who brazenly spoke Japanese at work without a care in the world that their Chinese coworkers don't understand, imposed their own work culture without respecting Chinese culture, excluded the Chinese, and laid off Chinese people while promoting their own. I imagine Chinese citizens would be outraged, and never allow that to happen in the first place.
The most blatant and obvious way that non-Chinese are excluded is that Chinese primarily speak Mandarin at work. I'm not talking about one-off conversations, I'm talking about every single conversation. Loudly and brazenly with no respect for others. 10+ teammates and leaders having a group conversation in Mandarin while the 2 non-Chinese don't understand and feel excluded from the team. Although everyone at least has the decency to speak English during formal meetings with a non-speaker present, it was common that right after the meeting ended everyone would immediately switch to Mandarin.
Funny I'm in Korea right now and was just on a double date with 3 other Koreans, and I was shocked that when the conversation would split into two, the other couple would speak to each other in English in my presence just out of respect. A Korean couple on a double-date had the courtesy to speak to each other in English in front of me even though I'd never expect that from them, but my Chinese coworkers did not.
Lunch was another place where non-Chinese were blatantly excluded. Recall that the team I joined was an all Chinese team with only one other non-Chinese person. The Chinese would always get lunch together and never invite us (except for one of them who occasionally would, though at some point stopped). Me and the non-Chinese person would invite them, they'd always refuse, and then shortly after they'd disappear and get lunch together. As a result, it was usually just the two of us getting lunch. (caveat, some of the newer Chinese who joined afterwards also experienced similar treatment. So it's moreso a clique thing than a Chinese vs. non-Chinese thing, though 100% of the clique was Chinese)
On Wednesdays and Fridays I'd often be the only non-Chinese person on my team in the office, and they'd all get lunch together without inviting me. It was depressing, and made me not want to come into the office on those days.
One team dinner we went to a Korean BBQ. I arrived with a non-Chinese coworker and the first table was full, so we sat at one end of the next empty table. Shortly after one of the Tech Leads walked in, and sat at the complete opposite end of our table, alone and not in talking distance to anyone. We invited her over, and she declined. Later another Tech Lead came in and sat across from her. Non-Chinese and Chinese at opposite ends of a long table at a team dinner, and they refused to sit with us. Eventually more people came and the TLs joined our side because I guess maybe it was too obviously anti-social, and they spent the entire dinner speaking speaking Chinese to each other. These were our tech leads.
I could not understand how Meta could have "Tech Leads" that so blatantly excluded teammates. I thought Tech Leads were supposed to uplift the team, and that Meta would hold tech leads to a higher standard.
Now someone might say that it's just lunch or a one-off team dinner, who cares? To that I vehemently disagree. Lunch is extremely important for team bonding, and so much information is transferred through informal socializing. I'm not saying that everyone needs to get lunch together everyday, but if a minority of people are excluded from getting lunch with the rest of the team, and especially the most tenured and senior employees, then naturally that minority is going to feel alienated, disadvantaged, and excluded from opportunities. And the very fact that they're excluded from lunch is reflective of being excluded in general.
When 90% of an org and the entire leadership chain is dominated by one ethnicity, naturally their work culture is going to spill through. Chinese culture is completely different from American work culture, and learning to navigate that was a huge obstacle for me. For example I'm the type that tends to question everything and isn't afraid to challenge a "superior", but I quickly realized that my TL seemed to take offense to that, and would punish/retaliate me for it.
I want to make it clear - I have nothing against Chinese people. Most of them are very kind (strong correlation between kindness and not engaging in the kind of exclusionary behavior I mentioned above), and I have many good friends who are Chinese. I get that some barely speak English (though I question how they got hired). I do genuinely believe that most are good people, and not deliberately trying to exclude others. But regardless of intent, the result is that non-Chinese get excluded. The fact that 6 of the 7 layoffs I observed were not Chinese in a 80-90% Chinese dominated org is testament to this. The fact that 90% Chinese dominated orgs even exist in the first place is testament to this.
I might not even be posting about this given the sensitivity of the topic if not for the fact that I've seen and/or heard stories of some very toxic people who I do not believe would otherwise survive if not for their ability to exclude others, throwing others under the bus for the next layoff. The same people do this over and over again, and get away with it because they're part of the "clique" that essentially has immunity.
I think the company needs to take this more seriously. Some ideas would be enforcing English at the office (I've heard of other teams that do this), raising leaders to a higher bar when it comes to team inclusivity (eg. under the "People" axis), investigating potential discrimination cases (eg. layoffs and/or mistreatment disproportionally affecting certain groups) and having a zero tolerance policy around that, having a zero tolerance policy around injustice in general (eg. lying or deliberately throwing somebody under the bus), ensuring more diverse teams, etc.
But to be honest, I don't have faith that much would change so long as the entire leadership chain up to the VP level is dominated by the same ethnicity, language, and culture. Nor does it seem that leadership even remotely cares given that this has been happening in the HQ for probably at least the last decade, and is obvious to anyone who's stepped foot in the office.
显示更多
Officially wrapped on “Mother Bhumi”! Can you believe I learned 6 languages for this film? Pali, Siamese, Hokkien, Malay, Indonesian, and Malaysian-accented Mandarin!
A huge thank you to my fans in China for the beautiful fan wall—you guys are amazing for organizing it from afar!
《地母》正式杀青!
我为了这部电影学了6种语言~
巴利语、暹罗语、福建话、马来语、印尼语和马来西亚当地的华语💁🏻♀️
特别感谢中国粉丝们送的漂亮花墙,我很喜欢!你们远程操控,太厉害了!
显示更多