与「mask」相关的搜索结果

I think the best case is to make the "monitor" as un-agentic as possible. We don't mind being "monitored" by various random tiny insects we don't even notice, even guard dogs are fine, but we really do mind if it's a globally connected networked system. And the intermediate case, human security guards with no recording equipment, we mind only a medium amount. The best idea I've come up with so far is to make these monitoring devices out of open-source verifiable hardware that has etched on it an open-weight LLM that classifies for a limited number of activities (basically, just violence; sorry, no scanning for jaywalking or not wearing a mask or drugs or unauthorized manufacturing or illegal immigrants, really just violence) and only records and forwards if that's what it sees. The device has no storage, no ability to load new algorithms, this is all it does. Also, a hash of every recording is published onchain (and a device can't record the next one until it sees confirmation of the previous one) so we can all count how much recording is done. Finally, everyone has a legal right to take any such device they see and grab it and dissassemble and verify the hardware themselves. Explicitly fund university clubs, hacker groups, etc to regularly do this.

Trade your shielded $ZEC for confidential USDC on Ethereum, without ever unshielding it. No bridge. No custodian. No wrapped ZEC. And the amount never shows up on chain. I connected @zama and @Zcash to make it work. Live on testnet 👇 What it is ZEC Desk is a small trading desk on Zama's FHEVM, on Ethereum Sepolia. On one side there's cUSDC, a dollar token whose balances are encrypted. On the other side there's shielded ZEC on Zcash testnet. You can trade either way. Built on Zama's model Zama's Confidential RFQ is already live on Ethereum mainnet, open to everyone: It runs confidential swaps with encrypted quotes, a sealed-bid pick on chain and a hidden floor. ZEC Desk takes that same model and extends it to native shielded ZEC. Zama's swap settles both legs on one chain, inside its own contract, so a Zcash leg can't plug into it directly. Here that leg lives on Zcash and settles minutes later with a proof, so the mechanics run in my own contract. It's a sketch of how native ZEC could sit next to Zama's swaps one day, with no wrapped token. How a trade works (buying ZEC) 👇 1️⃣ You lock cUSDC in the desk. The amount is encrypted. 2️⃣ Makers send encrypted quotes. Nobody sees anyone else's price, or the minimum you'll accept. 3️⃣ The contract picks the best one under FHE. 4️⃣ The winning maker sends shielded ZEC to your Zcash address, with the order's reference in the memo. 5️⃣ A zero-knowledge proof shows that payment happened, and the contract releases your cUSDC to the maker. If no proof arrives in time, your cUSDC comes back to you. Selling is the same in reverse: the maker locks cUSDC, you pay the ZEC, and the proof releases the cUSDC to you. Why these pieces Each piece does one job. Zcash keeps the payment private. Zama keeps the amounts encrypted and can still compute on them. Seam, the Zcash light client I built last month, connects the two: a contract checks every Zcash block header itself, and a RISC Zero proof shows a shielded payment reached the right receiver. The transaction, the note and the address never touch the EVM chain. The masked amount This was the hard part. Seam's proof used to write the paid amount in the clear, and ZEC amount × price gives away the dollar amount. So the amount is masked. The contract adds an encrypted one-time mask to the encrypted amount and reveals only the sum, which looks random to everyone else. The mask comes from a secret that the side receiving the ZEC hands to the payer. The proof checks that the payment was at least the sum minus the mask, and never states the amount. One-time pads are old, and Zama's RFQ uses one too. Using one to hand a value from FHE to a ZK proof is the part I haven't seen before. If you have, please send it my way. No vault, no signers Seam can read Zcash, but it can't take ZEC from anyone. So the design never needs someone to pay ZEC on someone else's behalf. Whoever pays, pays from their own wallet, and the escrow on the EVM side enforces the deal. The side that paid the ZEC can prove it itself, so nobody depends on the other side's goodwill. Seam does more than this Any EVM app that needs to know a shielded payment happened can use Seam: pay-with-ZEC checkouts, escrows, payouts, cross-chain orders. This desk is one example. Where it stands ↓ Testnet only, unaudited. On 12 November 2026 I ran a Buy end to end: ➡️ Settled with a proof: ➡️ One proof: 2 minutes on a rented RTX 4090, about $0.25 for the whole session ➡️ Gas per Buy on Sepolia: about 7.6M, in six transactions ➡️ A Sell also ran on Sepolia, up to the maker locking its cUSDC; it settles through the same proof step ➡️ Seam's light client is now deployed on Ethereum Sepolia too, next to Base Sepolia Where it can go ↓ → The desk only needs Zama's FHEVM and a cUSDC. Both already run on Polygon, where following Zcash costs a fraction of Ethereum mainnet. → Zama keeps adding chains. On any cheap EVM chain it reaches, the same desk can run, and if it comes to Base, Seam's relay already runs on Base Sepolia. → Zama's roadmap also goes beyond the EVM, to chains like Solana. Seam's verifier would need a port there. → On Ethereum mainnet, following Zcash header by header would cost over 2B gas a day, so batched header proofs are next for Seam. What it can't do yet - Settlement takes minutes, not seconds. Zcash confirmations set the pace, not the GPU. - Right now I'm the only maker, and a maker needs ZEC, cUSDC and a GPU. - Amounts are hidden, but EVM addresses are public. Read more ↓ Seam on Seam: ZEC Desk:

introducing @NanoBanana 2.1 🍌 our latest image generation model outperforms our previous models across the board: - better visual design - mask-based editing - subject consistency - more natural-looking images try it out today in

Meet Nano Banana 2.1, our latest image generation and editing model 🍌 This upgraded version outperforms our previous models across the board, with notable leaps in visual design, mask-based editing, and subject consistency to help you create more natural-looking images.

🚨 JUST IN:Garland’s own DOJ reportedly warned his school-board parents memo looked political. He did it anyway. Parents weren’t terrorists—they were protesting masks and curriculum. Will NYT and Politico call that “weaponization”?

Meet Naimi奶咪 ✨ @anaimiya 冷色近拍、沙發自拍，到金色布簾前的完整造型——Naimi奶咪 的神秘感每滑一張就更明顯。 A masked close-up, a relaxed sofa moment, then the full look in warm gold light. Which side would you explore first: mystery, candid, or full look? 👀 More of Naimi奶咪 on Iyaofans:

链上世界不该是透明到裸奔的地方。该藏的，就得藏住 胸弟们，今天不跟你们扯那些虚头巴脑的高大上术语，就用最直白的话聊聊一个事儿：咱们在链上的隐私，到底有多惨 你打开钱包一看，余额多少、转过谁、买过啥、持有什么币，全是明牌。随便一个地址扔进浏览器，别人就能把你的资金流水翻个底朝天。就像你去银行取钱，结果柜台上直接把你的存折贴门口了，谁想看都能看。这就是现在大多数公链的真实状态——透明到过分 以前想搞点隐私？得换新钱包、背新助记词、记一堆笔记、切各种奇怪的界面。麻烦得一批，很多人直接放弃了。隐私成了少数技术宅的专属玩具，普通人根本用不上。 直到有了 Nullmas @NullMaskio 它干的事儿特别简单粗暴：你原来用的钱包（MetaMask、Rabby、硬件钱包都行）继续用，不用换、不用新种子、不用新地址。就加一个虚拟网络，差不多20秒搞定。然后你该转账转账、该swap就swap，该存就存、该取就取，链上别人看到的只是一堆看不懂的加密数据，谁转的、转给谁、转了多少，全藏起来了。 说白了，它就像给你现有的钱包装了个“隐私VPN”。钱还是你的，控制权还是你的，密钥从来不出你的设备（硬件钱包也原生支持，这点很硬），但交易轨迹直接断了。 从隐私角度看，这玩意儿真正解决了几个痛点： 第一，不用牺牲方便换隐私。以前隐私工具要么难用，要么要你重新开始。Nullmask直接插进你已经习惯的流程里，几乎无感。 第二，真正的不可追踪。用的是零知识证明，发送方、接收方、金额在屏蔽交易里全藏着。外面看就是黑箱，想追踪链路？没门。 第三，安全不打折。别的隐私方案经常要你把权限交出去，或者提私钥。Nullmask不，签名还是你钱包自己签的标准交易，代理再聪明也偷不走你的钱。 第四，多链、多币种直接上。ETH、稳定币、各种ERC-20都能进隐私池，还能在里面直接做私密swap。以后还要扩更多网络。 现在链上每天成交量那么大，公开透明带来的风险也越来越大——大户被盯、策略被抄、个人被画像，甚至各种针对性攻击。隐私不再是“可有可无的加分项”，而是越来越像基本需求了。 Nullmask的思路很务实：不逼你改变习惯，就把隐私做成默认选项。你还是用原来的钱包，点几下就能把交易藏起来。 隐私这事儿，说到底就是“我的钱我自己说了算，不想让全世界都知道我在干嘛”。以前很难实现，现在有了这个工具，门槛一下子降下来了。 想真正体会一下“看不见、摸不着、追踪不了”的感觉？去关注一下@NullMaskio ，自己试试看。反正设置简单，不影响原有资产，隐私直接拉满。 他们的链上代币： $MASK 没有营销 但是拉盘拉的嗷嗷嗷猛 这是一个值得期待的区块链新鲜事物