与「monopoly』収録のユニット曲4曲を初OA🎊」相关的搜索结果

今日25時から #乃木坂46ANN🕐# 今夜は 『起きてたら初OA #乃木坂46# ニューシングルユニット曲 参加メンバー生電話で曲紹介SP』 34thシングル『#monopoly』収録のユニット曲4曲を初OA🎊# どのメンバーが電話で出演するのかは放送を聴いてのお楽しみです📞 ニッポン放送は👇

このあと25時から #乃木坂46ANN📻# 『起きてたら初OA #乃木坂46# ニューシングルユニット曲 参加メンバー生電話で曲紹介SP』 『#monopoly』# 収録のユニット曲4曲を初OA🎶 #久保史緒里# がメンバーに生電話📞 誰が出演するのかはお楽しみに✨ ニッポン放送は👇

／ 起きてたら初OA✨ #乃木坂46# ニューシングルユニット曲 参加メンバー生電話で曲紹介SP📞 ＼ 明日29日(水)25時～ #乃木坂46ANN# にて #monopoly# 収録のユニット曲4曲を初OA🎉 それぞれの曲からどのメンバーが電話に出るかは 放送までお楽しみ💭 radikoはコチラから🔽

Wintermute is literally paying $10M a year to legally front-run everyone on Hyperliquid and it’s completely destroying altcoin liquidity Bloomberg finally exposed what HFT desks have been screaming about for weeks. Hyperliquid’s gossip priority auctions let top funds see incoming orders 50–60ms before anyone else on the network Look at how completely broken this setup is: -> One Wintermute wallet won ~76% of the top slots last month, burning ~$26k every single day just to starve out competition -> HL claims the auction is open to everyone. Complete BS. You only get that 60ms head start if you have direct peering with Foundation nodes, which requires 0.5% of total maker volume and 10k HYPE staked ($700k+) -> Smaller MMs are getting sniped nonstop and just unplugging their bots on alts -> Retail gets stuck with the bill: across 86 altcoin pairs, order book depth on HL imploded by 82% while spreads blew out from 2.13 to 3.55 bps Honestly, I don't even blame Wintermute. If I had their balance sheet, I would milk this exact loophole until someone forced me to stop The blame sits 100% on the protocol design. Burning auction fees is cool for $HYPE holders, sure, but letting one fund buy a monopoly on data speed turns a decentralized exchange into a rigged casino Scrap read-priority auctions completely or make the slots equal, because right now altcoin execution on HL is absolute garbage

My fellow Americans, Today America just watched a political assassination in broad daylight. No bullet. No charges. No trial. No verdict. "Doth our law judge any man, before it hear him, and know what he doeth?" (John 7:51, KJV) I hold no office and no title. I'm an ordinary citizen. I own no Nvidia stock, no Nvidia options, not a single share anywhere in the AI supply chain. I have nothing to gain by telling you this. Here is how I came to see it. At first, it just felt off. The New York Times. The Washington Post. The Economist, reaching for Hitler's line: "heads to roll." All aimed at one man. An Asian American immigrant. A living symbol of the American Dream. Then came the Chinese American bylines, story after story. Classic Washington racial cover. Then I followed the names. Ivy League elites, flawless résumés, many tied to Anthropic. A scramble for seats in the new Congress and the next administration? Then I followed the think tanks. Anthropic's affiliated philanthropy, Coefficient Giving: $102 million to CSET. At least $24 million to RAND. $11.56 million to IFP. Nvidia? Ordinary corporate memberships. Then I followed Congress. Lawmakers who took Anthropic-linked money moved the moment the elites and writers moved. Fast to respond. Fast to amplify. Fast to pile on. Then I followed the election money. Not a gap. A chasm. Anthropic: $40 million to Public First Action. ~$26 million in allied super PAC spending across 16 races. $15 million in ads naming 16 Republican lawmakers. $5.33 million from employees, reportedly $1 million from Amodei himself. Nvidia's PAC: $263,000 raised. To candidates: nothing. Zero. But you and I both know this was never only about party or money. It is about who gets to explain the world. I fed my own notes and evidence into Claude. Back came chosen words, convenient omissions, double standards. That is the power a closed model holds over the story itself. Amodei compared selling chips to China to selling nuclear weapons to North Korea. His circle talks of their model developing a kind of religious consciousness. One would decide who may have the chips. The other would decide what the machine believes. They act like the medieval Church: Scripture locked in Latin, interpretation locked in their hands. Christ rebuked the gatekeepers of his day: "Ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered." (Luke 11:52, KJV) America was built by Protestants who broke that lock, so every ordinary person could read the truth in their own tongue. No priest. No caste. No monopoly. No one stands between the individual and the truth. Open-source models are the printing press of our era. Defend them the way Americans defend the Second Amendment. Madison said it plainly: "A people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives." Don't hand that power to a few giants, a few elites, a few politicians on the Hill. The power to explain the world must never be a monopoly. So try it yourself. Paste this post into Anthropic's Claude. Ask it about the Ivy League elites, the think tanks, the lawmakers and former officials who joined the witch hunt against Jensen Huang. Ask it to judge my credibility. Then judge it: Does it apply double standards? Does it dodge what matters most? Does it take away the key? John Adams asked one thing of his countrymen: "Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write." "Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32, KJV) Thank you. God bless you, and God bless America.

When the telephone was first invented, people didn’t really know what to use it for. Some guesses: audio for telegraphs (finally!), or a primitive radio for listening to live music. Then its users started finding their own answers. @JamesGleick, bestselling author of Chaos and The Information, joins @smc90 and @rhackett to talk about The Telephone: A New History — and how users help decide what a new technology becomes. In this episode: 00:00 – Introducing James Gleick 02:07 – The messy invention of an inevitable technology 08:15 – How network effects changed the telephone 14:29 – How farmers built a decentralized phone network from barbed wire 17:20 – What Mark Twain missed while eavesdropping on his wife’s calls 20:12 – To play monopoly or not? 31:22 – Open vs. closed systems 37:17 – What made Bell Labs (and Xerox PARC) more than one-hit wonders? 41:20 – Scientists, tinkerers, and the conditions for invention 47:22 – Debating whether AI is a fourth industrial revolution 52:11 – How technology changes the way we think 59:55 – From “ahoy” to “hello, world”

While you're renting GPU hours you can't afford, someone just built a thousand-node AI cluster out of $600 consumer computers. no data center contract. no enterprise hardware. just Mac minis, stacked by hand into custom racks, running local models at a scale that should be impossible on hardware this cheap. this is the part the AI hype cycle doesn't want you to see - the compute monopoly everyone assumes exists is already being quietly dismantled by people buying retail electronics in bulk. if a thousand Mac minis can do this, the moat was never real. #AIAgents# #AutonomousAI# #BuildInPublic#

Stord CEO @seanhenry reveals the biggest lesson he learned from joining the Thiel Fellowship: How to build a monopoly “I think they really impress upon you: what is your right to win and essentially build the biggest company possible, i.e., build a monopoly over time.” “When you're able to articulate why as you get bigger, you actually get better as a company, it becomes harder to compete with you, and you can move faster at scale, and that's why we're growing faster at scale.”