与「overseas」相关的搜索结果

Key takeaways on Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang’s resignation: 1. Near term, the bad news is priced in: For the stock market, this could be a one-time clearing event. Huang has now fully cut ties with Nvidia, so Congress summoning him and any follow-up investigations should have less impact on Nvidia’s stock from here. As for how Huang’s next moves might affect Nvidia, it’s too early to call before the investigation results are out. 2. Google’s TPU is likely the biggest beneficiary: With Nvidia facing succession uncertainty, Google’s TPU has a chance to win more trust from customers and the supply chain. Its key partners, MediaTek and Broadcom, could be the market’s near-term focus. 3. Succession impact shows up in 2028 at the earliest: CFO Colette Kress is now interim CEO. The formal CEO transition and the organizational changes that come with it will likely start affecting Nvidia’s product development and competitiveness in 2028 at the earliest. 4. Capacity pre-booking and spec upgrades are the key focus for supply chain checks: Huang’s product strategy pushed the supply chain hard in two ways: capacity pre-booking and spec upgrades. It’s critical to watch for any changes in capacity expansion and new tech development across the supply chain. These are among the core reasons Nvidia’s supply chain trades at high P/E multiples. 5. China demand and export controls: The share of Nvidia’s AI chip revenue that ultimately ends up with Chinese buyers may be higher than what the company has officially stated. That’s why some investors worry Nvidia’s revenue will drop sharply once the US government tightens export controls. But China’s end demand won’t disappear because of export controls. Even under tighter rules, as long as overseas resale channels exist, Chinese buyers may still pay the premium, even at several times the price, and get Nvidia chips/racks through indirect routes.

The Moral Collapse of the Chinese Crypto Community To Elon Musk 2022–2023 marked the golden age of Chinese-language Twitter. Back then, there was no creator revenue you offered purely based on traffic. Two main groups of creators came here to share insights: Influencers who migrated over with their followers after their Weibo accounts were banned. Content creators who were already living overseas. These people came with genuine intent to share, and they often uncovered valuable market alpha. Whether it was Bay Area Spaces, inscription research bloggers, or spot and secondary market analysts. Back then, everyone believed the next bull run would be bright. People expected their altcoin spot holdings would deliver at least 5–10x returns. After all, A16Z poured capital into projects left and right, and every so often, stories popped up of Gen Z traders hitting A8 and retiring financially free. Then the tide turned. High-cap tokens pumped immediately upon launch. Instead of bringing fresh liquidity into the market, the ETF event drained what little liquidity remained, driven largely by Trump-related narratives. The crash on October 11 was almost inevitable. Long before that, many had already lost everything on altcoins. That black-swan event merely liquidated whatever leveraged contract positions were left. Starting around 2024–2025, after X rolled out creator ad revenue, a flood of traffic chasers emerged, catering to lowbrow audiences. These people do not trade crypto, nor do they care about any market narratives. They crossed over to this platform just to scrape together that tiny creator payout, as they have little footing in real life. Consequently, we saw the worst tropes from mainland domestic social media spill over: gender polarization, disinformation, and bootlicking culture. While you tweaked the algorithm to curb plagiarism, the platform still fails to incentivize high-quality content. Plenty of boundaryless content farms still rack up views, and accounts that harass others relentlessly often evade effective reporting penalties. Meanwhile, posts from creators I used to follow have vanished from my timeline. I kindly request that you strictly investigate accounts that distribute other users’ private information without consent.

The Moral Collapse of the Chinese Crypto Community To Elon Musk @elonmusk 2022–2023 marked the golden age of Chinese-language Twitter. Back then, there was no creator revenue you offered purely based on traffic. Two main groups of creators came here to share insights: Influencers who migrated over with their followers after their Weibo accounts were banned. Content creators who were already living overseas. These people came with genuine intent to share, and they often uncovered valuable market alpha. Whether it was Bay Area Spaces, inscription research bloggers, or spot and secondary market analysts. Back then, everyone believed the next bull run would be bright. People expected their altcoin spot holdings would deliver at least 5–10x returns. After all, A16Z poured capital into projects left and right, and every so often, stories popped up of Gen Z traders hitting A8 and retiring financially free. Then the tide turned. High-cap tokens pumped immediately upon launch. Instead of bringing fresh liquidity into the market, the ETF event drained what little liquidity remained, driven largely by Trump-related narratives. The crash on October 11 was almost inevitable. Long before that, many had already lost everything on altcoins. That black-swan event merely liquidated whatever leveraged contract positions were left. Starting around 2024–2025, after X rolled out creator ad revenue, a flood of traffic chasers emerged, catering to lowbrow audiences. These people do not trade crypto, nor do they care about any market narratives. They crossed over to this platform just to scrape together that tiny creator payout, as they have little footing in real life. Consequently, we saw the worst tropes from mainland domestic social media spill over: gender polarization, disinformation, and bootlicking culture. While you tweaked the algorithm to curb plagiarism, the platform still fails to incentivize high-quality content. Plenty of boundaryless content farms still rack up views, and accounts that harass others relentlessly often evade effective reporting penalties. Meanwhile, posts from creators I used to follow have vanished from my timeline. I kindly request that you strictly investigate accounts that distribute other users’ private information without consent.

🤍🖤 幼愛Yume 2026 写真集《白夜の詩》已上架淘宝！ 白絹夢・黒絹夜・素肌詩 🌏 支持海外购买，国际邮费需自付 🤍🖤 My 2026 photobook "白夜の詩" is now available on Taobao! Shiro Kinu Yume, Kuro Kinu Yoru, Suhada Shi. 🌏 International orders welcome; overseas buyers cover their own shipping.

Jensen Huang’s affair is just a trigger. What we are witnessing is a pre-planned power grab over Nvidia’s trillion-dollar computing empire, coordinated by Wall Street and Washington. Some sharp Chinese-American commentators call it America’s new Red Scare targeting elite Asian entrepreneurs. Bill Gates, Elon Musk and other white tech billionaires have faced repeated scandals over personal conduct. None were dragged into national security probes or boardroom takeovers. Only Jensen Huang, after a personal relationship misstep, faces an independent board investigation and hostile narrative from intelligence circles. The double standard could not be clearer: For white elites, personal flaws are private matters. For a Chinese-born leader controlling a strategic tech asset, any tiny blemish gets framed as a national security risk. Nvidia is the backbone of global AI computing, valued at roughly $4 trillion. Unlike Meta, where Mark Zuckerberg locks control with dual-class super-voting shares, or Microsoft and Amazon, deeply integrated with the Pentagon and intelligence agencies, Nvidia has no such protective structure. Public filings from 2026 show Jensen Huang holds only 3.58% of shares, and all directors plus executives together hold merely 3.94%. Vanguard and BlackRock own 9.32% and 7.43% respectively, holding decisive voting power. Without institutional shields or deep political backing, this critical tech giant sits exposed on the chessboard of great-power competition. The groundwork for this takeover was laid months ago. Longtime board allies of Huang, Mark Perry and Michael McCaffrey, stepped down from key committees. Insiders tied to Democratic establishment, Wall Street and U.S. intelligence quietly moved in: ✅ Suzanne Nora Johnson, former Goldman Sachs vice chair and co-chair of Brookings Institution, joined Nvidia’s audit committee in July 2026 with direct oversight of internal investigations and compliance. ✅ Kenneth Jacobs, vice chair of Brookings and incoming Vanguard chair, controls the largest institutional voting bloc and operates within the same inner circle as Johnson. ✅ Gilman Louie,founding CEO of CIA-backed venture fund In-Q-Tel and member of the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board, works alongside Johnson on the same national tech fund, overseeing intelligence acquisition of strategic tech firms. The media rollout followed a precise political timeline. Initial trial balloons appeared on Oct 29. On Nov 6, the very day Democrats secured full control of Congress, Julian Barnes of the New York Times (national security beat) and Demetri Sevastopulo of the Financial Times published coordinated reports, citing intelligence memos while breaking the story of the personal scandal. The real offense was never the affair. It was the 2025 deal Jensen struck with the Trump administration: offering a 25% revenue share to win export approval for H200 chips into China. A normal commercial negotiation, reframed by incoming Democrats as a dangerous compromise on U.S. AI sovereignty. This investigation will not crash Nvidia’s stock — Wall Street holds massive stakes here. But it will deliver three strategic wins for the U.S. establishment: 1. De-founder and de-Sinicize Nvidia: A new permanent national security compliance committee, led by Johnson’s faction, will strip Huang of authority over chip exports and overseas strategy. His dual Chairman-CEO role will be split. 2. Lock down China’s AI ceiling: Washington will seize full command of global advanced computing supply, regulating chip flows to slow China’s AI progress. 3. Retroactively target Trump: Once Democrats take over congressional oversight panels in January 2027, this case will be used to accuse the Trump White House of negligence for approving the H200 export deal. Jensen Huang spent 27 years building this computing empire, believing in rules, technical merit and business contracts. But there is a brutal truth in America’s power game: Top-tier strategic technology and wealth without political cover are nothing more than bargaining chips waiting to be carved up. White elites get generous room for error. Asian pioneers who climb to the very top get almost none. This is not a story about infidelity. It is a raw demonstration of racial hierarchy, capital control and partisan power politics in the United States.

What if a better version of you is waiting in another postcode? For Lynette, London is independence, community and a second home. But she stays connected to her roots in unexpected ways. Find your own community overseas and create a #HomeAwayFromHome#:

ChatGPT Ads now has its own ad intelligence library. Someone built a **ChatGPT Ad Library** that continuously tests ChatGPT with purchase-intent prompts and collects every Sponsored ad it sees. So far: 11,000 advertisers, 43,000 unique creatives, and 410,000 ad appearances across 970 niches. Each ad is also paired with the exact prompt that triggered it. Useful for overseas ads and SaaS teams — check competitor creatives and see which purchase intents are more likely to surface ads. 👉