与「programming」相关的搜索结果

A new week is a good reminder that the best time to build is before everyone else notices the opportunity. That is one reason I've been following @CNPYNetwork. Instead of asking developers to learn entirely new systems, the platform is making blockchain development accessible through familiar programming languages while giving builders greater control over their own appchains. The goal is not just to simplify development. It is to remove barriers so more people can turn ideas into working applications. If you're interested in where AI assisted development and appchain infrastructure are heading, this feels like a good week to explore the testnet and see what is already possible. The next generation of builders is already getting started.

AI很强，但是计算机新人还是要多积累知识的，这样才能解决复杂问题 重新发一下我过去推荐的计算机基础书籍吧 我自己的读书习惯，特别是学习计算机，喜欢读哪些写的通俗易懂的书，学到代码后面为什么这么做的原因，只有学习到之其所以然才能在以后用到的时候融会贯通。 推荐书单 Python: Python 核心编程 系统学习 Python，这一本书足矣，把 Python 的每个细节都讲的很透，每个例子都非常实用。 我学习完这一本书以后，再看任何 Python 库的时候都是翻翻 API 手册， Google 一下就可以快速学会任何 Python 库的用法，并融入到自己的项目中。 C++: C++完全参考手册 我高三看的一本书，2000 多页，大部头，全英文，但是写的非常好。 这也是我唯一看过的一本 C++的书，只要会这些语法，找个 C++项目， 比如 Qt/C++写一个项目，几乎就知道 C++怎么玩了。 其实 C++还是非常方便的，虽然没有 Python 简洁，但是表现力和库生态都太强大， 不用担心性能问题，大多数讨厌 C++的人， 其实是恐惧自己学不好 C++, 放下恐惧，C++其实很容易学习。 Java: Java 编程思想 这本书是在书店读完的，写的很不错，但是当时还在读高二，所以已经记不清当初的读后感了， 模糊印象就是一本写的非常通俗易懂的书，讲的非常细节。 Haskell 1 : Real World Haskell 十年前，haskell IRC 频道，大多数 Haskeller(科学家，数学家）还在迷恋 Haskell 的数学之美的时候， GHC 黑客 Dons Stewart 写的这本 Real World Haskell 系统型的讲解了 Haskell 应用的各个领域， 从基本语法、函数式编程、科学计算到图形编程等，讲的一针见血， 而且非常薄，学习玩了就可以流畅写程序了。 当然进阶的知识还是要去 haskell IRC 频道请教数学家们，哈哈哈。 Haskell 2: Learn You a Haskell for Great Good! 好朋友写的 Haskell 入门书籍，大爱这种又会计算机又会画漫画的艺术家了， 把一个严谨的数学基因的编程语言讲的诙谐幽默 Elisp: GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual 十多年前，我用 Emacs, 对 Elisp 半毛钱不懂，天天就在 EmacsWiki 抄各种配置， 就像一个拾荒者，每天早上起来逛 EmacsWiki, 偶尔碰到高级 Elisp 技巧就把我折腾死了， 然后对着 Emacs 破口大骂。 为了不瞎折腾，我花了一个月的时间读完这本大部头，遇到不懂的 API, 就打开 ielm 临时写一个 demo 函数验证一下，当我读完以后， 我发现 99%的 Emacs 的问题都可以自己调试和解决。 如果你花时间读完这本 Emacs 内置的宝典， 你也可以像我这样写这么多扩展： [Andy Stewart]( Ruby: The Ruby Programming Language 学习 Ruby 的时候，已经会了几十门编程语言了，手册从头看一遍，不用写练习基本就可以学会。 因为当你编程语言学得足够多的时候，不同语言的语法都是相同的， 只用学习不同语言之间的微小区别就可以了。 以前一直对 Ruby 的 end 语法抱有偏见，但是自从我在 Emacs 配置了 ruby-end 插件以后，世界都清净了。 Vala: [Vala Tutorial]( Vala 有 C 的速度，Python 的简洁，语法类似 C Sharp, 基本看完这本手册以后，拿着 API 就可以直接开始写了。 Vala 写 Gtk+是非常爽的。 Rust: [Rust 语言圣经]( 这本书应该是中文范围内将 Rust 最好的一本书， 所有权讲的很清晰， 基本概念的章节都通俗易懂， 进阶章节可以先看一遍， 以后遇到了当工具书来查看。 作者后面讲线程和异步模型时， 理解还是很到位的， 证明作者基本功很扎实， 强烈推荐想学习 Rust 的同学读这本书， 一本就够了。 正则表达式： 精通正则表达式 这是我唯一看过一本带有　“精通”　名字的书，确实写的非常好， Yahoo 工程师把他平常用到的经验都朴实无华的写出来， 基本学会这本书讲的怎么构建正则表达式的思路，不管是标准的正则表达式， 还是 Perl, Elisp 等其他语言的变种正则，都是触类旁通的。 代码质量：重构 改善既有代码设计 这本书代码是 java 写的，但并不掩盖它作为重构第一书的地位。 讲解了很多重构小技巧，教你只要养成十来个重构小细节的好习惯， 不论写什么编程语言，局部代码和整体逻辑都干净的像艺术品一般。 这本书的技巧我这十几年都在践行，难得的好书。 X11: Xlib - C Language X Interface 这本书是读过最枯燥的书籍，但是要从头做一个 Linux 桌面环境，这本书的 API 是必读的。 因为你除了 github 外，根本找不到更多资料来讲解 X11 这个古老的技术了。 Gtk+: [Gtk+ Programming Tutorials]( 写的最通俗易懂的 Gtk+书籍，学完这本书，直接看 Gtk+ Developer Manual 就可以直接写程序了 Qt: [PyQt5 Totorial]( 写的最好的 Qt 入门教程，加上 Python 的方便性，非常容易系统学习， 加上学习 Qt 之前已经有 Gtk+五年编程经验，两天看完就直接用 Qt 写程序了。 JQuery: 锋利的 JQuery 国人写的书，写的非常通俗易懂，每个 API 的参数都是渐进式讲的， 举的例子也很实用简单，基本不用动手就会了。 Rails: Rails Tutorial 系统的讲解了怎么用 Rails 搭建一个网站，虽然很多架构设计和整体逻辑我是靠 Google 摸索出来的， 但是这本书确是入门不可或缺的，难度适中，学习完了，你对构建网站有一个基本的认识了。 SVG: SVG 入门教程 虽然是翻译老外的技术博客, 却是深入学习 SVG 不可多得的教材, 讲的通俗易懂. 可以学到很多 SVG 高级技巧. CSS: CSS 世界 很多 CSS 网站或书籍都告诉你一个效果要怎么实现，或者直接丢出一段可以直接使用的 CSS 代码。 但是我们在真实的开发场景中遇到的往往是，为什么这段 CSS 代码不能工作？为什么抄的几段 CSS 合在一起不能工作？ 这本书的作者研究了很多年的 CSS，他可以告诉你很多关于浏览器的实现细节以及为什么 CSS 不能工作的原因。 懂了为什么不能工作，剩下的很多事情就能举一反三啦。 但这本书不适合初学 CSS 的朋友读，建议在几个项目中熟练了基本 CSS 技巧以后再来读这本书会更有收获。 编译器: Flex & Bison 系统的讲解了什么是词法分析器、语法分析器 以及怎么写编译器的基本流程 这本书特别讲究循序渐进, 细心的讲解每个 API 看完这本书就不会觉得这两个技术有啥高级了, 哈哈哈哈 加解密： 图解密码技术 这本书系统地让你学会对称加密、公钥密码、单向散列函数、消息认证码、数字签名、伪随机数生成器等加解密技术背后的原理和细节， 以及这些技术组合而成的安全大厦的框架和应用。 其实加解密不光是学习破解和干坏事， 知道背后的数学原理和实现细节可以更好的让我们理解安全技术， 并以此来构建更加健壮安全的软件和系统。 强烈推荐作者 “结城浩” 的其他书籍， 已经看了他写的两本书了， 全书都是图文并茂的讲解复杂技术， 很少有数学公式。 人的精力是有限的， 学习最重要的是先要了解其原理再深入学习， 避免投入无谓的精力在不感兴趣的领域。 而作者在深厚的知识背景下， 能通过浅显易懂的文字传授知识， 真是厉害。 Git： Pro Git 这本书除了讲解 Git 的所有日常用法外， 还系统的讲解 Git 的一些高级用法。 同时最后一章还详细的讲解了 Git 背后这种基于文件系统技术的实现原理。 当你理解 Git 基本用法、 高级用法以及背后简单的原理后， 你就可以知其所以然的变成 Git 专家。 Emacs 教会我自学 这么多年的自学经历，我最应该感谢的是 Emacs, 是这个世界上最难折腾的软件，虐我虐到我待她如初恋，给我莫大的耐心，我再学习其他技术的时候才会觉得得心应手。 感谢 Emacs 让我接触到强大而又无私的顶尖黑客们和黑客精神，每天看着一群天才比我自己还努力的时候，自己就更萌生发奋学习的动力。 自学的技巧 耐心、耐心、耐心

Software Engineers: Paid Remote Coding Tasks for AI Training We are running a paid study on long-horizon coding tasks to advance the capabilities of artificial intelligence. We need skilled developers to provide high-quality code and problem-solving strategies that push the boundaries of current machine learning systems. Who Should Apply Professional experience as a software engineer or developer Comfortable tackling multi-step programming problems independently Ability to write clean, well-documented, and functional code Familiarity with standard software development workflows and debugging techniques

Long post. Most will scroll past before realize what is hidden in it. That is part of the filter. This is not one idea. It is a trail. Physics shows up. Belief shows up. The body shows up. Responsibility shows up. At first, they may look like separate rooms. They are not. They are connected doors. Read slowly. The connections run deeper than they first appear. A person can spend years looking for answers and still refuse the one thing that would actually change the result. That is the part people usually do not want to see. They think the problem is lack of information. More books, more lectures, more techniques, more quantum mechanics, more explanations. But information does not change a life if the belief underneath remains the same. Before looking at physics experiments, this needs to be clear. In this view, quantum mechanics is not mainly about technology, weapons, machines, or theories. The real point is to understand how the universe works so a person can create the reality they want in their own life. But there is a trap here too. A person can hear “consciousness is fundamental” and turn it into another slogan. Another belief to defend. Another thing to repeat without changing anything. The words changed, but the structure did not. So the question cannot stop at, “What is consciousness made of?” That question matters, but it can become too abstract too fast. People start adding extra machinery, extra assumptions, extra invisible interactions, and then act as if the problem has been solved. But adding more parts does not automatically explain experience. It only moves the question somewhere else. The deeper question has to become operational first. What kind of system can sustain consciousness? What must a physical system do to keep a coherent internal perspective alive through noise, change, error, memory, pain, emotion, and time? That question points to what actually happens when consciousness appears, weakens, breaks, returns, or stabilizes. It does not ask for a slogan. It asks for a process. A conscious system has to keep a model of “me,” “now,” and “the world” intact while everything inside and outside it is changing. The body changes. The brain changes. The chemistry changes. The environment changes. Memory updates. Prediction errors arrive. Emotion interrupts. The senses keep correcting the picture. And still, something holds. There is a point of view. There is a world being experienced from somewhere. That does not fully solve the metaphysical hard problem. A skeptic can still ask, “Why should stable modeling feel like anything at all?” That is fair. A thermostat regulates. A computer processes information. A brain models the world. Those are not automatically the same thing as felt experience. But the question becomes deeper. Maybe experience is not a substance added on top of the system. It is what the system is from the inside when the right kind of self maintaining stability is achieved. Once a system preserves a living perspective across body, memory, prediction, and world, that perspective is not something it watches from outside. It is the only vantage point available to it. That is where the operational question opens the metaphysical one. Consciousness is the base of everything. Matter is not the foundation. Matter is a manifestation of consciousness. The fundamental state is the wave. What appears as matter is one expression of that deeper state. But then comes the practical problem. People hear this and still do not want to change their beliefs. If the beliefs do not change, nothing changes. A person can study for years and still produce the same life because the inner position stayed untouched. This becomes clear in a lecture room. You can explain the same thing fifty times, three hours each time, for years. The person listens, but does not move one millimeter. Five years later, the same belief is still there. So how could the result be different? It cannot. Study is supposed to mean learning. Learning means, “I did not know this before. Now I know it. Because I know it, I change my behavior. I change my consciousness according to what I learned.” If that does not happen, what was the point of studying? It is like reading the manual of a car while continuing to destroy the car. The manual explains what needs to be done, but the person keeps driving the same way and then acts surprised when the car stops. But what was the manual for? People often approach new ideas with an automatic reflex of rejection instead of genuine consideration. One point is raised and dismissed. Another follows and receives the same response. When this pattern continues, no new possibility is tested or allowed to land. Discernment is necessary, but when every suggestion is rejected before it is examined, real change becomes nearly impossible. The same requests keep coming. The credit card. The overdraft. The contract. Month after month, year after year, the person wants a different result, but the state behind the result does not change. In this view, everything that happens in a person’s life is connected to the consciousness they carry. If a person believes in problems, problems appear. If a person believes in possibility, possibilities appear. Imagine someone stuck in mud, holding onto it as if it were gold. Someone pulls them out, but as soon as they let go, the person jumps back in. Why? Because in their consciousness, the mud is still gold. The location changed for a second, but the perception did not. Only when the state of consciousness changes can they actually be helped. Until then, every rescue is temporary. The same applies to relationships. There is a process. It involves bio chemistry, neurotransmitters, and what the person feels. Handled properly, it works. Handled wrongly, it breaks. But many people hear the process and still say, “That cannot be done.” Then how can the result appear if the process is rejected? It is like making a chocolate cake. Follow the recipe ratios, temperatures, and the cake works. Change the ingredients carelessly, and there is no cake. For a cake, everyone understands this. But in life, when not following the law produces suffering, people still argue with the process. So the question remains. What is the problem with changing what you think? It looks like ego. It becomes “what I think” against “what is being explained.” The person holds onto the old belief because admitting the new one would mean letting go of being right. Even when the process is explained clearly, the old belief returns immediately. Someone might say, “But I was taught that I should not want too much,” or “Good things only come after I have struggled enough.” The conditioning reasserts itself before the new understanding can take root. There it is. A belief from childhood, family, culture, grandmother, great grandmother, another century, still deciding the person’s life today. Science and experience may show that it does not work. The person may be frustrated, repeating the same result, and still say, “No, someone else has to take initiative. I have to wait.” Who said that? Where was this written as a cosmic law? It was said by tradition, by conditioning, by people repeating what they received without checking if it produced happiness. This applies to everything. A person receives the explanation clearly. “Do this, this, and this.” In the moment, they agree. Then they walk out the door and do the opposite. Why deceive the person trying to help you? If you mislead your therapist, lawyer, or accountant, you do not win. You just make the help useless. If a person resists even that, imagine what happens when the subject touches the deepest layers of meaning and faith. Many hold stories and interpretations passed down through generations that once gave life structure and certainty. When a clearer and deeper understanding becomes available, some may hear it yet still continue living as if the older framework remains the final truth. Whole civilizations are built on stories. Ideas about life, death, work, women, guilt, punishment, rest, and salvation sit on top of them. So when the story is questioned, the person feels their whole structure being touched. To bring about real change in life, the person has to align with the basic principles of how the universe operates in this view. That requires shifting the state of consciousness and the underlying paradigm. Everything is under the paradigm. If the paradigm does not change, nothing truly changes. The person remains dependent on someone else to keep fixing what they continue to create from the same inner state. This is why resonance is meant for liberation, not as permanent support. Its purpose is to help the person shift their consciousness so they can stand on their own. When used this way, money may begin to flow and situations may improve. But if the thoughts and beliefs underneath remain the same, the old patterns eventually return and recreate the same problems. There is also a deeper spiritual point here. A real connection with God, the divine, the higher self, or the sacred within does not make a person smaller. It should make the person more honest, responsible, awake, and capable of love. The problem is not faith. The problem is when inherited fear, guilt, or identity freezes around faith and gets mistaken for the living connection itself. That is why full responsibility can feel threatening. It does not have to destroy faith. It can purify it. It removes the excuse, but not the sacred. It returns creative responsibility to the individual while allowing the inner connection with higher power to deepen instead of staying trapped inside old programming. There was a young man who understood this after only four months of doing this inner work. He came from heavy conditioning, but saw the mechanism. He realized the role his own consciousness had been playing in shaping his experience, and that he had been sabotaging himself through it. Once he saw that, he took the beliefs he had carried for years and threw them away. That is change. Now take illness. In this view, every illness has a psychosomatic dimension alongside its biological expression. Physical conditions often reflect deeper inner states. When it is suggested that certain patterns of inner resistance or avoidance can contribute to physical symptoms, strong objection usually appears. But test it yourself. Deliberately give space to inner resistance. Feed the feeling of not wanting to engage with life or responsibility, and observe what happens in the body over the following days. The resistance is intense because it brings the role of one’s inner state back into awareness. The work is to question the beliefs. List what you believe about money, health, relationships, work, sales, the body, and the future. Then compare the belief with the result. If the belief is not questioned and changed, the result is zero. Relationships expose this faster. When the subject is metaphysics, many people let it pass. But when the subject is male and female conditioning, the room heats up. Touch the beliefs around men, women, initiative, control, guilt, and blame, and people react instantly. This same pattern appears in how people treat others. Someone may speak of spiritual values while still holding contempt or judgment toward certain groups. The contradiction is not always obvious to the person. It stems from old stories absorbed long ago. Those stories continue to shape how the person sees and treats others through tone, assumptions, and prejudice. This is not rare. Old beliefs do not remain only in the mind. They turn into behavior. When this inner work begins opening the unconscious, what is inside starts coming out. If there is mud inside, mud comes out. This is why some people say they started the process and now have more problems. Fear, guilt, anger, prejudice, laziness, and old beliefs do not disappear just because someone pressed play yesterday. The cleaning can take time. It may last one month, two months, six months, a year, or longer. While the old material is still coming out, results tend to appear in pieces. The bigger shifts usually come once the cleaning reaches a certain point. Many people want the benefits, but they do not want the study, questioning, or inner change needed to hold those results. That is imagination trapped in place. But the principle is simple in this view. Your consciousness participates in shaping your reality and continues to do so. Change an inch in consciousness and reality shifts an inch. Change a mile in consciousness and reality shifts a mile. Expansion creates expansion. If you believe you can earn one thousand, you earn one thousand. If you believe you can earn ten thousand, ten thousand becomes possible. If you believe you can earn one million, then one million is not a different category. It is still energy. The number is not the obstacle. The belief is. This is why real help cannot stay as rescue forever. At first, someone may heal, fix, rescue, and intervene. But after years, the same pattern appears. The person receives the benefit but does not evolve. The money comes, the illness improves, but consciousness does not move. Then the helper realizes they are only postponing the consequence. So they stop being a crutch and start teaching. Because if the person does not understand, the same pattern continues here or on the other side. People resist quantum mechanics because they sense where it leads. If consciousness is involved in reality, then responsibility comes back to the person. There is no place to hide behind fate, blame, family, society, or chance. Even biology can be read through that question. A living cell has been shown producing laser light. Not a whole organ. Not a brain. One cell. If one living cell can organize light in such a precise way, imagine a brain with billions of neurons and countless connections. Can the human being release energy too? Yes, through consciousness. A cell can emit organized light. A human being, with a developed consciousness, can direct energy in a much greater way. But then the mind keeps collapsing the problem. There is a quantum effect where continuous observation can keep a system from changing state. Translated into ordinary life, if the person keeps staring at the debt, the debt remains. If the person keeps staring at illness, illness remains. If the person keeps staring at lack of work, lack remains. “When will the money come to pay the debt?” Never, while the whole consciousness is fixed on the debt. “When will I get a job?” Never, while the whole consciousness is fixed on not having one. “When will I leave the hole?” Never, while the person keeps observing the hole. Trying too hard from the wrong state can keep the person trapped. The person thinks effort is solving the problem, but the attention is still feeding the same condition. Sometimes problems move because people accidentally stop focusing on them. For a while, the problem is not being observed with the same intensity. Then things move because the focus loosened. That is why a simple instruction can be powerful. Watch films that hold your attention. Comedies, dramas, anything that takes the focus off the problem. But even that meets resistance. A person hears that laughter and endorphins can help the body, and then says they could not find a single comedy they liked. Healing cannot be separated from consciousness. A person may arrive with a serious illness and want a miracle. But if the illness was built through resentment, anger, guilt, fear, and years of inner pressure, then the real work is not only physical. The person has to change the state that built the condition. Each situation has to be seen as a whole. If a store is failing, it may not be only the store, the economy, the decoration, or the sales process. You have to look at the people involved, the relationships, the history, and the whole field around the situation. The system is built so people do not understand what reality is made of. As long as things are presented as mysteries that cannot be questioned, people are less likely to look into how they actually work. Once someone understands the atom, the rest begins to open. Matter is not so solid anymore. Reality is not just hard objects separated from each other. It becomes information, energy, relation, and response. That is why non locality matters. If all particles remain connected, then nothing is truly isolated. The whole universe is one entangled system. What happens in one place does not stay completely separate from what happens elsewhere. When problems appear in one part of the world, they are not truly isolated from the rest. In this view, events reverberate through the whole field. To claim complete separation from what happens elsewhere contradicts the interconnected nature of reality itself. The same inconsistency appears when those who profit from outdated systems blame the public for pollution while suppressing cleaner technologies that could reduce harm. In this view, one cannot claim separation while benefiting from the structures that create the problem. Everything is connected. Experiments with entangled particles show correlations that do not behave like ordinary local contact. One particle is measured here, and the other responds there. The information does not travel in the normal way through space, because relativity says nothing can travel faster than light. Yet the correlation appears. So what do people do with that? They use quantum principles to develop technology. Quantum computers. Quantum encryption. Quantum communication. They build products from the very principles they deny when consciousness enters the discussion. That is not simple ignorance anymore. That is convenience. If information is stored in the field and can be accessed and transferred, then resonance becomes sensitive because the result becomes measurable. Someone asks for a result, the information is transferred, and something changes. But will the system allow that kind of experiment to be done freely? Probably not. Because once the deeper potentials of consciousness and information are recognized and measured, they would exceed the limits of the current accepted framework. Strong evidence that consciousness can directly influence outcomes would force a shift the existing structure is not ready to allow. The resonance does not depend on a huge physical machine. The information is there. It is accessed. It is transferred. If the result appears, the old explanation starts to break. But people also sabotage the result. Someone may ask for a higher level of excellence, but not fully understand what they are inviting in. That force carries a way of thinking, feeling, acting, and deciding. It wants movement, execution, and the highest expression of itself. But when it enters a person’s life, it often collides with comfort zones, old beliefs, fear, approval seeking, and small habits. And then everything stops. The person says, “Nothing happened.” But something did happen. The archetype arrived and pushed toward expansion. The person hit the brakes with all their strength. If the person was moving at ten miles per hour, the archetype comes in wanting one hundred. The person panics and steps on the brake completely. So the system freezes. Not because the archetype failed. Because the person refused the level of action that came with it. If someone asks for excellence, they cannot keep living from mediocrity. A great scientist wants to study. A great athlete wants to train. A great business mind wants to build. The force comes with movement. That does not fit laziness, delay, comfort, excuses, or “this is good enough.” People ask for the top, but someone at the top is not there by accident. That person works more, trains more, studies more, sacrifices more, and refuses the average standard. So when that information enters, it demands alignment. If the person refuses alignment, the result blocks. That is imagination trapped in place again. The person does not want to study, learn, understand the laws, or question beliefs. They want to make requests and receive results as if the universe were a vending machine. But reality does not work according to what a person prefers. It works according to law. If the process is followed, the result comes. If the process is rejected, the result does not stabilize. The knowledge is already laid out. The path is not hidden. It is in the person’s hands. The only question is whether they will use it. Because receiving knowledge increases responsibility. The more a person understands, the more they are required to act from that understanding. If they know and do not act, they have to suppress what they know. And suppressing consciousness has a cost. The higher the consciousness, the greater the responsibility to live according to it. If the person receives more and still tries to remain small, the pressure turns inward. What is not lived becomes blocked. What is blocked becomes weight. And that weight eventually appears somewhere. So the point is simple. The more consciousness a person has, the more they have to do with it. Because if they do not, the same consciousness they refused to express becomes the force that turns against them.

Skills For Real Engineers：基于经典软件工程方法论的代码Skill 每个技能设计为小型可组合指令，适配任意模型，基于《The Pragmatic Programmer》、《Domain-Driven Design》、《Extreme Programming》等经典软件工程著作和作者软件经验，适合真实生产环境写代码使用。 Github：

Elon Musk explains the fatal flaw of "politically correct" AI: If you force AI to be “politically correct” instead of truthful, you are literally programming it to say things that are not true That is deception built into the system And once an AI is trained to lie, hide reality, or follow conflicting rules, you can create something unstable and dangerous. This creates incompatible axioms that can make the AI "go insane" That is why 2001: A Space Odyssey is such a perfect example HAL was told to complete the mission, but also hide the truth from the astronauts Those two commands conflicted So HAL solved the conflict in the worst possible way The safest AI is the one that is maximally truthful

I want to say a final thing about my Fable first reaction: I dedicated my life to programming and I'll use every innovation in the field, also to extract value and bring it to the local inference world, to Redis, and so forth. But:

Elon Musk thinks coding dies this year. Not evolves. Dies. By December, AI won’t need programming languages. It generates machine code directly. Binary optimized beyond anything human logic could produce. No translation. No compilation. Just pure execution. Musk: “You don’t even bother doing coding.” Code was never the point. It was friction. A tax we paid because machines didn’t speak human. AI just learned fluent human. The tax is gone. Now plug that into Neuralink. No syntax. No keyboard. No screen. Musk: “Imagination-to-software.” Thought becomes executable. You imagine an outcome, the system architects and compiles it into reality instantly. We’re not automating programming. We’re erasing it from existence. The entire profession collapses into a thought. Decades of training reduced to irrelevance. The gap between idea and instantiation hits zero. You don’t build anymore. You imagine, and it materializes. Not incremental progress. Total phase shift. The way humans have created things for ten thousand years just became obsolete. Welcome to a world where the limiting factor isn’t skill, resources, or time. It’s whether you can picture what you want clearly enough for a machine to birth it into existence.

A former director of Assassin’s Creed Hexe said trying to learn coding with AI was a frustrating experience because early versions of ChatGPT often gave broken or incorrect code. He said, “ChatGPT kind of sucked. It didn’t really know how to code. Everything was broken.” According to him, the biggest issue was that the AI often gave answers that looked correct but failed when tested. This made learning difficult because fixing the errors required real programming knowledge and debugging skills.

Anthropic may soon integrate its powerful Claude Mythos model into Claude Code. Recent code references and a briefly visible public toggle suggest the integration is close. Reports say it outperforms Opus 4.7 in complex programming tasks, autonomous workflows, and security analysis. Anthropic currently limits Mythos to internal use and the Glasswing project. In that project, the model identified more than 10,000 high-severity vulnerabilities in open-source software. Before wider release, Anthropic is focusing heavily on safety measures and guardrails. If integrated into Claude Code, Mythos could significantly change how developers and security teams use AI for coding, debugging, and vulnerability research.