与「sorry」相关的搜索结果

I think the best case is to make the "monitor" as un-agentic as possible. We don't mind being "monitored" by various random tiny insects we don't even notice, even guard dogs are fine, but we really do mind if it's a globally connected networked system. And the intermediate case, human security guards with no recording equipment, we mind only a medium amount. The best idea I've come up with so far is to make these monitoring devices out of open-source verifiable hardware that has etched on it an open-weight LLM that classifies for a limited number of activities (basically, just violence; sorry, no scanning for jaywalking or not wearing a mask or drugs or unauthorized manufacturing or illegal immigrants, really just violence) and only records and forwards if that's what it sees. The device has no storage, no ability to load new algorithms, this is all it does. Also, a hash of every recording is published onchain (and a device can't record the next one until it sees confirmation of the previous one) so we can all count how much recording is done. Finally, everyone has a legal right to take any such device they see and grab it and dissassemble and verify the hardware themselves. Explicitly fund university clubs, hacker groups, etc to regularly do this.

We are deeply sorry for the disruption this incident has caused our customers and partners. We know the trust they place in our services and take that responsibility extremely seriously. We are seeing broad recovery and stability across our services. This was a technical issue not related to cyber or AI / agents. The incident was introduced by an issue during an earlier network capacity upgrade that surfaced following a recent network change. We have addressed the underlying issue and continue to restore service to remaining customers and regions. Given the scale of demand, we restored services gradually, validating stability at each stage. While this took longer, it helped ensure a stable restoration. We will provide a full post-incident report once our review is complete.

An American porn actress says a single shoot in Madrid involved 80 men and nearly a liter of semen. She counted 122 ejaculations, followed by another 10 onto her face. The night before, she had sat across from the director asking about pay and medical testing. He answered by opening a spreadsheet. In the interview below, she describes how the production was organized, from recruiting performers to deciding when she could take a break. According to her, the studio maintained a roster of around 300 men in Madrid. Getting onto it required a referral. Test results fed into the spreadsheet so the crew could track who was cleared to participate. The men could earn more depending on the shot they delivered. She says she was given three medications before filming, including one she describes as a muscle relaxant. Nine women worked as fluffers. Their waiting room had pink furniture and candy on the table. Outside, the men lined up while her videos played on a television. The shoot followed a repeating schedule: ten ejaculations into her mouth, swallow, then another ten. After fifty, she took a break and recorded an interview before returning. One assistant held a bowl beneath her chin to catch whatever spilled. She says the role even had a name: “scooper.” Amid all that coordination, she remembers one man missing and quietly apologizing. “I’m so sorry. I’m so sorry.” For the final sequence, she requested ten men instead of the usual five. Then the director addressed the group in Spanish. One word caught her attention: “ojos.” Eyes. Afterward, she asked whether he had instructed them to aim at her eyes. He denied it. According to her, he had repeated something she mentioned over dinner - that she didn’t mind and the men interpreted it differently. She has since referred other American performers to the production. “I’ve sent them so many Americans.”

Woman: "Hey, can you lower your laptop volume? The entire café can hear your Zoom meeting." Tech Bro: "Sorry, I’m leading a product sprint. It’ll only be another hour." Woman: "There are people trying to study and read here. Why not use earbuds?" Tech Bro: "Earbuds hurt my ears. Honestly, it's a public coffee shop, deal with it." He smirked, sipped his iced latte, and unmuted his mic to address his team. Tech Bro: "Alright team, let's review the Q4 lay-off list before HR finalizes it." The woman across the table calmly closed her book, walked over, and pulled up a chair right next to him.

Judge: Ma'am, let me get this straight. You're asking this court to order your former boyfriend to pay child support? Lady: Yes, Your Honor. He should take responsibility. Judge: Responsibility for whose child? Lady: My child, Your Honor. Judge: Is he the biological father? Lady: No, but we were together when I got pregnant. Judge: I'm sorry… what? Lady: We were dating at the time. I believe he should help me raise the child. Judge: You believe? Ma'am, did he father this child? Lady: I don't know who the father is. Judge: You don't know who the father is, but you know who you want to pay? Lady: Your Honor, he was my boyfriend. He was supposed to be there for me. Judge: Being your boyfriend does not automatically make him the father of your child. Did he agree to adopt the child? Lady: No. Judge: Did he sign any legal document accepting parental responsibility? Lady: No, but I thought he would stand by me. Judge: Standing by you and being legally responsible for a child are two entirely different things. You cannot simply walk into this courtroom and nominate your ex-boyfriend as the father because you don't know who the biological father is. Lady: So you're saying he has no responsibility at all? Judge: I'm saying you need to establish a legal basis for that responsibility. A relationship is not a paternity test, ma'am! Lady: But I need financial support! Judge: And I understand that. But the court cannot turn your former boyfriend into a father simply because the actual father is unknown. Lady: This is unfair! Judge: What's unfair is expecting someone to pay for a child he did not father, without a legal basis. Court is adjourned!

Her name is Kimberly Powell. She is 48 this year and joined Nvidia in 2008. > November 8, 2026. Jensen Huang sends a letter to every Nvidia employee. > “I was unfaithful to my wife. My actions hurt her and our children. There is no excuse for what I did. I am deeply sorry.” > The affair was with Alice Huang, a Chinese businesswoman suspected by US intelligence of being a spy. > The board opens an investigation. > The FBI is involved. > Nvidia’s stock falls. > Then, three days later, the story gets worse. > November 11, 2026. The New York Times publishes a second report. > Jensen Huang had another affair. > A second woman. > A subordinate. > Someone who reports directly to him. > Her name is Kimberly Powell. > Vice president of healthcare at Nvidia. > Joined the company in 2008. > Promoted to senior director in 2016. > Vice president by the end of 2017. > Eighteen years at Nvidia. > One of Huang’s roughly sixty direct reports. > She is 48. He is 63. > Both are married. > March 2026. Nvidia’s GTC conference in San Jose. > Powell presents on AI and healthcare. > Her slides use animated images of Huang. > Then executives gather at a nearby hotel. > Huang and Powell are seen together. > Affectionate. Intimate. > A witness records it on their phone. > Huang’s security team spots the witness. > Escorts them away. > Asks them to sign a confidentiality agreement. > The video still exists. > Five former Nvidia employees confirm the relationship was discussed inside the company. > Nvidia’s code of conduct has a rule. > Personal relationships can create conflicts of interest. > The company says it promptly investigates reports of misconduct. > The CEO wrote the letter that begins the code. > He is now the subject of the investigation. > November 12, 2026. The board prepares to meet. > The Wall Street Journal reports the board could determine his future as soon as that day. > The board is preparing to oust the CEO who built the most valuable chip company on Earth. > Nvidia’s stock sinks more than 7% after hours. > Huang, Powell, and Nvidia have all declined to comment. > None of the allegations have been confirmed by any of them. > The first affair cost him his reputation. > The second affair may cost him his company. > He admitted one. He has said nothing about the other. > The board is meeting. > The investigation is expanding. > The man who kept his promise to Lori Mills is running out of promises to keep. He built the most powerful company in the history of computing. He admitted to one affair. Then a second woman’s name surfaced. The board is deciding whether he still runs the company he founded. His name is Jensen Huang. He is 63 years old. And for the first time in his life, the next move is not his to make.