与「239】宮本佳林」相关的搜索结果

【M-line Music】 【M-line Music#239】宮本佳林# Sweet Box 2026「カリーナノッテ」／保田圭・矢口真里「君に届け」／エムハロキッチン／Berryz工房 ツアー日記 MC 宮本佳林・豫風瑠乃 #mlinemusic#

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-DSpark has now completed the r0b0bench core-subset protocol on 2× NVIDIA GB10. ⚡ Quality • GSM8K: 95.0% • HumanEval pass@1: 90.9% • ARC-Easy: 96.0% • IFEval lightweight: 79.5% • BFCL multi-turn: 75.5% Performance • Dedicated C1 decode: 79.2 tok/s • Aggregate output throughput: C1 86.9 · C2 145.9 · C4 239.3 · C6 337.8 tok/s • TTFT mean: 221.9 ms • ITL mean: 68.9 ms Long context Needle retrieval passed at 25%, 50%, and 90% depth across a full 1,048,576-token context. ✅ 0 infrastructure errors ✅ Runtime gate passed ✅ 5/5 canaries passed ✅ Package-backed, reproducible result freeze ✅ Valid for publication These are measured results—not projected capabilities or marketing claims.

这个大二学生用Claude写了个量化机器人，在Polymarket上搞了81,323美金。 54天，25,511笔预测，胜率只有46%。 平均下来每天进账1,506美金，怎么做到的？逻辑其实不复杂： 1. 只做短线加密“涨/跌”市场，玩法类似高频做市 2. 不要求两边同时建仓，价格偏了就先拿一边，等另一边跌到位了再补上 3. 核心就三条：吃时间差、做部分对冲、轮动持仓 账户在这： 赚得最狠的几笔： $1,277 → $2,516，+$1,239，+97.0% $1,059 → $2,205，+$1,146，+108.2% $1,372 → $2,487，+$1,115，+81.3% 整个收益曲线就靠同一个微小优势，反复磨，磨成一个大数字。

Whales continue accumulating $ETH! A newly created wallet, 0xf31d, withdrew 8,239 $ETH($14.5M) from multiple exchanges over the past 12 hours. Whale 0x363A has accumulated 11,843 $ETH($20.8M) in the past 3 hours.

美光 $MU 拯救了全世界，微策略都要感谢美光，不然真完了！ 真的万万没想到，他们管理层还透露出来一个机器人利好，机器人的内存需求是智能自动驾驶汽车的10倍！ 利润率堪称茅台，真的是美国之光啊！ 反正逻辑就是，这不是一个普通周期，这是一个一直牛逼的超级周期。 我真的佩服美国上市公司高管们这种维护股东维护市值的能力，再看看中国A股，大股东不是减持改善生活就是大股东质押套现，没有对比，没有伤害！ 大概的核心数据👇 • 收入 415 亿美元 vs 预期 360亿美元 • 每股收益 25.11 美元 vs 预期 20.39 美元 • 净利润 337 亿美元 vs 预期 239 亿美元 • 毛利率 85% vs 预期 82% 第四季度指引 • 收入 500 亿美元 vs 预期 430 亿美元 • 每股收益 31.00 美元 vs 预期 25.07 美元 • 毛利率 85% vs 预期 84%

Ashton Forbes Claims Secret U.S. Technology Removed MH370 From the Sky...🧐🤔 More than a decade after Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 disappeared with 239 people aboard, the aircraft’s main wreckage and flight recorders have still not been located. That unresolved absence has allowed numerous alternative theories to develop, including one centered on two viral videos that appear to show a passenger aircraft surrounded by three luminous objects before suddenly disappearing. In a recent interview, information technology consultant Ashton Forbes argued that the videos may show what happened to MH370. Forbes does not believe the objects were extraterrestrial. He claims they may represent secret technology developed or operated by the United States military, possibly the U.S. Navy. The two controversial recordings are commonly described online as a satellite video and an infrared drone video. Both appear to show a large passenger aircraft flying through clouds while three small objects circle it. The sequence ends with a bright visual event, after which the aircraft and the objects are no longer visible. Forbes says he began investigating the recordings after encountering them online in 2023. He explains that he had no previous involvement with the UFO community and initially approached the material by asking what evidence would need to exist for the videos to be authentic. His argument depends on three broad areas. The first is the unresolved disappearance of MH370. The second is the alleged timing and provenance of the videos. The third is the possibility that classified military technology could account for the aircraft’s apparent disappearance. Forbes argues that a Boeing 777 should not have been able to disappear completely in 2014. He points to satellite surveillance, military radar, aircraft engine monitoring, acoustic detection systems and over the horizon radar networks as technologies that might have recorded the aircraft or its destruction. He specifically refers to Australia’s Jindalee Operational Radar Network, which can monitor activity across very large distances. From his perspective, the absence of a publicly released record showing the final moments of MH370 suggests that relevant information may have been withheld. However, MH370 did not disappear without leaving any trace. Military radar recorded the aircraft reversing direction and crossing the Malay Peninsula after communication with civilian air traffic control ended. Satellite communication data also indicated that the aircraft continued operating for several hours after it vanished from conventional air traffic tracking. Those records became the basis for the official search in the southern Indian Ocean. Physical debris was later recovered from islands and coastlines in the western Indian Ocean. A flaperon found on Réunion Island was confirmed as belonging to MH370, and additional pieces were either confirmed or assessed as almost certainly originating from the aircraft. The main fuselage, engines and flight recorders remain missing, but it is inaccurate to say that no physical evidence from the aircraft has ever been found. Forbes also points to the online history of the alleged satellite video. The original upload reportedly described the file as having been received on March 12, 2014, four days after MH370 disappeared. The video itself was published online in May 2014. Forbes argues that this narrow timeline would have made it extremely difficult for someone to create an elaborate fabrication containing accurate details about the case. The problem is that the “received March 12” statement comes from the anonymous uploader’s description. It is not an independently authenticated government timestamp. A description written by the person uploading a video cannot establish when the underlying footage was created or received. The fact that the material appeared online within several months of the disappearance is relevant to its history, but it does not prove that it was recorded by a military satellite or drone. It also does not make visual effects work impossible. The strongest public challenge to the alleged satellite video concerns its cloud background. Researchers identified cloud photographs that appear to match the background used in the video. Those photographs were reportedly taken in 2012, approximately two years before MH370 disappeared, and later appeared in an online visual asset library. The photographer provided raw image files associated with the original photographs. If the match is genuine, the implication is substantial. A real satellite recording of MH370 in 2014 could not naturally contain a cloud scene photographed in another location in 2012. That would indicate that the video was assembled using preexisting visual material. Supporters of the videos have disputed the conclusion, questioned the history of the image files and argued that the entire moving sequence has not been satisfactorily reproduced from a single static background. Nevertheless, the visual correspondence remains one of the most serious problems facing the authenticity claim. The infrared video has also been criticized because the final flash resembles an existing visual effects element used in older digital productions. Similar appearance alone does not automatically prove that an effect was copied, but it adds another unresolved issue to the footage. Forbes rejects the idea that these elements conclusively demonstrate a hoax. He believes the videos contain technical details, motion, perspective and apparent sensor information that would have been unusually difficult to fabricate so soon after the disappearance. He also argues that two different viewpoints showing the same event would require a coordinated and technically sophisticated production. Even if the videos were authentic recordings of a real aircraft, a further problem would remain. Nothing visible in them independently identifies the plane as MH370. There is no readable registration number, no authenticated telemetry and no verified chain of custody connecting the recordings to the aircraft. The association with MH370 was made online after the disappearance. Forbes’s most extraordinary claim is that the three objects and the aircraft’s disappearance may be linked to secret human technology rather than extraterrestrial intervention. He describes the objects as advanced systems associated with the U.S. military and suggests that the event could involve technology capable of manipulating space, energy or the physical position of the aircraft. No publicly available technical evidence currently demonstrates that the United States possesses a system capable of making a Boeing 777 disappear in the manner shown. No identified satellite operator, drone crew, intelligence officer or military program has authenticated the footage. No original government file, metadata record or classified document has been publicly verified as its source. The official investigation also provides a different evidentiary trail. Radar and Inmarsat data indicate that MH370 continued flying for hours after its initial diversion. Confirmed debris recovered in the Indian Ocean is consistent with the aircraft having ended in that region. These findings do not explain why the plane diverted, who controlled it during its final hours or exactly where the main wreckage lies. They do, however, create a major conflict with the interpretation that the aircraft disappeared during the event shown in the viral recordings. The continued mystery of MH370 is real. The failure to locate the main wreckage and flight recorders has left the families of those aboard without a complete explanation. There were also serious failures in communication, coordination and the early search response. Those failures deserve continued investigation. But an unresolved tragedy does not automatically validate every alternative explanation. For the viral videos to be accepted as genuine evidence, investigators would need the original files, a verifiable chain of custody, authenticated metadata, confirmation of the recording platforms, orbital or flight data matching the scene, and independent analysis showing that the imagery was not assembled from existing visual assets. Forbes presents the videos as the key to solving one of aviation’s greatest mysteries. The publicly available evidence currently supports a more cautious conclusion. The footage is historically connected to the MH370 discussion and contains enough detail to continue generating debate, but its source remains unverified and major visual evidence indicates that at least part of it may have been artificially constructed. Until the original files and their provenance can be authenticated, the videos cannot establish that MH370 was removed by UFOs, secret U.S. technology or any other unconventional system.

Wemby is the first player EVER with 500 points and 200 boards in their postseason debut! 👽 524 PTS (2nd all-time in debut) 👽 239 REB (4th all-time in debut) His 78 blocks are also the third-most in a postseason during the block-tracking era 🤯

咋一看觉得以太坊基金会好委屈好可怜，0.16% 的 Dev 为了这么大个盘子操碎了心真是太伟大了，你们怎么这么苛责 EF 呢？ 然后我查了一下 以太坊基金会（EF） 的 ETH 持仓全史， 以太坊创世区块预挖了 7200 万 ETH，其中 6000 万分配给 2014 年众筹参与者，1200 万给开发基金（即以太坊基金会），所以其实最早是占了 16.7% 的。 但当时是 POW 游戏规则啊，EF 自己又不挖矿，自然慢慢稀释了。这是上古时期，跟现在项目方动则控盘 ，其他公链拿 10-50% 不是一个框框，没法比。 但EF基金会实际上通过内部分配和运营积累，峰值持仓远高于0.16%，为什么现在这么少？还不是一直不停的卖卖卖，所以别卖惨了。 至少我没看到别的公链基金会甩卖自己的币能激起如此大的反感的。 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 根据 2022 年 3 月的链上数据，EthDev 钱包地址显示基金会总持仓约 353,318 ETH，价值约 8.27 亿美元。这大致是可考证的历史持仓高点，约占当时总供应量的 0.3% 左右。 历史上几次重要卖出 2017 年，在 Vitalik 的主导下，基金会卖出了 70,000 ETH，基本卖在了当时的高点，这笔操作让基金会的运营储备翻了一倍。 2021 年 5 月，ETH 冲上新高约 4000 美元时，基金会卖出 35,000 ETH；同年 11 月，ETH 创下近 4900 美元的历史高点后一天，基金会又进行了一次卖出。 仅 2021 年以来，基金会累计卖出了约 239,000 ETH，套现约 6.54 亿美元。 2025-2026 年加速卖出 截至 2025 年 10 月，基金会当年已进行了 17 次 ETH 卖出，剩余约 222,720 ETH。 进入 2026 年后，基金会又通过 OTC 方式向 BitMine 连续出售，仅过去一周就卖出了约 4700 万美元的 ETH。 截至最近数据，基金会 ETH 持仓约 92,548 枚，按当前价格约值 2.148 亿美元。另外，基金会还质押了约 70,000 ETH（约 1.43 亿美元），这部分不计入流动持仓。 0.16% 是现在的数字，而2024 年下半年时这一比例还是约 0.25%。 按这个速率继续下去，基金会的 ETH 储备可能在 2027 年耗尽——这也正是 Vitalik 这篇文章提到"资源有限"、要重新聚焦战略的核心背景。 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 所以，Dev Sell 卖爽了，持币比例下降，怪谁？

Crunchyroll’s Japanese subsidiary reported a net profit of ¥453 million (about $2.85 million) for the fiscal year ending December 2025. >This represents a 63.4% decline from ¥1.239 billion the previous year. >At the same time, the global Crunchyroll platform has grown to more than 21 million paid subscribers. These profit figures apply specifically to the Japanese entity