与「AItools」相关的搜索结果

Describe a need in one sentence → generate a Mac App? Ironsmith: Open-source project that uses AI to create Mac utility apps. Input your requirement, AI generates a SwiftUI app and packages it into a runnable macOS application. Supports Ollama / LM Studio local models and cloud APIs. Perfect for building personal productivity tools you can’t find on the App Store. 👉 #macOS# #AItools# #OpenSource#

AI won't replace people. People using AI will replace people who don't. 真正拉开差距的，非 AI 本身，而是每天都在用 AI 的人。 #AI# #ChatGPT# #AIAutomation# #AITools# #Productivity# #FutureOfWork# #WorkSmart# #Automation# #DigitalSkills# #PersonalGrowth# #BuildInPublic# #OnlineBusiness# #CreatorEconomy# #TechTrends# #Web3# #Cryptocurrency#

AI Practical Use #3#: Let AI help you with Excel data analysis. AI 实用玩法第 3 个： 让 AI 帮你做 Excel 数据分析。 Here is a very common office situation: You have an Excel file with sales data, costs, profit, regions, products, and dates. Normally, you may spend 2 hours writing formulas, checking data, making summaries, and building charts. But with AI, you can finish the first draft in about 10 minutes. 一个很常见的办公场景： 你手里有一份 Excel 数据， 里面有销售额、成本、利润、区域、产品、日期。 以前你可能要花 2 小时： 写公式、查数据、做汇总、看趋势、做图表。 现在可以先交给 AI， 10 分钟生成初步分析结果。 You don’t need to manually type every complex formula. Let AI help you: Build formulas Summarize key findings Find abnormal data Compare trends Suggest chart formats Create a report structure 你不需要自己一个个输入复杂函数。 可以让 AI 帮你： 生成公式 总结关键结论 找出异常数据 对比趋势变化 建议图表形式 生成汇报框架 Here is a simple prompt: 这里有一个简单提示词： Please analyze this Excel data. Help me build the right formulas, summarize the key findings, find possible errors or abnormal values, and suggest the best chart or report format. I will review and verify the final results. 中文版本： 请分析这份 Excel 数据。 帮我生成合适的公式，总结关键结论，找出可能的错误或异常值，并建议最适合的图表或汇报格式。 最终结果由我来审核确认。 The key idea is simple: AI does the heavy first draft. You review the logic and final result. 核心思路很简单： AI 负责先把复杂工作做出来， 你负责审核逻辑和最终结果。 Before: 2 hours manually writing formulas. After: 10 minutes with AI assistance. 以前： 手动写公式、做分析，可能要 2 小时。 现在： 借助 AI，10 分钟先完成初稿。 AI is not here to replace your judgment. It helps you save time on repetitive work, so you can focus on checking, thinking, and making better decisions. AI 不是替代你的判断力。 它是帮你节省重复劳动的时间， 让你把精力放在审核、思考和决策上。 Let AI write the formulas. You review the results. 让 AI 写公式， 你负责审核结果。 That is a smarter way to work. 这才是更聪明的办公方式。 #ChatGPT# #AI# #AITools# #Excel# #ExcelTips# #DataAnalysis# #Productivity# #WorkSmarter# #OfficeWork# #BusinessTools# #Automation# #DigitalTools# #TechTips# #FutureOfWork# #PromptEngineering#

一、发现竞品的途径 1. G2 软件类产品的对比榜单、用户评分和功能拆解。 2. Product hunt 每日新产品发布，尤其适合发现初创和创新型竞品。 3. Capterra 聚焦企业软件，适合 B2B 竞品调研。 4. Betalist 展示和推广全球早期初创产品的平台，让创业者获得第一批用户和反馈。 5. Techcrunch 专注科技与创业领域的全球知名媒体，报道新创公司、投融资与趋势。 6. AITools 收录和推荐各种 AI 工具的网站，帮助用户发现合适的 AI 应用。 7. AI library 一个集合 AI 资源和工具的库，方便快速检索和学习。 8. SaaS AI Tools 专注 SaaS 场景下的 AI 工具目录，方便企业用户筛选使用。 9. aitools directory 系统化整理 AI 工具的网站，按功能和行业分类。 10. Crunchbase 全球最大的新创公司数据库，提供公司、投融资、创始团队等信息。 11. The SaaS Report 关注 SaaS 行业新闻、分析和榜单的媒体，现已更名为 The Software Report。 12. AIDB 和朋友维护着的一个 AI 产品流量榜 13. Reddit 相关主题社区如 r/Productivity、r/SaaS，有真实用户反馈。 14. LinkedIn 行业动态、专业人士的观点。 15. Mobbin 有各种设计不错的产品的界面分享 16. 订阅竞品的 release notes / blog / newsletter 邮件订阅竞品的 Newsletter 17. App Store、Google Play 输入关键词（如"AI presentation tool"、"团队协作工具"），找到同类产品。 18. Google/ChatGPT 搜索引擎搜索比如 “2025 AI tools ”。 二、分析竞品的途径 1. Gartner、Forrester 报告：偏大型企业软件趋势。 2. SimilarWeb（ 3. App Annie / 4. Crunchbase（ 5. BuiltWith（ 6. Google Trends ( 7. Latka（ 网站通过收集和整理全球SaaS（软件即服务）公司的详细数据，包括收入、增长率、团队规模、盈利情况等，帮助用户快速发现、分析和比较各类SaaS企业。平台的核心特色是基于创始人亲自访谈获得的一手信息，支持按行业、地区、收入等多维度筛选，适合产品经理、投资人、创业者等深入研究SaaS市场和趋势。 8. 国内一些咨询报告机构（艾瑞、腾讯研究院、阿里研究院、CBNData、易观分析、每日报告、知乎…）

10 Best AI Coding Tools 🧑‍💻 1. Cursor 🔗： 2. V0 🔗： 3. Marscode 🔗： 4. Tabnine 🔗： 5. Trae 🔗： 6. Cody 🔗： 7. Bolt 🔗： 8. Copilot 🔗： 9. Zencoder 🔗： 10. Replit 🔗： #AItools# #十佳AI代码编辑器#

The World is Changing: AI For Creativity By Jeffrey Katzenberg A few months ago, I sat in my office in Silicon Valley and watched as a tech founder showed me something extraordinary. On the screen was a fully realized, beautifully lit, well-composed animated scene. It was stunning and it made me feel exactly what I felt in 1986 watching Luxo Jr. That was the first time I watched a computer-animated 3D character take a breath and seem, against all reason, to have life. It left me in awe. Later that day, I received a text from an artist I've known for thirty years, 350 miles to the south, in the city where I spent most of my career. After seeing a similar video, she texted: "Is this the end of us?" My answer was, "Certainly not.” I have spent the better part of the last decade in Silicon Valley, but the heart of my career has been in Hollywood. Being deeply connected to both worlds means I have deep loyalties to each and a responsibility to speak honestly to both. In 2023, I said that these new AI tools would cut the time and cost of producing world-class animation by as much as ninety percent within three years. Some colleagues were alarmed, many were furious. There is growing fear and resistance surrounding AI within the creative community. I deeply understand it, because I've spent countless hours walking through animation studios watching gifted artists bent over their desks, rebuilding a single second of film for the tenth time because the ninth version wasn't quite right. I've sat in screening rooms where four years of people's labor played out in minutes, and I knew the name of every person that had spent countless hours bringing those images to life. The creative process is a calling, there's really no other way to describe it. From the outside some see resistance. From the inside, it is love. People do not fight this hard for things they don't care about. The pushback coming out of Hollywood represents the collective effort of people who are deeply passionate about their craft. Is History Repeating Itself? The history here is more complicated than either side may realize. In 1906, the most famous composer in America, John Philip Sousa, published an essay titled “The Menace of Mechanical Music." He warned that the phonograph would become "a substitute for human skill, intelligence and soul." Sousa's fight was not really about the machine, it was about money. The machines were playing his compositions, and the men who built them weren't paying him a cent. His campaign helped create the Copyright Act of 1909. He did not stop the technology. He changed the terms under which it could use his work. A hundred years ago, sound came to the movies. We remember it now as a miracle, and it was. What we forget is who paid for it. Before sound, tens of thousands of musicians made their living in the orchestra pits of movie houses, scoring every film live, every night, in towns all over the world. When the soundtrack arrived, the work of one composer and one orchestra was recorded for a film that went into thousands of theaters. The union fought back with everything it had, taking out newspaper ads across the country warning against the menace of "canned music," one of them showing a mechanical man tearing the strings out of a harp while an angel wept. They were not fools, and they were not Luddites. They were right. Those pit jobs did not come back. And yet (this is the part we have to be brave enough to admit), sound gave us the movie musical, the modern score, sfx, sound design, audio engineering, and an art form vastly larger than the one it disrupted. And it helped keep Hollywood in the forefront of world entertainment for the rest of the century and into the next. The loss was real. And yet the art form expanded. This is a story that has been told over and over again. To resist technology is to risk irrelevance. Just look at Kodak or Blockbuster. To embrace technology is to open doors of new possibility. Just consider Apple and Netflix. What I Learned From Walt Disney In the mid-1980s, I was tapped to lead Disney's animation division at a moment when the studio was at an inflection point. Animation wasn't just another business unit. It was the soul of the company, a medium revered because of Walt's genius and his passion. But the production system was cumbersome and unforgiving. A single movie was 125,000 individual hand-drawn and painted cels, photographed one frame at a time. Every revision carried a cost measured in months. These degrees of difficulty shaped the kinds of stories we could tell. We found our way forward in an unexpected place: Walt himself. The Disney archives held astonishing recordings of Walt explaining his creative process. His own writings. His notes and storyboards. Work product captured at every stage of his process. This was truly a gift. Listening, reading, sitting with the work itself, we heard him talk about character, about emotion, about how an audience feels when a character truly comes alive. He talked about making bold choices and refining a scene until it genuinely moved people. We didn't hear a word about pencils or paintbrushes. In fact, Walt was famous for being a technologist, forever hunting for state-of-the-art tools, often inventing them himself to achieve the images he saw in his head. But he never defined animation by the tools. He defined it by whether the audience believed the character. His principles were timeless. The tools were not. That realization changed everything. We co-developed the Computer Animation Production System (CAPS) with a young Northern California company called Pixar, replacing hand-painted cels with CGI. In The Little Mermaid, the final scene shimmered with a dimensionality and light that the old process simply couldn't achieve. In Beauty and the Beast, the ballroom sequence moved with a cinematic sweep that placed the audience inside the emotion of the moment. In Aladdin, the Cave of Wonders felt vast and alive, and the Magic Carpet became an intricate, compelling character all its own. In The Lion King, the stampede carried a scale and intensity that raised the emotional stakes beyond anything we'd done before. Technology didn't diminish the craft, it expanded the canvas. It gave artists more room to create. A decade later, the canvas expanded again. When Disney released Pixar's Toy Story, it wasn't simply a technical milestone. It was proof that a fully computer-animated film could carry real emotional weight, that it could make audiences laugh, cry, and believe. At DreamWorks, we made the difficult decision to sunset hand-drawn animation and become a fully computer-animated studio. It was the right thing to do, but it was not without pain. It cost talented people their place in an industry where they had worked their whole lives. Some made the leap to the new tools and did the finest work of their careers. Some never did. Tools are never the point. The instruments change with every generation. What endures is taste and imagination. The magical ability to make an audience feel. One of the greatest storytellers of our generation, George Lucas, succinctly captured the eternal essence of this issue: “It’s not the how, it’s the why.” A Distinction With a Difference I asked one of the leading AI models a question that has been challenging me for months. What is the difference between reasoning and creating? Its answer changed how I think about almost everything happening in this industry. It said . . . Reasoning and creating are two distinct cognitive modes, though they also work together. Reasoning is fundamentally evaluative and analytical. It operates on what already exists: facts, premises, evidence. It moves toward a conclusion that was in a sense already implied by the input. Reasoning is constrained by logic and truth. Its goal is to arrive somewhere correct, not to invent somewhere new. Creating is fundamentally generative. It produces something that didn't exist before. And crucially, there's no single right answer waiting to be found. A blank page has infinite valid responses. Creation involves choices that can't be fully justified by logic alone. Taste, intuition and vision fill the gap where deduction runs out. Reasoning is what Silicon Valley has been perfecting. Creating is what Hollywood has been practicing for more than a century. AI today operates almost entirely on the reasoning side of the line. It can deduce, evaluate, optimize, and pattern-match brilliantly. And while it can create, there is a real distinction to being creative. What it doesn’t yet have is those things that make us human: empathy, devotion, serendipity, the kind of creativity that comes from a person trying to say something only they could say. When the bot generates a piece of art, it is not trying to communicate anything. It is statistics, not soul; it is emulating things that have been done. By contrast, human creativity isn’t about repeating patterns of zeros and ones; it is about doing something new. One day, AI may close this gap. Three years ago, the leaders building AI would have called what they are achieving today, improbable, if not impossible. Impossible is no longer improbable. Today, the line between reasoning and creating is real. Even the leading technologists acknowledge we are not there yet. There is no scientific path to crossing this divide that anyone in the field can articulate today. Understanding that gap is where we will find common ground. A Path Forward In 2016, I closed one chapter in Hollywood with the sale of DreamWorks and opened another in Northern California, co-founding WndrCo. We’ve backed more than 50 founders building the next generation of technology and watched how breakthroughs in Silicon Valley emerge, first as experiments, then as platforms, and finally as infrastructure that reshapes entire industries. It's worth remembering that the last great revolution in animation also came from the north. Pixar was a Northern California company, forged not in the conventions of the Hollywood studio system, but in the technological breakthroughs of Silicon Valley. I've spent years on both sides of this bridge. For sure, I don’t have all the answers (take Quibi, for one!). But, from my past and present vantage points of my long career, here is what I see . . . Brilliant people in Northern California building this technology have made something extraordinary. They have earned the right for the rest of us to be, if not believers, at least optimistic that what comes next will be remarkable. But they have not made an artist. The tools are powerful, but they are not what makes a story matter. That knowledge lives 350 miles to the south, inside people whose life's work has informed the very models you are building. The right path forward includes them by design, with credit, with consent, and with compensation. Build this with the storytellers. Not on top of them. Taste is not something that can be synthesized, it is uniquely human. At the same time, Hollywood needs to accept that AI is not going away. The energy they are spending trying to make it disappear is energy they are not spending deciding the terms on which it will exist. And the terms are everything. The north needs something from it that they cannot build and cannot buy: creativity. The kind that takes a blank page and conjures a single right answer where there was none and has held audiences for a century. Without it, the most powerful reasoning engine ever invented will still be missing the only thing that makes a story worth telling. The artists who learn to wield these new instruments will do things the engineers never dreamed of. They always have. Edison invented the motion picture but made terrible movies. It took Chaplin, Lloyd, Keaton and so many others to make movies emotional. Now, the canvas is about to expand yet again. We should decide now that we intend to paint on it. There are so many valuable lessons in history. This has happened many times before, and it was never settled by the technology. It was settled by the terms. Sousa did not stop the phonograph; he helped write the law that made sure composers got paid. And two years ago, when the writers and the actors walked out, they were fighting for the very things Sousa was fighting for in 1906. Consent, compensation, the basic recognition that human creative work has a price that must be paid. The terms of that fight are still being negotiated, but the principle is older than any of us. The tools-versus-no-tools argument is a trap. First, we must all agree that there should be terms. Then we can have the crucial debate about what fairness requires. What I Learned From Steve Jobs Years ago, Steve Jobs said, "It's in Apple's DNA that technology alone is not enough. It's technology married with the liberal arts, married with the humanities, that yields us the result that makes our hearts sing." He was describing a device. But he could just as easily have been describing this tale of two cities. What I See Coming Soon As the barriers and the costs come down, more films will get made, not fewer. Studios will get to take more risks. There will be more seats at the table, and very soon entirely new forms of storytelling. In the 1980s, animation was dismissed as a niche corner of the business. Today it is one of the most beloved and profitable forms of storytelling in the world. In live action, filmmakers like Steven Spielberg, James Cameron and Peter Jackson embraced new visual tools not as shortcuts, but as instruments, and expanded cinema in the process. Every time storytelling has met a genuine technological shift, from synchronized sound to color to computer animation, it has redefined the boundaries of the medium and grown larger in the process. Assuredly, I don’t have all the answers, but I am confident that the creative opportunities will expand yet again. How we come through this is a choice. The north has the new tools. The south has the creative soul. The best future will draw on the best of both worlds.

I updated my 2023 roadmap diagram to overlay where the items that were there sit in the current Strawmap ( ). In general, a lot of overlap, but: * Some things got reshuffled in order (eg. quantum safety up-prioritized) * Some things deprioritized (eg. VDFs; many EVM improvements) * Some things replaced with superior constructions (eg. Verkle -> unified BT -> PBT; state expiry -> new state types) What's most striking, however, is that some completely new things are in the strawmap that are NOT in this diagram, because they were not in the 2023 roadmap at all. These reflect changing priorities. Notably: * First-class attention to strong privacy. This covers: keyed nonces and recent roots, aspects of FOCIL, lean privacy pool & wormholes * Aggressive scaling in the context of post-quantum. This covers: leanSPHINCS signatures and aggregation, zkzk frames (see ) * Lean-ification of the spec, to assist in formal verification (full FV of everything is only possible because of modern AI) * Blob and gas futures (this idea just didn't exist back in 2023) * Native rollups (SNARKs were nowhere near mature enough to even consider this back in 2023) * A more open design space for the "future of the EVM". zkzk frames already implies that the protocol will expose to users some ISA that's not the EVM - current leading candidates are leanISA and RISC-V. These ISAs are more simple, modern and efficient than the EVM. Once they're there, why not expose them to developers everywhere? (And then, why not turn the EVM into being an IR on top of that ISA, instead of an enshrined feature massively complicating the base protocol?) Though much of the deeper exploration here is too early even for the strawmap. * New state types are not just a replacement for expiry, they're a fundamentally different paradigm to how Ethereum does scaling A common theme in scaling, found in both state types and zkzk frames (both new ideas), is that instead of trying to maximally scale ALL ethereum activity, we try to create specialized mechanisms that have more restrictive properties that make them more scaling-friendly, while supporting the heaviest loads incurred by users and applications today (eg. token transfers, swaps) and tomorrow (eg. privacy protocols). The other common theme is treating STARKs and AI-accelerated FV as first-class objects, that we are okay betting the technical future of Ethereum on. There are recursive STARKs in many layers of the protocol, one particular primitive (the "aggregate to union verified dependencies" primitive) is expected to be used in *three* places in the protocol: EL, CL and DL. This can only be safe with formal verification, which is itself only feasible with modern AI tools. In general, many steps forward in maturity. And a huge amount of hard work by many dozens of Ethereum researchers and developers on all of these features. Ethereum will be quantum-safe. Ethereum will put users' privacy first. Ethereum will be secure. Ethereum will be censorship-resistant. Ethereum will be highly performant and scalable while satisfying the above. And Ethereum will be Lean.

The new Huberman Lab episode is out: Using AI to Increase Your Intelligence & Enrich Humanity | Dr. Fei-Fei Li (@drfeifei) 0:00 Fei-Fei Li 3:46 Vision & Intelligence; Human Vision & Contribution to AI 12:11 Computer Vision & the AI Revolution 18:34 Sponsors: Lingo & Wealthfront 21:19 Speech, Sound & AI Development 23:36 AI & Contextual Learning, Human Intelligence 33:43 Current AI Gaps, Emotion & Creativity 45:48 Computers Enhancing Humanity; Tool: Personal Agency & Learning about AI 53:04 Sponsors: AG1 & LMNT 55:37 Public Discourse about AI 57:34 AI to Enhance Scientific Discovery & Healthcare; Human Collaboration 1:07:38 Intuition, Motivation & Human States Beyond AI 1:19:18 Sponsor: David 1:20:37 Social & Ethical Considerations for AI 1:27:38 Kids, Development & AI Tools; Tool: Prompt AI Effectively 1:35:04 Next Frontier for Robotics & AI; Human Agency 1:43:52 Human-Centered AI Future 1:50:10 World Labs, Spatial Intelligence 1:54:12 Concerns about AI & Creativity; Movies, Art, Storytelling 1:59:51 Younger Generation & AI, Teachers 2:05:38 Zero-Cost Support, YouTube, Spotify & Apple Follow, Reviews & Feedback, Sponsors, Protocols Book, Social Media, Neural Network Newsletter Includes paid partnerships.

🔥 还在为AI工具贵到心疼？ 3w3帮你实时挖掘最新AI优惠折扣，省钱又高效，工具党必收藏！ Tired of overpaying for AI tools? 3w3 finds the latest discounts for you — save money and work smarter.

🚀 Calling all innovators in Pakistan! We're thrilled to launch Pakistan's First and Largest Alibaba Cloud AI Hackathon—a unique opportunity for students, developers, entrepreneurs, and AI enthusiasts to turn bold ideas into real-world solutions powered by cutting-edge cloud and AI technologies. 📅 Registration closes: 7 August 2026 🔗 Secure your spot now: • Build with Alibaba Cloud’s advanced AI tools • Win cash prizes & exclusive Alibaba Cloud credits • Get direct mentorship from our tech experts • Showcase your talent on a national stage At Alibaba Cloud, we believe the future is built by local talent. Let's build it together. 💻✨ #AlibabaCloud# #AIHackathon# #CloudInnovation# #DigitalPakistan# #HackWithAlibabaCloud#