与「Accountability」相关的搜索结果

Industrial infrastructure was never designed for machine-speed accountability Most operational systems were built for internal coordination, not for continuous verification across global supply chains, compliance environments, and multi-party ecosystems. That creates friction everywhere. A maintenance record may exist in one system. An inspection report may exist in another. Lifecycle history may be incomplete. Verification may depend entirely on manual review. As industries become more interconnected, these gaps become harder to manage. Because operational certainty becomes difficult to scale. The future industrial economy will increasingly depend on infrastructure capable of answering simple but critical questions: Did the operation actually happen? Was the procedure followed correctly? Can the evidence be independently verified? Can operational history remain trustworthy over time? These are infrastructure problems. At ACTUM, we believe industrial systems need a stronger verification layer built around real-world operational accountability. Proof of Human Action (POHA) is designed to help bridge physical industrial activity with auditable digital evidence. Because the next era of industrial infrastructure will depend not only on automation.

Canadian soy beta male content creator Mtashed continues to crash out as he unprivates his YouTube video library after privating everything. Then he makes another ill-advised rant video with a legendary scale, fem-coded emotional freak out, lacking in any real receipts that back his side. His comments section is hilarious, with everyone mocking him, and supportive comments are few and far between. This video blames everyone else except himself, including Tectone, Hexjuice, and Asmongold. Just more smarmy framing acting like "everyone" is a hypocrite, while skirting accountability and framing himself as a victim, like a toxic woman. And the massive cope, acting like he is financially set for life, and he could just walk away... yet he doesn't. Massive midlife crisis in real time. No way this isn't bleeding into his private life; his ego won't let it go. I wonder what his wife and kids think of this... His supporters are barely there, doing the bare minimum effort to hit "like" on the video, while ghosting the comments section, being too cowardly to enter the arena.

The way to save Ethereum: The community needs to create an organization that's economically aligned with Ethereum and accountable to it. The EF now holds less than 0.1% of all ETH. There is no flow of Ethereum staking or fee revenues to it. If we want to get Ethereum back to winning: - create an organisation with credible funding, minimum $1b as a start. That's very reasonable for an ecosystem with $250b market cap - find a leader who is competent and wants to fight - make it accountable: a board of people who want ETH to go up, and a charter that holds the org accountable to it - fund it permanently: A significant amount of staking revenue needs to go to it. A governance mechanism that can adjust it (also part of accountability). Very hard to imagine now, but I think this is the only way (and it will probably happen, but it might take a long time before it is consensus).

An 18-year-old kid gets stabbed in the street. He’s running for his life, begging for help, and instead of saving him, the police handcuff him while he bleeds out because the attacker claimed “racism.” They let him choke on his own blood. No urgency. No humanity. Just cold, ideological policing. Months later? Still no names. Still no suspensions. Still no accountability. Meanwhile, the same UK police have arrested over 12,000 people for social media posts. They move at lightning speed to jail citizens for tweets and online comments, yet they can’t even name or discipline the officers who allegedly let a stabbing victim die in handcuffs on the street. This is the definition of two-tier policing: aggressive against ordinary people speaking online, but protective when it comes to their own failures and protecting the narrative. The British people deserve real justice, not another cover-up. Justice for Henry Nowak.

🐸 To @OpenAI's and @AnthropicAI's leadership teams, boards included, I say this personally and with deep gratitude: your remarkable lack of philosophical seriousness has led OpenAI to stand up a $4 BILLION "deployment company" and Anthropic helped stand up a $1.5 BILLION enterprise services venture for poorly documented synthetic systems you continue to market as so-called "AI". But your strategies now show: @ChatGPTapp and @claudeai are not "AI". You've made a market category error. You're now marketing so-called “AI” while building $5.5B in deployment layers around the HUMAN expertise required to make your "AI" accountable to reality. What is synthetic "intelligence" without accountability? 🤔 These ventures validate the HUMAN as necessary for synthetic output to become accountable system-level action. Thus, your new ventures do not compete with advisory firms but with the "AI" sales pitch itself. 🤡 The market can now see orgs should expect to pay intelligent HUMANS to make synthetic outputs accountable. Though that was already true. To meet you in the middle: most "consultants" are economically unjustifiable LARPers. Most "consultancies" are behind the times in ways which will look absurd in retrospect. Hard agree. But the so-called "AI" thing is getting very silly now, isn't it? I'll rephrase: you're telling the public your products are "intelligent" while setting the practical standard that enterprise customers should still pay HUMANS to implement and operate YOUR MACHINES. I appreciate the indirect shoutout, but...that's just a machine. Not "AI". And this is just a first-order inference, on yours truly—pro bono. History has caught up with you, it seems. Listen: in mature industries, labeling actually matters. Intended use actually matters. Post-market stewardship actually matters. Claims about what a product does actually matter. And in MedTech, we figure out pretty quick who are the leaders and who just has an expired badge. The leaders I choose to serve in regulated industries don't get to hand-wave their burdens away with two letters. They have skin in the game. They have GxP regs to follow, and labeling and filing ecosystems to manage. Their products must succeed on technical and ethical merit. And yet, I see them demonstrate, weekly, good faith accountability. As for OpenAI's and Anthropic's leadership, you are not operating at the standard my clients already meet. So, because your customers deserve better, and because serious investors and consultants—myself among them—will earn serious money to close the accountability gap your strategies just made visible, I had to write this down. But I am not the only serious person who will make this inference. I am just the first to confess it. OpenAI receipt: $4B deployment company Anthropic receipt: $1.5B services venture This is only the beginning. It is not "AI." 🐸

Today, we took long-overdue action to restore science, accountability, and the rule of law. In September 2023, the Biden FDA pushed a number of peptides into Category 2 — “Bulk Drug Substances that Raise Significant Safety Risks” — driving a dangerous black market that puts Americans at risk. Now, after nominators withdrew 12 peptides, the FDA will remove them from Category 2 and will bring them to PCAC at its next two meetings, beginning in July—where independent experts will rigorously evaluate each substance on its scientific merits using full clinical, pharmacological, and safety evidence. • BPC-157 • Thymosin beta-4 fragment (LKKTETQ) • Epitalon • GHK-Cu (injectable) • MOTS-c • DSIP (Emideltide) • Dihexa Acetate • Ibutamoren Mesylate • Melanotan II • KPV • Semax (heptapeptide) • Cathelicidin LL-37 This action begins to restore regulated access and will immediately begin shifting demand away from the black market. We will follow the science, enforce the law, and deliver the clarity patients, providers, and pharmacies deserve.

Fox News x Kalshi The largest news network in America integrates Kalshi. Prediction markets add accountability by rewarding accuracy. That’s why the three leading networks have chosen Kalshi. No spin. No partisan lens. Just incentives to be right.

华尔街日报今天这篇文章不错。人工智能领域的高管如何向子女描述未来的职业前景。 一句话总结：AI领袖们普遍不建议孩子过度追求当下的技术技能，而是强调适应性、批判性思维、文科教育（通才能力）以及人类独有的情感与责任感。 观点一：当下的具体技术技能（Technical Skills）保质期极短（甚至不到两年），未来的核心竞争力在于应对变化的敏捷性（Agility）。 Caroline Hanke (SAP) 指出，与其纠结于现在的编程技术，不如培养批判性思维、适应性和伦理判断力。 教育的重点应从“掌握工具”转向“适应新工具”和“判断工具的使用”。 观点二：在AI时代，传统的文科教育（Liberal Arts）比以往任何时候都重要，因为通过自然语言与AI交互需要深厚的元认知能力。 Jaime Teevan (Microsoft) 强调，以前操作电脑是决定性的（按按钮->出结果），现在是基于自然语言的意图表达。这要求使用者具备批判性思维、提供语境和挑战AI结果的能力（即元认知）。 Ethan Mollick (Wharton) 认为通才（Generalist）将是赢家。AI可以填补技能短板，因此拥有广泛技能组合的人（如既懂医学又懂人际沟通）更有优势。 与其成为单一领域的专才，不如成为能够整合多种知识并在AI辅助下工作的“超级通才”。 观点三：AI无法承担责任，也无法替代真正的人际连接。 Daniela Amodei (Anthropic) 认为，随着AI接管工作，人类品质（同理心、善良、沟通能力）的溢价会越来越高。人类本质上渴望与其他人类共处。 Jaime Teevan 指出，AI可以给出建议，但不能承担责任（Accountability）。像法律、会计这种需要对决策后果负责的职业，依然需要人类来做最终判断（Passing Judgment）。 未来的工作重心将从“执行任务”转移到“承担后果”和“提供情感价值”。 观点四：避开纯数字化的内卷，转向原子世界（能源、医疗）和社会服务领域。 Manny Medina ( 看好能源（特别是核能）和医疗保健。无论是为了驱动AI本身（能源需求），还是解决人类疾病（癌症治疗），这些都是硬需求。 鉴于AI发展的不平衡，致力于解决社会不平等（帮助被AI抛下的人群）和环境问题（海洋污染）也将是有意义且有前景的职业路径。 最后：孩子拥有一张“白纸”，他们不需要像成年人那样去“重塑”旧观念，这是一种优势。家长们的焦虑往往源于自身的旧经验与新世界的冲突，而孩子们是AI原住民。 不要把上一代的恐惧投射给孩子，鼓励他们去玩、去实验，而不是仅仅作为使用者。 AI高管们给子女的建议揭示了一个反直觉的趋势：在一个高度技术化的未来，最不值钱的可能是纯粹的技术执行力，而最值钱的是最“复古”的人类特质——对他人的共情、对复杂概念的哲学思考（文科）、对物理世界的改造（能源/医疗）以及对决策后果的承担（责任）。教育策略应从“学习如何像机器一样高效工作”转变为“学习如何做在大机器时代中独一无二的人”。

Flexibility is what allows you to accept what reality (or knowledgeable people) teaches you; self-accountability is essential because if you really believe that failing to achieve a goal is your personal failure, you will see your failing to achieve it as indicative that you haven't been creative or flexible or determined enough to do what it takes. And you will be that much more motivated to find the way. #principleoftheday#