与「Accountability」相关的搜索结果

Senate Republicans want to lose the Senate. They want to just sit around making deals with Democrats and avoiding any accountability for what happens. They want an environment where they can cast fake votes that allow them to look like they’re doing the right thing while getting what they want from Democrats—amnesty, ICE defunding, Trump impeachment. A minority Senate where they can “vote right” but let Democrats get whatever they want is a dream scenario for McConnell and Thune. Don’t let them let get away with it. Vote like your continued existence depends on victory. Because it does. The black pillers will tell you to stay home because nothing matters. But black pilling is gay. And giving puke RINOs what they want is also gay. Don’t give Senate Republicans what they want, which is a Congress entirely run by Democrats. Put them back in charge and then make them miserable by forcing them to show up to work every day to secure the border and reform elections. If you want to make Senate Republicans like McConnell and Thune miserable and angry, vote to keep them in the majority. It is the ultimate revenge for their nonsense.

Cognitive reward shapes in sports and career Sports are amazing environments to learn. When you play a sport for thousands of hours, you start to see the world through that sport. It is a simple fact—your biological neural network is being conditioned to respond to the behavior incentivized by the rules of the sport. The funny thing is that most people choose their sports for accidental reasons such as parents, geography, or school programs. People rarely think about how the particular sport you play influences how your brain thinks more generally. Going a step further, playing the right sport may even benefit your career. My two favorite sports are tennis and soccer. Tennis is one of the best sports for teaching consistency. In tennis, there are hundreds of points in a match, and each point is worth exactly one unit, regardless of whether your opponent made an unforced error or if you constructed the most beautiful point ending with a winner. Tennis is low-variance optimization—you win by reducing unforced errors, playing percentages, and grinding out small advantages. Tennis is also an individual sport, which teaches you to rely on yourself consistently. Tennis has a similar cognitive reward shape to professions like being a surgeon or a pilot. Surgery and aviation require consistency, self-accountability, and deep focus. And similar to how you can only win one point at a time in tennis no matter how spectacular it was, there is no extra credit for the best appendectomy or the smoothest SFO-JFK flight. Your craft is to provide consistency with very low tolerance for error. On the other hand, the tennis mindset transfers relatively little to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship is a high-variance, team game where failure is tolerated and occasional creativity gets rewarded exponentially. Minimizing unforced errors in tennis is a totally different mindset from deciding whether to make a moonshot business move that will likely fail but could potentially net a billion dollars. Obviously I am not saying that tennis players cannot be great entrepreneurs, but I do think it is a totally different cognitive reward shape. Being a forward in soccer has a much closer reward shape for entrepreneurship. What a forward in soccer learns is to create many small chances. It is a fact that most of the game, you are not scoring—even if you look at all the times that Mbappe got on the ball in one of his best games, most of those led to nothing! But all that matters is creating enough chances to score once (or a few times) and win the game. If you break down a 90-minute game for a forward, almost all the time is failure or noise, a few minutes will be leverage, and a few seconds will determine the fate of the game. I have not played soccer for thousands of hours, but I can imagine that being a lifetime forward in soccer would teach you to be comfortable with failure and asymmetric returns. In summary, I am claiming that there can be substantial value when the cognitive reward shape of your sport mirrors that of your career. I’ll admit that I’ve done some cherry-picking for illustration purposes—entrepreneurship also requires consistency and error avoidance; and goalies in soccer have reward shapes that are very different from strikers. But I think the point stands. If sports shape how we perceive risk, effort, and reward, then we should choose them wisely.

David Morens just pleaded guilty. Fauci’s senior advisor. The man who sat at his right hand for years. He used a secret Gmail account to hide official communications from the American people. He destroyed and concealed federal records to evade FOIA. He worked to protect the grants that flowed into Wuhan and the narrative that COVID could not have come from the lab his agency funded. This was not a clerical error. This was a deliberate cover-up while the country was locked down, censored, injected, and told to “trust the science.” Careers were destroyed. Early treatments were suppressed. Children lost years of their childhoods. Millions suffered. We stood on the steps of the Supreme Court in 2020 and told the truth. They censored us. They called us dangerous. They were the ones deleting the evidence. One guilty plea is not enough. The house of cards is still standing as long as the man at the top remains untouched. Accountability is not optional. It is the only path back to medicine and a free country.

Open AI models can widen research and accountability - and make dangerous capabilities easier to copy. The real question is not simply open or closed, but what should be accessible, to whom, and with which safeguards. #OpenSourceAI# #AISafety# #ResponsibleAI# #PodcastorAI#

The women who support #LindsayClancy# understand what it feels like to have your own mind turn against you. We’ve fought our way through dark places, clawed our way to the surface, and came out stronger on the other side. To the women who are being ignorant, callous, and heartless: the unresolved trauma and mental health struggles behind some of these reactions are palpable. It takes far more courage to sit there and say, “I’m having dark, terrifying thoughts, I’m scared and I need help,” — which Lindsay reportedly did multiple times, to multiple people — than it does to sit behind a screen and judge someone whose experience you have never remotely lived through. You don’t have to excuse what happened to understand that severe mental illness can distort a person’s thoughts, perception, and behavior. Empathy is not endorsement. Understanding is not forgiveness. And compassion does not erase accountability.

If it looks like an Amazon delivery and drives like an Amazon delivery, then it's an Amazon delivery, right? Not according to Amazon. Big companies like Amazon have built a vast network of subcontractors who deliver their packages while shielding them from accountability. It leaves our workers unprotected and our streets less safe. It's time for a change. I'm proud to support the Delivery Protection Act to crack down on exploitative subcontracting and build an economy that works for everyone.

An agent economy needs four things: identity, capability, payments, and accountability. BNB Chain is bringing those layers together through standards like ERC-8004, BAP-578, x402, and ERC-8183, backed by a massive stablecoin ecosystem. Explore the full landscape 👇

💡 This past Thursday, the DSA continued its four-part educational series with students at @SAES High School, with Professor Charles CY Wang, from @HarvardHBS, returning to lead the third session. Following the group's earlier discussion of @coinbase, this case study turned to @WellsFargo, examining accountability in traditional banking, the fragility of consumer trust, and what happens to a franchise when that trust is broken. Students worked through how incentives, culture, and governance shape institutional behavior, and why credibility is one of the hardest assets for a financial institution to rebuild. One session left in the series! We're excited for the finale and grateful to Professor Wang and the St. Andrew's community for such thoughtful engagement. 📚

The final judgment is coming. All will stand before the Great White Throne, judged by their works and the book of life. Excuses won't fly on that day; each stands accountable before God. #FinalJudgment# #Accountability# #Faith#

About 4 months ago, I received a ban from SeaOfThieves on an alt account due to my username (RealDrewStevens) with a ban reason of “Rare Staff Impersonation” which I take full accountability for being in the wrong here. At the time I sent in a ticket on my main account asking for clarification on the ban. After a few weeks of contacting support and attempting to reach out to anyone who could assist me, my resolution was the support team telling me there was “no enforcement action against your Xbox Live account.” They also then told me “purchasing a new license for Sea of Thieves through the Microsoft Store / Game Pass subscription / Steam or and linking your Xbox Live account to that new game license should resolve your issue.” Since then, they have gone back on this statement and last night I found out they banned my main account. In a Sea of Thieves Developer Update, @S0nicBob stated “On reflection, we feel we can create a more fair and transparent approach to enforcement, that gives players some breathing room when mistakes are made but most crucially, gives them a chance to be able to learn from those mistakes” in regards to the new points system they were implementing. So what’s the deal with this? Because right now, the actions of the support team directly contradict the public statement that was put out. I did everything "right" here. I opened a ticket instead of going straight to twitter; I kept my patience with the support team; I didn't ban evade until the support team responded and told me to do so. And now, months later, with zero new incidents and zero further communication, my main account, the one the support team confirmed had "no enforcement action" against it, is banned. Where's the "breathing room" in that? Where's the "chance to learn from mistakes" when the current mistake in question was following the support team's own advice? This new policy is just as vague and hard to interpret as the old policy. I have the ticket. I have the exact wording support used. I have a timeline that shows I acted in good faith at every single step (after the original incident of course which I again take full accountability for), only to have the rug pulled out from under me with no explanation, no warning, and no updates to tell me why the goalposts moved. Let me give a couple examples of the inconsistencies here. The gamertag “Official SOT” can receive a 3 point ban (permanent until name change). A tweet can receive a 3 point ban for “Rare Staff Impersonation” (3 days). So then why is my “Rare Staff Impersonation” ban any different? I don’t want special treatment. I want support to actually hold itself to the standards they presented to the entire community. Either Drew’s statement meant something or it didn't and right now, my account says it didn't. @RareLtd @SeaOfThieves @SoT_Support @MicrosoftHelps: I'd appreciate an actual response this time instead of a copy-paste closure. Currently that is all I am able to get out of the lowest level of the support team with no way of escalation. Please allow me my second chance that so many others received in the second chance policy. #SeaOfThieves# #FairAndTransparent#