与「Dirtywork」相关的搜索结果

‖‖‖‖‖‖ Dance cover LastPart ‖‖‖‖‖‖ ⛓️[ #aespa# ] - #Dirtywork# ⛓️ ↘︎ Watch the rest on Tiktok ↙︎ 📺 #shortmovie# #フルはTiktokへGO#

‖‖‖‖‖‖ Dance cover Part❸ ‖‖‖‖‖‖ ⛓️[ #aespa# ] - #Dirtywork# ⛓️ ↘︎ Watch the rest on Tiktok ↙︎ 📺 #shortmovie# #フルはTiktokへGO#

‖‖‖‖‖‖ Dance cover Part❷ ‖‖‖‖‖‖ ⛓️[ #aespa# ] - #Dirtywork# ⛓️ ↘︎ Watch the rest on Tiktok ↙︎ 📺 #shortmovie# #フルはTiktokへGO#

‖‖‖‖‖‖ Dance cover Part❶ ‖‖‖‖‖‖ ⛓️[ #aespa# ] - #Dirtywork# ⛓️ ↘︎ Watch the rest on Tiktok ↙︎ 📺 #shortmovie# #フルはTiktokへGO#

｜｜｜｜Tiktok New upload｜｜｜｜ 🎞️ #aespa# - #DirtyWork# Full 🎞️ 編集に時間かかってしまって どんどん⏰が過ぎていき 誰も見ないだろう夜中の3時にUPしました🥹 ４つにわけて投稿しているので、 是非見てほしいなり♡ #tiktok# #踊ってみた#

23時頃に #Tiktok# にて [ #aespa# ] " #Dirtywork# Fullver UP致しますので是非見てください✨ ほんとにダンスが特殊で覚えづらくて 何回も撮ってあきらめてあたためて やっと載せれるので、お楽しみに🤍 #kpop# #kpopdancecover#

My view of: Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6-Sol. They are not easy models to compare, these are my vibes - take them as you will. My overall feel is that Fable is a 'wise owl' who is very thoughtful and very well spoken, GPT-5.6-Sol is like a rottweiler who will grab the problem by the throat and not let go until it is done. In other words, Fable, is a fundamentally smarter model - even at low reasoning it can be very insightful and writes in a clear compelling way. GPT-5.6-Sol on the other hand is extremely diligent, I can give it a list of 8 things to do and you will be sure that they will be done. Fable feels more arrogant to me, I was both to get it to build a new benchmark for me - 5.6 worked between 6 hours and 2 days (I tried several times) and it came up with very thoroughly tested, working benchmark. Fable came back within 40 minutes (twice) and the benchmark sounded smart, but was ultimately was 'vibe' based slop and since it was Fable's vibes that was doing the judging, it decided that it was good to go (it kept giving Fable 100% score btw). Some thoughts by category: UI & App building: Fable will still craft a better UI from scratch, the flow of the app would probably be a bit nicer. But I find that Fable often misses quite key things, which GPT-5.6-Sol doesn't. GPT's Frontend skills are big jump vs previous GPT models, but still not as great overall. Writing: Fable is better hands down, Sol feels quite difficult to align to what I want to say or explain things to me simply. Though I think the 'Pro' model writes clearer. Robustness & Reliability: This is where I think GPT-5.6-Sol wins for me hands down. Fable seems to do things of high quality, but I can never relax with it, it always misses something. With 5.6 this just almost never happens. Other things where I liked GPT-5.6-Sol, but can't compare to Fable directly. - Video editing is actually working now, it is not completely perfect, but with the right skill/guidance you can just give it 1h footage and it can give you a 5 min highlight clip no problem - Computer use - getting really rather good, very usable - Sub agents - it is very fluent at managing sub-agents and speaking to different threads, can help with some new workflows - Adhering to existing code patterns - I love this, even without asking it would implement something in a way that aligns with you app - major problem for slop generation - Research - I think it is getting quite a bit better, it still has some bad patterns (e.g being too tactical), but it feels like it is more steerable to be a good researcher - Multi-day runs - the /goal feature is pretty insane with 5.6-Sol, you can run it for days if you wanted to and it does work. Useful to have another thread or /side to check up on it, but I have some great results with it - Token efficiency - it is so much more token efficient and faster than 5.5, in reality it is now much faster than Fable too On the downside, you can feel that Fable is naturally smarter, and I did have some baffling moments with 5.6 when I was getting it to make a fairly simple change in 8 turns - it seemed to get stuck in a dumb stream that was hard to get out of. So it is not AGI, don't get too carried away by the hype. I have some phenomenal examples that I'm honestly blown away by that I'll share, but as a side anecdote, I have a kind of 'swear meter' which counts how often I'm rude to Codex. In GPT-5.5 era, the % was at around 4-5%, it dropped to 1-2% when I was testing GPT-5.6-Sol and it shot up to 7% when I went back to 5.5 - it was so shocking to go back to 5.5 and experience how much worse it was. So is GPT-5.6-Sol better than Fable? On pure intelligence - no. But man, I missed it when I just wanted to get sh*t done. It is insanely capable workhorse that you can give any task to and just expect it to be done. No lectures or 'you are absolutely rightisms', nothing is beneath it, if it takes 2 days to do some dirty work, it will do it. It feels like the first time in a while when we have quite different types of frontier intelligences that benchmark sort of similarly, but feel very different. If you can, you would be probably better off using both and iteratively finding what you'd use Fable or GPT-5.6-Sol for. Perhaps, something like - an architectural discussion with Fable, implementation with 5.6 and docs & comms with Fable.

CBB 这篇指南和神鱼的 A5 到 A10 指南其实是有相似之处的，或者说很多共性非常像，但其实最后一句话才是前提，或者说想赚钱必须要具备的能力：并不是所有人都那么具备执行力——Don't be lazy 执行力不是说能不能做得了事的问题，而是能不能把事最好的问题。从我观察来说，币圈绝大多数人甚至不能把事做完，更别提把事做好，这就是他们入圈多年仍然没有办法脱离目前阶段瓶颈的原因 从我自己观察来说，先从进圈这步说起，很多人说要入圈接触 crypto 业务，却甚至做不好基础的 dirty work，没有自驱力把各个项目是什么和行业生态格局搞清楚（这样根本进不了圈，我进圈就是从实习生开始）； 很多人羡慕影响力，却甚至不能做到每天至少发一篇文章表达自己的观点（我至今基本仍保持着日更的输出）； 很多人知道自己的瓶颈在于英语，却根本不能每天至少抽出来十分钟背单词，找机会和老外对话提升表达能力（我从跟老外说话结结巴巴到能清晰地表达无障碍交流） 总是羡慕别人，却从不自己实干，看了一条又一条怎么赚到 A9 A10 的游戏攻略收藏起来，喝了口鸡汤安心睡下，却从不执行并独立思考。每天都过着和前一天一样的生活长期没有正反馈，却不懂什么叫穷极思变 ——这才是大多数人的现状