与「GoogleOne」相关的搜索结果

赛博大善人又发福利了！🔥 Google AI Plus 免费 12 个月，实测已订阅成功，Google Play 官方确认邮件也到了！ 不是活动页面看看，也不是卡在付款界面，而是真正开通成功： ✅ Google AI Plus 免费用一年 ✅ 实付金额：NT$0.00 ✅ 有效期至：2027 年 7 月 26 日 ✅ 额外赠送 400GB Google One 存储空间 ✅ 更多 Gemini 使用额度 ✅ 支持 NotebookLM、Google Flow、图片及视频生成 ✅ 可在 Gmail、Docs、Slides 等应用中使用 ✅ 试用期内随时取消 领取地址： 操作步骤也很简单： 1️⃣ 注册 Internshala 账号 2️⃣ 完善基本个人资料和毕业信息 3️⃣ 找到 Google AI Plus 优惠活动 4️⃣ 点击领取，跳转 Google Play 5️⃣ 确认显示 12-month free trial 后订阅 需要注意： 页面显示主要面向 2026 年及以后毕业的 Internshala 用户，具体资格、地区及年龄限制以账号页面为准。 部分账户绑定付款方式时，可能会暂扣 2 印度卢比用于验证，预计 10 天内退回。 免费期结束后会自动续费，我这里显示 NT$165/月（因为我之前订阅的时候是台区IP，会员掉了可以继续试用），Google 会提前 7 天提醒，不想续费记得提前取消。 Google AI Plus + 400GB 存储，直接白嫖到 2027 年， 这次真的不是画饼！ 能领到的赶紧冲，晚一点可能又被赛博难民薅没了😂 #GoogleAI# #Gemini# #GoogleOne# #AI工具# #免费福利# #羊毛分享#

如果你也和我一样订阅了 19.99 的 Google Pro 会员，但在 Google One 里看不到 YouTube Premium Lite 的福利，可以试试这个方法：先关闭家庭组共享，然后再重新开启。 如果你之前没有创建过家庭组，可以先创建一个家庭组，再尝试开启或关闭家庭组共享。 操作完成后，再回到 Google One 查看，YouTube Premium Lite 的福利一般就能显示出来了。

Some of my perspective on where the @ethereumfndn is going. First of all, this is only my own view. The board is not just me, and I have no extra special powers on the board that the other board members do not. @aerugoettinea is the one executing much of this transition. My input has been largely on technical questions. The board is in the process of expanding, and my own power within the org will continue to decrease, which is honestly what I want. The 2025 era brought many important improvements to EF and its ability to execute. Many issues were resolved, and EF continues to benefit from its improved efficiency and greater focus on concrete goals to this day. And so with those problems resolved, early this year, the largest remaining hole that I perceived was something different nagging at me: I would regularly spot people saying things like "vitalik says these beautiful things about ethereum needing to be decentralized, and have privacy, and be a sanctuary technology, but why do the EF's actions not reflect that?" Now, you may have been hearing something different. You may not have been sensing a feeling of crisis at all, and maybe were hearing people saying that finally we were taking execution and BD seriously and the main task for us is to keep going that way and be even better and faster. Then probably there is genuine difference between you and me, in what kinds of criticism I take most seriously, and what kinds of critics through their criticism are most able to make me feel pain. As an analogy, let's briefly switch over to a different domain. One belief you can have about Google is that it is a success story, and has brought a lot of good to humanity in organizing the world's information. Another belief you can have about Google is that they had a beautiful idealistic beginning, but at some point the corruption of mainstream corporate attitudes seeped in, and they slowly bit by bit completely abandoned the "don't be evil" slogan. My belief on Google specifically is probably somewhere between the two. BUT, if you had taken me back in time to ~2008, and offered me a button to press to make Google one or two standard deviations more "dogmatic", eg. give Richard Stallman permanent veto power over some key policies, I would immediately press it. Why? Because a choice for one company is not a choice for the world, or even one country. Google existed and exists in the context of a technology industry generally drifting away from early idealistic don't-be-evil roots and toward greed for financial gain, totalizing visions of accelerated superintelligence, infiltration by sociopaths, and craven capitulation to (or worse, active participation in) government pressure for ideological control, surveillance and war. And so *one company* doing something different, positioning itself to be what George Bernard Shaw calls the Unreasonable Man, resisting the trend of the times, would have been better for freedom, balance of power and stability of society as a whole, than *all* large companies bending to dominant trends. This is a part of my version of pluralism. This line of thinking is not just mine, but I also is not too far off from what Aya and others had in mind with the Mandate. Now how does this all get to the role of the EF? EF is not a "center of Ethereum", rather EF is "one node, with a defined purpose, alongside other nodes". We've always said that the EF should be the latter, but many in the Ethereum ecosystem (and even within the EF) wanted us to be the former. Now, we are taking action to ensure that we will be the latter. This is particularly important because EF is a limited organization, with limited resources and limited organizational capacity. The EF has only ~0.16% of all ETH (less than many other individual ETH holders), whereas among other blockchains it's common for "the central foundation" to have 10-50%. Fiscally, the EF was originally designed to fulfill a limited work scope defined in the token sale docs and other pre-launch materials (building the chain software; getting through Frontier, Homestead, Metropolis, Serenity), which was fully completed in 2022; it was not designed to be an eternal steward. And so today, the EF is choosing to use its remaining resources to pursue longevity over breadth (yes, this means we sell less ETH). The EF focuses *specifically* on those activities critical to the success of ethereum as a censorship/capture-resistant, open, private and secure system, that would not happen otherwise. This means making hard choices, and in some cases even activities that we highly approve of and people that we highly respect becoming outside of the EF. People of great technical talent, public respect and even alignment with the mission and CROPS being outside of the EF is in fact necessary if we want important tasks to be able to attract outside capital. This also means the EF taking opinionated stands culturally. This is all intended in cooperation with all other parts of ethereum. We recognize that many other parts of the ethereum world highly respect CROPS and related values. But highly respecting is not the same as choosing to specialize and totally dedicate to a domain (Compare in a different domain: I think reducing animal cruelty is important, and I like vegan food, but am not full unconditional vegan myself) EF is still in a transition period, and we expect its new long-term form to stabilize over the next few months. What are the guiding principles of this new form? Again, I am only one person, but I can give my answer from a technical perspective (there are also critical non-technical aspects). At the core, *Ethereum must be impressive*. We are living in an age of highly intelligent AI and all kinds of other technological acceleration. "Status quo EVM, with a hard fork or two a year to optimize for short-term needs of users" is not interesting. To some, "impressive" means: 250ms latency and 1M TPS. I think Ethereum trying to go that route is a mistake. Being as fast and as scalable as possible, and only a small epsilon more decentralized than the others, is a route to mediocrity, and if we try it we will lose. I think Ethereum should scale. But I think Ethereum should strive the hardest to be deeply impressive in a different dimension: the CROPS dimension. This means things like: * Provably bug-free Ethereum. This is a goal that all cybersecurity researchers would have thought is absurd and impossible, up until roughly 6 months ago. Now, it's on the cusp of being possible, thanks to AI-assisted formal verification. So we should be frontrunners in doing this. * Available chain consensus. Ethereum is, and with lean consensus will cotninue to be, the ONLY chain that has both (i) traditional-BFT style properties that it's safe under asynchrony up to a high level of fault tolerance, and (ii) the bitcoin PoW-style property that under synchrony it's safe up to 49% attackers. As far as I can tell, literally no other chain has this or is planning for it; bitcoin goes for (ii) only and most other chains go for (i) only. Some will remember I fought hard for this, Unreasonably insisting that it is not OK for ethereum to rely on social consensus and hard forks to rescue ethereum from 34% of nodes going offline. It's OK for chains like hyperledger, bnb, solana, tempo, etc. It's not OK for bitcoin or ethereum or eg. zcash. * Intermediary minimization. The fact that smart contract wallets, protocols like railgun, etc have to send transactions through intermediaries to get included onchain is honestly embarrassing, and it's a constant point of fragility. Hence the work on FOCIL and EIP-8141 (and 7701 and years of work before) to make transaction sending intermediary-minimized with public mempool and strong inclusion properties, in a truly general-purpose way, that covers not just eg. secp256r1, but also privacy protocols and much more. Kohaku is pushing intermediary minimization at the user layer, pulling Ethereum away from the dystopian status quo world where our wallets don't even verify the chain, send our private data out to a dozen third-party servers, and toward a brighter CROPS future. Some of these goals are Unreasonable - maybe Ethereum would be "fine" getting only 50% of the way - what if we depend on intermediaries, but make it easy to switch? But going 50% of the way would not make Ethereum Deeply Impressive in the CROPS way. So we push for 100%. Fortunately all these goals are compatible with high TPS, this is a major focus of research (esp. on scaling the state). Well-designed L2s can also help, especially L2s optimized for specific applications (eg. high-volume trading, privacy...). These goals are even compatible with significantly lower slot times, thanks to Raul's work on erasure-coded P2P, and many other optimizations. The most high-value "product" of the ethereum blockchain, financially speaking, is ETH the asset. Ethereum secures $250 billion of ETH. The types of properties of Ethereum that I mentioned above are very good for ETH the asset. Nearly 90% of my net worth is in ETH, and most of the remainder is ~$40m of onchain fiat of which every dollar has already been allocated for some open-source biotech or software or hardware initiative. That said, there are aspects of supporting ETH the asset - *necessary* aspects even - that are outside the scope of the EF. This is where we need other heroes (some of whom hold more ETH than the EF does) to step in and help. EF has been recently thinking more about how it will relate to other such organizations, and give them needed initial support. EF will be a smaller ship than in previous years, a more opinionated one - in some cases more opinionated in ways that might be difficult to comprehend - but a longer-lasting one, and one suited to making sure that ethereum brings something meaningful to the world. We are grateful to all those inside and outside the EF who are helping to make this happen.

为了让交付更快、更稳，我通常会先和 AI 一起把需求的整体设计讨论清楚，包括前端交互设计、后端 MVC 结构、代码逻辑抽象、组件复用、开放模块设计、稳定性设计，以及架构和工程层面的优化。 一轮讨论结束之后，AI 通常会生成 3～5 个文件，对应不同维度的项目变更设计文档。 接下来，就会让 AI 根据项目复杂度选择合适的模型配置，同时开启多个进程跑 CLI，或者拉起多个子 Agent 一起干活。 这个模式的效率确实很高，不过带来的最大问题只有一个：钱不够烧。 我在 Codex 上买了两个账号轮着用，Github Copilot 也买了两个账号。用了一段时间之后发现，Codex 的 token 限额算是最亲民的，5 小时窗口 + 周限额窗口。周限额有时候看起来还挺随机，昨天还显示要等一周才能恢复，结果第二天一看，额度已经恢复到 100%。 Github Copilot 刚开始没有太注意，它其实是按照 Request 来限流的。有一次为了调一个细节，一晚上来回聊了很多次，直接把月额度干没了。后来慢慢摸索出一个用法：专门让 Copilot 处理大的需求，一个 Request 里塞进去好几个复杂任务，反而会觉得“真香”。 Google One 的 Family 方案其实也很香，用 Antigravity Tools 做反代就能跑。不过最近封号有点猛，现在基本不太敢用了。 当所有账号都被干到限流之后，也试过用国内的一些模型，比如 Kimi-k2.5、GLM-5。做一些常规的小需求其实问题不大，一旦遇到复杂问题，就很容易陷入无限递归循环： 排查 → 修复 → 没改好 → 继续排查。 这个时候就会特别怀念 Codex-5.3-xhigh 和 Claude-Opus-4.6。 另外，这几天刚出来的 Codex 5.4 表现更明显，之前需要排查好几轮才能解决的问题，它经常一把就能过。

／ OK Google, バックステージトークにつないで ＼ 7 / 16 - 7 / 18 開催の #YouTubeMusicWeekend# を記念して、アーティストや VTuber に質問をして遊べる機能が追加されました📱✨ #GoogleNest# やお使いのデバイスに話しかけると、こだわりやプライベートな一面について聞くことができます👂

Our WeatherNext 2 AI model from @GoogleDeepMind and @GoogleResearch can predict tropical cyclones with an extra day of lead time. Now, we’re open sourcing the model. Published in @Nature, Google researchers demonstrate how it delivers roughly a decade's worth of weather forecasting progress in a single jump. Here's how it works:

BREAKING: MiniMax H3 by @MiniMax_AI is 1st across 3 Video categories (Multi-Image to Video, Image to Video, and Video Editing) on Design Arena. MiniMax H3’s performance in Video Arena puts it ahead of other top performing models like Seedance 2.0 by @BytePlusGlobal, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Preview by @SpaceXAI, and Gemini Omni Flash by @GoogleDeepMind. This marks another category to be led by open-weight models, following Kimi K3’s first place in our coding categories. Congratulations to the @MiniMax_AI team for establishing a new SOTA in video generation!

ICYMI: our July AI recap ⬇️ 🌦️ Advanced weather forecasting with @NOAA and Google Cloud, using high-performance H4D virtual machines to run its atmospheric models, providing meteorologists with the AI capabilities needed to deliver life-saving early warnings. 💻 Introduced 3 new Gemini models — Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber — to deliver the efficiency, latency, and reliability to build AI agents at scale. 🇺🇸 Launched the Alliance for America’s Skilled Trades With BlackRock, Carhartt, and Ford to build a stronger pipeline for the skilled trades, scale evidence-based training approaches, and expand opportunities nationwide. ☁️ Rolled out AlphaEvolve, our Gemini-powered AI code-optimization agent, to help Cloud customers solve their hardest problems by automatically searching for better solutions and returning human-readable, optimized code. 🎵 Delivered significant advancements in musicality, lyrics, and vocal quality in Google Flow Music with Lyria 3.5, our newest music generation model. 📡 Launched three new FireSat satellites, expanding a global initiative led by the Earth Fire Alliance (EFA) with @GoogleResearch to help detect wildfires before they spread. 🧪 Established over 15 global bioresilience partnerships across governments, research groups, and biosecurity organizations to prevent model misuse, detect outbreaks rapidly, and deliver swift, coordinated responses in partnership with @IsomorphicLabs.