与「INTCON」相关的搜索结果

最近链“币股概念又开始动了，INTCON、MPON、QBTSON 一直刷到 👀 然后 WEEX 这波币股交易周奖励还蛮大，直接 60,000U 池子。 看了一下规则，其实挺简单： ✔ 新用户净充值 100U，做一次指定币种现货交易，最高 18U ✔ 指定币种现货累计交易量到 1000U，可以分 30,000U 奖池 ✔ 合约交易量还有机会拿 100U 体验金 重点是现在参与的人好像还不算很多，榜单很多位置都空着。 最近热点轮动太快了，很多人天天追单，但这种本来就要交易顺便拿奖励的活动，我觉得反而比较舒服 😂 我先冲了，你们最近最看好哪个币股概念？ 活动链接：

最近美股链上概念又开始活跃了，INTCON、MPON、QBTSON 这些币讨论度明显起来了。 刚看到 WEEX 又开了个【币股交易周】，总奖池直接干到 60,000U。 我比较关注的是两个点： ✅ 新用户净充值100U，完成指定币种首笔现货交易，最高还能拿18U奖励 ✅ 指定币种累计现货交易量满1000U，就能参与瓜分30,000U奖池，榜单现在基本还是空的，早参与优势比较大 另外完成合约累计交易量还有机会领100U体验金。 最近链上热点轮动太快，很多人天天追热点却没拿到额外福利，这种本来就要交易的活动顺手参加一下，说不定还能把手续费赚回来。 我已经报名了，你们最近最看好哪个币股概念？ #WEEX# #币股交易周# #INTCON# #MPON# #RGTION# #QBTSON# #CryptoTrading# 活动链接:

《🔥币安 Alpha 上新的 80 个代币化美股/ETF：谁在领涨，谁在掉队？》 1. 币安 Alpha 上了什么？ 截止发文，Binance Alpha 的 Tokenized Securities 样本目前覆盖 80 个美股及 ETF 代币标的，包括大型科技股、AI/半导体、加密相关股、指数 ETF、商品 ETF，以及杠杆/反向 ETF 等。 这类资产更准确的理解方式是：链上美股/ETF 经济敞口，而不是传统股票本身。例如： - NVDAon：对应 NVIDIA - AAPLon：对应 Apple - QQQon：对应 Invesco QQQ ETF - REMXon：对应 VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF Ondo 文档明确提到，这类代币设计目标是提供与底层资产相近的经济敞口，但一个代币不一定等于一股正股，价格也不一定始终等于底层股票或 ETF 价格；持有人获得的是经济表现敞口，而不是底层证券的直接所有权。 2. 有多少可以和合约市场联动观察？ 本图将其中 22 个底层资产标的 标注为“可与 Binance U 本位合约市场形成观察或对冲联动”的样本，例如： NVDAon、AAPLon、TSLAon、SPYon、QQQon、MSTRon、COINon 等。 这里要特别说明： “22 个合约联动标的”不是指这些 Alpha 代币本身上线了合约，而是指其底层资产或相关标的可与 U 本位合约市场形成行情观察、风险对冲或情绪联动参考。 换句话说，它更像是一个交易观察口径，而不是官方产品分类。 3. 哪些板块最强？ 按本图分类，80 个样本大致可以分为三类： - 个股型代币化证券，例如 NVDAon、AMDon、AAPLon、MSTRon、COINon。 - 普通 ETF 型代币化证券，例如 SPYon、QQQon、IAUon、SLVon、USOon、REMXon。 - 杠杆/反向 ETF 型代币化证券，例如 SQQQon、PSQon 等。 从区间表现看，样本明显偏向 Crypto 用户熟悉的高弹性资产： 半导体/AI 主线表现最强。相关标的平均涨幅约 +32.6%。代表样本包括 NVDAon、AMDon、INTCon、MRVLon、MUon、ARMon、QCOMon、AVGOon、TSMon 等。 加密/区块链相关资产弹性也较高。相关标的平均涨幅约 +18.7%。代表样本包括 COINon、HOODon、MSTRon、CRCLon、RIOTon、MARAon 等。 需要注意的是，本图涨跌幅主要按照底层美股/ETF 在 2026-02-24 至 2026-05-11 区间表现测算；部分新增标的使用可得实时或 24h 数据，因此不完全等同于 Alpha 代币上市以来涨跌幅，不能直接理解为长期收益能力。 4. 区间表现说明了什么？ 从排名看，80 个样本呈现出三个层次： 领涨区：Top 1–27：半导体与加密相关股占据主导。其中，INTCon 以 +180.7% 位居第一，其次是 MRVLon +117.9%、CRCLon +114.7%、AMDon +114.5%。 中性区：Top 28–52：大盘 ETF 和大型科技股提供了更稳健的基准表现。例如 QQQon 区间涨幅约 +17.3%，SPYon 约 +7.6%，整体反映美股大盘在该阶段的温和上涨。 承压区：Top 53–80：共 28 个标的，主要包括反向 ETF、部分中概股、军工、商品与医药资产。其中，SQQQon -40.2%、PSQon -14.9%，属于纳指上涨背景下的机制性回撤；LMTon -22.9%、BILIon -25.6% 表现靠后；新增的 REMXon 位列第 62，区间表现约 -5.9%。 整体来看，当前样本区间内呈现出“AI 半导体与加密资产领涨，传统板块分化，反向 ETF 承压”的结构。但这只反映 2026-02-24 至 2026-05-11 这一阶段的市场偏好，不代表未来持续性。 ⚠️风险提示：一个面向 Crypto 用户的美股敞口入口 代币化美股/ETF 的核心看点是“链上美股敞口”，但它不是传统股票账户里的正股，也不应被简单理解为股票替代品。 需要特别注意： 1️⃣不等同于直接持有底层股票或 ETF 例如不提供底层证券的直接所有权、股东投票权、法定信息权等完整股东权利。 2️⃣存在地区可用性与 KYC 限制 Binance 公告提示，相关产品和服务可能并不适用于所有地区；Ondo 文档也说明，其产品通常面向非美国投资者，并受司法辖区等限制。 3️⃣存在流动性、溢价/折价与价格偏离风险 代币化美股的价格不一定始终等于底层资产价格，交易报价也可能与实际买卖底层资产价格略有差异。 4️⃣存在交易时段与价格跳动风险 代币化美股通常为 24/5 交易，但在交易时段切换、公司行动、风控限制等情况下可能暂停或受到影响。 5️⃣如果涉及链上交互，还要关注合约地址、链、池子与桥接风险 Binance Alpha 本身也提示，Alpha tokens 属于链上 Web3 代币，波动和风险更高。 结论：这类资产真正要看的，不只是“能不能买”，而是“你买到的到底是什么”。它更像是一个面向 Crypto 用户的链上美股敞口入口，而不是传统股票账户的平替。 数据来源：Binance Alpha（ ） 免责声明： 本文仅作信息展示与数据解读，不构成投资建议。代币化证券存在流动性、溢价/折价、盘前盘后价格跳动、交易时段差异、地区可用性、KYC 限制及链上合约等风险。投资前请自行研究，DYOR。

About 4 months ago, I received a ban from SeaOfThieves on an alt account due to my username (RealDrewStevens) with a ban reason of “Rare Staff Impersonation” which I take full accountability for being in the wrong here. At the time I sent in a ticket on my main account asking for clarification on the ban. After a few weeks of contacting support and attempting to reach out to anyone who could assist me, my resolution was the support team telling me there was “no enforcement action against your Xbox Live account.” They also then told me “purchasing a new license for Sea of Thieves through the Microsoft Store / Game Pass subscription / Steam or and linking your Xbox Live account to that new game license should resolve your issue.” Since then, they have gone back on this statement and last night I found out they banned my main account. In a Sea of Thieves Developer Update, @S0nicBob stated “On reflection, we feel we can create a more fair and transparent approach to enforcement, that gives players some breathing room when mistakes are made but most crucially, gives them a chance to be able to learn from those mistakes” in regards to the new points system they were implementing. So what’s the deal with this? Because right now, the actions of the support team directly contradict the public statement that was put out. I did everything "right" here. I opened a ticket instead of going straight to twitter; I kept my patience with the support team; I didn't ban evade until the support team responded and told me to do so. And now, months later, with zero new incidents and zero further communication, my main account, the one the support team confirmed had "no enforcement action" against it, is banned. Where's the "breathing room" in that? Where's the "chance to learn from mistakes" when the current mistake in question was following the support team's own advice? This new policy is just as vague and hard to interpret as the old policy. I have the ticket. I have the exact wording support used. I have a timeline that shows I acted in good faith at every single step (after the original incident of course which I again take full accountability for), only to have the rug pulled out from under me with no explanation, no warning, and no updates to tell me why the goalposts moved. Let me give a couple examples of the inconsistencies here. The gamertag “Official SOT” can receive a 3 point ban (permanent until name change). A tweet can receive a 3 point ban for “Rare Staff Impersonation” (3 days). So then why is my “Rare Staff Impersonation” ban any different? I don’t want special treatment. I want support to actually hold itself to the standards they presented to the entire community. Either Drew’s statement meant something or it didn't and right now, my account says it didn't. @RareLtd @SeaOfThieves @SoT_Support @MicrosoftHelps: I'd appreciate an actual response this time instead of a copy-paste closure. Currently that is all I am able to get out of the lowest level of the support team with no way of escalation. Please allow me my second chance that so many others received in the second chance policy. #SeaOfThieves# #FairAndTransparent#

Si è svolta oggi, al Viminale, la Sessione europea della Conferenza Stato-Città ed Autonomie locali, presieduta dal Ministro dell’Interno, Matteo Piantedosi e dal Ministro per gli Affari europei, il PNRR e le Politiche di coesione, Tommaso Foti. Presenti i rappresentanti di ANCI, UPI e delle autonomie locali. Nel corso dell’incontro, i ministri hanno illustrato, per le parti di competenza, lo stato di avanzamento delle principali iniziative europee in materia di accordi commerciali e di sviluppo delle politiche di coesione. Si è discusso delle nuove politiche europee su migrazione e sicurezza, evidenziando il contributo dell’Italia alla definizione del nuovo quadro normativo dell’Unione, in particolare in materia di immigrazione. La notizia:

Many new founders look at slow or inconsistent revenue and assume nothing is working. But long before sales become predictable, your business may already be sending signals that you are moving in the right direction 💨 Customers rarely discover your business and buy immediately. They ask questions. Reply to your messages. Book a call. Return to your content. Raise objections. Refer someone else. Every one of these interactions reveals something about their interest, trust, hesitation, or understanding. 💡 Treat every customer interaction as market research. Look for patterns in the questions people ask, the objections they raise, the content they engage with repeatedly, and the conversations that continue. Those patterns often reveal what customers value most, what is still unclear, and where your business needs to improve next. 👇 At the end of each week, review more than just your revenue. Ask yourself: → What questions kept coming up? → Which objections repeated? → Who came back for a second look? → Who replied, referred, or re-engaged? Then ask, "Which signals are getting stronger, and what do they suggest I improve next?". The founders who learn to read early customer signals make better decisions because they build from market evidence instead of personal assumptions. Consistent revenue often follows founders who first become great at reading the market. As always, keep going and growing. 👉 Follow @bMightie for more founder intelligence for solo founders and bootstrapped businesses on the journey from day zero to takeoff. #startupadvice# #newbusiness#

Everyone's building smarter AI agents. OpenAI and Anthropic keep making models more capable. Frameworks like LangGraph make it easier to orchestrate complex workflows. But in a real clinic, the challenge isn't just completing a task. Take prior authorization. Every request needs to review the patient's history, follow insurance requirements, apply clinic policies, and produce an auditable decision. One inconsistent step can delay treatment or create compliance issues. In this workflow: Hermes plans the process. OpenClaw executes each step. Marrow provides shared memory and governance so agents can reuse previous decisions, stay consistent, and keep a complete audit trail. That's the difference between an AI agent that works and one a healthcare team can actually rely on. Enterprise AI isn't just about smarter models. It's about building workflows that are reliable, compliant, and repeatable. See Marrow in action →

The world is deeply unfair. Some of the most talented people I know are stuck in dead end desk jobs while some of the snarkiest narcissistic tyrannical workhorses are in positions of great power. This has always greatly saddened me. After a lot of analysis, I think there are 5 reasons this happens: 1. Refusal to believe / fear of failure. Loss of belief that where there is a will (to enact change), there is a way e.g. “I am just a cog in the wheel. If I say something, no one will listen.” or “if I do this, I will upset somebody” 2. Lack of purpose. You don’t really understand what you’re fighting for and what you believe in. You fight for inconsequential, often selfish, goals. e.g “Will doing this get me a promotion? Should I completely change everything to do this other project cause it will get me a promotion?” 3. Lack of self awareness. I will stand up to this thing I believe in and they will listen to me. e.g intern saying: “why doesn’t the ceo like my view on company strategy?” 4. Refusal to play. The failure to acknowledge that your worldview is only as powerful as your ability to influence others of your worldview OR a complete repudiation of the will to interact with those who don’t share your worldview e.g. “these guys just do what they want. They won’t listen to me. what will happen if I do this?” 5. Refusal to strategize or concede. The unwillingness to play and win a side quest that will ostensibly further your vote because you find the interim goal pointless. Or the inability to concede a battle to fight the war. e.g. “this direction is wrong. I need to fight it (even though it’s a small issue)” Almost everyone who is bitter or feels stuck in their career boils down to one of these 5 failure modes 1, 2 and 3 are the most common. Many suffer consequences of 2-5 and end up in 1. I’ve personally seen some of my sharpest friends land up in 1 because they just don’t believe they can win. One privileged part of my job is getting to interact with people who are willing to, against all odds, believe in something heretical, know why it’s important, know what needs to be done to make it real, do it, and make side quests to get it done. I think it applies to everyone doing anything.