与「If_We_Do」相关的搜索结果

`🚨⁉️🚨Is America a sovereign nation or are we now as subservient to a foreign power as we are to the lobbyists controlling our elected officials? We are in a very strange time where I see a Democrat voicing a concern that we should all have while many Republicans are staying quiet. Generally speaking the Dems are nuts but Congress is now debating merging our military with Israel. I support the nation of Israel and I support the Jewish people but this is an insane attack on our sovereignty. Benjamin Netanyahu has reportedly destroyed peace talks with Iran numerous times, he sold his own people out with the mRNA COVID jabs, and even funded Hamas terrorists to attack his own people through Qatar - why would we trust him ever? And even if we could trust him what happens when a new leader comes in and sells our military secrets to an enemy. We constantly watch our elected officials sell out to big pharma, big chemical, and every other lobby out there but, never before have we considered giving our most sensitive secrets to a foreign power. A power we do not control and that could then sell those secrets to our adversaries with no recourse. Section 224 of the NDAA - in Congress now - indisputably puts our nation at risk. We can support any country we want but why in the world would we give away our military tech and secrets?

Honored to meet with Syrian Ambassador Mohammed Qanatri in Washington today. ​Pursuing peace, coexistence, and stronger US-Syria relations isn't a choice, it's a duty. To my country, my people, and my faith. Because the reality is if we dont work together then we cannot move forward. 🕊 🇺🇸🇸🇾☪️✝️🕎

"I think if we operate with extreme urgency, then we have a chance of making life multi-planetary. It’s still just a chance, not for sure. If we don’t act with extreme urgency, that chance is probably zero” —Elon Musk.

The truth hurts sometimes... Reality is teams/projects in blockchain, not just Cardano, weren't forced to run lean enough. ICOs, Early Raises, and Grants caused companies to scale irresponsibly, miss-manage capital, and have no path towards sustainable revenue. Not pointing my fingers at anyone specifically but it's a clear issue I have seen across many companies, and blockchains. I'm not saying I am some kind of business guru or prophet but I am saying that I have lived the reality of what businesses are facing for over 2 years now. We had to make cuts, sacrifice salaries, rebalance infrastructure, and most importantly, hunt our own food. We survived because we made hard decisions and built real revenue off of services and tools. Outside of blockchain, you constantly hear stories about the entrepreneur who sacrifices everything for their dream. I mean, just go watch an episode of Shark Tank. I tried to embody this to give our team the chance to scale and grow. Gave up my salary, my co founder did as well. We only spent money the last 3 years outside of payroll on RareEvo. I'm no hero for that, I just figured that was the reality of running a business and everyone else in the space was dealing with similar. Boy was I wrong lol. Not saying you have to necessarily struggle to know success, but hitting rock bottom and having to really grind it out changes the way you operate. You won't see me committing to doing a thousand new features for Wayup. It's not realistic in this market with the revenue that the platform produces. We ran Wayup at a net loss of $1800 a month for almost 2 years to get here. Business requires balance and thankfully the work we were doing at Anvil helped us keep it alive for so long. When the revenue allows for us to hire a part/full time dev, the features will start shipping. Want the features faster? Fundraise it. That's what real business do, but they typically start with a revenue producing vehicle. Maybe this is the exodus we are currently seeing in our space. Maybe I'm wrong. Without knowing companies full financials, I can only imagine this to be why. And honestly, I can't blame someone for wanting to build and have a salary. If you want talent, eventually it has to have opportunity. That's what made Cardano so great, the idea of opportunity, and the reality of it. The sinking reality is that opportunity is leaving and being found elsewhere. There's one thing I know for sure. Cardano itself should be focused on revenue. Everyone, and the treasury itself, should be working towards more than transactional volume to the treasury, this is how we win. Loans, Rev-shares, direct shares, any means necessary we need to start treating Cardano as a whole as a business. Charles gave me a great idea earlier in an X space. If the research budget is $5mil in the hole, and we have the best researchers in blockchain, why don't we take advantage of that and start doing research for other chains? Call me crazy but seems like an actual opportunity because I do believe we have great researches and I do not want to see them leave. Cardano treasury could fund the Cardano based research, and subsidize pricing to be competitive to other chains. Then there could be a potential rev share opportunity to rebalance the treasury. These are the type of initiatives I think people would really rally behind and make Cardano more valuable. It would set a really good public image that people are willing to work with Cardano and actually do respect our research driven approach. Regardless of what happens, if we don't start leaning out the end result will be inevitable. I look forward to the responses here and have enjoyed the course of many conversations over the past few days. Call me a shill, call me whatever you want but if you agree with me delegate. I'm making it a point to get more delegation and push my vision of Cardano. drep1ygeyfh8nm03dnl5a2hxdtv09pu7uhep9l0cpg0zpr60jqys05cku2

Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO, says AI will become a utility like electricity or water. His exact words: “We see a future where intelligence is a utility like electricity or water and people buy it from us on a meter and use it for whatever they want to use it for.” He means you’ll pay only for what you use, like your power bill, heavy users pay more, light users pay less, instead of flat subscriptions. This was at the BlackRock Infrastructure Summit back in March. He says the real challenge is building enough compute power so it stays cheap and doesn’t just go to rich people. Altman said demand for AI is exploding, and if we don’t keep building compute infrastructure fast enough, either supply runs short or prices skyrocket, making it something only rich people can afford. He called it a big infrastructure challenge, basically saying the buildout has to keep pace with that rising demand to make AI truly like a cheap utility for everyone.

Re-posting the idea from the second half of this post a few months ago (This is very relevant to the options ideas from yesterday) Question: if we're making a synthetic stable, what should it really be stable WITH RESPECT TO? USD is actually far from the best choice. --- What do people who want stablecoins ultimately want? They want price stability. They have some future expenses in mind, and they want a guarantee that will be able to pay those expenses. But if crypto grows on top of USD-backed stablecoins, crypto is ultimately not truly decentralized. Furthermore, different people have different types of expenses. There has been lots of thinking about making an "ideal stablecoin" that is based on some decentralized global price index, but what if the real solution is to go a step further, and get rid of the concept of currency altogether? Here's the idea. You have price indices on all major categories of goods and services that people buy (treating physical goods/services in different regions as different categories), and prediction markets on each category. Each user (individual or business) has a local LLM that understands that user's expenses, and offers the user a personalized basket of prediction market shares, representing "N days of that user's expected future expenses". Now, we do not need fiat currency at all! People can hold stocks, ETH, or whatever else to grow wealth, and personalized prediction market shares when they want stability.

Jensen Huang: "Intelligence is not top of my list of things I value about my abilities." Someone asks: what's the real skill that separates great builders from everyone else? Huang responds: "I hope you believe in something, something unconventional, something unexplored, but let it be informed and let it be reasoned. Then dedicate yourself to making it happen." He offers a test: "Of all of the things that I value most about my abilities, intelligence is not top of that list. My ability to endure pain and suffering, my ability to work on something for a very, very long period of time, my ability to handle setbacks and see the opportunity just around the corner ... I consider to be my superpowers." On why he doesn't wait for perfect markets: "We chose a market with no customers, a $0 billion market, and it was robotics. We built the world's first robotics computer processing an algorithm nobody understood at the time called deep learning. Ten years later, I can't be happier with what we've built." He explains why timing rarely works the way people expect: "One setback after another, we shook it off and skated to the next opportunity. Each time, we gained skills and strengthened our character. Our company is really hard to distract and really hard to discourage." Huang points to a lone gardener at the Silver Temple in Kyoto, carefully picking dead moss with a bamboo tweezer from a garden the size of a courtyard: "He said, 'I have cared for my garden for 25 years. I have plenty of time.' That was one of the most profound learnings in my life." He shares a thought experiment: "I begin each morning by doing my highest priority work first. Before I even get to work, my day is already a success. I've already completed my most important work and can dedicate my day to helping others. When people apologize for interrupting me, I always say I have plenty of time... and I do." On getting lucky with breakthroughs: "We did well in 2012 because Hinton, Krizhevsky, and Sutskever used our GPUs to win ImageNet. We did well because we believed in deep learning before anyone else did. If you build it, will they come? Our logic was: if we don't build it, they can't come." Then he delivers the point: "I hope you find a craft you want to dedicate your lifetime to perfecting, to hone the skills of, and let it be your life's work. But you don't want to spend your life waiting for the perfect moment to start.

Mina the Hollower from Yacht Club Games, the studio behind Shovel Knight, has sold around 55,000 copies on Steam shortly after launch. Console sales figures are not yet available. Co-founder Sean Velasco has really high expectations. He stated, “If we don’t sell a million copies, I’m going to be disappointed.” The game is priced at $20.

Elon Musk: "I think if we operate with extreme urgency, then we have a chance of making life multi-planetary. It’s still just a chance, not for sure. If we don’t act with extreme urgency, that chance is probably zero The rate of innovation is not going to be constant; it’s either going to increase or it’s going to slow down. If you look at American access to space with a crew, we were able to go to the moon in ’69. Then with the Space Shuttle, we could only go to low Earth orbit. Then the Space Shuttle retired, and for almost a decade, America had no access to space with people So this is a pretty bad trend, it's trending to zero. We need a very strong trend in the other direction in order to have any chance whatsoever of making life multiplanetary. So that's the reason for the extreme sense of urgency."

Throwback to @ChicagoBooth TechCon, great to see so many students engaging seriously with questions around tech, impact, and who it ultimately serves. One thing that really stuck with me: we keep treating technology risk like a product problem. It’s not, it’s a question of power. About who decides, and who bears the risk. If we don’t get that framing right, we’ll keep building systems that scale faster than our ability to govern them.