注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「Narratives」相关的搜索结果

Narratives 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 Narratives 的内容
I am actually disgusted by the timing of this drop. And this will get a bit more technical. Let’s do a real technical teardown of this "1,385-sigma Blackwell weight fingerprint" report that OpenAI and Anthropic are breathlessly promoting today, because banking on nobody reading past the headline is how DC narratives get manufactured. ​First, look at the actual CUDA maths: when PyTorch initialises model weights (torch.nn.init) with a fixed PRNG seed, curand/Philox parallelises random number generation across the GPU’s Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs). Because Hopper has 132 SMs and Blackwell has 148 or 152 SMs, the exact same seed lays out initial weights in a different spatial pattern depending on the GPU’s SM count. In huge MoE models, certain low-gradient null-spaces or unrouted slices preserve faint directional traces of those step-0 weights even after training. ​So yes, brute-forcing the seed and SM grid can show that a model’s step_0 weight initialisation script ran on a 148/152-SM Blackwell GPU. Now read what the summary explicitly admits in the fine print: 1. Initialisation is not full training: The report literally states that these signatures show how the weights were created, and "support (but do not prove) the inference that Blackwell also participated in model training". Initialising a model checkpoint takes seconds on a single rented dev node before loading the safetensors onto a standard Hopper cluster. The "2,000 to 3,000 Blackwell GPUs" and "$500 million" cluster numbers do not come from the weight fingerprint and Depue admits in his own thread that he simply "estimated" cluster sizes from release schedules and model details. ​2. Zero geolocation and zero proof of smuggling: The final sentence of the executive summary explicitly admits that the findings "do not establish the physical location of the chips, how they were acquired, or whether export control regulations were violated". Depue himself rented a cloud GB200 instance just to run his verification test. Commercial labs that are not on the Entity List renting bare-metal Blackwell nodes in offshore clouds (Singapore, Japan, or the Middle East) is completely legal under BIS rules and leaves the exact same SM fingerprint. Now ask yourself why a former OpenAI researcher dropped this on November 12, the exact day Jensen Huang was pushed out, with OpenAI and Anthropic immediately stepping in to "independently verify" it. US closed-source labs are watching their paid API moats get eaten alive by free Chinese open-weights models. Conflating a step-0 PRNG initialisation seed with a "$500M smuggled Blackwell cluster" hands DC hawks the exact pretext OpenAI and Anthropic want to regulate global cloud compute and kneecap open-source AI.
显示更多
0
18
394
60
转发到社区
Took me years to realize the steadiest money in crypto never comes from guessing candles. While traders bleed out chasing narratives, the quietest businesses here just act as the middleman between projects that need liquidity and wallets sitting on idle cash. That is literally all @turtledotxyz does. Instead of gambling on token prices, they brought in $1.04M in cash in Q3, up from $898K in Q2, just by connecting protocols, creators, and depositors. Holding $TURTLE doesn't mean you automatically get a cut of that cash, but watching a boring middleman print 7 figures in a choppy market is a good reminder of where the real money sits.
显示更多
Every market starts with a narrative. Every narrative starts with an idea. Sway is where ideas become markets, narratives find their communities, and being right pays. Early Swayers get a boost 👇
显示更多
0
439
1.7K
256
转发到社区
The Moral Collapse of the Chinese Crypto Community To Elon Musk 2022–2023 marked the golden age of Chinese-language Twitter. Back then, there was no creator revenue you offered purely based on traffic. Two main groups of creators came here to share insights: Influencers who migrated over with their followers after their Weibo accounts were banned. Content creators who were already living overseas. These people came with genuine intent to share, and they often uncovered valuable market alpha. Whether it was Bay Area Spaces, inscription research bloggers, or spot and secondary market analysts. Back then, everyone believed the next bull run would be bright. People expected their altcoin spot holdings would deliver at least 5–10x returns. After all, A16Z poured capital into projects left and right, and every so often, stories popped up of Gen Z traders hitting A8 and retiring financially free. Then the tide turned. High-cap tokens pumped immediately upon launch. Instead of bringing fresh liquidity into the market, the ETF event drained what little liquidity remained, driven largely by Trump-related narratives. The crash on October 11 was almost inevitable. Long before that, many had already lost everything on altcoins. That black-swan event merely liquidated whatever leveraged contract positions were left. Starting around 2024–2025, after X rolled out creator ad revenue, a flood of traffic chasers emerged, catering to lowbrow audiences. These people do not trade crypto, nor do they care about any market narratives. They crossed over to this platform just to scrape together that tiny creator payout, as they have little footing in real life. Consequently, we saw the worst tropes from mainland domestic social media spill over: gender polarization, disinformation, and bootlicking culture. While you tweaked the algorithm to curb plagiarism, the platform still fails to incentivize high-quality content. Plenty of boundaryless content farms still rack up views, and accounts that harass others relentlessly often evade effective reporting penalties. Meanwhile, posts from creators I used to follow have vanished from my timeline. I kindly request that you strictly investigate accounts that distribute other users’ private information without consent.
显示更多
The Moral Collapse of the Chinese Crypto Community To Elon Musk @elonmusk 2022–2023 marked the golden age of Chinese-language Twitter. Back then, there was no creator revenue you offered purely based on traffic. Two main groups of creators came here to share insights: Influencers who migrated over with their followers after their Weibo accounts were banned. Content creators who were already living overseas. These people came with genuine intent to share, and they often uncovered valuable market alpha. Whether it was Bay Area Spaces, inscription research bloggers, or spot and secondary market analysts. Back then, everyone believed the next bull run would be bright. People expected their altcoin spot holdings would deliver at least 5–10x returns. After all, A16Z poured capital into projects left and right, and every so often, stories popped up of Gen Z traders hitting A8 and retiring financially free. Then the tide turned. High-cap tokens pumped immediately upon launch. Instead of bringing fresh liquidity into the market, the ETF event drained what little liquidity remained, driven largely by Trump-related narratives. The crash on October 11 was almost inevitable. Long before that, many had already lost everything on altcoins. That black-swan event merely liquidated whatever leveraged contract positions were left. Starting around 2024–2025, after X rolled out creator ad revenue, a flood of traffic chasers emerged, catering to lowbrow audiences. These people do not trade crypto, nor do they care about any market narratives. They crossed over to this platform just to scrape together that tiny creator payout, as they have little footing in real life. Consequently, we saw the worst tropes from mainland domestic social media spill over: gender polarization, disinformation, and bootlicking culture. While you tweaked the algorithm to curb plagiarism, the platform still fails to incentivize high-quality content. Plenty of boundaryless content farms still rack up views, and accounts that harass others relentlessly often evade effective reporting penalties. Meanwhile, posts from creators I used to follow have vanished from my timeline. I kindly request that you strictly investigate accounts that distribute other users’ private information without consent.
显示更多
TRON is quietly absorbing stablecoin liquidity while Ethereum loses over $30 BILLION! According to Token Terminal, the past 12 months (Nov 8, 2025 - Nov 8, 2026) reveal a pretty interesting shift: 🔴 TRON: +$16.1B, the biggest gain among 45 tracked blockchains. 🔅HyperEVM: +$6.3B 🔅Arc: +$1.3B 🔅Arbitrum: -$4.3B 🔅Ethereum: -$30.6B Here's what caught my attention. While everyone is busy chasing L2s, AI narratives, and the next high-TPS blockchain, TRON keeps focusing on something much simpler: stablecoins and everyday payments. Of course, this doesn't mean $30.6B moved directly from Ethereum to TRON. But the bigger picture is hard to ignore. TRON is strengthening its position as one of crypto's key stablecoin settlement networks. Sometimes the biggest winner isn't the loudest blockchain. It's the one people actually use to move money. @justinsuntron
显示更多
Every crypto cycle creates the same characters. The guy who turns one lucky trade into a full-time personality. The friend still holding a bag from three narratives ago. The “alpha” caller who vanishes after the rug. And somehow we’ve all been each of them at least once. That’s why @ptsdshow feels way too relatable It’s a dark animated crypto comedy following PT a repeatedly rekt trader alongside an OG with secrets, an AI scam investigator, and the kind of group-chat logic that only makes sense in a bull market. Watch the show, get your diagnosis, and see where you stand:
显示更多
Why Tokenization Could Be the Most Important Economic Innovation of Our Lifetime | Bruce Fenton @BruceFenton is a longtime Bitcoin advocate since 2012, securities professional, and one of the early pioneers of tokenized securities. He is the founder and CEO of Chainstone Labs and founder of Atlantic Financial. Alongside Overstock founder @PatrickByrne, Bruce was involved in some of the earliest efforts to bring securities and financial-market infrastructure onto blockchain rails. In 2018, he tokenized equity in his own company, Chainstone Labs, on the Ravencoin blockchain—years before tokenization became one of Wall Street’s biggest narratives. In this episode, Bruce breaks down naked short selling, the plumbing behind traditional securities markets, and why he believes much of the problem is ultimately a ledger problem. We dive into questions such as: Who actually owns the stocks sitting in your brokerage account? How can shares be lent and rehypothecated? What role do brokers, clearing firms, DTCC, and Cede & Co. play in determining who owns what? And could blockchain replace an opaque system of claims and intermediaries with a transparent ledger showing exactly where an asset is and who owns it? We unpack what “tokenized stocks” actually means—and the important distinction between a token that simply gives you exposure to a stock’s price and a security issued natively onchain, where the token itself represents the actual share and the ownership rights that come with it. Bruce discusses how tokenization could allow smaller businesses to tokenize ownership and have their stock traded globally without needing to be listed on a traditional exchange like the NYSE, as well as what a future without KYC could look like. Finally, we get into Wall Street’s embrace of tokenization, the SEC’s evolving approach to tokenized securities, and one of the biggest questions surrounding the future of this technology: who ultimately controls these new financial rails? Remember to subscribe and hit the bell “🔔” icon to get notifications 0:00 Bruce Fenton & Patrick Byrne: Pioneers of Tokenized Securities 3:36 Naked Short Selling Explained 6:28 Who Actually Owns the Stocks in Your Brokerage Account? 12:00 Tokenization Solves Wall Street’s “Ledger Problem” 15:48 What Are You Actually Buying With Robinhood’s Tokenized Stocks? 16:48 Real Tokenized Stocks: When the Token IS the Share 21:46 Tokenization Could Open U.S. Markets to the Entire World 22:52 Why Companies May No Longer Need the NYSE 26:29 Could Tokenized Markets Exist Without KYC? 29:31 Bruce Tokenized Equity on Ravencoin in 2018 30:53 Will Blockchain Make Clearing Houses & DTCC Obsolete? 33:17 Could Tokenization Have Prevented the GameStop Crisis? 38:19 Wall Street Is Embracing Tokenization — Who Gets the Power? 40:20 The SEC’s New Tokenized Securities “Innovation Exemption” 42:57 Why Robinhood’s Tokenized Stocks Don’t Qualify 47:01 Could Everything Eventually Be Tokenized? 51:02 The Dystopian Side of Tokenization: Surveillance & Asset Seizure
显示更多
0
7
86
27
转发到社区
Institutions arrived. Research got serious. With 50 million tokens in existence, the question is no longer "what's the price", it's "what's driving this & what comes next." Our Head of Research Alice Liu joined Raghda Ibraheem on @FINTECHTVglobal 's Capital Markets: Wall Street to MENA to walk through the data and tools that answer it: from CMC's trending narratives, Fear & Greed, Altcoin Season, to ETF flows, open interest, exchange reserves and AI hub. Watch the segment 📺:
显示更多
0
18
37
14
转发到社区
Bitcoin is ripping... but the real bottom may still be ahead. @NewsAsset says the 4-year cycle still points to October, and even $45K BTC isn't off the table. His strategy if it crashes again? Buy MORE. The lower it goes, the more aggressive his DCA gets. FT @BitcoinJesusETH Subscribe so you don't miss the next one 👇 ⏱ TIME POINTS ⏱ 00:00 – Intro 01:14 – Has Bitcoin Bottomed? 04:00 – Milk Road PRO 05:07 – DCA in a Bear Market 09:56 – What Could Move Bitcoin? 12:32 – What’s Next for the Clarity Act? 14:40 – SEC’s New Crypto Regulations 17:01 – Sponsor: Saber Money 17:41 – Are ICOs Coming Back? 19:25 – Is Self-Custody Too Risky? 26:50 – Which Altcoins Is Rob Buying? 30:43 – Next Bull Run Narratives 34:08 – When Will the Bear Market End?
显示更多