注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「REALITYワールド」相关的搜索结果

REALITYワールド 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 REALITYワールド 的内容
メタバースワールドにてスペシャルライブ配信ありがとうございました いっぱい口から🔥ふいてたー!笑 ずっと笑って本当に楽しかったです!! #瀬戸田めぐり# #REALITYワールド#
显示更多
0
29
1.2K
127
转发到社区
I find it funny that some people got hung up on Starship not having gone orbital before Flight 14 when in the grand scheme of things it was completely arbitrary in terms of performance. The 19ish second burn only added about 91 m/s of velocity (a 1.2% increase in velocity) This capability has been physically capable since Flight 6 which demonstrated a single Raptor relight in space. Heck, Flight 13’s burn was about 14 seconds, but intentionally oriented to primarily do a plane change instead of a prograde insertion burn for continued safety. Any of the relights COULD have done the orbital insertion burn, the duration was not of any special technical capability. The reason Starship didn’t go orbital until Flight 14 is probably what we should applaud them for the most… SAFETY. Their methodical approach to getting good data and going one step at a time while hucking the single most massive object ever put into space proves they weren’t just doing things haphazardly, despite the occasional narrative from the outside. While it’s easy to compare Starship to vehicles like SLS or Vulcan or New Glenn, the reality is the focus hasn’t been on orbit, it’s been all on the “downhill” side of that. Safe and targeted de-orbit, clean reentry, targeted and soft splashdown. That’s the part that has (almost) never been done before. And here I do have to add a little Space Shuttle admiration for figuring out a lot of these things on its first flight in 1981 (although it came a bit close to not being successful). Pretty amazing there was a vehicle of similar scale capable of such precise deorbit and reentry that it landed on a runway with no go-around capabilities. Crazy. But Starship is well on a path to absolutely leap-frog the Space Shuttle in terms of performance (already over double and someday 6 fold) and hopefully in terms of full and rapid reuse. I hope we see the latter part speed up even more now that orbit has been demonstrated. Exciting times ahead!!! Keep going @spacex @elonmusk
显示更多
0
77
2.9K
165
转发到社区
Britney's online persona: ultra wealthy heiress, rubbing shoulders with celebrities in China and the US, poker is just a fun hobby where she splashes money around, private jets and A-list friends are just another Tuesday for her. The reality: barely educated, fake boobs, fake boss. Her actual income comes from running private games, taking pieces of players, and raking the pot.
显示更多
经广州移动和北京移动实地验证,确认 Vless+Reality+Vision 是已经能被移动识别并阻断了的。联通没这问题,但既然移动能做到,想必联通也不是啥问题,单纯想不想。
显示更多
0
42
279
15
转发到社区
I dramatically underestimated the value of Grok Bot in my Tesla. Can you technically do everything you’re able to do with Grok Bot in the Tesla just by launching the app on your phone and going voice mode? Sure. But the magic isn’t in the raw capability itself, it’s in the combination of raw capability and total seamlessness. I often have fleeting thoughts while driving around. Some of these things aren’t significant enough to make me fumble around with my phone while supervising FSD, but when I literally don’t have to lift a finger and can just “Hey Grok” anything computer related into reality, I find myself taking advantage daily. And the little things add up. I’m on my way to work and remembered that I have a few documents on my home computer that I am going to need for work. So I just asked “Hey Grok, can you grab those 4 pdf files from my Mac downloads folder and move them into X folder on my one drive?” Now they’ll be where I need them to be when I get to my desk, and I won’t have to re-download them on my work machine. I have to work on a presentation today for a talk in a few weeks. “Hey grok, go into my sales enablement folder and have Claude Code build me a deck focused on X product for Y industry.” Claude already has my full job context, styling preferences etc and can build a nearly finished deck with a prompt. Now when I get to my desk, instead of building from scratch, I can review and prompt revisions before beginning to dig through my email backlog. Feels insane.
显示更多
0
21
145
15
转发到社区
From concept to reality. @SpaceX has successfully deployed Starlink V3 satellites into Earth’s orbit and made contact with them for the first time. At scale, one Starship carries 60 V3 satellites, the same network capacity as about 20 Falcon 9 launches.
显示更多
0
628
25.2K
3.4K
转发到社区
The Tea Ceremony (Life is a series of natural and spontaneous changes. Don't resist them... Let reality be reality.- Lao Tse) Richard Avedon, Veruschka 1966
0
17
5.3K
124
转发到社区
My god this is such a good speech that every SWE needs to hear. You know what? Every person should hear it Keep the happy memories, eyes on the reality, be excited about the future. That’s the best that anyone can do
显示更多
0
352
15.1K
1.9K
转发到社区
Meta 在 Connect 2026 正式发布 Meta VR Glasses!这是一台售价 1300 美元、约 100 克的眼镜式头显,计算与供电全靠外置 Puck,和 Vision Pro 不一样;Puck 搭载高通 Snapdragon Reality Elite,跑与 Quest 3 相同的系统,靠更强芯片和眼动注视点渲染做到更高分辨率。 其形态上和 Quest 差别很大:头显本身几乎没有计算,连 tracking 协处理器都没有,镁合金镜框、被动散热、开放周边视野——侧向和下方能直接看到真实世界。 双屏 120Hz、2412×2288 HDR micro-OLED,是 Meta 自初代 Oculus Quest 以来首款非 LCD 头显,支持 Dolby Vision,也是首款支持 Dolby Atmos 音景的 VR 设备。代价是视场角偏小:水平 70° × 垂直 66°,对角约 87°,远低于 Quest 3 的约 110° × 96°;装上可选遮光片时沉浸感会弱很多,但摘掉遮光片做透视时,周边自然可见反而是优势。Meta 把它定位成「能塞进包里的影院、场边座位和工作空间」。 和 Xreal Aura 一类 Android XR 眼镜比,它用 VR 式透视、更大对角 FoV、更高分辨率、全不透明,还带眼动和可选追踪手柄。内容侧会扩一批手势追踪的 VR / MR 游戏(含 Beat Saber 新手势模式 Flux)。 首发还有 Hologram:可像 Vision Pro 的 Personas 一样,以逼真面部追踪形象现身,并在其他 Meta VR Glasses 用户前以真人尺度出现。Meta 计划逐步做成真正 6DoF 3D,最终取代卡通 Meta Avatars,成为平台默认形象。
显示更多
Rough back of the envelope math: if 40% of US physicians are OpenEvidence DAUs and there's ~22 workdays a month, 42m queries in August implies ~5 queries per workday day per physician (Google is ~4.2 searches per day and ChatGPT is ~2.5 queries per day). This kind of pulse on real-time clinical uncertainty is remarkable. Imagine you could now categorize those queries: see for which flavors of clinical uncertainty existing knowledge / solutions are most scant (or don't exist at all) and then plug in that knowledge / those solutions, fund studies / initiatives to create that knowledge / those solutions, etc. You see how OpenEvidence's flywheel will start to spin a lot faster than the labs in terms of capabilities. It's all about your product enumerating demand in some valuable subset of economic reality faster than competitors. In this case, OpenEvidence enumerates physician demand for information / capabilities that can help solve patient problems. They do this faster and with higher fidelity than anyone else. This is incredibly valuable.
显示更多