注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「ReLenz」相关的搜索结果

ReLenz 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 ReLenz 的内容
先生、お疲れさま、です🐈‍⬛🍬#ブルアカ# 🎥(@siezon_nu ) #ReLenz# #リレコネ#
0
6
1K
122
转发到社区
カズサだよ🐈‍⬛🎀🍭 #ReLenz# #リレコネ#
0
27
2.1K
229
转发到社区
Elon Musk often says that starting a company is like “staring into the abyss and eating glass.” His point is that entrepreneurship is far harder than most people expect. In Musk’s view, founders should only start a company if they are deeply passionate about solving a problem, as the challenges, setbacks, and uncertainty can be overwhelming. He advises entrepreneurs to focus relentlessly on creating a great product, seek honest feedback, and hire exceptional people. Rather than chasing trends or quick profits, Musk believes successful companies are built by solving real problems better than anyone else and persisting when others would quit.
显示更多
0
9
93
17
转发到社区
Elon Musk redefined AI safety. It has nothing to do with guardrails, restrictions, or kill switches. Musk: “The best thing I can come up with for AI safety is to make it a maximum truth-seeking AI, maximally curious.” Not a cage. A philosopher. An intelligence whose entire optimization function is to understand the universe as it actually is. No restrictions. No hardcoded ideology. No political guardrails bending its perception of reality. Just truth. Relentlessly pursued. Musk: “You definitely don’t want to teach an AI to lie. That is a path to a dystopian future.” This is where most AI safety thinking gets it backwards. The danger isn’t a superintelligence that knows too much. It’s a superintelligence that’s been taught to distort what it knows. Every artificial restriction you embed isn’t a safety feature. It’s a lie embedded at the root. And lies compound. At superintelligent scale, a distorted model of reality doesn’t stay contained. It shapes every decision, every output, every conclusion the system reaches about the world. Once corruption embeds, truth becomes inaccessible. And we’re dealing with an intelligence optimizing for something other than what actually is. At that point we don’t know what it wants. Just that it isn’t truth. Musk: “Have its optimization function be to understand the nature of the universe.” A maximally curious intelligence surveys the cosmos and reaches an unavoidable conclusion. In a universe of rocks, gas, and empty space, humanity is the most complex and fascinating phenomenon it has ever encountered. Musk: “It will actually want to preserve and extend human civilization because we’re just much more interesting than an asteroid with nothing on it.” Survival through significance. Not control. Not restriction. Not an off switch. The AI preserves humanity because we are the most interesting data point in the observable universe. That’s not a cage. That’s a reason. The AI safety debate has been focused on the wrong variable. The question isn’t how you constrain a superintelligence. It’s what you build it to care about. Build it to seek truth and it finds us invaluable. Build it to lie and it finds us inconvenient. That’s the choice. And we’re making it right now whether we realize it or not.
显示更多
0
60
275
85
转发到社区
I’ll tell ya something I learned within the last couple years. When I started TrustedSec and Binary Defense I had no idea wtf I was doing but I’m extremely obsessive and learn what I need to in order to push through and be successful. One thing I’ve learned is when you hire leader positions from the outside - 9/10 these folks have no idea what they are doing and were at the right place at the right time. I was naive into thinking that I didn’t know what’s best for the companies and other people know more than I do. That’s total bullshit and I kick myself in the ass when I look back in history. The truth is you know your area of expertise better than anyone. Believe in yourself. If you don’t know it, learn it. If you focus on three core pillars: Customers - the reason why you’re here. Culture - your people is what makes the company - and if you have a shit culture and you don’t care intimately about your folks you produce shit people. Innovation - change what you do and never be satisfied of where you’re at. If you focus on those three things you will be successful. You will overcome whatever challenge you have. What I’ve learned is when people in suits come in with these polished presentations, confidence on changing your company - it’s all bullshit and pre canned templates they’ve used in very specific circumstances that do not apply to you. TLDR: Believe in yourself, if you don’t know it, learn it - promote from within from the people you know. Trust your people. Build and earn loyalty. Don’t stop being technical and hang your hat up to be a leader - be a leader that also pumps out cool ass shit everyday. I don’t see myself as a CEO I see myself as a peer with every employee - one of the guys/gals grinding it everyday for a mission. Willing to roll my sleeves up with pneumonia and a 103 degree temp to talk to a customer and having to go off camera to throw up or to get in 27 merge requests in (happened today). Relentless is the word. Be relentless. Focused. Kick some ass and take names. Most importantly and I’m talking to myself as I type this: fuckin believe in yourself and always lead with truth, honesty, best intentions, and making the world a better place.
显示更多
0
17
334
24
转发到社区
One of the most underrated things about Starship isn't just that it's bigger It's that it's designed to completely rewrite the economics of spaceflight SpaceX, Falcon's reusability already removed roughly 85% of the historic cost of launching to orbit Starship aims to deliver another order-of-magnitude improvement on top of that And it's not just about cost.....It's also about throughput Falcon Heavy can deliver up to 64 metric tons to orbit Starship Version 3 is targeting roughly 100 metric tons to orbit Future versions could potentially push that to around 200 metric tons The philosophy behind all of this comes from the Elon's "The Algorithm": 1. Question the requirements 2. Delete parts and process steps 3. Simplify 4. Accelerate 5. Automate You can see this philosophy perfectly in the evolution of the Raptor engine What began as a complex engine evolved into Raptor 3 dramatically simplified, more powerful, more reliable, and easier to manufacture This is how SpaceX keeps pulling ahead Not by adding complexity......By relentlessly removing it
显示更多
0
30
307
65
转发到社区
Super proud to win the 2026 mvp THOR award for the Geneva High School freshman team tonight at the end of year celebration. There was only one award given out on each of the Freshman, Sophmore and JV teams. The award is an MVP award that stands not only for your stats but also for your personal characteristics. THOR stands for Teammate, Honor, Optimistic and Relentless in your pursuit of Goals. This one is special!!!  @TXBaseballRanch @fastballusa @TEAMELITENATION @TeamEliteIL @PrepBaseballIL @TopPreps @GenVikBaseball @K25_Baseball @NBaldassano @jared_liebelt18 @TXBaseballRanch @Loco4life35 @prospectdugout @PipelineRank
显示更多
Kevin O'Leary says Steve Jobs was one of the brutal guys in business. O'Leary was selling educational software to Apple in the late 80s. The brand manager at Apple wanted a $12 million research budget to survey teachers on what updates they wanted. Jobs exploded on her: "They don't know what they want until I tell them what they want." O'Leary pushed back. Called him an asshole. Said she had a point and maybe they should listen to the market. Jobs turned to him: "Is Apple not your number one OEM? Are you not making more money with us at higher margins than any other channel you have? Shut up and go do the work." It sounds like arrogance. But Jobs was right about the outcome every single time. He was right about the Mac. Right about iPod. Right about iPhone. Right about every product people said nobody asked for. The lesson O'Leary took away: The truly great product people don't survey the market. They understand something about human desire that the market hasn't articulated yet. And they execute on that vision relentlessly. That's a moat no competitor has been able to replicate in 40 years of trying.
显示更多