与「Repeg」相关的搜索结果

🚨 $DOUSD IS LIVE 🚨 DO Corp's first stablecoin has landed, and it was built with a mission: bringing $USTC back to $1. 🎯 Here's how 👇 🔁 DOUSD buys back $USTC, putting real buy pressure behind the repeg 🛡️ Artemis Protocol lets you stake $USTC and earn USTC rewards ⚡ Mint. Buy. Stake. Every step pushes the repeg forward, faster. Terra Classic fam, you never gave up on USTC. Neither did we. 💪 This is the moment to make it count: ✅ Mint $DOUSD ✅ Grab $USTC ✅ Stake it on Artemis The repeg starts with us. Let's bring it home. 🌕 👉 #USTC# #LUNC# #TerraClassic# #DOUSD# #Repeg# Crypto is high risk and you could lose all you invest. Not financial advice. DYOR.

🚨 THIS IS WHY BITCOIN KEEPS CRASHING BELOW $67,000 If you still think Bitcoin trades like an asset whose price is determined purely by spot supply and demand, you need to read this carefully. Because that market no longer exists. What you’re watching right now is NOT normal price action. This isn’t just an AI stock sell-off. This isn’t just hotter inflation. And this definitely isn’t retail suddenly deciding to dump Bitcoin at the exact same time. Most people have no idea what is actually happening. And by the time it becomes obvious, the damage is usually already done. This didn’t start today. It has been building underneath Bitcoin for YEARS. And now it’s accelerating. Here’s the truth: Bitcoin still has a hard cap of 21 MILLION coins. But Wall Street can create almost unlimited financial EXPOSURE around those coins. That distinction changes everything. Because once derivatives dominate short-term price discovery... Bitcoin stops trading purely on who wants to own the actual coins. It starts trading on: 1) LEVERAGE. 2) HEDGING. 3) MARGIN. 4) LIQUIDATIONS. 5) FORCED SELLING. And that is exactly what is happening right now. It’s the same mechanism that repeatedly drives violent moves in: → Gold → Silver → Oil → Stocks Once derivatives become large enough, spot buyers are no longer the only force setting the price. And this is the part almost nobody understands: Bitcoin’s scarcity didn’t disappear. But scarcity alone no longer controls the SCREEN PRICE. Wall Street built an entire financial layer on top of Bitcoin: → Cash-settled futures → Perpetual contracts → Options → ETFs → Broker lending → Swaps → Wrapped BTC The 21 million cap controls the COINS. It does NOT cap the amount of leveraged exposure that can be created around them. And once that leverage starts unwinding... The market doesn’t care what the long-term thesis is. It SELLS. Look at what just happened: Over $1.9 BILLION in leveraged crypto positions wiped out in 24 hours. More than $1.1 BILLION liquidated in Bitcoin alone. Spot Bitcoin ETFs have already seen roughly $1.9 BILLION in outflows this month. Once leveraged selling overwhelms real buyers, price stops responding only to long-term demand. It starts responding to positions. Hedging. Margin calls. And cascading liquidations. Wall Street does not need to own millions of physical Bitcoin to push the market around. It only needs enough derivatives exposure and enough leverage sitting in the wrong place. The playbook is brutally simple: 1st: Build enormous leveraged exposur 2nd: Push price through obvious liquidity 3rd: Trigger stops and liquidations 4th: Forced selling pushes price even lower 5th: Buy back into the panic 6th: Repeat THIS is why Bitcoin can lose thousands of dollars while the number of coins on-chain barely changes. The coins didn’t suddenly disappear. The PRICE DISCOVERY mechanism changed. That’s what people are missing. Bitcoin is still scarce. But the financial claims built around Bitcoin are NOT. And when leverage controls the marginal trade... 21 million coins can behave like a market with FAR more supply than 21 million coins. That’s not the Bitcoin market retail thinks it is trading. That’s a WALL STREET PRICING SYSTEM built on top of Bitcoin. You can choose to ignore it. But don’t pretend nobody warned you. Bitcoin is now trading around $66,600, its lowest level since August and roughly 48% below the $126,200 high. If $65k breaks, the next level I’m watching is $62k. Reminder: I called the Bitcoin top at $126,000 and told you to start buying again around $60,000. The next call will matter even more. When I EXIT the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

First @tedlieu. Now @RepGraceMeng. Both Taiwanese American Democrats. The racial cover isn't even subtle. Rep. Grace Meng calls the @nvidia chip sales a "five alarm fire" and demands full transparency. Fine. Let's start with her. Let voters see how the Washington machine really works. The checks: Three @AnthropicAI employees gave her $17,000 this cycle. The PAC of Americans for Responsible Innovation (@americans4ri) added $2,000. The same donors: Those same three Anthropic employees also funded ARI's PAC—$85,000 in total. One gave Meng $3,000, then nearly $1M to Public First, an AI super PAC network. The same operative: ARI and Public First share a founder: former Democratic congressman Brad Carson (@bradrcarson). Anthropic gave Public First Action $20M, and Dario Amodei (@DarioAmodei) added $1M of his own. The same agenda: Two days after the midterms, ARI led 52 groups urging Democrats to hand out committee chairs based on AI safety positions. The seat and power: With Democrats taking the House, ARI is pushing hard for Grace Meng to chair the Commerce, Justice, Science (CJS) Appropriations subcommittee— the panel that funds the Department of Commerce (@CommerceGov). Commerce runs AI chip export controls and @NIST's AI safety work: Anthropic's top two priorities in Washington. Now she's going after NVIDIA—Anthropic's fiercest rival on export controls—and Commerce, the very agency she'll fund. Same donors. Same operative. Same agenda. Same subcommittee. No law needs to be broken. Interests find power. Power finds interests. That's the five-alarm fire. The real one. Congresswoman, you asked for full transparency. Here it is.

Je viens de regarder mon passage dans Quotidien. Évidemment, je suis qualifié d’« influenceur entrepreneur d’extrême droite ». Déroulons. Je ne sais pas si vous vous rendez compte à quel point le peuple français vous méprise. Vous êtes tellement déconnectés du réel que, dans votre petit monde, vous êtes persuadés d’avoir le monopole du bon sens. Alors je vais vous dire ce que vous êtes vraiment. Mais avant, je vais vous dire d’où je parle. Je suis breton. J’ai grandi dans un système scolaire profondément cassé. La majorité de mes profs étaient de gauche, et la plupart étaient déprimés. Pas méchants. Déprimés. Ils ne transmettaient qu’une chose : la conviction que le monde est injuste, que l’effort ne paie pas, et que demain sera pire qu’hier. Ce qui m’a sauvé, c’est d’avoir appris seul. J’ai commencé à coder à 12 ans. À 15 ans, j’avais créé un jeu qui me rapportait plus que le salaire de mes profs. Personne ne m’a donné la permission. Personne ne m’a subventionné. J’ai construit, des gens ont joué, j’ai été payé. La leçon d’économie la plus honnête de ma vie. Ensuite j’ai travaillé dans la tech, j’ai vécu dans la Silicon Valley, j’ai construit pas mal de choses. Et j’ai étudié l’économie par moi-même. Pas pour un diplôme. Pour comprendre comment le monde fonctionne vraiment. Et surtout, j’ai eu une chance que vous n’aurez jamais. J’ai été connecté, et je le suis encore, aux deux extrémités de la société. D’un côté, les couches les plus modestes, celles que vous prétendez protéger et incarner sans jamais leur parler. De l’autre, les couches les plus hautes : des milliardaires, des bâtisseurs, Elon Musk. Je fais le grand écart tous les jours. Et je peux vous dire une chose : en bas comme en haut, le diagnostic est le même. Vous, vous êtes au milieu, dans le seul étage de l’immeuble qui n’a pas de fenêtre. Ce que je vais dire maintenant, n’importe quelle personne saine d’esprit qui a un contact avec le réel le comprend. Yann, tu incarnes un mouvement et des idées qui ne représentent quasiment plus que vous. Ceux qui croient encore Quotidien et ses mensonges répétés en boucle, ce sont deux populations. Les gamins endoctrinés par une école capturée par l’idéologie. Et une partie des Français issus de l’immigration, qu’on manipule en leur répétant que les Français sont racistes. Un récit construit de toutes pièces par cette gauche mortifère, qui a besoin de victimes pour exister et qui les enferme dans ce rôle pour garder leurs voix. Les idées que vous défendez sont des idées de mort. Elles culpabilisent le travail. Elles humilient ceux qui construisent. Elles transforment chaque citoyen en assisté ou en suspect. Partout où elles ont été appliquées jusqu’au bout, elles ont produit la même chose : la pauvreté, la défiance, l’effondrement. Pas une exception. Pas une. Je le dis souvent : dans votre camp, il y a les cyniques et les believers. Les cyniques savent que ça ne marche pas, mais ça leur rapporte de l’audience, du pouvoir, des subventions. Les believers, eux, y croient sincèrement. Yann, je vais te laisser le bénéfice du doute. Je te range dans la case des believers. Alors un conseil : lis Hayek. La Route de la servitude. Ça se lit en un week-end, et ça t’expliquera pourquoi chaque bonne intention que tu défends à l’antenne pave exactement la route que tu prétends combattre. Tu as sans doute l’impression d’être du bon côté de l’histoire. Ils l’avaient tous. Mais tout ce que tu représentes enverra la France dans le chaos total. Les gens que tu appelles « extrême droite », ce sont des gens normaux. Des gens qui veulent vivre en sécurité, travailler, être payés dignement pour ce qu’ils font, et élever leur famille dans un pays qu’ils reconnaissent encore. C’est tout. Ce n’est pas une idéologie. C’est le bon sens que vous avez abandonné, puis insulté. Et je ne sais pas si vous mesurez ce qui est en train de se passer. Les peuples, dans leur intégralité, et avec eux les entrepreneurs, les créateurs de valeur, tous ceux qui font tourner ce pays, commencent à vous détester. Pas à vous critiquer. À vous détester, profondément, viscéralement. Chaque leçon de morale, chaque étiquette, chaque sketch condescendant creuse un peu plus le fossé. Alors un conseil d’ami : calmez-vous. Vraiment. Je viens d’un milieu très loin des salons feutrés parisiens et des dîners bobos où l’on décide entre soi qui a le droit de parler. Toi, tu vis dans une bulle. Une bulle confortable, chauffée, avec un public qui rit au signal. Mais le réel ne rit pas au signal. Plus personne ne vous croit. Et le réel vous jugera. Très sévèrement. Le replay a 27mn :

An American porn actress says a single shoot in Madrid involved 80 men and nearly a liter of semen. She counted 122 ejaculations, followed by another 10 onto her face. The night before, she had sat across from the director asking about pay and medical testing. He answered by opening a spreadsheet. In the interview below, she describes how the production was organized, from recruiting performers to deciding when she could take a break. According to her, the studio maintained a roster of around 300 men in Madrid. Getting onto it required a referral. Test results fed into the spreadsheet so the crew could track who was cleared to participate. The men could earn more depending on the shot they delivered. She says she was given three medications before filming, including one she describes as a muscle relaxant. Nine women worked as fluffers. Their waiting room had pink furniture and candy on the table. Outside, the men lined up while her videos played on a television. The shoot followed a repeating schedule: ten ejaculations into her mouth, swallow, then another ten. After fifty, she took a break and recorded an interview before returning. One assistant held a bowl beneath her chin to catch whatever spilled. She says the role even had a name: “scooper.” Amid all that coordination, she remembers one man missing and quietly apologizing. “I’m so sorry. I’m so sorry.” For the final sequence, she requested ten men instead of the usual five. Then the director addressed the group in Spanish. One word caught her attention: “ojos.” Eyes. Afterward, she asked whether he had instructed them to aim at her eyes. He denied it. According to her, he had repeated something she mentioned over dinner - that she didn’t mind and the men interpreted it differently. She has since referred other American performers to the production. “I’ve sent them so many Americans.”

🚨 HERE’S WHY BITCOIN IS NONSTOP DUMPING RIGHT NOW It's NOT because of the stock market AI bubble. It's NOT because of the rising inflation. It's NOT because of retail panic selling. Bitcoin no longer trades like a supply-and-demand asset. The crypto market has changed FOREVER. And what we're seeing right now is not ordinary price action. It’s not weak hands, changing sentiment, or retail panic. Something much bigger is happening behind the scenes, and most people haven't even realized it yet. By the time the crowd catches on, it'll already be too late. This didn't happen overnight. The structural shift has been developing for YEARS, and now we're seeing its consequences. Here's what nobody wants to acknowledge: The moment synthetic supply enters the equation, genuine scarcity loses its meaning. And once scarcity stops determining price, the market no longer discovers value through actual ownership. Price discovery moves into derivatives. That's precisely what has happened to Bitcoin. We've already witnessed this exact transformation in: → Gold → Silver → Oil → Equities Once derivatives became dominant, the underlying market structure changed permanently. Bitcoin is now facing the same reality. The entire original investment thesis was based on 2 fundamental principles: 1. A fixed maximum supply of 21 million BTC. 2. No rehypothecation. Both principles lost their effectiveness once Wall Street built an entire financial system around Bitcoin: → Cash-settled futures → Perpetual swaps → Options markets → ETFs → Prime broker lending → Wrapped BTC → Total return swaps And from that moment onward, synthetic Bitcoin exposure became effectively UNLIMITED. Not in actual blockchain supply. But in the financial markets that determine the price. Synthetic Float Ratio (SFR). This is the missing metric most people aren't aware of. When synthetic exposure exceeds the available real supply, price stops following demand. It becomes driven by positioning, hedging, and liquidation cascades. Wall Street now has the ability to manufacture Bitcoin exposure and trade against the underlying asset. Their playbook is really simple: 1. Manufacture unlimited paper BTC 2. Short aggressively into rallies 3. Trigger cascading liquidations 4. Cover positions at lower prices 5. Take profit and repeat This isn't simple speculation. It's financial inventory manufacturing. A single real BTC can simultaneously support: → An ETF share → A futures position → A perpetual swap → An options delta → A broker loan → A structured note ALL AT THE SAME TIME. 6 separate financial claims backed by one actual on-chain Bitcoin. That's NOT the decentralized free market people believe they're participating in. That's a new financial system operating under the Bitcoin name. You can ignore this reality, but you cannot escape its consequences. Quick reminder I’ve successfully called every major Bitcoin top and bottom for the past 10+ years. I publicly called the $17K BTC bottom in 2022 and the $126K top in 2025. Then, I called the $57K local bottom in 2026. Missed those calls? Don't worry, you'll get another chance soon. If you haven’t followed yet, now is the best time.

Honnêtement, je doute de plus en plus de la crédibilité de nos médias en France, bordel. Ces dernières années, la télé française nous répétait tous les soirs que la Chine était un pays "totalement fermé, hostile aux étrangers et au bord de l'effondrement". Puis la Chine a ouvert ses frontières sans visa aux Européens, et mon fil d'actualité est rempli de vidéos de Français qui voyagent à Shanghai ou Chongqing : des rues ultra-propres, des TGV pas chers et à l'heure, et la possibilité de marcher seul à 2h du matin sans craindre de se faire braquer. Et voilà, bordel, ça recommence. D'un côté, des experts sur nos plateaux télé qui prédisent la chute de la Chine. De l'autre, les images réelles des Européens sur place qui font passer Paris pour le tiers-monde. Je n'ai pas étudié l'histoire de la Chine et je ne comprends rien aux grandes théories politiques, je crois juste ce que je vois de mes propres yeux. J'ai une question toute bête : Pourquoi nos médias mettent-ils autant d'énergie à diaboliser un pays moderne ? Ils ont peur qu'on réalise que d'autres vivent mieux que nous et qu'on demande des comptes à nos propres politiciens ?

Breaking: Michael Burry says to “get out” of Nvidia $NVDA before it’s too late Burry's reasonings: 1. Without Huang, customers are free to “slow down deals, push back, renegotiate terms, or simply walk to a competitor” 2. Nvidia financed customer purchases through special vehicles and hidden debt, creating “tremendous leverage in the system” 3. Huang pushed customers to buy chips they didn’t need yet by threatening to cut their future allocations 4. Its growth may slow and “critically, its margins may fall” With Jensen Huang out, Burry says “Nvidia bulls will have another fluffy big chance to get out. Get out.”

Mi exnovia, con la que lo dejé hace 4 meses, me mandó ayer un WhatsApp de repente: «Gracias por pagarme los 3.200 € que me faltaban del alquiler. Sabía que todavía sentías algo por mí». Me quedé mirando el móvil sin entender absolutamente nada. Llevábamos 4 meses sin estar juntos. ¿Y el alquiler? Ella seguía viviendo en el piso que compartíamos antes. El contrato ya estaba únicamente a su nombre. Y todas las cuentas que teníamos pendientes las habíamos dejado zanjadas cuando me fui. ¿Que yo había pagado 3.200 €? ¿Yo? Ni de broma. Pensé que estaba intentando provocarme otra vez. Pero enseguida me mandó otro mensaje: «No hacía falta que hicieras esto para demostrarme que me sigues queriendo». Abrí la aplicación del banco. Revisé los últimos movimientos. Ni transferencias, ni cargos, ni absolutamente nada. Y entonces empecé a sospechar que había algo raro. Así que le contesté con una frase: