与「Vote_again」相关的搜索结果

BREAKING: Democrats on the Senate Homeland Security Committee just blocked a Republican effort to offer immunity to a former Dr. Fauci assistant in exchange for her testimony. She has been accused of destroying government documents on Fauci's behalf. Only one Democrat showed up to the meeting (Sen. Hassan D-NH), the other six voted no by proxy. All eight Republicans showed up. The resolution required a two-thirds vote to pass and it failed 8-7 along party lines. The unnamed former Fauci assistant previously pleaded the Fifth Amendment before the committee and refused to answer any questions, hence the GOP effort to offer her immunity from prosecution in exchange for her testimony. Republicans on the committee blasted their Democratic colleagues for not showing up, and for "having no interest in the truth." Chairman @RandPaul (R-KY): "There's no principal reason to vote against giving her immunity, the only reason is that you don't want her to answer, and you do not want to know the truth." Sen: @RonJohnsonWI (R-WI): "I do not want to see Anthony Fauci's assistant go to jail. I want the truth. I think it's pretty obvious today, we only have one Democrat here, we're not going to get it."

If Democrats in Congress care about affordability, then why did every single one of them vote against eliminating taxes on tips, overtime, and Social Security? Instead, Democrats tried to massively hike taxes on working families. They are affordability frauds.

I asked Senator Thom Tillis about his vote against the Save America act and whether it has anything to do with the money he’s receiving from industries who profit off of cheap illegal labor. He was VERY mad about the question. We deserve better than these America Last losers!

BREAKING: VP Vance just SHOT DOWN the defeatism coming from Leader Thune on the SAVE America Act: Reporter: "Leader Thune says it's unrealistic to get the SAVE America Act passed, do you believe this is possible?" Vance: "Why don‘t we try? At least force people to vote against it... let people go on the record and actually answer to the American people."

🚨 ALERT: The Trump-Vance administration has dropped a bombshell on America’s enemies, announced that “No more taxpayer dollars for hostile nations that hate America. If you vote against us at the UN, chant ‘Death to America,’or fund anti-American NGOs, you’re cut off. Period.”

Paper ballots are the smartest, safest way to ensure your vote is secure against attacks by foreign actors. Russia can’t hack a piece of paper like they can a computer. We introduced the Secure Elections Act to ensure our elections are safeguarded. We must be ready.

Four protocols I track describe themselves as buying back their own token, and the four promises have almost nothing in common. The word does a lot of hiding. A buyback can mean tokens are permanently destroyed, or that they are sitting in a vault someone still holds the keys to, or that a team has decided for now to spend some revenue this way and could decide otherwise next quarter. Those are different claims on future supply, and only one of them is irreversible. hyperliquid:native is the strict version. Protocol fees buy HYPE on the open market and the tokens go to an address with no private key, which makes the destruction provable rather than promised. Validators formalized the mechanism rather than leaving it as a team policy. That is about as binding as this gets. The catch is the buyback is denominated in dollars, so a rising price retires fewer tokens for the same spend. Tokens repurchased fell roughly 61% year over year while the dollars spent fell under 20%. The support mechanically weakens exactly when the price is working, and there is a separate overhang underneath it, with a large tranche of team tokens vested but unclaimed. ethereum:0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the conditional version, and it is the newest. Governance had to vote the fee switch on, which it did in late July, and the mechanism itself is code rather than discretion. But the burn rate is a function of trading volume, and a meaningful share of that volume currently runs on a chain where gas is being subsidized. Day one spike burned 106,000 tokens. The 30-day mark lands Saturday, and the number that matters is the lowest sustained rate over the window rather than the average, because the average is still carrying the launch. solana:pumpCmXqMfrsAkQ5r49WcJnRayYRqmXz6ae8H7H9Dfn is the discretionary version. The share of revenue directed to buybacks was cut from most of it to half of it in April. The revenue is real and recovering, but the allocation is a dial the team controls, and it has already been turned once. A policy that has been changed is a policy that can be changed. Same dollar-denominated arithmetic applies here too. $LINK is the one most people misread. Chainlink converts revenue into LINK on the open market, including revenue from enterprise contracts that settle in dollars, which almost nobody else does. Then it puts the tokens in a timelocked reserve. A reserve is not a burn. The tokens still exist, and the contract permits them to move eventually. Scale is the bigger challenge as roughly $60 million a year of conversion against a market capitalization near $7 billion absorbs about 1% of supply, while team-managed unlocks have added multiples of that. Emissions are outrunning absorption by something close to ten to one. The business is winning its market. The token is losing the arithmetic. The ranking that matters is not which protocol buys back the most. It is which promise survives someone changing their mind. Provably unspendable beats code-executed beats team policy beats a vault with keys. The market frequently prices all four the same way. Observations, not advice.

BREAKING: A special prosecutor has declined to file criminal charges against Elon Musk over the 2025 Wisconsin Supreme Court election. After reviewing the full evidence, DA Tim Gruenke concluded the recipients were paid to support a petition against activist judges, not to vote.