与「Walk_in_space」相关的搜索结果

[NOTICE] #gugudan# #HANA#'s Web drama <Yeonnamdong family> OST #Walk_in_space# has been released❣ A sweet song that is delivered with HANA's clear voice🎶 Dear Friends, let's listen together💕 🎧 #Yeonnamdong_family# #OST#

[NOTICE] #구구단# #하나# 가 참여한 웹드라마 <연남동 패밀리> OST #Walk_in_space# 음원이 모든 음원 사이트에 공개되었습니다❣ 하나의 청아한 목소리로 전하는 달달한 감성의 곡🎶 단짝들 우리 같이 들어요💕 🎧 #gugudan# #HANA# #연남동패밀리# #OST#

Hibiya Park is a lush green space in the heart of Tokyo where you can feel the changing seasons. In early summer, fresh greenery fills the park, making it perfect for a walk. The park also offers a pleasant, accessible space for everyone through its barrier-free initiatives.

AI Is Moving Beyond “Generating Videos” — Toward “Generating Worlds” Over the past two years, AI video models have advanced at an astonishing pace. From Runway and Pika to Sora and Veo, AI-generated videos have become increasingly realistic and more consistent with the physical laws of the real world. Many people believe the next objective is simply to generate videos that are longer, sharper, and more lifelike. But if we take a step back, we can see that the real transformation is not happening in video itself. It is happening in world models. What Is a World Model? In 1943, psychologist Kenneth Craik proposed an idea that would influence artificial intelligence research for decades. He argued that the human brain does not merely react to the outside world. Instead, it maintains an internal model of how the world works. Because we have this internal model, we can predict the outcome of an action before we actually take it. Before crossing a road, we estimate whether a car will pass by. Before catching a ball, we predict its trajectory. These abilities come from continuously simulating the world in our minds, rather than relying entirely on trial and error. This idea later became known by a more formal term: World Model. A world model does not describe a single image or a fixed video clip. It is an internal representation capable of continuously simulating the rules and dynamics of the real world. Why Is AI Research Turning Toward World Models? Because predicting “what comes next” is becoming increasingly central to how AI systems work. Language models predict the next token. Image models predict the next step in the denoising process. Video models predict the next frame. A world model, however, attempts to predict something broader: What should the world look like in the next moment? In 2018, David Ha and Jürgen Schmidhuber proposed in their paper World Models that an intelligent agent could first learn a model of the world, and then use that internal model to plan its actions. The Dreamer series later demonstrated that many complex tasks could be learned by training agents inside an “imagined world.” At the same time, the development of video models such as Sora and Veo led researchers to another realization: A model capable of continuously generating video has already learned, at least implicitly, many of the rules governing the real world. As a result, these two research directions have gradually begun to converge. But Video Is Not Yet a World This is where the distinction is often misunderstood. For a world model to support meaningful real-time interaction, it must solve several critical problems. Most video models today are essentially answering one question: What should the next frame look like? A true world model needs to answer much more: What happens if I take one step forward? If I walk behind a building and then return, will the building still be there? If I suddenly change the camera angle, will the entire space remain consistent? If I enter a command such as: “Summon a dragon.” Will the world respond immediately? In other words, a world model must do more than generate content. It must understand space. It must understand time. It must understand causality. And it must understand interaction. Moving from watching to participating is where the real difficulty of world models begins. World Models Are Entering the Interactive Era One of the latest attempts in this direction is Alaya World, recently open-sourced by Alaya World, or @alayastd. Instead of generating a fixed video clip, it generates a world that users can explore in real time. Users can begin with text, an image, or a video, enter the generated scene, move freely through it, and introduce new prompts at any moment during generation. The world responds immediately. According to the publicly released information, Alaya World provides: Real-time streaming generation at 720p and 24 FPS Stable continuous exploration for more than one minute The ability to switch prompts and trigger skills or events during generation Model weights and inference code released under the Apache 2.0 License Training code and datasets planned for future release What makes these capabilities important is not simply the technical specifications. It is that the generated “world” can now support continuous interaction. The official demo shows that users can genuinely control, transform, and explore the generated environment. AI Is Evolving From a Tool Into an Environment Over the past few years, most discussions around AI have focused on content generation. Generating text. Generating images. Generating videos. But world models raise a fundamentally different question: Can AI generate an environment that people can inhabit, explore, and continuously evolve? If the answer is yes, the impact will extend far beyond video generation. Game development, robotics training, embodied intelligence, digital twins, virtual production, and many other fields could be transformed by the development of world models. World models are still at a very early stage. Yet from Craik’s proposal of an internal mental model more than eighty years ago to the emergence of today’s interactive world-generation systems, a clear evolutionary path is beginning to take shape. Perhaps what AI is ultimately learning has never been limited to images, videos, or language. Perhaps it is learning the world itself. References GitHub: Technical Report:

Contemporary art, bold exhibitions, and a building that earns its place in the city. Today Art Museum in Chaoyang is one of Beijing's best creative spaces—and getting there is straightforward. Line 7 to Shuangjing, Exit F, 15-minute walk.

One of my 4am tweets mentions nonce reuse. I was speaking casually bc I was flabbergasted by just how fucking stupid this is. And nonce reuse is historically the stupidest thing so they got crossed in my heads. I got the other one right, so I'll repeat it now: These guys rolled their own crypto so fucking hard that anyone could get your private key from public information. Cardano should stop obsessing over whether this is a Cardano hack and realize that THIS IS INSANE. Fucking up the nonces is common with ECDSA. It is NOT EdDSA/Ed25519. This shit was intentionally DESIGNED to eliminate the footguns that are common with EDCSA. It took WORK for the developers of this wallet to accomplish this. Using the standard crypto libs—which are used by all wallets in a sane universe—would NOT result in this issue. If you are building a wallet and cant get the bare minimum correct, you deserve to die a violent and bloody death. NO ONE should not expect someone who cannot even walk to be able to run, jump, skip, hop, etc. And ALL of those skills are necessary when building a wallet in this adversarial ass space. This must be the end of Emurgo/SecondFi/Yoroi. If you forgive and forget, you are sealing your own fate and being willfully fucking retarded.

Long post. Most will scroll past before realize what is hidden in it. That is part of the filter. This is not one idea. It is a trail. Physics shows up. Belief shows up. The body shows up. Responsibility shows up. At first, they may look like separate rooms. They are not. They are connected doors. Read slowly. The connections run deeper than they first appear. A person can spend years looking for answers and still refuse the one thing that would actually change the result. That is the part people usually do not want to see. They think the problem is lack of information. More books, more lectures, more techniques, more quantum mechanics, more explanations. But information does not change a life if the belief underneath remains the same. Before looking at physics experiments, this needs to be clear. In this view, quantum mechanics is not mainly about technology, weapons, machines, or theories. The real point is to understand how the universe works so a person can create the reality they want in their own life. But there is a trap here too. A person can hear “consciousness is fundamental” and turn it into another slogan. Another belief to defend. Another thing to repeat without changing anything. The words changed, but the structure did not. So the question cannot stop at, “What is consciousness made of?” That question matters, but it can become too abstract too fast. People start adding extra machinery, extra assumptions, extra invisible interactions, and then act as if the problem has been solved. But adding more parts does not automatically explain experience. It only moves the question somewhere else. The deeper question has to become operational first. What kind of system can sustain consciousness? What must a physical system do to keep a coherent internal perspective alive through noise, change, error, memory, pain, emotion, and time? That question points to what actually happens when consciousness appears, weakens, breaks, returns, or stabilizes. It does not ask for a slogan. It asks for a process. A conscious system has to keep a model of “me,” “now,” and “the world” intact while everything inside and outside it is changing. The body changes. The brain changes. The chemistry changes. The environment changes. Memory updates. Prediction errors arrive. Emotion interrupts. The senses keep correcting the picture. And still, something holds. There is a point of view. There is a world being experienced from somewhere. That does not fully solve the metaphysical hard problem. A skeptic can still ask, “Why should stable modeling feel like anything at all?” That is fair. A thermostat regulates. A computer processes information. A brain models the world. Those are not automatically the same thing as felt experience. But the question becomes deeper. Maybe experience is not a substance added on top of the system. It is what the system is from the inside when the right kind of self maintaining stability is achieved. Once a system preserves a living perspective across body, memory, prediction, and world, that perspective is not something it watches from outside. It is the only vantage point available to it. That is where the operational question opens the metaphysical one. Consciousness is the base of everything. Matter is not the foundation. Matter is a manifestation of consciousness. The fundamental state is the wave. What appears as matter is one expression of that deeper state. But then comes the practical problem. People hear this and still do not want to change their beliefs. If the beliefs do not change, nothing changes. A person can study for years and still produce the same life because the inner position stayed untouched. This becomes clear in a lecture room. You can explain the same thing fifty times, three hours each time, for years. The person listens, but does not move one millimeter. Five years later, the same belief is still there. So how could the result be different? It cannot. Study is supposed to mean learning. Learning means, “I did not know this before. Now I know it. Because I know it, I change my behavior. I change my consciousness according to what I learned.” If that does not happen, what was the point of studying? It is like reading the manual of a car while continuing to destroy the car. The manual explains what needs to be done, but the person keeps driving the same way and then acts surprised when the car stops. But what was the manual for? People often approach new ideas with an automatic reflex of rejection instead of genuine consideration. One point is raised and dismissed. Another follows and receives the same response. When this pattern continues, no new possibility is tested or allowed to land. Discernment is necessary, but when every suggestion is rejected before it is examined, real change becomes nearly impossible. The same requests keep coming. The credit card. The overdraft. The contract. Month after month, year after year, the person wants a different result, but the state behind the result does not change. In this view, everything that happens in a person’s life is connected to the consciousness they carry. If a person believes in problems, problems appear. If a person believes in possibility, possibilities appear. Imagine someone stuck in mud, holding onto it as if it were gold. Someone pulls them out, but as soon as they let go, the person jumps back in. Why? Because in their consciousness, the mud is still gold. The location changed for a second, but the perception did not. Only when the state of consciousness changes can they actually be helped. Until then, every rescue is temporary. The same applies to relationships. There is a process. It involves bio chemistry, neurotransmitters, and what the person feels. Handled properly, it works. Handled wrongly, it breaks. But many people hear the process and still say, “That cannot be done.” Then how can the result appear if the process is rejected? It is like making a chocolate cake. Follow the recipe ratios, temperatures, and the cake works. Change the ingredients carelessly, and there is no cake. For a cake, everyone understands this. But in life, when not following the law produces suffering, people still argue with the process. So the question remains. What is the problem with changing what you think? It looks like ego. It becomes “what I think” against “what is being explained.” The person holds onto the old belief because admitting the new one would mean letting go of being right. Even when the process is explained clearly, the old belief returns immediately. Someone might say, “But I was taught that I should not want too much,” or “Good things only come after I have struggled enough.” The conditioning reasserts itself before the new understanding can take root. There it is. A belief from childhood, family, culture, grandmother, great grandmother, another century, still deciding the person’s life today. Science and experience may show that it does not work. The person may be frustrated, repeating the same result, and still say, “No, someone else has to take initiative. I have to wait.” Who said that? Where was this written as a cosmic law? It was said by tradition, by conditioning, by people repeating what they received without checking if it produced happiness. This applies to everything. A person receives the explanation clearly. “Do this, this, and this.” In the moment, they agree. Then they walk out the door and do the opposite. Why deceive the person trying to help you? If you mislead your therapist, lawyer, or accountant, you do not win. You just make the help useless. If a person resists even that, imagine what happens when the subject touches the deepest layers of meaning and faith. Many hold stories and interpretations passed down through generations that once gave life structure and certainty. When a clearer and deeper understanding becomes available, some may hear it yet still continue living as if the older framework remains the final truth. Whole civilizations are built on stories. Ideas about life, death, work, women, guilt, punishment, rest, and salvation sit on top of them. So when the story is questioned, the person feels their whole structure being touched. To bring about real change in life, the person has to align with the basic principles of how the universe operates in this view. That requires shifting the state of consciousness and the underlying paradigm. Everything is under the paradigm. If the paradigm does not change, nothing truly changes. The person remains dependent on someone else to keep fixing what they continue to create from the same inner state. This is why resonance is meant for liberation, not as permanent support. Its purpose is to help the person shift their consciousness so they can stand on their own. When used this way, money may begin to flow and situations may improve. But if the thoughts and beliefs underneath remain the same, the old patterns eventually return and recreate the same problems. There is also a deeper spiritual point here. A real connection with God, the divine, the higher self, or the sacred within does not make a person smaller. It should make the person more honest, responsible, awake, and capable of love. The problem is not faith. The problem is when inherited fear, guilt, or identity freezes around faith and gets mistaken for the living connection itself. That is why full responsibility can feel threatening. It does not have to destroy faith. It can purify it. It removes the excuse, but not the sacred. It returns creative responsibility to the individual while allowing the inner connection with higher power to deepen instead of staying trapped inside old programming. There was a young man who understood this after only four months of doing this inner work. He came from heavy conditioning, but saw the mechanism. He realized the role his own consciousness had been playing in shaping his experience, and that he had been sabotaging himself through it. Once he saw that, he took the beliefs he had carried for years and threw them away. That is change. Now take illness. In this view, every illness has a psychosomatic dimension alongside its biological expression. Physical conditions often reflect deeper inner states. When it is suggested that certain patterns of inner resistance or avoidance can contribute to physical symptoms, strong objection usually appears. But test it yourself. Deliberately give space to inner resistance. Feed the feeling of not wanting to engage with life or responsibility, and observe what happens in the body over the following days. The resistance is intense because it brings the role of one’s inner state back into awareness. The work is to question the beliefs. List what you believe about money, health, relationships, work, sales, the body, and the future. Then compare the belief with the result. If the belief is not questioned and changed, the result is zero. Relationships expose this faster. When the subject is metaphysics, many people let it pass. But when the subject is male and female conditioning, the room heats up. Touch the beliefs around men, women, initiative, control, guilt, and blame, and people react instantly. This same pattern appears in how people treat others. Someone may speak of spiritual values while still holding contempt or judgment toward certain groups. The contradiction is not always obvious to the person. It stems from old stories absorbed long ago. Those stories continue to shape how the person sees and treats others through tone, assumptions, and prejudice. This is not rare. Old beliefs do not remain only in the mind. They turn into behavior. When this inner work begins opening the unconscious, what is inside starts coming out. If there is mud inside, mud comes out. This is why some people say they started the process and now have more problems. Fear, guilt, anger, prejudice, laziness, and old beliefs do not disappear just because someone pressed play yesterday. The cleaning can take time. It may last one month, two months, six months, a year, or longer. While the old material is still coming out, results tend to appear in pieces. The bigger shifts usually come once the cleaning reaches a certain point. Many people want the benefits, but they do not want the study, questioning, or inner change needed to hold those results. That is imagination trapped in place. But the principle is simple in this view. Your consciousness participates in shaping your reality and continues to do so. Change an inch in consciousness and reality shifts an inch. Change a mile in consciousness and reality shifts a mile. Expansion creates expansion. If you believe you can earn one thousand, you earn one thousand. If you believe you can earn ten thousand, ten thousand becomes possible. If you believe you can earn one million, then one million is not a different category. It is still energy. The number is not the obstacle. The belief is. This is why real help cannot stay as rescue forever. At first, someone may heal, fix, rescue, and intervene. But after years, the same pattern appears. The person receives the benefit but does not evolve. The money comes, the illness improves, but consciousness does not move. Then the helper realizes they are only postponing the consequence. So they stop being a crutch and start teaching. Because if the person does not understand, the same pattern continues here or on the other side. People resist quantum mechanics because they sense where it leads. If consciousness is involved in reality, then responsibility comes back to the person. There is no place to hide behind fate, blame, family, society, or chance. Even biology can be read through that question. A living cell has been shown producing laser light. Not a whole organ. Not a brain. One cell. If one living cell can organize light in such a precise way, imagine a brain with billions of neurons and countless connections. Can the human being release energy too? Yes, through consciousness. A cell can emit organized light. A human being, with a developed consciousness, can direct energy in a much greater way. But then the mind keeps collapsing the problem. There is a quantum effect where continuous observation can keep a system from changing state. Translated into ordinary life, if the person keeps staring at the debt, the debt remains. If the person keeps staring at illness, illness remains. If the person keeps staring at lack of work, lack remains. “When will the money come to pay the debt?” Never, while the whole consciousness is fixed on the debt. “When will I get a job?” Never, while the whole consciousness is fixed on not having one. “When will I leave the hole?” Never, while the person keeps observing the hole. Trying too hard from the wrong state can keep the person trapped. The person thinks effort is solving the problem, but the attention is still feeding the same condition. Sometimes problems move because people accidentally stop focusing on them. For a while, the problem is not being observed with the same intensity. Then things move because the focus loosened. That is why a simple instruction can be powerful. Watch films that hold your attention. Comedies, dramas, anything that takes the focus off the problem. But even that meets resistance. A person hears that laughter and endorphins can help the body, and then says they could not find a single comedy they liked. Healing cannot be separated from consciousness. A person may arrive with a serious illness and want a miracle. But if the illness was built through resentment, anger, guilt, fear, and years of inner pressure, then the real work is not only physical. The person has to change the state that built the condition. Each situation has to be seen as a whole. If a store is failing, it may not be only the store, the economy, the decoration, or the sales process. You have to look at the people involved, the relationships, the history, and the whole field around the situation. The system is built so people do not understand what reality is made of. As long as things are presented as mysteries that cannot be questioned, people are less likely to look into how they actually work. Once someone understands the atom, the rest begins to open. Matter is not so solid anymore. Reality is not just hard objects separated from each other. It becomes information, energy, relation, and response. That is why non locality matters. If all particles remain connected, then nothing is truly isolated. The whole universe is one entangled system. What happens in one place does not stay completely separate from what happens elsewhere. When problems appear in one part of the world, they are not truly isolated from the rest. In this view, events reverberate through the whole field. To claim complete separation from what happens elsewhere contradicts the interconnected nature of reality itself. The same inconsistency appears when those who profit from outdated systems blame the public for pollution while suppressing cleaner technologies that could reduce harm. In this view, one cannot claim separation while benefiting from the structures that create the problem. Everything is connected. Experiments with entangled particles show correlations that do not behave like ordinary local contact. One particle is measured here, and the other responds there. The information does not travel in the normal way through space, because relativity says nothing can travel faster than light. Yet the correlation appears. So what do people do with that? They use quantum principles to develop technology. Quantum computers. Quantum encryption. Quantum communication. They build products from the very principles they deny when consciousness enters the discussion. That is not simple ignorance anymore. That is convenience. If information is stored in the field and can be accessed and transferred, then resonance becomes sensitive because the result becomes measurable. Someone asks for a result, the information is transferred, and something changes. But will the system allow that kind of experiment to be done freely? Probably not. Because once the deeper potentials of consciousness and information are recognized and measured, they would exceed the limits of the current accepted framework. Strong evidence that consciousness can directly influence outcomes would force a shift the existing structure is not ready to allow. The resonance does not depend on a huge physical machine. The information is there. It is accessed. It is transferred. If the result appears, the old explanation starts to break. But people also sabotage the result. Someone may ask for a higher level of excellence, but not fully understand what they are inviting in. That force carries a way of thinking, feeling, acting, and deciding. It wants movement, execution, and the highest expression of itself. But when it enters a person’s life, it often collides with comfort zones, old beliefs, fear, approval seeking, and small habits. And then everything stops. The person says, “Nothing happened.” But something did happen. The archetype arrived and pushed toward expansion. The person hit the brakes with all their strength. If the person was moving at ten miles per hour, the archetype comes in wanting one hundred. The person panics and steps on the brake completely. So the system freezes. Not because the archetype failed. Because the person refused the level of action that came with it. If someone asks for excellence, they cannot keep living from mediocrity. A great scientist wants to study. A great athlete wants to train. A great business mind wants to build. The force comes with movement. That does not fit laziness, delay, comfort, excuses, or “this is good enough.” People ask for the top, but someone at the top is not there by accident. That person works more, trains more, studies more, sacrifices more, and refuses the average standard. So when that information enters, it demands alignment. If the person refuses alignment, the result blocks. That is imagination trapped in place again. The person does not want to study, learn, understand the laws, or question beliefs. They want to make requests and receive results as if the universe were a vending machine. But reality does not work according to what a person prefers. It works according to law. If the process is followed, the result comes. If the process is rejected, the result does not stabilize. The knowledge is already laid out. The path is not hidden. It is in the person’s hands. The only question is whether they will use it. Because receiving knowledge increases responsibility. The more a person understands, the more they are required to act from that understanding. If they know and do not act, they have to suppress what they know. And suppressing consciousness has a cost. The higher the consciousness, the greater the responsibility to live according to it. If the person receives more and still tries to remain small, the pressure turns inward. What is not lived becomes blocked. What is blocked becomes weight. And that weight eventually appears somewhere. So the point is simple. The more consciousness a person has, the more they have to do with it. Because if they do not, the same consciousness they refused to express becomes the force that turns against them.

If you're paying $2T for SpaceX at IPO, this clause is in the S-1. Anthropic pays $1.25B/month to rent SpaceX's Colossus data center. That's $15B/year - the core of the xAI business case. The contract has a 90-day cancellation clause. Either side can walk. @rodriscoll on @20vcFund: one customer and one 90-day window stand between you and losing a third of the valuation argument. Any Anthropic statement on compute strategy - shifting toward AWS, Google, or in-house capacity - is a material event that moves in 90 days. The clause that wasn't discussed when the deal was announced: Source: 20VC with Harry Stebbings -

🍌 nano banana pro prompt 🎬✨ Experience cinematic magic: a stunning split-screen photo seamlessly merging past and present, capturing dynamic interactions across time! ⏳ --- Prompt --- A horizontal split-screen cinematic shot of {Scene}, seamlessly blending two different eras: {Era_A} on the left and {Era_B} on the right (default: about 100 years ago vs. present day). On the left side ({Era_A}): show era-appropriate architecture, interior or environment design, materials, vehicles, and props that clearly belong to that historical period. People wear authentic clothing from {Era_A}, including hairstyles, accessories, and typical items in their hands (such as books, umbrellas, instruments, letters, newspapers, etc.). The overall mood feels nostalgic and historically accurate. On the right side ({Era_B}): show the same {Scene} in the modern era, with updated architecture or renovated structures, contemporary materials (glass, steel, LED screens, modern furniture), modern vehicles or equipment, and current technology (smartphones, laptops, cameras, etc.). People wear contemporary fashion that matches today’s style in this setting. In the center: the two eras merge and overlap organically, without a hard dividing line. Elements from {Era_A} and {Era_B} visually interact: people from different times look at each other, walk through each other’s space, or seem surprised by the other era’s technology and objects. Architecture and environment smoothly morph from old to new (for example, stone gates turning into modern campus gates, classical concert hall décor fading into a futuristic stage, old street shops transforming into neon-lit storefronts). Make sure the scene is not just a simple left/right comparison but a dynamic time-travel interaction where buildings, clothing, props, and human gestures clearly emphasize the contrast and fusion between the two eras. Photorealistic, 8k resolution, cinematic lighting, wide angle, highly detailed textures, rich sense of time-travel storytelling. --- SCENE: Times Square, New York Era Comparison: 1920s and present day Aspect Ratio: 4:3

Over the last ~2 hours I curated a new Podcast of 10 episodes called "Histories of Mysteries". Find it up on Spotify here: 10 episodes of this season are: Ep 1: The Lost City of Atlantis Ep 2: Baghdad battery Ep 3: The Roanoke Colony Ep 4: The Antikythera Mechanism Ep 5: Voynich Manuscript Ep 6: Late Bronze Age collapse Ep 7: Wow! signal Ep 8: Mary Celeste Ep 9: Göbekli Tepe Ep 10: LUCA: Last Universal Common Ancestor Process: - I researched cool topics using ChatGPT, Claude, Google - I linked NotebookLM to the Wikipedia entry of each topic and generated the podcast audio - I used NotebookLM to also write the podcast/episode descriptions. - Ideogram to create all digital art for the episodes and the podcast itself - Spotify to upload and host the podcast I did this as an exploration of the space of possibility unlocked by generative AI, and the leverage afforded by the use of AI. The fact that I can, as a single person in 2 hours, curate (not create, but curate) a podcast is I think kind of incredible. I also completely understand and acknowledge the potential and immediate critique here, of AI generated slop taking over the internet. I guess - have a listen to the podcast when you go for walk/drive next time and see what you think.