与「empath」相关的搜索结果

QUOTE 1: Conscience is an indispensable companion of both moral life and holistic self-realization. It recognizes our errors and weaknesses, giving an early signal for correction. Yet conscience itself must grow — and its development is supported by reason and constructive feelings. : The author presents conscience as an indispensable companion to both moral life and holistic self-realization. It serves as an inner guardian, sensitively detecting our errors and weaknesses and providing an early warning that allows for timely correction. However, conscience is not static or infallible. It must itself grow and mature. This development is nourished by two essential forces: reason, which brings clarity, consistency, and depth of understanding, and constructive feelings, which provide warmth, empathy, and moral sensitivity. When reason and feeling work in harmony, conscience becomes sharper, wiser, and more reliable. Without this ongoing cultivation, conscience can remain narrow, inconsistent, or overly rigid. With it, conscience evolves into a powerful guide that supports not only ethical conduct but the continuous unfolding of our full human potential. QUOTE 2: The choice of the modern individual is the duty of full self-realization and the readiness to face the judgment of conscience in moments of weakness. : The author states that the fundamental choice facing the modern individual is the conscious acceptance of a duty: the commitment to full self-realization. This is not optional self-improvement but a moral obligation to develop one’s intellect, character, creativity, and potential to the highest possible degree. Equally important is the readiness to face the judgment of one’s own conscience during moments of weakness. True self-realization demands honesty with oneself. When we falter, conscience must be allowed to speak clearly and without evasion. This inner accountability prevents self-deception and ensures that personal growth remains genuine rather than superficial. In this view, modern freedom is inseparable from responsibility. The privilege of shaping one’s life comes with the duty to shape it meaningfully and the courage to confront one’s shortcomings. Self-realization and moral self-honesty together form the core ethical demand of our time.

Elon Musk on the left’s fundamental moral flaw: “The fundamental moral flaw of the left is empathy for the criminals and not empathy for the victims” They feel sorry for the criminals but show zero empathy for the actual victims There’s also been immense unconstitutional judicial overreach that was never intended and it’s destroying the public’s faith in the legal system This needs to stop Put the victims first. Restore real justice

Elon just endorsed it. Gad Saad dropped the hammer on Fox this morning. We now live in a world where: - Rape victims get less sympathy than their rapists - Homeowners get less than the squatters breaking in - American vets get less than illegal migrants - Repeat felons with 186 charges get 200 more “chances” because “society made them do it” This isn’t kindness. This is suicidal empathy. Universities spent decades teaching our judges, leaders, and elites that personal agency is a myth if you check the right oppression boxes. So criminals become victims, victims become bigots for complaining, and the whole system rots from the inside.

There will be no AI jobpocalypse. The story that AI will lead to massive unemployment is stoking unnecessary fear. AI — like any other technology — does affect jobs, but telling overblown stories of large-scale unemployment is irresponsible and damaging. Let’s put a stop to it. I’ve expressed skepticism about the jobpocalypse in previous posts. I’m glad to see that the popular press is now pushing back on this narrative. The image below features some recent headlines. Software engineering is the sector most affected by AI tools, as coding agents race ahead. Yet hiring of software engineers remains strong! So while there are examples of AI taking away jobs, the trends strongly suggest the net job creation is vastly greater than the job destruction — just like earlier waves of technology. Further, despite all the exciting progress in AI, the U.S. unemployment rate remains a healthy 4.3%. Why is the AI jobpocalypse narrative so popular? For one thing, frontier AI labs have a strong incentive to tell stories that make AI technology sound more powerful. At their most extreme, they promote science-fiction scenarios of AI “taking over” and causing human extinction. If a technology can replace many employees, surely that technology must be very valuable! Also, a lot of SaaS software companies charge around $100-$1000 per user/year. But if an AI company can replace an employee who makes $100,000 — or make them 50% more productive — then charging even $10,000 starts to look reasonable. By anchoring not to typical SaaS prices but to salaries of employees, AI companies can charge a lot more. Additionally, businesses have a strong incentive to talk about layoffs as if they were caused by AI. After all, talking about how they’re using AI to be far more productive with fewer staff makes them look smart. This is a better message than admitting they overhired during the pandemic when capital was abundant due to low interest rates and a massive government financial stimulus. To be clear, I recognize that AI is causing a lot of people’s work to change. This is hard. This is stressful. (And to some, it can be fun.) I empathize with everyone affected. At the same time, this is very different from predicting a collapse of the job market. Societies are capable of telling themselves stories for years that have little basis in reality and lead to poor society-wide decision making. For example, fears over nuclear plant safety led to under-investment in nuclear power. Fears of the “population bomb” in the 1960s led countries to implement harsh policies to reduce their populations. And worries about dietary fat led governments to promote unhealthy high-sugar diets for decades. Now that mainstream media is openly skeptical about the jobpocalypse, I hope these stories will start to lose their teeth (much like fears of AI-driven human extinction have). Contrary to the predictions of an AI jobpocalypse, I predict the opposite: There will be an AI jobapalooza! AI will lead to a lot more good AI engineering jobs, and I’m also optimistic about the future of the overall job market. What AI engineers do will be different from traditional software engineering, and many of these jobs will be in businesses other than traditional large employers of developers. In non-AI roles, too, the skills needed will change because of AI. That makes this a good time to encourage more people to become proficient in AI, and make sure they’re ready for the different but plentiful jobs of the future! [Original text in The Batch newsletter.]

Human beings are not inherently bad, yet the rapid growth of problems in modern social life may push the rules of society toward greater selfishness and harshness. Only the elevating force of education and enlightenment can prevent this. : The author maintains that human beings are not inherently bad or malicious by nature. However, the rapid accumulation of problems in modern social life such as inequality, competition, and uncertainty creates conditions that can gradually push societal norms toward greater selfishness and harshness. When external pressures intensify, self-preservation instincts tend to dominate, weakening empathy, cooperation, and moral restraint. Without conscious intervention, this drift can reshape the rules of society in ways that prioritize individual gain over collective well-being. The only effective counterforce, according to the author, is the elevating power of education and enlightenment. These cultivate critical thinking, ethical awareness, and a broader sense of humanity, helping people rise above immediate pressures and maintain civilized values. In essence, the future character of society depends not on whether humans are good or bad at their core, but on whether we actively nurture the better angels of our nature through sustained intellectual and moral development.