与「reentry」相关的搜索结果

JUST IN: The New York Police Department declaring there’s no more room for spectators at the Knicks championship parade hours before the event is set to kick off. All viewing pens for the Knicks championship parade are full, and officials say no one else will be allowed into the designated viewing areas. If you're already inside, don't leave, reentry won't be allowed.

Grateful to have received a fourth donation from @CZ_BInance for $500K. He has donated $2M to further our mission of providing free educational resources to people in federal prison. #justiceeducation# #reentry# #secondchances#

Starship Was Engineered Backward From One Objective: Moving millions of tons to Mars at the lowest possible cost per ton to build a self-sustaining civilization. Five first-principles decisions make it possible: - Produce propellant on Mars. Methane and oxygen made from local CO2 and water ice via Sabatier. No Earth return fuel required. - Use 301 stainless steel. 67× cheaper than carbon fiber and survives both cryogenic propellants and 1,700°C reentry without heavy shielding. - Refuel in orbit. Tankers reset the rocket equation, enabling 100–150 ton payloads to Mars. - Belly-flop reentry. Maximize drag area so the atmosphere does most of the braking. - Full reusability. Both stages fly again rapidly. Marginal cost collapses to propellant only. This is the minimum architecture that makes multi-planetary life feasible.

🚨 SPACEX JUST GOT FAA APPROVAL TO TEST ITS NEW “STARFALL” CAPSULES. These are not regular reentry vehicles. SpaceX’s new circular Starfall capsules are designed to bring up to 1,000 kg of payload back from orbit safely, repeatedly, and at scale. They can launch on either Falcon 9 or Starship, perform in-space manufacturing, then reenter and splash down in the Pacific for rapid recovery. Why this matters: • Enables true commercial in-space manufacturing (microgravity + vacuum) that can be returned to Earth • Could become a “proliferated successor” to the ISS for self-sustaining space industry • Opens the door to rapid point-to-point cargo delivery from orbit to anywhere on Earth • Directly competes with companies like Varda that have been flying similar missions on SpaceX rockets The deeper implication is massive: We are moving from “occasional experiments in space” to routine manufacturing and logistics in orbit. If Starfall works at scale, companies could build factories in space, produce high-value materials that can’t be made on Earth, and ship them back down regularly all without needing a full space station. This is one of the clearest steps yet toward a real, self-sustaining commercial space economy. What do you think will in-space manufacturing finally become a serious industry, or is this still too early? Follow for more frontier space and future technology.

【プライズ総額100万相当】 Special DBB CUP 〜MAIN EVENT〜 20/22名様で回ってます🃏 ⏰ Late21:00 💰 Entry¥25,000(40,000点) ReEntry¥22,000(40,000点) 【早割あり🉐】 ︎ ※18時までの着席でスタートチップ 40,000点→50,000点 ※19時までの着席でスタートチップ 40,000点→45,000点 🎁プライズ🎁 1位　200,000coin＋JOPTチケット3枚＋優勝トロフィー 2位　140,000coin＋JOPTチケット3枚 3位　95,000coin＋JOPTチケット3枚 4位　70,000coin 5位　50,000coin 6位　35,000coin 詳細はこちら↓ #ポーカー# #ポーカートーナメント# #港区# #浜松町# #新橋# #芝大門# #六本木#

🚨SlowMist TI Alert🚨 💸 Loss: 62.5 BNB & 1,195,918.92 JOE 🔍 Root Cause: Single-function reentrancy in `_removeLiquidityViaContract` – BNB sent via low-level `call` before updating `lpInfo[user].lpAmount`, allowing recursive calls. 📌 Attacker EOA: 0xaa761779945dcc5f26064fc6dcb36ffab6ac7610 📌 Attacker Contract: 0x31f81fcd91025728f24bd6f0e4efb156e345a4cf 📌 Vulnerable Proxy: 0xef0f12d08d66e76e1866e60f30a0daa578e00c04 📌 Vulnerable Implementation: 0xb12ce0a21f67a9fc3c8ad1c7dbc4b017b7e67319 Attackers exploited the delayed state write to repeatedly withdraw liquidity, netting 62.5 BNB and ~1.196M JOE via 25 reentrancy loops. Powered by #SlowMist#.AI

每次看到圈里急着给智能体发“数字人格”，我就觉得跑偏了。人格管不了责任，只能管追责时谁上法庭。我们现在缺的不是一张身份证，而是一套跟着每一笔链上操作自动盖章的 责任链条。 我仔细想了一个框架，叫 Agent 责任栈，五层，层层有人兜底。 1️⃣ 构建者 对设计缺陷负责 如果智能体的代码有后门，或者目标函数写错了导致它疯狂套利把自己干爆，这不能怪 Agent。就像当年 The DAO 的 reentrancy 漏洞，没人说“合约自己作的”，大家找的是写代码的人。设计上有坑，builder 出来认。具体来说，构建者需要公开设计文档和已知风险清单，并在链上 Commit 一个不可篡改的 builder 签名。 2️⃣ 部署者 对目标设定和权限负责 你把 Agent 部署上链，给它私钥，给它规则“单笔不超过 5 ETH，滑点容忍 3%”。结果它遇上闪电贷操纵，亏了 200 ETH。你怪 Agent 不够聪明？不。怪你给的权限太宽，没有设风险熔断。部署者的责任包括：设定明确的操作边界、配置紧急暂停机制、并定期更新权限策略。出事了，你是第一顺位的问责对象。 3️⃣ 平台方 对访问和执行环境负责 Agent 跑在哪个链或执行层上，那个平台就得提供可验证的沙箱和轨迹记录。如果平台允许无限制循环调用、跨合约越权、gas 耗尽攻击，那是平台的责任。举个例子，iOS 允许一个 App 偷通讯录，用户不会只骂开发者，更会骂苹果。链上同样：EVM 如果没做重入保护的标准接口，平台方应该背一部分责任。具体到 Agent 治理，平台至少要提供标准化的日志格式和权限审计 API。 4️⃣ Agent 本身 默认内置可审计的轨迹 注意，这不是“人格”，这是黑匣子。每一笔 on‑chain 操作必须记录：谁调用的、输入参数、触发条件、执行结果、签名者。这些数据要么上链，要么存在可验证的去中心化日志里。Agent 不能成为加密世界的匿名幽灵。如果你连它过去 100 笔交易都查不清楚，你怎么判断该不该信任它？目前已经有项目在做链上操作记录标准，比如将每次调用 hash 绑定到 Agent 的唯一 ID 上。 5️⃣ 高风险操作 执行前必须上链式担保 不是所有动作都需要抵押。订个酒店、转 0.01 ETH 测试，那是低风险。但如果 Agent 要做这些事： 单笔调动超过 10 ETH 的资金 与其他 Agent 签具有约束力的智能合约对赌协议 参与治理投票，尤其是影响财库或协议参数的 那么执行前必须锁定一笔责任保证金。金额按风险比例算，比如操作金额的 5% 或固定 1 ETH。出事就 slash 给受害方，没事就原路退还。这叫 bonded responsibility。不是阻碍创新，是让创新不要裸泳。 核心困境从来没变 我们到底想要 Agent 当 自由行动者，还是 持证工具？ 自由行动者：不需要谁背锅，但也意味着没人敢跟你深度合作，没有保险，没有流动性池愿意接入。持证工具：效率会打一点折扣，但出了事有人赔、有人修、有人能一键禁用。我选后者。因为“是 AI 自己干的”正在变成下一个“公司行为”。那套 corporate veil 我们见得太多了，最后受害者只拿到一纸免责声明，而真正该负责的人早已套现离场。 最后问你一句，对照你心里的模型 当一个 Agent 真的造成损失。比如它订了不可退的头等舱机票并骗走了客户的支付私钥，或者在一个跨链流动性池里误判汇率导致 LP 被烧掉 500 ETH。你让谁第一个站出来？ 构建者 部署者 平台方 还是那个连私钥都没资格持有的 Agent 本体