与「sylus」相关的搜索结果

Why would anyone use prediction models when we can use real mortality data? Answer: Because you can't make bodies appear out of thin air, but you can make fake projections appear out of thin air. When we look at mortality data what do we see? All cause mortality went down. HIV Infection rates went down. AIDS related deaths went down. Coverage went up. As predicted, USAID was just a Democrat slush fund they used to pay their activists, journalists and NGO workers. Which is the real reason why you're freaking out over this.

Someone ran Claude Code on an e-ink notebook and the slowest screen in the world suddenly turned out to be the best home for an AI that already thinks one word at a time. This is the reMarkable Paper Pro, a paper tablet for notes with no browser and no social media and not a single app. He went into it over SSH and brought up Claude Code on Opus 4.8 on Claude Max and typed right into the terminal on the paper screen: "hello reddit, this is ssh terminal on rmpp". For years this screen got slammed for one thing. E-ink is too slow and it draws with a delay and it ghosts and it is no good for real work. But Claude itself puts out a thought one word at a time. And here is what came out of it: the very thing that killed the paper screen for normal software lined up perfectly with the pace of the AI. There is no more lag because there is nothing left to lag. And then come the things no monitor can give you. Your eyes do not get tired. You can watch Opus think on max effort for an hour and it feels like reading a book and not staring into a backlight. Nothing distracts you. Not a single notification and not a single tab and just a cursor and an agent that writes code while you simply watch the page. The charge lasts for days. E-ink barely touches the battery so Claude can grind on a task all night long and the tablet is still alive by morning. And it weighs as much as a notebook. The whole work setup now fits into a bag like a notepad with a stylus on top. Everything on the screen is for real: Claude Code v2.1.162 and bypass permissions on and Opus going off to think on max effort right on the e-ink. In my opinion this is the most unexpected home for an AI this year. Not a farm of graphics cards and not a wall of monitors but a quiet sheet of paper on a coffee table where the most powerful Claude writes code one word at a time like a pen.

Originally USAID was a slush fund invented in 1964 during the cold war under the Johnson Doctrine. An election fund to prevent communist and Socialist regimes from the Western Hemisphere. Mainly Central and South America.. Democrats abused and perverted USAID to elect Socialist and Communist fegimes in the western hemisphere. And radical Islamic Regimes in Northwest Africa This phenomenon isn't immediately apparent but a map. And the dates of the elections shows a trend.

USAID was a far left slush fund, not a benevolent, live-saving charity. Periodic reminder of what the DOGE team uncovered: • $1.5 million to advance DEI in Serbia’s workplaces and business communities • $70,000 for a DEI musical in Ireland • $47,000 for a transgender opera in Colombia • $32,000 for a transgender comic book in Peru • $2 million for sex changes and LGBT activism in Guatemala • Gain of function funding through EcoHealth Alliance (tens of millions cited) • Millions diverted to Al-Qaeda affiliated groups in Syria ($9 million in one reported case) • Condoms and family planning initiatives in conflict zones like Gaza • Various global LGBTQ and ideological programs across multiple countries

Democrats aren’t going after Elon Musk because of “dying children.” They are pissed off that DOGE cut their USAID slush fund used to manipulate information and tilt elections in our country and foreign countries. Notice the pattern? Since the 2025 USAID cuts, 7 conservative candidates swept presidential elections across Latin America: Ecuador, Bolivia, Honduras, Chile, Costa Rica, Colombia, and Peru. If USAID was still in place, Lula most likely wouldn’t have won in Brazil. Here, Samantha Power, the former administrator of USAID, proudly highlighted the agency’s role in influencing what she called “strategically important elections” through the Democratic Elections Fund. She also discussed how USAID funded journalists not only to report the news, but also to “fact-check” incoming information. USAID directed nearly $500 million to the Internews Network, a little-known NGO funded by the U.S. government. The organization worked with 4,291 media outlets, produced 4,799 hours of broadcasts in a single year, reached as many as 778 million people, and trained more than 9,000 journalists by 2023. Internews also supported social media censorship initiatives. USAID also funded and trained thousands of lawyers, judges, and election workers, conducted polls that questioned election legitimacy, published reports alleging fraud, and participated in overseeing new elections both in the United States and abroad, among many other activities. On the contrary, Elon Musk and DOGE actually saved millions of children. By cutting USAID influence, they let parents freely reject leftist failures on crime, economy, and socialism at the polls without manipulation.