注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

LinearUncle (@LinearUncle) “Ralph 作者分享的一个 GLM-5.2 使用技巧: 他发现 GLM 这类模型有个特点——提示词写得” — TopicDigg

LinearUncle 的个人资料封面
LinearUncle 的头像
LinearUncle
@LinearUncle
👑 AI coding - 职业工程师 💻 只分享硬核AI编程工具,技巧等
加入 March 2020
1.1K 正在关注    10.2K 粉丝
Ralph 作者分享的一个 GLM-5.2 使用技巧: 他发现 GLM 这类模型有个特点——提示词写得越充分,它表现越惊艳;反之,提示信息不足时效果就比较一般。而 Opus / Fable 则相反,即便提示信息残缺,也能"脑补"着把任务漂亮地完成。 所以他的建议是:先用 Gemini 这类擅长写提示词的模型,帮你打磨出一份足够详尽的提示词,再交给 GLM-5.2 去执行。两者分工,效果会好很多。
显示更多
alright it seems people are losing their shit about zai glm being good. it’s been a not to open secret that the best hyper token burning engineers for last six months have been doing statsarb in this window of opportunity whilst western companies have been locking in with either openai or anthropic. the glm models are really fantastic but they are like an autistic german. black and white thinking and high precision. whereas opus/fable are great for painting colours/figuring out with gaps of meaning when under specification of prompts. here’s how you should be using it. use another model (ie gemini) which excels at painting to create the prompts used for generation the prompt which is then put into glm. for those similar with Amp’s oracle pattern. it’s that. register another model in as a tool within GLM itself for quality of living benefits.
显示更多
0
16
74
8
转发到社区