Star_OKX (@star_okx)

I have always believed that great competitors deserve respect. We compete fiercely on products and execution, but we can also recognize each other’s achievements and work together to advance the industry.

More and more exchanges are choosing to comply with MiCA and serve EEA users through licensed EU entities. According to public reports, Binance continues to serve users in most of EEA countries through offshore entities. If that is accurate, it raises important questions about its approach to regulatory compliance and its willingness to align with local legal and regulatory requirements.

What a huge loss? A loss for whom—European regulators or the people of Europe? What exactly did Europeans lose? Another October 11? According to public reports, the company failed to demonstrate that its AML, sanctions compliance, and market integrity programs are effective, and did not obtain a license. Yet instead of reflecting on those issues, it claims that Europe is the loser. That says a great deal about the company’s attitude toward the rule of law and financial regulation.

Crypto was only the beginning. Our vision for Europe is to build the most comprehensive regulated digital finance platform. One app. One account. Crypto. Stocks. ETFs. Commodities. Payments. Cards. Earn. Tokenized assets. Institutional infrastructure. Backed by MiCA, MiFID and Payment Institution licences. This is what the next generation of finance looks like.

Football brings fans together. Prediction markets bring opinions together. OKX brings everyone into the game with free XP, giving every fan a chance to turn their football knowledge into BTC rewards. ⚽️₿

MiCA marks the beginning of a new chapter for digital assets in Europe. If you’re looking for a regulated platform built for the long term, we’re excited to welcome you to OKX. To celebrate this new chapter, we’re offering one of our biggest welcome campaigns for eligible EEA users, including welcome bonuses and deposit matching of up to 8%. Welcome to the future of digital finance in Europe. @okx

The biggest scammer talking about liquidity. The one that listed 99999 tokens and rugged them all to 0 then delist them. The one that orchestrated 10.10. Dump trying to kill @HyperliquidX. The one that killed all the trust that was in crypto in 10.10. Europe is waking up, soon more countries will ban @binance and @cz_binance will go back to jail where it belongs.

CZ said Binance offers "the best liquidity in the world" for consumer protection. He's right. But let's talk about WHERE that liquidity comes from. It comes from retail getting rekt on Binance Launchpad. Since 2019, Binance has launched 60+ projects. The narrative is always the same: Binance vets the project, lists it at launch, and retail piles in. Binance becomes the gatekeeper of "credibility." But here's the part CZ doesn't mention. The Lazio Fan Token (LAZIO) launched October 2021 at $1.00 on Binance Launchpad. Private investors got in at $0.10. Binance announced it. Retail FOMO'd. Price hit $26.75 in 48 hours. Retail thought they were early to something Binance blessed. Fast forward to today. LAZIO trades at $0.65. That's a 97.5% loss from the peak. Retail never stood a chance. Alpine F1 Team (ALPINE)? Same blueprint. Launched Feb 2022 at $1.00. ATH $11.29. Current price: $0.42. Down 96%. The token was delisted from Bitget in Feb 2026 due to zero trading volume just dead weight. But here's where it gets darker. Binance Launchpad isn't a bug. It's the business model. 1) Binance identifies a hype narrative (sports fan tokens, move-to-earn, etc) 2) Binance vets the project (gives it institutional credibility) 3) Private/VC investors get massive allocations at $0.001-$0.10 4) Launchpad subscription creates artificial scarcity ("hard cap" per user) 5) Retail buys at $1.00 thinking Binance wouldn't list garbage 6) Token pumps 10-100x in first week (retail euphoria) 7) Vesting schedule unlocks over 12 months (insiders exit) 8) Token declines 90-99% over next 24 months (retail holds bags) 9) Binance collected trading fees on every step of the decline The liquidity CZ brags about? It's built on retail extraction. Let's look at the pattern across Launchpad: - STEPN (GMT): Launched at $0.01, peaked at $4.11 (411x), now bleeding lower - Open Campus (EDU): 33x peak, now declining - Space ID (ID): 41x peak, now sliding - Hooked Protocol (HOOK): 41x peak, lost 90%+ since ATH - Arkham (ARKM): Only 16x at peak in 2023 (falling returns as the grift gets known) Notice the trend? Earlier projects had bigger peaks (because retail still believed). Recent ones are smaller. Why? Because the market is learning that Binance Launchpad = slow-motion rug pull. But retail is trapped. Binance has 100M+ users. Binance has regulatory licenses. Binance is THE credibility anchor. When Binance lists something, retail thinks "this must be vetted, this must be safe." It's not. It's the opposite. The vetting isn't for retail protection. It's for Binance's protection. Binance ensures the project won't implode in week 1 (that would hurt Binance's brand). But they don't care if it implodes in month 12. The damage is already extracted. Here's what "consumer protection" actually means in the Binance universe: - Deep liquidity pools (so Binance profits from every trade) - IEO credibility (so retail trusts the listing) - Vesting schedules published (so insiders can front-run the dumps) - No accountability for post-launch performance (so Binance faces zero liability) Retail thinks liquidity = safety. It's the opposite. High liquidity on a scarcity pump = maximum extraction efficiency. Compare Binance Launchpad to actual consumer protection: - SEC-regulated IPOs: Lock-up periods for insiders are EQUAL to retail - Traditional venture: Downside protection, governance rights, legal recourse - Binance Launchpad: Insiders get $0.10 pricing, retail gets $1.00, both tokens identical = wealth transfer complete The 60+ projects Binance has launched since 2019 represent billions in retail wealth extraction. LAZIO alone = $26.75 ATH on a $1.00 launch = $26.75B market cap at peak. The fact it's now $0.65 doesn't erase the fact that retail lost 97% while Binance kept the trading fees. CZ's statement about "the best liquidity in the world" is technically true. But it's like bragging about having the best highway system while running tolls that siphon wealth from drivers. The liquidity exists to serve extraction, not protection. The real consumer protection would be: - Identical vesting schedules for all token holders (no insiders first) - Binding lock-up periods (prove you believe in your own project) - Performance clawback clauses (if the token dumps 90%, insiders pay retail back) - Regulatory disclosure (project financials, insider allocations, exit plans) Binance offers none of this. Because that would kill the model. The model is: - Build hype through Binance credibility - Capture retail FOMO - Execute insider exit - Repeat Liquidity is the tool. Extraction is the goal. So when CZ says Binance offers "the best consumer protection," what he means is: Binance offers the most efficient wealth extraction vehicle the crypto world has ever seen. And the liquidity is so good, retail can watch their investment die in real-time on every refresh. That's not protection. That's the grift, just wrapped in institutional packaging. The Lazio Token didn't fail because it was a bad project. It failed because the Binance Launchpad model requires failure. Insiders need to exit. Retail needs to hold bags. Binance needs trading volume on the decline. The ecosystem needs constant new projects to pump and dump because the old ones are dead. It's a machine. And it's working exactly as designed. Binance isn't protecting users from bad liquidity. Binance is using liquidity to protect itself from accountability.

This is Binance’s philosophy of doing business. They ignore laws and regulations, while misleading the public with bullshits. According to public media reports and court filings, the platform’s so-called “best liquidity” included trading activity associated with risks involving money laundering, sanctions violations, and market manipulation.

As I have predicted before, I believe this illustrates Binance’s regulatory arbitrage strategy. Based on public information, Binance, as an unauthorized CASP, appears to have continued operating in most EU Member States despite the implementation of MiCA and public statements from ESMA. In my view, this reflects a willingness to prioritize business growth while regulatory expectations were evolving. The broader question is whether any EU Member State would be comfortable processing or approving a MiCA application from a firm that appears to have intentionally disregarded MiCA requirements after the end of the transition period. It also highlights a broader challenge for European regulation: rules are only effective when they are applied consistently, fairly, and uniformly across all market participants.

OKX这交易所最精了 @star_okx 免费送积分大家玩，让大家认清自己🤣 1⃣如果你认为自己是天选之人，预测很准，你依然可以通过竞猜获得积分最后瓜分奖池，获得“钱” 这部分奖金是OKX出的，瓜分16.66个BTC，相当于免费赞助大家边看球边预测娱乐 2⃣如果你的预测是错的，你只是没了积分，而不是你裤兜里实打实的人民币 就像我一样~睡醒被德国整懵逼了，大爆冷，如果我这2300是U的话就亏麻了 @misaENFP misa姐救我😭我又没积分了 --------------------------------------------- 对了，没参与的记得参与一下，每天免费领300分 博个冷门变两千多分就能分到20U左右 OKX注册：