注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「CheckItOut」相关的搜索结果

CheckItOut 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 CheckItOut 的内容
OCHA NORMA's latest MV『ちはやぶる』 is now available on YouTube! Come and check it out 👀🫶 #OCHANORMA# #NewMV# #Chihayaburu# #NowOnYouTube# #JapaneseIdolGroup# #CheckItOut# #HelloProject# @ocha_norma
显示更多
0
0
174
51
转发到社区
Question for everyone in Canada: which grocery item has surprised you most at the checkout lately? Here's what the latest data shows. According to Statistics Canada, grocery prices rose 1.7% year over year in September, the smallest increase since May 2024. Fresh vegetables were down 2.9% and sugar and confectionery down 2.7%, while fresh or frozen beef was still up 8.7%. But averages don't always match what you see on the shelf. Tell us the item and the price where you live 👇 October numbers should be out next week, and we'll see if your experience matches the data Source: Statistics Canada, September 2026 CPI 
#Canada# #groceries# #food# In-depth reports at
显示更多
Trade your shielded $ZEC for confidential USDC on Ethereum, without ever unshielding it. No bridge. No custodian. No wrapped ZEC. And the amount never shows up on chain. I connected @zama and @Zcash to make it work. Live on testnet 👇 What it is ZEC Desk is a small trading desk on Zama's FHEVM, on Ethereum Sepolia. On one side there's cUSDC, a dollar token whose balances are encrypted. On the other side there's shielded ZEC on Zcash testnet. You can trade either way. Built on Zama's model Zama's Confidential RFQ is already live on Ethereum mainnet, open to everyone: It runs confidential swaps with encrypted quotes, a sealed-bid pick on chain and a hidden floor. ZEC Desk takes that same model and extends it to native shielded ZEC. Zama's swap settles both legs on one chain, inside its own contract, so a Zcash leg can't plug into it directly. Here that leg lives on Zcash and settles minutes later with a proof, so the mechanics run in my own contract. It's a sketch of how native ZEC could sit next to Zama's swaps one day, with no wrapped token. How a trade works (buying ZEC) 👇 1️⃣ You lock cUSDC in the desk. The amount is encrypted. 2️⃣ Makers send encrypted quotes. Nobody sees anyone else's price, or the minimum you'll accept. 3️⃣ The contract picks the best one under FHE. 4️⃣ The winning maker sends shielded ZEC to your Zcash address, with the order's reference in the memo. 5️⃣ A zero-knowledge proof shows that payment happened, and the contract releases your cUSDC to the maker. If no proof arrives in time, your cUSDC comes back to you. Selling is the same in reverse: the maker locks cUSDC, you pay the ZEC, and the proof releases the cUSDC to you. Why these pieces Each piece does one job. Zcash keeps the payment private. Zama keeps the amounts encrypted and can still compute on them. Seam, the Zcash light client I built last month, connects the two: a contract checks every Zcash block header itself, and a RISC Zero proof shows a shielded payment reached the right receiver. The transaction, the note and the address never touch the EVM chain. The masked amount This was the hard part. Seam's proof used to write the paid amount in the clear, and ZEC amount × price gives away the dollar amount. So the amount is masked. The contract adds an encrypted one-time mask to the encrypted amount and reveals only the sum, which looks random to everyone else. The mask comes from a secret that the side receiving the ZEC hands to the payer. The proof checks that the payment was at least the sum minus the mask, and never states the amount. One-time pads are old, and Zama's RFQ uses one too. Using one to hand a value from FHE to a ZK proof is the part I haven't seen before. If you have, please send it my way. No vault, no signers Seam can read Zcash, but it can't take ZEC from anyone. So the design never needs someone to pay ZEC on someone else's behalf. Whoever pays, pays from their own wallet, and the escrow on the EVM side enforces the deal. The side that paid the ZEC can prove it itself, so nobody depends on the other side's goodwill. Seam does more than this Any EVM app that needs to know a shielded payment happened can use Seam: pay-with-ZEC checkouts, escrows, payouts, cross-chain orders. This desk is one example. Where it stands ↓ Testnet only, unaudited. On 12 November 2026 I ran a Buy end to end: ➡️ Settled with a proof: ➡️ One proof: 2 minutes on a rented RTX 4090, about $0.25 for the whole session ➡️ Gas per Buy on Sepolia: about 7.6M, in six transactions ➡️ A Sell also ran on Sepolia, up to the maker locking its cUSDC; it settles through the same proof step ➡️ Seam's light client is now deployed on Ethereum Sepolia too, next to Base Sepolia Where it can go ↓ → The desk only needs Zama's FHEVM and a cUSDC. Both already run on Polygon, where following Zcash costs a fraction of Ethereum mainnet. → Zama keeps adding chains. On any cheap EVM chain it reaches, the same desk can run, and if it comes to Base, Seam's relay already runs on Base Sepolia. → Zama's roadmap also goes beyond the EVM, to chains like Solana. Seam's verifier would need a port there. → On Ethereum mainnet, following Zcash header by header would cost over 2B gas a day, so batched header proofs are next for Seam. What it can't do yet - Settlement takes minutes, not seconds. Zcash confirmations set the pace, not the GPU. - Right now I'm the only maker, and a maker needs ZEC, cUSDC and a GPU. - Amounts are hidden, but EVM addresses are public. Read more ↓ Seam on Seam: ZEC Desk:
显示更多
Starting November 1, OnlyFans can freeze your earnings if they think something you did could hurt OnlyFans' reputation. That's one of two new suspension triggers in the updated terms. This is part 2 of my TOS breakdown, and it's all about your account and your money. The new suspension triggers... Section 14.b lists when OF can suspend your account and hold your earnings without notice while they review. Two new reasons were added. The first is any action OF thinks "has caused or is reasonably likely to cause" a loss to OnlyFans or its users, or harm to the reputation of OnlyFans or any user. The second is not promptly giving OF information they ask for. That second one is going to be hard for a lot of us. Basically if OF emails you asking for documents, answer fast. Idk about you but I'm allergic to checking my emails so this is about to get annoying. Also disputes now need to be in writing... If OF suspends you, deletes content or forfeits earnings, you still have six months to dispute it. The new terms add that the dispute has to be "in writing" (14.d). Keep copies of everything you send. One notice promise is gone. The 2024 terms said that when OF suspends or deletes content or accounts, "we will try to notify you." That line was removed. OF still promises a statement of reasons after a review decision (14.c). Now the money... Payouts that need a currency conversion now "include currency conversion fees to cover processing costs and exchange rates" (10.e). The 2024 version only warned that your own bank might charge you. If you're paid outside USD, compare your next few payouts after November 1. OF can now add "any Tax, fee or other amount" to a fan's payment without further notice to comply with the law or payment network rules (9.f). That means fans could see a higher total at checkout than our listed price. OF can now send your earnings to a third party entitled to them by law or court order (14.e). It can also check that your bank details match your ID verification (10.a). One change that helps us... If a fan's card declines, OF can now retry it multiple times before the renewal fails (9.i). That should mean fewer subscriptions lost to one declined payment. Obviously this is my read of the new terms, and (again!) I'm not a lawyer. Read them yourself and tell me if you see it differently. Part three will be tomorrow and it's the last one about what to do before you click accept, plus the change that works in your favor.
显示更多
0
81
689
233
转发到社区
Kaspa covenant 'DoorDash' demo: order food, the payment locks at checkout, and the dasher's scan at the door pays restaurant, dasher, and taxes in one transaction. No middleman.
显示更多
0
9
139
46
转发到社区
Flying to Singapore on Monday for TOKEN2049 Needed two things before takeoff: data the second I land and a hotel My @jumperapp perks covered both eSIM: the @bitrefill Tier 1 perk unlocks at Jumper Pass Level 4 and takes 50% off Bitrefill eSIMs. Got 3 days of unlimited data in Singapore for €7.67 instead of €15.34. Claim the perk, copy the code, paste it at checkout. Took me 2 minutes Hotel: Jumper Travel Tier 3 (Level 12+) stacks 3% cashback on top of up to 65% off. Sofitel Singapore Sentosa came up at -49%, €2,418 → €1,233 for 3 nights. Tip: log in to Jumper Travel with the same email you claimed the perk with, otherwise the cashback won't show up Going to TOKEN2049 too? Check your Jumper Pass level at before you book anything Thanks Jumper, see you in Singapore!
显示更多
0
11
21
10
转发到社区
the most famous egocentric datasets are people cooking in their own kitchens. the robots we're training on them are headed for warehouses, garages, and factory floors apac egocentric stereo is 12 first-person recordings of people actually doing their jobs: an automotive garage, a construction site, an electronics factory, a bar, a shipment hub, a laundromat head-mounted stereo rig, 1920x1080 per eye at 30 fps, plus a depth render, hand and head tracking, and a caption for what the wearer is doing at every moment. 248 segments spanning 62 distinct verbs checkout the dataset parsed into fiftyone format. every stream scrubs on one shared timeline in fiftyone: both eyes, depth, tracking, and captions together, one line to load checkout the dataset here: or just jump right in with the hugging face space hosting the dataset:
显示更多
4 new photoshoots and a new hi-res pack are available right now in my Patreon shop 💕 Instant download right after checkout, so you can grab them and start scrolling straight away ✨ Don't miss out, check the shop before they're gone 👀
显示更多
THE "NO TIP" SURCHARGE ────────────────── The menu board price and the price after you decline the tip screen are not the same number. Nobody prints the difference as a fee. ────────────────── - A Shake Shack kiosk raised one customer's total by $1.50 the moment he tapped "No Tip" instead of the suggested-tip screen - The clip hit 61K+ likes and 7.5M+ views in a day. NBC picked it up four days later - 329K views on their own version - Shake Shack blamed the one register, not the policy. But the mechanic isn't store-specific - most quick-service kiosks now run "suggested tip" as a live input into your total, not a line item after it - None of this has to be itemized as a fee. The FTC's own "Junk Fees Rule" took effect May 2025 covering only two categories: live-event tickets and short-term lodging. Restaurants got cut from the final draft before it shipped - Same week, a separate viral post (9,900+ likes) flagged card-only checkouts skipping the itemized receipt entirely - one total, no breakdown, sometimes an unlabeled line the post claimed goes straight to the restaurant. Unverified beyond that post, but the pattern matches Shake Shack's kiosk exactly: one number, no itemization ────────────────── "No Tip" was never a discount option. It's the input that tells the register how much more to charge you for saying no.
显示更多
从一条离线 Agent 轨迹出发,沿 15 个可运行 checkpoint 亲手实现一个 Pi-style coding agent,每一步都能 checkout 和验证。