与「DataCenters」相关的搜索结果

Sholto, thank you for setting the record straight. Larger issue is that multiple very serious people in Silicon Valley have heard some variation of this and believe it to be true. And the reason it is believable to so many is that it is consistent with Dario’s public messaging and what he outlined in the essay you shared: this technology *might* be dangerous for humans in multiple ways, could lead to extreme concentration of economic power (as outlined in the essay) and therefore needs to be regulated thoughtfully. I agree with the potential risks and I believe Dario makes all of these arguments in good faith. 
As discussed on the pod, if one agrees that AI *might* be dangerous, there are two ways to address this potential risk. Either concentrate it in the hands of a chosen few companies and politicians via regulation or distribute it widely. Essentially boils down to whether one believes AI is too dangerous to concentrate or too dangerous to distribute. There are reasonable arguments on both sides, but I profoundly agree with Zuckerberg’s statement that: “The notion that AI is so dangerous that the only safe path is an extreme concentration of power seems inherently problematic. Historically, hoping that an absolute power will benevolently provide for humanity if sufficiently enlightened has not led to safe or positive outcomes.” And as Dario says in the aforementioned essay, “some may object that we can simply keep AIs in check with a balance of power between many AI systems, as we do with humans.” I believe this is the best path forward: I want as many AIs as possible to maximize the odds that one shares my own particular values. And as Dario notes, no human has ever been able to take over the world. At this point, I think safe to say that Dario has lost the argument. His messaging has failed to result in his preferred regulatory path. The fact that the only solution to the recent incident where an unreleased advanced OpenAI model hacked Hugging Face was an open-source model likely ended any chance of strict near-term regulation. Essentially every major company other than Anthropic has signed Jensen’s letter. However, Dario’s messaging has been massively helpful to efforts to ban datacenters here in America. I suspect we will see anti-datacenter advocacy groups runnings ads using clips of Dario warning about how dangerous AI could be for humans. His good faith efforts in favor of regulation are now increasing the odds that AI will not be beneficial for Americans and humans everywhere. I believe that there is a reasonable chance AI might help us cure most forms of disease such that we have extended lifespans and can enjoy these long lives in an abundant Star Trek like future. That is the future that I want and I think Dario is decreasing the odds of that future at this point. He is about to be the CEO of one of the most important public companies in the world and given that the pro-regulatory effort has failed (at least for now), I respectfully think he should make an effort to be a more positive advocate for his own industry. And if I am wrong and we do need to regulate this technology, he will be a more effective advocate for this in the future having been open-minded to the alternative. And for the sake of clarity and as I outlined on the pod, I think Anthropic has deep competitive advantages and is an amazing company. Ironically, the main risk I saw to Anthropic a few months ago was nationalization as a result of Dario’s own rhetoric and behavior.

Loudoun Supervisor Mike Turner calls for mandatory closed-loop water systems in all new data centers. Is this the solution to conservation? Watch to see why. #DataCenters# #Loudoun# #Sustainability# #WaterUsage#

It’s always funny how people in SF twitter bubble will say things like “Claude has unbeatable narrative momentum” and then 2 weeks later “wow did Kimi just end the race” My brother in Christ nobody outside of this little bubble even calls any AI anything other than “Chat” and they think datacenters destroy water molecules You sound dumb. Focus on things that actually impact people not the little scores on overfit evals And also people who bet against Elon are stupid. The man built real world self driving cars (non-LLM based AI) that is still the best AI I’ve ever used by far. You think he can’t come from behind and win on writing code? He’s literally catching 30 story buildings with chopsticks and that’s like one of his projects I like a lot of the tools and have friends at all the main labs. Truly amazing work being done. But the overblown commentators are actually so out of touch

SpaceX is hiring exceptional engineering & skilled trades talent to build & operate the most powerful AI supercomputer clusters on & off Earth. If interested, please email 3 bullet points demonstrating evidence of exceptional ability & your resume to datacenters@spacex.com.

Are data centers putting our health at risk? Theodora Scarato reveals alarming EMF levels at Northern Virginia substations and the lack of federal safety standards. Watch this eye-opening breakdown. #EMF# #DataCenters# #PublicHealth# #Safety# #TechRisk#

Residents take a stand at the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors meeting. Concerns over safety, noise, and infrastructure vs. business growth. Is this the right balance? #LoudounCounty# #DataCenters# #CommunityImpact# #AspenPower# #LocalGovernment#

Earlier this year, @SpaceX acquired @xAI (now SpaceXAI), which operates the Colossus datacenters in Memphis.   As SpaceX continues to invest in the area, SpaceX is offering our neighbors in the Memphis area no upfront hardware costs on Residential @Starlink kits for new customers and a discount on home internet service plans for both new and existing customers. FAQ: