与「EthereumFoundation」相关的搜索结果

🚨 Vitalik与以太坊基金会遭前员工起诉！ 前 #以太坊基金会# Protocol Support负责人Kayleen Fulton（Nixo）于11月4日在美国科罗拉多州联邦法院提起诉讼，将 #VitalikButerin# 等列为被告。 📄 起诉书称，基金会《EF Mandate》中的“切腹条款”引发员工反对，79人支持删除，53人联名反对强制表态。 Fulton称，她披露癌症诊断后，于4月6日与另一名联名信组织者相继遭解雇。 ⚖️ 原告提出11项法律诉求。所有相关指控尚未经法院认定。 🚨 Vitalik Buterin and the Ethereum Foundation Face Employee Lawsuit Former #EthereumFoundation# Protocol Support lead Kayleen Fulton, also known as Nixo, filed a lawsuit in Colorado on November 4. The complaint alleges retaliation following internal opposition to the EF Mandate and raises discrimination and medical leave claims after Fulton disclosed a cancer diagnosis. ⚖️ The allegations have not been adjudicated, and no liability has been established. #以太坊# #ETH# #Ethereum# #Vitalik# #CryptoNews# #TECHUBNEWS#

♾ Optimum Pulse: September 21 - 27, 2026 🔻🔻🔻 1. "Must-watch" Podcast @get_optimum CEO Prof. @MurielMedard explains on A Global Tech Podcast how to optimize latency in DeFi and why a hybrid approach between TraFi and DeFi as most likely. 🔗 Full interview with @AGTPinsights (with correct timestamp): ---- 2. ETHSofia 2026 CPO @sajidazouarhi attended the panel discussion Building Under CROPS: What the Ethereum Foundation's Mandate Means for Developers and Institutions alongside representatives from European Ethereum Institute, Ethereum Foundation and 0xbow. 🔗The full recording will be available soon ---- 3. APAC Tour - Part 2 Save the Optimum team's schedule this later September and early October 👇 🇰🇷 Korea Blockchain Week: 📍 Sept 28 - Ethereum Korea One Genesis 📍 Sept 29 - signature CODED@KBW event 🇸🇬 Token2049: 📍 Oct 6 - co-hosting an event with AMBR 📍 Oct 7 - Digital Asset Summit (DAS) 2026 ---- 4. Weekly Role Upgrade - Refined Batch 29.

7.28梭哈晨报： 存储的行情到此为止了吗各位，怎么HYPE的存储集体插针，这种怎么处理，插针果然是crypto圈的独门秘籍！ 1. $BTC 直接回姥姥家了，这就是传说中的从哪儿来回哪儿去？ 2. $ETH 昨天都在问世界计算机开始拉盘是什么情况，今天就打回去了； 3. $SOL 真的无人问津的表现存在了； 4.特朗普：有足够耐心与伊朗达成新协议，否则就开打； 伟大的k线之神； 5.韩国交易平台触发 KOSPI 指数侧车机制，程序化交易暂停 5 分钟； 韩国人的交易时间，只有天堂和地狱； 6.Ethereum Foundation披露以AI代理审查协议代码的安全实践，AI x Crypto叙事落点转向基础设施安全； 7.SEC委员Peirce重申：链上化不自动排除证券法适用，Vault与收益策略需审视法律结构； 8.美国现货BTC/ETH ETF最近披露日同步净流出，机构现货需求尚未确认修复； 9. Circle收购IBM区块链专利资产组合，扩充稳定币与链上金融基础设施护城河； 10.美联储议息今明两日举行，宏观波动窗口正式开启； 11.K3 Capital 宣布与 Galaxy、Accountable 合作推出机构收益金库； 12.城堡证券：美联储主席沃什本周或意外加息，以强化抗通胀信誉； 13.Tom Lee称Lighter对以太坊基础设施至关重要； 挺有意思的，这是付费喊单吗？ 14.宾夕法尼亚州法案拟禁止博彩企业为预测市场做市； 预测市场的做市商才是流动性最大的提供者； 15.Ondo推出新的执行网络，称之为‘Ondo Chain的演进’； 道理上来说，所有的利好都是为了出货，毕竟对代币没有任何作用； 16.Aave：Stable Vaults 已通过 Certora 形式化验证； -------------- 这个Robin Hood和bsc差不多，都吃口水，rb的人关注点赞转发评论都能拉盘，而且真的挺难玩的，全是发射平台。 #Bitcoin# #Ethereum# #Solana# #Crypto# #Nasdaq#

市场上有人传“以太坊基金会解散了”，这是误传。 以太坊基金会（Ethereum Foundation）的 Protocol Support Team（协议支持团队） 确实已经解散，但这只是基金会本次重组的一部分，并非整个基金会解体。 本次重组主要内容包括： • 裁员约 20%（共54个职位）； • 预算削减约 40%； • 从之前的“全能型核心开发者”角色，转向更精简的“协议守护者”（Stewardship, Not Control）定位； • 重组后更聚焦于核心协议开发，并调整为几个专注集群（clusters）。 此次调整是以太坊基金会为实现长期可持续支持以太坊发展而进行的战略瘦身，核心开发工作仍在继续（包括 Glamsterdam 等升级）。一些被裁或离职的人员/团队也转向了独立实验室或社区贡献。 总体来说，基金会仍在运作，只是变得更精炼高效。市场上的“解散”传言属于夸大或误读。

LATEST: ⚡️ The Ethereum Foundation published a policy guide arguing Ethereum's decentralized design makes it fit for government use cases like digital identity, public records, and asset tokenization.

.@hwwonx has been a steadfast contributor to the Ethereum ecosystem for a decade. I still remember her early days in the Ethereum research community, first outside the Foundation and then inside it, and the thought and care she put into making Ethereum research and consensus work more organized and legible. At the same time, she put a lot of work into building an excellent Ethereum community in Taipei, with people and events that were among my favorites. Last year she, along with @tkstanczak, voluntarily took on the burden of what is perhaps the most challenging position in the Ethereum Foundation, at one of the most challenging times for Ethereum - and realistically, a challenging time for all of humanity. She handled the task skillfully and gracefully, and has constantly strived to find and insist on outcomes that are right both for the Ethereum protocol and for the human beings that build and maintain it. I look forward to her next adventures.

Today a crazy quantum story just got wilder. On March 31, the Google Quantum AI team published a landmark result on Shor's algorithm for elliptic curve cryptography. Technically, the paper was a bombshell: a dramatic 10x improvement over the state-of-the-art. As a stunt and wakeup call to the blockchain space, those optimisations were illustrated on secp256k1, the elliptic curve underlying Bitcoin and Ethereum signatures. But perhaps the most striking part of the paper was sociological, not technical. Instead of following standard academic process, the optimisations were kept secret, hidden behind a zero-knowledge (ZK) proof. Google's accompanying blog post mentions they "engaged with the U.S. government". The ZK proof demonstrates the existence of algorithmic improvements without leaking details. Academic censorship with ZK, a historic first! As a co-author of the Google paper I witnessed some of the context surrounding this censorship. To be honest, multiple aspects of that context don't sit well with me. As much as I believe the general public ought to know more, I am limited in my ability to whistleblow. Though let me be clear about one thing: the Google team's professionalism has been absolutely exemplary, and they deserve nothing but praise. Censorship has a way of backfiring. The Streisand effect, where an attempt to bury something only draws more attention to it, is exactly what's unfolding today. First, Google's key optimisation has been rediscovered by the French. And in a thrilling turn of events, a collaborative Shor-at-home challenge just launched. The initiative, available at ecdsa[.]fail, breached a new Shor world record in a matter of hours. Let's start with the rediscovery. Just two months after Google's paper, French quantum expert André Schrottenloher cracks the main secret optimisation. His paper, titled "Optimized Point Addition Circuits for Elliptic Curve Discrete Logarithms", landed on the arXiv today. Big congrats to André, who beat several other nerdsnipped experts to it. In a blog post also published today, Craig Gidney, the world expert on Shor optimisations, revealed that he'd been sitting on this very optimisation for a whole year under censorship pressure. Interestingly, André missed a handful of minor optimisations, both from Google's original publication and from improvements found since. It's plausible there's still plenty of juice left to squeeze out of Shor, and this is exactly what the ecdsa[.]fail challenge is about. The verifier program developed for the ZK proof does double duty, automatically filtering for valid submissions. Dozens of compounding small and micro improvements are rolling in. As of the time of writing there's an 8.4% improvement to Google's circuit, as measured by the product of logical qubit count and Toffoli gate count. Nice! The nerdsnipping ran deeper than anyone expected. Over the last few weeks it became clear it extended well beyond André and other quantum experts. Behind the scenes, a small army of amateurs quietly got to work. Inspired by Karpathy-style autoresearch, they turned AI on Shor. Ironically, the verifier program for the ZK proof makes an ideal reward function for AIs. The barrier to entry for this modern style of research is refreshingly low, with several non-experts, even a teenager, finding nice optimisations. Get in touch if you'd like to join a Telegram group with fellow autoresearchers :) Part 2: neutral atoms and qday The story doesn't end with Google. On the same day Google went public, a stealthy startup called Oratomic published its own Shor paper in a coordinated release. It made a splash, ultimately becoming the most upvoted paper on scirate[.]com, a website ranking arXiv papers. Oratomic's claim was wild. By building on Google's logical optimisations and applying custom physical optimisations for neutral atoms, they claimed just 10K physical qubits were sufficient to run Shor's algorithm on secp256k1. That number is mind-bogglingly low. Knowing essentially nothing about neutral atoms when Oratomic's paper landed, I was intrigued and decided to learn more about the tech. I fell straight down the rabbit hole and spent a couple hundred hours on the topic. I got a little obsessed and watched every YouTube video I could find and spoke to a bunch of experts. My conclusion? The tech is real, very real. Even Google recently decided to start a neutral atom lab, a notable pivot from their sole focus on superconducting qubits. If you care about qday, i.e. the day a quantum computer will break the first piece of cryptography in production, neutral atoms demand your attention. I shared some of my learnings on Shor and neutral atoms in a 30min talk at the ZKProof cryptography conference. You can find it on YouTube by searching "zkproof neutral atom". Here's an interesting observation about this duo of breakthrough papers: neither Google nor Oratomic say a word about what their results mean for qday. No timelines. Zero. Nada. That is especially baffling given that the whole point of whitehat quantum cryptanalysis is to inform qday estimations and help the general public make good decisions. So let me attempt to partially fill the silence, similarly to what Scott Aaronson did in his April 29 post. Given everything I know, including scary non-public information, I now put the odds of qday by 2032 at 50%. 10% by 2030. Anecdotally, the US government has its own date: 2035. Originating at the NSA and later adopted by NIST, it's when branches of the US government will be disallowed from using quantum-vulnerable cryptography. In plain language: with hindsight, that date is a joke and should be discounted entirely. I don't see how NIST avoids being forced to pull it forward by years. Part 3: post-quantum cryptography There are good reasons to sound the alarm today, but please do not panic. Rushing carelessly towards immature post-quantum cryptography is a recipe for disaster. IMO a good target date for migration is 2029, roughly 3.5 years out. 2029 happens to be the date selected by Google, Cloudflare, and the Ethereum Foundation. These days most of my time goes to safely migrating Ethereum towards post-quantum cryptography as part of the broader lean Ethereum effort. There's a lot to do. We need to rip out and replace BLS signatures at the consensus layer, KZG commitments at the data layer, and ECDSA signatures at the execution layer. The plan to get there is compelling, and is based on hash-based cryptography. Within the Ethereum Foundation we've developed a Swiss army knife called leanVM (github[.]com/leanEthereum/leanVM) powered by the magic of hash-based SNARKs. Thanks to truly exceptional work by Emile, Thomas, and others, its performance is derisked. Regarding security, leanVM is a jewel, a minimal zkVM crafted for end-to-end formal verification and maximum security. Want to help? There are two $1M initiatives. First, the Proximity Prize (proximityprize[.]org). Solve a long-standing mathematical conjecture in coding theory, improve hash-based SNARKs, and go home a millionaire. Second, the Poseidon Initiative (poseidon-initiative[.]info), offers $1M for breaking Poseidon, the SNARK-friendly hash function.

吴说获悉，Ethereum Foundation 表示，Open Intents Framework 旨在作为跨链 Intent 的共享基础设施，为生态提供可部署、发现和执行 Intent 的模块化开放框架。与此同时，LI FI 宣布推出 LI FI Intents，这是一套面向同链与跨链转账的全栈执行引擎，通过专业 Solver 网络竞争报价并完成订单执行。LI FI 文档显示，其 Intent/Solver Marketplace 是 Open Intents Framework 的官方基础之一，Ethereum Foundation 称该框架正进入规模化采用阶段。

The #Ethereum# narrative has reached a turning point: It’s no longer just about optimizing transaction fees—it’s about retrofitting the network's cryptographic architecture against future quantum threats. The latest KuCoin blog covers: How the Ethereum Foundation plans to ship Layer 1 quantum-safe upgrades by 2029. Why Vitalik Buterin’s latest roadmap identifies four critical cryptographic vulnerabilities requiring proactive migration. The shift toward hash-based signatures and STARK-based systems to secure validators and wallets before threats become practical. Knowledge is your best asset. Read the full analysis: