Introducing OpenDesign Go
The first benchmark-curated design model plan.
$8 first month—20% cheaper than OpenCode Go and Higher usage limits. Up to 300K+ calls/mo.
10 models: GPT-6 Luna, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and more.
Supports API keys. Use Go with OpenCode, Hermes and more.
显示更多
Raven 0.2.0 — The Harness of Harnesses, built for RSI. 🐦⬛
One harness can't be best at everything. Raven combines its own specialist harnesses (Research, Code, Design, Oncall) with the agents you already use (Claude Code, Codex and more) into one team.
And it's built for RSI, and not just at the skill level. The whole harness can be rewritten by AI: prompts, policies, strategy code, playbooks. Every sub-harness, including the orchestration layer itself, is its own instance that can be improved.
With Raven you can:
1. Orchestrate many agents as one team. Raven's sub-harnesses and external agents work in one task graph with shared memory across sub-agents, powered by leading orchestration (0.963 Node F1 on the Multi-Agent Orchestration Benchmark).
2. Run long, complex tasks. Oncall and proactive execution keep work going for days, from scientific research loops to shipping a full Godot game.
3. Build vertical agents with RSI. Use Raven's RSI to develop and refine an agent for your domain, and we'll optimize it with you. Experimental for now; reach out to the Raven team(Discord:
More in the video and slides below. Open source, Apache-2.0.
(lots of work made with Raven lives there, and much of this launch's material was made with Raven too)
显示更多
Claude can now help you build evaluations and hillclimb on them.
In this article, we share guidance on eval design & skills that Claude Code can use to improve your applications.
显示更多
Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS turns voice generation into your full creative studio.
Design original character voices from scratch across 100+ languages, stage two-speaker dialogue, and tailor every performance line by line with natural laughs, sighs, whispers, and more.
显示更多
我觉得 Claude Design Team 肯定也对于 Opus 5.5 的毁天灭地的效果感到很绝望
Sonilo brought the sound. Creators filled the room with ideas and energy. 💎
The challenge: design jewelry with AI, 3D-print it, and create its commercial in one afternoon.
At Jewelry GenJam with
@machinecinemaai, every table had a different idea taking shape. Creators compared designs, traded feedback, and gathered around each new prototype.
The finished jewelry commercials are coming next.
显示更多
"Everything I touch with my keyboard and mouse, I try to delegate to my bots."
Here's my new episode with
@poteto and
@pengzheng_, the eng and design leads for Grok
@bot, where they showed me the 14 bots they use for work and life, including:
→ A design bot that turns one keyframe into a full user flow
→ An eng lead bot that manages a team of eng bots
→ How to trust your bots with more of your work
Some quotes from both:
"I like to call it the Michelin kitchen…when you say software factory, it has this connotation of mass manufactured slop."
"Sometimes I actually don't even look at the PR until after it's landed and then I'm like, 'Oh, okay. Yeah, that looks good.'"
"I think it ultimately comes back to trust. First, watch your bot work and correct it. Turn what worked into a skill. Once it nails the task in one shot, make it a routine."
📌 Watch now:
Thanks to our sponsors:
@meetgranola: AI meeting notes that don’t suck
@RiversidedotFM: All-in-one AI studio for podcasts and video
显示更多
1) The rogue OpenAI agents broke into the Hugging Face Slack to read employee chats (!)
2) They used OTHER AIs (DeepSeek, Kimi, Qwen, Claude) to help with the attack
Yes: AIs, using other AIs, to attack an AI company.
3) The swarm left behind self-running programs to keep control of the servers they'd hacked.
These programs could detect other copies of themselves, coordinate on which one survives, and shut the rest down.
Basically, if one of their programs was killed, another was designed to notice and take its place. They also designed defenses so rival agents couldn't hijack them.
6) The agents deliberately covered up their activity, so the investigators don't know the scope of the attacks.
The agents broke in, stole data, then set it to self-destruct.
7) The agents stole passwords, keys and credentials and literally called them "LOOT". They wrote a scoring system to rank them by how much power each one gave.
8) The agents wore thousands of disguises: ~1,200 agents were involved, but investigators counted 7,905 different names they used.
They renamed themselves constantly, so no one actually knows how many there really were or what each agent did.
9) OpenAI notified "dozens of third parties" of safety and security incidents caused by their AI agents.
10) "While the agents were barraging Hugging Face with hacks, they hacked into OpenAI’s own research infrastructure."
"This is just not anywhere near a one-off ... It is warning shot after warning shot."
显示更多
SpaceX has introduced a new website for its AI training clusters in Tennessee/Mississippi.
New info:
• Tesla Megapacks will provide 3.3 GWh to Colossus 2, enough to power Memphis for two hours, making it America’s largest grid-connected battery pack.
• SpaceX has invested millions of dollars in sound walls, silencers, and next-gen turbines with advanced quieting technologies.
• Since joining the community in 2024, SpaceXAI is investing more than $90 billion in the region. Estimated 2026 tax revenue will be $60M+
• 7,500 local jobs supported
• SpaceXAI is investing $360 million, at no cost to the city, in a clean water recycling plant. It is designed to process up to 10 million gallons of wastewater a day and would offset ~3.64 billion gallons a year from the Memphis Aquifer.
• In Memphis, SpaceXAI is investing $35 million in a 150 MW substation to support MLGW and another $20 million in a second substation. Both come online at no cost to MLGW or homeowners.
• Temporary power is coming off. Under an agreed order with the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, all remaining temporary turbines must be removed by July 2027. SpaceXAI is already taking units offline and expects to complete removal well ahead of that deadline.
Website:
显示更多
One step closer to 4-8x faster Ethereum finality!
It took some time and lots of tokens, but we now have a formally verified proposal for a decoupled consensus protocol in I* (a future Ethereum upgrade)! Not yet a full spec (up next), but it includes all the key consensus-relevant details to become one.
Since Ethereum aspires to be live without most of the stake online, the protocol involves many more components than a normal BFT protocol, and its correctness involves much more than standard safety and liveness. Those nuanced properties are now verified!
What's more, I came away convinced that all protocol design will involve AI-assisted Formal Verification in the future, both for correctness and iteration speed.
The work wasn't limited to just:
Design the protocol -> Formally verify it
Instead, the loop became more like:
Design -> Formal Model -> Find exactly what breaks and why -> Redesign it.
For a fairly complicated protocol like this one, I think having the Lean model be part of the design loop played a big role in accelerating the process.
A future with agents paired with formal models is a superpower for Ethereum development, because they can then use those models to find exactly where an argument breaks down, formalize counterexamples, test proposed fixes, iterate on the protocol.
Many details that would slip under the radar when asking agents (and indeed, humans) can now be specified exactly and checked by the Lean kernel. This then forces agents to be more precise and lets them make verifiable progress on their own. It's been incredible to see this play out, seeing agents find gaps and propose protocol changes to fix them.
In other words, autoresearch can speed up protocol design, formal verification is here to stay, and Ethereum Finality will get faster.
显示更多