注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

Dongxi 东锡 NLP 的个人资料封面
Dongxi 东锡 NLP 的头像

Dongxi 东锡 NLP (@dongxi_nlp)

@dongxi_nlp
0 正在关注    0 粉丝
振聋发聩。 黄仁勋用27年打造计算帝国,相信规则、技术实力与商业合同。 但美国权力游戏的残酷真相是: 顶级战略科技与财富若无政治庇护,不过是待分割的筹码。白人精英享有宽裕容错空间,攀至顶峰的亚裔先驱几乎没有。 这是美国种族等级、资本控制与党派权力政治的赤裸展示。
显示更多
Jensen Huang’s affair is just a trigger. What we are witnessing is a pre-planned power grab over Nvidia’s trillion-dollar computing empire, coordinated by Wall Street and Washington. Some sharp Chinese-American commentators call it America’s new Red Scare targeting elite Asian entrepreneurs. Bill Gates, Elon Musk and other white tech billionaires have faced repeated scandals over personal conduct. None were dragged into national security probes or boardroom takeovers. Only Jensen Huang, after a personal relationship misstep, faces an independent board investigation and hostile narrative from intelligence circles. The double standard could not be clearer: For white elites, personal flaws are private matters. For a Chinese-born leader controlling a strategic tech asset, any tiny blemish gets framed as a national security risk. Nvidia is the backbone of global AI computing, valued at roughly $4 trillion. Unlike Meta, where Mark Zuckerberg locks control with dual-class super-voting shares, or Microsoft and Amazon, deeply integrated with the Pentagon and intelligence agencies, Nvidia has no such protective structure. Public filings from 2026 show Jensen Huang holds only 3.58% of shares, and all directors plus executives together hold merely 3.94%. Vanguard and BlackRock own 9.32% and 7.43% respectively, holding decisive voting power. Without institutional shields or deep political backing, this critical tech giant sits exposed on the chessboard of great-power competition. The groundwork for this takeover was laid months ago. Longtime board allies of Huang, Mark Perry and Michael McCaffrey, stepped down from key committees. Insiders tied to Democratic establishment, Wall Street and U.S. intelligence quietly moved in: ✅ Suzanne Nora Johnson, former Goldman Sachs vice chair and co-chair of Brookings Institution, joined Nvidia’s audit committee in July 2026 with direct oversight of internal investigations and compliance. ✅ Kenneth Jacobs, vice chair of Brookings and incoming Vanguard chair, controls the largest institutional voting bloc and operates within the same inner circle as Johnson. ✅ Gilman Louie,founding CEO of CIA-backed venture fund In-Q-Tel and member of the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board, works alongside Johnson on the same national tech fund, overseeing intelligence acquisition of strategic tech firms. The media rollout followed a precise political timeline. Initial trial balloons appeared on Oct 29. On Nov 6, the very day Democrats secured full control of Congress, Julian Barnes of the New York Times (national security beat) and Demetri Sevastopulo of the Financial Times published coordinated reports, citing intelligence memos while breaking the story of the personal scandal. The real offense was never the affair. It was the 2025 deal Jensen struck with the Trump administration: offering a 25% revenue share to win export approval for H200 chips into China. A normal commercial negotiation, reframed by incoming Democrats as a dangerous compromise on U.S. AI sovereignty. This investigation will not crash Nvidia’s stock — Wall Street holds massive stakes here. But it will deliver three strategic wins for the U.S. establishment: 1. De-founder and de-Sinicize Nvidia: A new permanent national security compliance committee, led by Johnson’s faction, will strip Huang of authority over chip exports and overseas strategy. His dual Chairman-CEO role will be split. 2. Lock down China’s AI ceiling: Washington will seize full command of global advanced computing supply, regulating chip flows to slow China’s AI progress. 3. Retroactively target Trump: Once Democrats take over congressional oversight panels in January 2027, this case will be used to accuse the Trump White House of negligence for approving the H200 export deal. Jensen Huang spent 27 years building this computing empire, believing in rules, technical merit and business contracts. But there is a brutal truth in America’s power game: Top-tier strategic technology and wealth without political cover are nothing more than bargaining chips waiting to be carved up. White elites get generous room for error. Asian pioneers who climb to the very top get almost none. This is not a story about infidelity. It is a raw demonstration of racial hierarchy, capital control and partisan power politics in the United States.
显示更多
OpenAI 的一切产品决定都是从 Slack 上交流和协调的。 这世界这么多 AI 巨头,当年收购 Slack 的却是 Saleforce
事实有据,权限有度。 DeepSeek Harness,把边界写成契约。
“所有中国模型都在复制美国前沿模型”,显然是一种粗暴且缺乏证据支撑的叙事。 然而,有组织和规模化采集美国闭源模型输出的行为,已经超出纯粹传闻的范畴。Anthropic 披露的 API 流量证据,加上这篇论文展示的攻击机制,使相关指控形成了一条技术上连贯的证据链。 常规蒸馏: 问题 -> 最终答案 论文揭示的漏洞可能提供密度更高的数据: 问题 -> 隐藏推理 -> 最终答案 由此可以构造完整的推理蒸馏 pipeline: Frontier API -> Encrypted Reasoning Trace -> Weak Decoder -> Reasoning Dataset -> SFT/RL 最值得关注的是 Appendix B: 在注入少量 Opus 或 GPT-5.6 Sol 推理片段后,Kimi-K3 和 GLM-5.2 的生成会选择性地向来源模型偏移;但包括 DeepSeek 模型在内的对照组通常没有表现出同等程度的变化。 这篇论文虽然在技术上证明了蒸馏的可行性,但现有公开证据仍无法确认这些蒸馏轨迹是否进入了某个具体模型的训练集,也无法量化中国开源模型的性能中有多少来自闭源前沿模型。 最后,东方西方,蒸馏起来吧!
显示更多
We can finally talk about it: We found a way to extract hidden reasoning of frontier models using a vulnerability in the APIs of every frontier AI company. We verified that our reasoning token count matches billed API thinking tokens 1:1 for most of the prompts we queried.
显示更多
0
13
22
4
转发到社区
从散乱 learning artifacts 到个人 harness 知识库 火山引擎发布了最新2.1系列模型,Doubao-Seed-2.1-Pro 在 Coding 和 Agent 能力上有明显提升,VLM能力保持领先。 拿到内测机会的我,用它处理了一个很早就想做的场景:在学习 harness 时留下了大量 learning artifacts,包括手写笔记,写好的 x 文章,与 agent 的对话,架构记录,文件很多,结构并不清晰。 于是,用 TRAE Work + Doubao-Seed-2.1-Pro 做了一次完整整理:自动读取材料,归纳主题,按 harness 架构从简单到复杂重新组织,生成一个可持续更新的个人知识库。 这个任务考验 Agent 自动化,长上下文理解,Coding,前端实现和 GUI 验证。整体完成度非常不错,最后的知识库可以按主题联想,查找,继续补充。
显示更多
我订阅 ChatGPT Pro 的一个很大原因,是听到 Minimax 的闫俊杰在播客里说,他曾几次因为与 Pro 的对话而被震撼到呆坐在椅子里。 我也想追求这种震撼的感觉。 订阅很长一段时间了,震撼还没有发生,呆坐倒是一直存在。
显示更多
0
155
1K
18
转发到社区