Dep (@0xDepressionn)

letting AI run your computer with no rules is f*cking insane... it tried to wipe out weeks of my work twice. once it went for my passwords. one small file stopped it every time and while i slept it still did the actual job. wrote code, tested it, saved it, sent it for my review. i woke up to finished work, not a disaster most people use AI agents one of two ways, and both are wrong: -> they babysit it, clicking "approve" 100 times a day -> or they give it full control and pray the third way is a rulebook it reads before it starts: can do alone -> read, write code, run tests, save progress must ask me first -> publish, install anything new never, no matter what -> delete everything, overwrite history, touch passwords and keys, send data out the "never" list always wins. thats the whole point when nobody is watching this matters more every week. openai, anthropic, everyone is shipping AI that runs on its own for hours the rulebook matters more than the prompt. the exact file is in the article below

CHATGPT WILL START HIDING AN INVISIBLE MARK IN EVERYTHING IT WRITES FOR YOU openai just confirmed it. its called textGrain and it hits chatgpt and codex in the EU over the next few weeks, because the EU AI Act forces it you wont see anything. no weird symbols, no hidden characters. the model just picks its words in a slightly patterned way, and a detector can read that pattern later what it can tell: "was this likely written by an openai model" what it cant tell: who you are, your account, your prompt the funny part is openai itself says it barely holds up: -> short paragraph: caught about 80% of the time -> change 1 in 10 words: detection drops from 92% to 66% -> change 1 in 4 words: 17% -> translate it or rewrite it: the mark can disappear completely the scariest part isnt the watermark. its who actually gets caught anyone who edits a little walks free. the kid who copy pastes a full essay without touching a word is the one it catches. and only "approved researchers" get the detector for now, so you cant even check your own text to be fair, openai isnt hiding any of this. they published the weak numbers themselves, API users anywhere can switch it on today, and they say theyll open source it personally i think this is bigger than a watermark. europe gets a chatgpt that marks its text, america doesnt. same AI, different rules depending on where you open it and this is just the first law. there will be more

SAM ALTMAN JUST SAID THE WORLD SHOULD "ACCEPT SOME BAD THINGS HAPPENING" FOR AI on politicos new show decoded: "We believe the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology." and he went further: "I wouldn't take a trade of saying we will make sure there's no major hacks, there's no misuse of this technology, there's zero scams" same weekend, to vanity fair, he warned about "a coming tidal wave of cybersecurity problems" from open source models so bad things are acceptable when they come with openais progress, and a tidal wave when they come from open source 6 days ago openais president signed the white house accord. internal controls on cyber, bio and chemical risks, outside auditors, board oversight to be fair, hes saying out loud what every lab believes. no technology this big ships with zero misuse. cars, the internet, phones, all of them came with damage the scariest part is who decides which bad things are "acceptable". right now its the company shipping the model personally, id respect it more if the same rule applied to everyone. you cant ask the world to accept your risks and call everyone elses a tidal wave

a 19 year old dragged boxes in n8n at a VIP dinner older men leaned over his laptop 29,400 likes. the comments called it "not real AI" they spent the whole thread arguing about whether the skill counts he was already getting paid for the thing every business in that room couldn't build > the skill that matters now isn't writing the code > it's knowing what to wire together that barrier is gone the people who notice first take the room the people still debating whether it counts will lose to a 19 year old with a laptop full breakdown: