2026.06.03 17:00

Andrej Karpathy: paying $20/month for a subscription isn't "using AI" - most people never even started the gap was never access. everyone has the same model, in the same tab, one click away. the dead list: copy-pasting prompts all day, arguing with the model in circles, rewriting the same code 5 times, asking it questions like it's google, "the AI just doesn't get it" what actually separates the top 1%: → they configure the tool instead of just opening it → they give it context, rules and memory, not one-off prompts → they build systems the model runs inside, not single chats → they think in workflows, not in questions → they make AI do the work while everyone else watches it type that's the real skill. not prompting harder. building around it. most people sit next to the tool. almost nobody makes it work for them. one group types questions. the other group ships systems. you're not behind on access. you're behind on leverage.

显示更多

0xMorty@0xMortyx

2026.06.03 14:10

Boris Cherny (Claude Code's creator): I deleted my IDE in November and hasn't opened it since. I writes more code than ever. his actual words on stage: I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops that are running. They're the ones prompting Claude. My job is to write loops. the progression he described: → a year ago: writing code by hand with autocomplete → then: running 5-10 Claudes in parallel, prompting each one → now: he doesn't prompt at all - he writes the loops that prompt Claude what it's already done inside Anthropic: • ~3x more code shipped per engineer (he says that number is already outdated and higher) • Cowork - a full product - built in ~8 days, 100% with Claude Code • designers, the finance guy, even the chief of staff now ship code his advice to founders: give everyone as many tokens as possible, and underfund every project on purpose - 2 engineers + a pile of tokens instead of 4. the roles are melting into one "builder." Watch this, than read the article below

显示更多