注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

Daniel Jeffries (@Dan_Jeffries1) “This kind of safety research is utter nonsense. It's safety theater. Nobody asks” — TopicDigg

Daniel Jeffries 的个人资料封面
Daniel Jeffries 的头像
Daniel Jeffries
@Dan_Jeffries1
Author, futurist, and systems architect. Recursively self improving.
加入 July 2012
1.7K 正在关注    37.8K 粉丝
This kind of safety research is utter nonsense. It's safety theater. Nobody asks the model if they can shut it down. We just shut it down. Its a blob of code. The IT team simply turns it off. Done. This is nothing like "testing an airplane" in the real world to see if it will crash. It's worse than nonsense. It has no practical value whatsoever for security or safety. Anthropic repeatedly and deliberately creates these sensational headlines and paints itself as the only wise, kind, safe, special people who can be trusted to guide AI because their strategy is to get Washington to pass legislation that boosts them and harms competitors. But when your safety "research" is on par with the TSA confiscating children's toys that look like guns and pretending it means anything for actual airline safety, why should they be trusted for anything?
显示更多
0
68
996
112
转发到社区