注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

atomic.chat (@atomic_chat_hq) “Sakana Fugu surprisingly performed near GLM 5.2 level but 17× more expensive! We” — TopicDigg

atomic.chat 的个人资料封面
atomic.chat 的头像
atomic.chat
@atomic_chat_hq
Local AI chat and Inference Engine. Enhanced by TurboQuant. Team: @gladkos @skinbagwbones @AlexFromAtomic @danyurkin
加入 March 2026
40 正在关注    11.4K 粉丝
Sakana Fugu surprisingly performed near GLM 5.2 level but 17× more expensive! We gave the same prompt to 4 models: build a complete live Trader Desk with both frontend and backend components, real-time market data fetched from external APIs for 8 symbols, and a custom dark-theme UI. Outputs: Fugu Ultra — 22,225 t, $0.51 Opus 4.8 — 15,802 t, $0.31 GPT-5.5 — 11,474 t, $0.26 GLM 5.2 — 13,677 t, $0.03 Fugu created the most polished and feature-rich trading desk in the run. GLM 5.2 was very close behind, with a similarly complete multi-panel interface and live data, but at a much lower cost. Opus and GPT also performed well, delivering solid results with a better balance between quality and cost
显示更多
0
90
2.2K
229
转发到社区