注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

beamnxw ./ (@beamnxw) “Claude Fable 5 was tested against Opus 4.8 on physics simulation tasks Both mode” — TopicDigg

beamnxw ./ 的个人资料封面
beamnxw ./ 的头像
beamnxw ./
@beamnxw
hyperfixation on AI | always dyor
加入 August 2024
873 正在关注    2.3K 粉丝
Claude Fable 5 was tested against Opus 4.8 on physics simulation tasks Both models received the same prompts and were tasked with generating standalone HTML5 simulations without using third-party libraries: → Chaotic double pendulum → Galton board → Water in a rotating drum (WCSPH) Generation costs: • Fable 5 - $3.35, 68.7k tokens, 14 min 47 sec • Opus 4.8 - $0.93, 38.9k tokens, 8 min 10 sec Fable demonstrated its most notable advantage in the water simulation. The model created a more cohesive and stable fluid volume Opus exhibited large gaps near the walls, with individual particles scattering across the scene, and the fluid itself was less stable
显示更多
0
24
149
10
转发到社区