My AI wrote perfect code on the first try. Then it destroyed the entire project over the next two hours.
That's what working with Claude Code looked like for me: fix one bug, break two more.
Patch the UI, watch the layout fall apart. A hundred hotfixes later, my codebase was a dead Frankenstein of duct-taped patches - and the feature still didn't work.
Turns out the model isn't "dumb." It's an intern who starts typing before you've finished the sentence.
The fix was almost embarrassingly simple: ban the AI from touching code until there's an approved plan. First - clarifying questions.
Then - 2-3 architecture options with trade-offs. A design doc. Only after that - 2-5 minute micro-tasks, tests before implementation, root-cause debugging instead of guessing.
The moment I forced it to think before typing, the chaos ended that same day.
The lesson: AI isn't bad at coding. It's bad at solving giant problems in one shot. Give it structure, and you get an architect - not an intern running on caffeine and vibes.
显示更多