Dr. 67. Pump (@real_dr_pump) “这里提到 $FWA 的 RTP（玩家回报率） 是 77% 每次抽奖的成本是 NFT backing 平均值的” — TopicDigg

Hey @token_works, your packs have a 77.3% RTP and you don’t publish it anywhere. users deserve to see this before they buy You pay EV × 1.10. the exit pays you 85% of backing. 0.85 / 1.10 = 77.3%. you lose 23 cents of every dollar, every single pack The EV term cancels. it does not matter which pool you pick or how it’s built. the number is identical every time. no skill, no timing, no edge And it compounds. 5 packs leaves you 27%. 10 packs leaves you 7.6%. this is not variance you recover from, it is a straight line to zero Just for reference, blackjack returns 99.5% RTP. roulette 94.7% RTP. the worst slot machine on ANY casino returns 88% RTP. But $FWA packs return 77.3% RTP, before the nonrefundable VRF fee It’s all in your own docs at /docs/pricing-draw and /docs/winning. just never as one number. a buyer staring at a pack has no way to know they’re taking a worse deal than any casino on earth would legally be allowed to offer • users: 77.3% out. keeping the NFT only breaks even if the floor beats 1.10 × pool EV. know which bet you’re making • team: put the RTP on the pricing page. one line. UK operators are required to surface exactly this for slots You would literally have better odds gambling at a casino than aping $FWA packs