与「SmartCity」相关的搜索结果

😲Departure Times Displayed on 3 Screens! 🚌#Fuzhou# #Bus# has launched a smart & convenient new initiative. #SmartCity# #TravelFuzhou# #SustainableFuzhou# #transportation# #FuzhouCity# #inclusion#

🤝 CM Devendra Fadnavis presided over the signing and exchange of MoUs between Sahakar Taxi Co-Operative Limited (STCL) and various organisations. List of organisations: 🔸Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) 🔸Navi Mumbai Traffic Police 🔸Mumbai Traffic Police 🔸Thane Municipal Corporation 🔸Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation 🔸Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai 🔸Thane Traffic Police 🔸M/s. Loknete D B Patil Native Project Affected Transport Co-Operative Limited 🔸Cosmos Co-operative Bank Ltd Purpose of these MoUs: ✅To enhance last-mile and first-mile connectivity for MSRTC passengers, improve the overall commuter experience at bus stands via dedicated prepaid systems and promote integrated, sustainable green urban mobility across Maharashtra ✅To provide seamless last-mile connectivity to MSRTC passengers at designated bus stands via the Bharat Taxi platform ✅To establish structured physical prepaid booths at principal transit junctions to cater to walk-in passengers ✅To advance sustainable transport paradigms via structural co-branding layouts on the City Electric Buses and long-distance MSRTC transit fleets ✅To ensure safe, affordable, and accessible transport for all commuters, including women, senior citizens and persons with disabilities ✅To enhance commuter security via tracked, cashless, app-based taxi operations, integrate digital emergency response networks and regulate dedicated taxi facilitation zones ✅To improve urban mobility in the corporation's jurisdiction through safe, organised, app-based and cashless taxi services ✅To enhance first-mile and last-mile connectivity at public transport hubs and high-footfall civic locations; promote green and electric mobility and support TMC, NMMC, MCGM's Smart City and digital governance initiatives ✅To outline the strategic partnership between the Parties for the commercial rollout and day-to-day management of the ‘Bharat Taxi’ platform within the precinct of NMIA Union MoS Murlidhar Mohol, Minister Babasaheb Patil, MLA Manda Mhatre, MLA Mahesh Baldi, MLA Prashant Thakur and other dignitaries were present. 🤝 मुख्यमंत्री देवेंद्र फडणवीस यांच्या प्रमुख उपस्थितीत सहकार टॅक्सी को-ऑपरेटिव्ह लिमिटेड (STCL) आणि विविध संस्थांदरम्यान सामंजस्य करार (MoU) करण्यात आले. सामंजस्य करार झालेल्या संस्था : 🔸 महाराष्ट्र राज्य मार्ग परिवहन महामंडळ (MSRTC) 🔸 नवी मुंबई वाहतूक पोलीस 🔸 मुंबई वाहतूक पोलीस 🔸 ठाणे महानगरपालिका (TMC) 🔸 नवी मुंबई महानगरपालिका (NMMC) 🔸 बृहन्मुंबई महानगरपालिका (MCGM) 🔸 ठाणे वाहतूक पोलीस 🔸 लोकनेते स्व. दि. बा. पाटील नेटिव्ह प्रोजेक्ट अफेक्टेड ट्रान्सपोर्ट को-ऑपरेटिव्ह लिमिटेड 🔸 कॉसमॉस को-ऑपरेटिव्ह बँक लिमिटेड सामंजस्य करारांची उद्दिष्टे: ✅ MSRTC प्रवाशांसाठी प्रथम टप्प्यातील (First-mile) आणि अंतिम टप्प्यातील (Last-mile) प्रवास अधिक सुलभ करणे, बसस्थानकांवर प्रीपेड टॅक्सी व्यवस्था उपलब्ध करून प्रवाशांचा प्रवास अधिक सोयीस्कर बनवणे तसेच महाराष्ट्रात एकात्मिक, शाश्वत आणि पर्यावरणपूरक शहरी वाहतूक व्यवस्थेला चालना देणे ✅ भारत टॅक्सी प्लॅटफॉर्मच्या माध्यमातून निश्चित MSRTC बसस्थानकांवर प्रवाशांना अखंड लास्ट-माईल कनेक्टिव्हिटी उपलब्ध करून देणे ✅ थेट येणाऱ्या प्रवाशांची सोय करण्यासाठी प्रमुख वाहतूक केंद्रांवर सुव्यवस्थित आणि कायमस्वरूपी 'प्रीपेड' बुथ्स उभारणे. ✅ शहरातील इलेक्ट्रिक बसेस आणि एमएसआरटीसीच्या लांब पल्ल्याच्या बस ताफ्यावर संरचित संयुक्त ब्रँडिंगद्वारे शाश्वत वाहतूक व्यवस्थेला प्रोत्साहन देणे. ✅ महिला, ज्येष्ठ नागरिक आणि दिव्यांगांसह सर्व प्रवाशांसाठी सुरक्षित, परवडणारी आणि विश्वासार्ह टॅक्सी सेवा उपलब्ध करून देणे. ✅ ट्रॅकिंग सुविधा, कॅशलेस व ॲप-आधारित टॅक्सी सेवांद्वारे प्रवाशांच्या सुरक्षिततेला बळकटी देणे. डिजिटल आपत्कालीन प्रतिसाद प्रणालीशी समन्वय साधणे. तसेच नियोजित टॅक्सी सुविधा क्षेत्रांचे (Taxi Facilitation Zones) प्रभावी नियमन करणे. ✅ महानगरपालिकेच्या क्षेत्रात सुरक्षित, नियोजित, ॲप-आधारित आणि कॅशलेस टॅक्सी सेवांद्वारे शहरी वाहतूक व्यवस्था अधिक सक्षम करणे. ✅ सार्वजनिक वाहतूक केंद्र आणि नागरिकांची मोठी वर्दळ असलेल्या ठिकाणी फर्स्ट-माईल व लास्ट-माईल कनेक्टिव्हिटी वाढवणे, हरित व इलेक्ट्रिक मोबिलिटीला प्रोत्साहन देणे तसेच TMC, NMMC आणि MCGM यांच्या स्मार्ट सिटी व डिजिटल गव्हर्नन्स उपक्रमांना बळकटी देणे. ✅ नवी मुंबई आंतरराष्ट्रीय विमानतळ (NMIA) परिसरात ‘भारत टॅक्सी’ प्लॅटफॉर्मच्या व्यावसायिक अंमलबजावणी आणि दैनंदिन व्यवस्थापनासाठी धोरणात्मक भागीदारी प्रस्थापित करणे. यावेळी केंद्रीय राज्यमंत्री मुरलीधर मोहोळ, मंत्री बाबासाहेब पाटील, आमदार मंदा म्हात्रे, आमदार महेश बालदी, आमदार प्रशांत ठाकूर व इतर मान्यवर उपस्थित होते. @Dev_Fadnavis @mohol_murlidhar @babasahebpati1 @MlaMandaMhatre @mlamaheshbaldi @ithakurprashant @coopbharattaxi @msrtcofficial @TMCaTweetAway @NMMConline @Cosmospune #Maharashtra# #DevendraFadnavis# #BharatTaxi#

China’s Buildings Rain to Beat the Heat POV: It’s 39°C… but your street, building, and park just turned on outdoor AC. China’s mist cooling systems (rooftops raining, lamp posts spraying, plazas in cool fog) drop temps 3-8°C instantly. Feels like a gentle waterfall, zero extra cost, and it’s everywhere now. Genius summer hack. #ChinaInnovation# #SmartCities#

🤔 @elonmusk says money will be irrelevant by 2036 because AI and robots will create abundance. But abundance is not the same as post-scarcity. AI can make scalable goods and services extremely cheap. It cannot mass-produce beachfront land, homes in desirable locations, original art, elite access, human attention or status. As ordinary goods approach zero cost, more demand will chase the things whose supply cannot expand. These “positional goods” may become more expensive, not less. Money may matter less for basic needs, but ownership and purchasing power could matter even more for everything that remains scarce.

Former $CRWV employee on why neoclouds are far more exposed to GPU generation cycles than hyperscalers ( $MSFT, $AMZN, $GOOGL ): - The expert describes GPU utilization tracking at hyperscale as a continuous and disciplined process built around two lenses. The first is infrastructure utilization, covering GPU occupancy, idle time, and memory utilization, noting that 95% booked usage can still mask inefficiency if jobs stall or batches have idle gaps. The second is outcome utilization, asking whether the compute is actually generating business value, measured by metrics such as tokens trained per dollar, time to reach target accuracy, and tokens per second per GPU. - The expert sees a meaningful difference between hyperscalers and neoclouds on GPU investment economics. Hyperscalers like $MSFT, $GOOGL, and $AMZN can tolerate a 3-5 year payback period given their ability to monetize the same infrastructure across multiple revenue streams. Neoclouds like $CRWV operate on a tighter 2-3 year window. - With higher financing costs and direct dependence on infrastructure cash yield, neoclouds are far more sensitive to utilization and GPU residual risk. The biggest risk is GPU generation cycles, where a slow payback means newer chips could erode pricing power before the asset has paid itself off. - The expert explains that for hyperscalers, roughly 60% of GPU capacity is allocated to external monetization, including GPU rentals, managed AI services, enterprise inference workloads, and startup model training. The remaining 40% is used internally, and of that internal portion, the majority is still indirectly monetized through products like M365 Copilot or GitHub. Around 40% is dedicated to pure R&D. - The GPU pricing mix has shifted meaningfully over the past few years. In 2023, around 70-80% of revenue was hourly as customers paid a premium just to get access to scarce GPUs. By 2025 that had moved to roughly 50% hourly and 30-50% committed, and the expert expects 2026 to tip further toward committed at around 65% for hyperscalers as AI matures and inference becomes more predictable. Neoclouds are moving in the same direction but more slowly. - By 2027-2030, the expert sees committed contracts settling at 55-65% as the norm, with hourly pricing remaining but losing its scarcity premium as more supply comes online.

Elon Musk said saving for retirement becomes pointless in 10 to 20 years. Not speculation. Math. Musk: “Don’t worry about squirreling money away for retirement in like ten or 20 years. It won’t matter.” We passed the event horizon. Retirement savings assumes scarcity persists. It won’t. AI and robotics collapse labor costs to zero. Living costs follow. You’re not saving for security. You’re saving for a world that stops existing. Musk: “If any of the things that we’ve said are true, saving for retirement will be irrelevant.”

AI is the single greatest innovation in human history. The only thing that comes close is splitting the atom. Every economic system we've ever built runs on the scarcity of knowledge. Lawyers, doctors, experts of every kind… they get paid because what they know is scarce. With AI, knowledge is now infinite. That breaks everything. Our entire economic model, as well as our understanding of what humans do, and what we're for. This is the Exponential Age. I've been mapping this out for years across @RealVision and GMI, piecing it together as it unfolded. Today I wrote a full breakdown that pulls it all into one place. Link below.

A major grain producer — yet short on water. How to solve this? 💦 Shandong's Dezhou has the answer. The city is tackling water scarcity head-on with a smart, large-scale approach: upgrading field-level canals, linking 1,500+ waterways, and rolling out intelligent irrigation.

🚨 WHAT IF THE MEMORY SHORTAGE WAS MANUFACTURED? Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron are being sued for allegedly engineering the DRAM shortage on purpose. The lawsuit claims they used the AI boom as cover to quietly cut normal memory supply. DRAM prices are up 500 to 700%. The damage is now showing up in iPhone and Mac prices. The makers say it's innocent: AI buyers showed up with huge money for HBM. But here's the bigger question. Memory stocks are priced for endless AI demand. If a court rules the scarcity was manufactured, how much of that demand was ever real?

CZ said Binance offers "the best liquidity in the world" for consumer protection. He's right. But let's talk about WHERE that liquidity comes from. It comes from retail getting rekt on Binance Launchpad. Since 2019, Binance has launched 60+ projects. The narrative is always the same: Binance vets the project, lists it at launch, and retail piles in. Binance becomes the gatekeeper of "credibility." But here's the part CZ doesn't mention. The Lazio Fan Token (LAZIO) launched October 2021 at $1.00 on Binance Launchpad. Private investors got in at $0.10. Binance announced it. Retail FOMO'd. Price hit $26.75 in 48 hours. Retail thought they were early to something Binance blessed. Fast forward to today. LAZIO trades at $0.65. That's a 97.5% loss from the peak. Retail never stood a chance. Alpine F1 Team (ALPINE)? Same blueprint. Launched Feb 2022 at $1.00. ATH $11.29. Current price: $0.42. Down 96%. The token was delisted from Bitget in Feb 2026 due to zero trading volume just dead weight. But here's where it gets darker. Binance Launchpad isn't a bug. It's the business model. 1) Binance identifies a hype narrative (sports fan tokens, move-to-earn, etc) 2) Binance vets the project (gives it institutional credibility) 3) Private/VC investors get massive allocations at $0.001-$0.10 4) Launchpad subscription creates artificial scarcity ("hard cap" per user) 5) Retail buys at $1.00 thinking Binance wouldn't list garbage 6) Token pumps 10-100x in first week (retail euphoria) 7) Vesting schedule unlocks over 12 months (insiders exit) 8) Token declines 90-99% over next 24 months (retail holds bags) 9) Binance collected trading fees on every step of the decline The liquidity CZ brags about? It's built on retail extraction. Let's look at the pattern across Launchpad: - STEPN (GMT): Launched at $0.01, peaked at $4.11 (411x), now bleeding lower - Open Campus (EDU): 33x peak, now declining - Space ID (ID): 41x peak, now sliding - Hooked Protocol (HOOK): 41x peak, lost 90%+ since ATH - Arkham (ARKM): Only 16x at peak in 2023 (falling returns as the grift gets known) Notice the trend? Earlier projects had bigger peaks (because retail still believed). Recent ones are smaller. Why? Because the market is learning that Binance Launchpad = slow-motion rug pull. But retail is trapped. Binance has 100M+ users. Binance has regulatory licenses. Binance is THE credibility anchor. When Binance lists something, retail thinks "this must be vetted, this must be safe." It's not. It's the opposite. The vetting isn't for retail protection. It's for Binance's protection. Binance ensures the project won't implode in week 1 (that would hurt Binance's brand). But they don't care if it implodes in month 12. The damage is already extracted. Here's what "consumer protection" actually means in the Binance universe: - Deep liquidity pools (so Binance profits from every trade) - IEO credibility (so retail trusts the listing) - Vesting schedules published (so insiders can front-run the dumps) - No accountability for post-launch performance (so Binance faces zero liability) Retail thinks liquidity = safety. It's the opposite. High liquidity on a scarcity pump = maximum extraction efficiency. Compare Binance Launchpad to actual consumer protection: - SEC-regulated IPOs: Lock-up periods for insiders are EQUAL to retail - Traditional venture: Downside protection, governance rights, legal recourse - Binance Launchpad: Insiders get $0.10 pricing, retail gets $1.00, both tokens identical = wealth transfer complete The 60+ projects Binance has launched since 2019 represent billions in retail wealth extraction. LAZIO alone = $26.75 ATH on a $1.00 launch = $26.75B market cap at peak. The fact it's now $0.65 doesn't erase the fact that retail lost 97% while Binance kept the trading fees. CZ's statement about "the best liquidity in the world" is technically true. But it's like bragging about having the best highway system while running tolls that siphon wealth from drivers. The liquidity exists to serve extraction, not protection. The real consumer protection would be: - Identical vesting schedules for all token holders (no insiders first) - Binding lock-up periods (prove you believe in your own project) - Performance clawback clauses (if the token dumps 90%, insiders pay retail back) - Regulatory disclosure (project financials, insider allocations, exit plans) Binance offers none of this. Because that would kill the model. The model is: - Build hype through Binance credibility - Capture retail FOMO - Execute insider exit - Repeat Liquidity is the tool. Extraction is the goal. So when CZ says Binance offers "the best consumer protection," what he means is: Binance offers the most efficient wealth extraction vehicle the crypto world has ever seen. And the liquidity is so good, retail can watch their investment die in real-time on every refresh. That's not protection. That's the grift, just wrapped in institutional packaging. The Lazio Token didn't fail because it was a bad project. It failed because the Binance Launchpad model requires failure. Insiders need to exit. Retail needs to hold bags. Binance needs trading volume on the decline. The ecosystem needs constant new projects to pump and dump because the old ones are dead. It's a machine. And it's working exactly as designed. Binance isn't protecting users from bad liquidity. Binance is using liquidity to protect itself from accountability.