注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

Star@Day1Global Podcast 的个人资料封面
Star@Day1Global Podcast 的头像

Star@Day1Global Podcast (@starzq)

@starzq
0 正在关注    0 粉丝
提前 4 天预判非农不及预期,然后黄金的确提前涨了 这个博主有点东西
btc 金子 银子 被加息预期压制 金子已经和10y 有一些脱钩了。利率up已经超了 对贵金属已经有点免疫了 然后后面 nfp不及预期 市场会从加息看向降息。反弹最凶应该是金子 银子 btc
显示更多
0
25
58
3
转发到社区
这句话太精辟了 「可以理解为Meta自己多余的员工宿舍,想卖出真的服务型顶级公寓的租赁价,可能么?」
一边是海水一边是火焰。Meta暴涨,半导体硬件大跌。如何解读背后的机遇、市场的误读以及风险? $META 暴涨拉升因为要转型云服务商二房东出租多余算力。1GW目前能租200亿年收入按85%运营利润,每股净利润$5,提升EPS预期超过15%。 现在Meta总算力明年20GW,AI算力13GW,拿一半多余的出来,股价还不暴涨?做白日梦都不能这么笑醒的。怎么看? 算力多余了,AI Capex投资第一个信号,市场先跑为快,肯定半导体硬件大跌。但是首先简单批判一下。小扎这种干啥啥不行套路,不是说整体算力多余。 这种小作文上季度财报小扎就已经透露了,算力建多了,可能拿出来卖。资本市场也在惩罚他一路忽悠从元宇宙到AI自己模型的干啥啥不行。然后资本开支ai capex 还增长近1500亿/年,和Google,亚马逊和微软不一样,都是自用没有云服务收入,自然股价和估值都不行。 现在作为投机份子,第一个说算力多余要转型,那么市场第一时间暴涨“奖励”他肯定AI capex 不加投资,还能把多余资产利用产生现金流,转型云服务商,当然这种假设是合理。 但是Google目前限制Meta使用 Gemini 模型,因为 Meta 需要的计算能力超过 Google 能提供的规模。 这说明Meta出租算力不等于AI算力需求崩了。 而是在于Meta自己管理筹划和错配,不是谁都能搞好云服务商的,这背后新的业务需要真正的高效匹配/低延迟/服务顶级模型/每GW的token/长期客户生态锁定。 可以理解为Meta自己多余的员工宿舍,想卖出真的服务型顶级公寓的租赁价,可能么? 当然对于简单粗暴靠出租GPU挣钱的云服务商边际利润竞争大。但是真正市场缺的的是一个AI云服务商的“整体生态软服务”。 大概率是Meta自己算力部署特别是训练阶段冗余了,这个完全可以预测出,看看他模型开发啥也不是。然后服务自己广告方面的推理阶段算力,干不过Google的高效,多余了算力出来卖还能吹一个云服务商转型故事。 当然对于Meta业绩收入肯定有提高,但是不要过于乐观,特别是他那个多余算力买不出什么高价,真正市场稀缺的反而是一个结构性故事。 最稀缺的不是 GPU,而是可用适配、低延迟满负荷、可计费能形成客户锁定的推理产能和云服务商的管理能力。不是谁想进就进的。 对于客户安全合规长期性承诺,稳定高效最重要,不是你觉得多余算力想卖就卖。当然这种都抢着买的话,难道不是说市场对于AI云服务需求巨大么?高毛利吸引新玩家。 对于小扎就是投机份子,刚和几家neocloud签了大单,看到SpaceX卖算力挣钱,然后还能讲故事拉股价,就开始放风忽悠市场了。 详细的云服务/半导体硬件分析 我稍后有时间系统解读这个事件性的重大冲击 $GOOG $MSFT $AMZN $INTC $MU $SOXX $NBIS $SPCX
显示更多
一篇不错的解读:《META出租H100与购买先进算力并不矛盾》 Meta 做 NeoCloud 与继续租 Crusoe 1.6GW,并不矛盾 昨天盘前,Meta 被报道正在考虑把多余 AI 算力对外商业化,甚至做成类似 NeoCloud 的业务。市场第一反应非常剧烈:Meta 盘前上涨接近 6%,但 AI算力和 neocloud 相关股票则受到负面 Narrative 影响, 市场担心的是:如果 Meta 也开始把 GPU 算力对外卖,是否会直接导致算力过剩? 这个反应可以理解,但我们认为市场把问题想简单了。 首先,Meta 这件事本质上不是“AI 算力需求见顶”,也不是“Meta 不需要继续买算力”。相反,Meta 同时还在继续锁定非常大规模的新算力。根据 Bloomberg/Reuters 报道,Meta 最近与 Crusoe 签署了新的 AI computing capacity 协议,将从 Crusoe 位于 Texas Childress 和 Missouri Warrenton 的两个数据中心获得合计约 1.6GW 的容量。 同时,Meta还在向其他Neocloud购买算力。我们在去年3Q25 META Preview中就提到过META正在向NeoCloud寻求购买3GW算力。 所以表面上看,这里确实有一个矛盾:如果 Meta 自己已经有多余算力,为什么还要继续向 Crusoe 租 1.6GW? 我们的理解是,这不是矛盾,而是算力代际切换。 过去两年,Meta 已经采购和部署了大量 H100/H200。这些 GPU 不是没价值,恰恰相反,它们对 inference、fine-tuning、企业模型服务、图像/视频生成、传统 ML workload 仍然非常有价值。但对于下一代 frontier model training,尤其是 3T+ 参数规模的 MoE、长上下文、多模态和 RL-heavy post-training,H100/H200 的训练经济性会明显下降。 关键不是 H100 不能训练,而是单位有效 token 成本变差。 当模型进入 3T+ 规模后,瓶颈不再只是单卡 FLOPS,而是 HBM 容量/带宽、GPU 间通信、scale-up 网络、checkpoint/restart、expert routing、sequence parallel、pipeline bubble、以及大规模 collective communication。H100 集群当然还能跑,但训练 wall-clock 更长,通信开销更高,集群利用率更难维持,最终表现为同样训练一个 frontier model,成本和时间都不如 GB200/GB300,未来更不如 Vera Rubin。 因此,Meta 现在面对的是一个很典型的资产配置问题: 最先进的 GB200/GB300/Rubin,要优先留给下一代模型训练;上一代 H100/H200,则应该尽量转成 inference 或外部商业化收入。 这也是为什么“做 NeoCloud”和“继续租 Crusoe 1.6GW”可以同时成立。 Meta 继续向 Crusoe 锁定 1.6GW,本质上是在为更长期、更先进、更大规模的 AI infrastructure 做准备。这种资源对于 Meta 来说,更多是未来 GB200/GB300/Rubin 时代的战略性产能,而不是简单补 H100 的缺口。 另一方面,Meta 既然已经买了大量 H100/H200,就不可能让这些资产在 frontier training 代际切换后闲置。Meta 内部当然有广告、推荐、内容排序等大量推理 workload,但这和 OpenAI/Anthropic 那种直接面向外部客户卖 token 的 LLM inference 业务并不完全一样。Meta 如果没有足够多可以直接 monetization 的外部 token demand,把 H100/H200 做成 cloud capacity 或 hosted model API 对外销售,是非常合理的资本回收方式。 这其实和 xAI / SpaceX 的思路有相似之处。xAI 今年公开宣布与 Anthropic 达成 compute partnership,向 Anthropic 提供 Colossus 1 算力;xAI 官方称 Colossus 1 包含超过 22 万张 NVIDIA GPU,包括 H100、H200 和 GB200,并可支持 training、fine-tuning、inference 和 HPC workload。(xAI) 这说明即使是 frontier AI 公司,也可能把一部分已有 GPU fleet 对外出租,同时把最新、最稀缺、训练效率最高的下一代集群保留给自己的 frontier model。 所以今天市场担心“Meta 进入 NeoCloud 会打垮所有 NeoCloud”,我们觉得有些过度。 更准确的判断应该是: AI 算力市场正在从单一的 GPU shortage,进入多代 GPU 分层定价和分层使用阶段。 第一层是最新训练算力:GB300、Rubin,以及后续更大 scale-up domain 的系统,主要服务 frontier model training。这部分供给仍然稀缺,客户仍然会向 Crusoe、CoreWeave、Nebius、Oracle、Microsoft 等各类供应商锁产能。 第二层是上一代高端算力:H100/H200/部分 GB200,更适合 inference、fine-tuning、enterprise AI、hosted model、agent workload 和中小模型训练。这部分不是没有需求,而是从“最稀缺的训练资源”变成“可以规模化商业化的推理资源”。 第三层是更通用的 GPU cloud 和 long-tail enterprise workload,对价格更敏感,但需求弹性也更大。 在这个框架下,Meta 的行为其实很合理:它不是停止建设 AI infrastructure,而是在把不同代际的 GPU 放到最适合的经济用途上。 因此,我们不认为这是 AI infrastructure 的大问题。真正重要的判断是:下一代 frontier model training 对 GB200/GB300/Rubin 的需求仍然非常强;同时,H100/H200 这类上一代 GPU 也不会被废弃,而会进入 inference monetization 和外部算力销售阶段。 这对整个 AI supply chain 的含义反而是: GPU fleet 开始变成多代际资产,而不是一次性训练工具。旧 GPU 不归零,新 GPU 继续稀缺。Meta 做 NeoCloud,不是需求崩了,而是算力资产终于开始金融化和商业化。
显示更多
. $CRCL CEO @jerallaire 对 OUSD 的回应 1. USDC 的优势是网络效应 - 成千上万的服务与USDC网络集成 - 全球流动性排名前三的数字资产 - 政策和监管环境的深度融合 2. OUSD 的「宣传优势」不一定能落地 - 无限次免费赎回:没有那么容易实现 - 人人受益,共享收益:会使得基础设施投资不足 - 联盟: 在规模化、产品/市场契合度,甚至基本的敏捷性方面,记录都惨不忍睹 我比较同意 Jeremy 的观点,没有那么容易新建一个稳定币网络,同时一个所有成员都能发表意见的联盟,效率也不见得有多高 当然 Stripe 也是非常厉害的公司,就像我之前一条写的 ,希望看到稳定币的整体规模变大,对所有玩家都是好事
显示更多
We’ve had lots of questions from our investor community looking for thoughts on OUSD, and so I thought I’d share my direct views here for anyone. Stablecoin networks are platform and network effect businesses that are established over a long period of time, tend towards winner-take-most market structures, and resemble other internet platform utility markets. There are several layers that drive this. First, stablecoin networks effectively act as public protocols and software layers on the internet and their network strength is a matter of the number and range of applications and services that integrate to the network. Every time a developer or service provider integrates to the network, it brings more network effects. This attracts more developers and adds more utility and more network effects. This then drives demand for the digital currency itself, which then reinforces these network effects through liquidity network effects. We have realized this at a massive scale with the USDC network today — thousands upon thousands of services integrate with our network, which in turn provides immense utility not just to each application, but to users as a whole who benefit massively from the reach and interoperability that exists. This drives user and developer preference further. We’ve invested in building that ecosystem over nearly a decade, and now it’s accelerating as mainstream institutions come onto the network, connecting their customers and users. We add to that utility by building software stacks that further expand and strengthen the network — protocols like CCTP and Gateway, which promote interoperability, safety and liquidity around the world. This expands the target surface area for app builders and developers, making it easy for them to tap into the liquidity and network effects that already exist. We are now seeing that stack get pulled into all kinds of chains, permissioned L2s, networks being built by governments, and so much more. The second layer is that of liquidity network effects. This is fundamental. Liquidity begets liquidity. For a stablecoin to achieve scale and utility, it needs to be highly liquid, both on a primary basis (e.g., through all the major financial market centers in the world, with world class direct banking liquidity) and on a secondary basis both by being available and tradeable for retail and institutional clients in every geography and against every fiat instrument in the world. People who want to access and move value need to be able to easily get in and out of that digital currency. Here, we’ve invested nearly a decade in building out that liquidity, and it is now entrenched in exchanges, DeFI venues, and with PSPs, payments firms, regional exchanges, and so many others. Establishing these liquidity network effects also involves building global regulatory infrastructure and ensuring that the stablecoin is available under various regimes around the world. Today, USDC is in the top 3 most liquid digital assets in the world, and it falls off sharply after that. BTC, USDT and USDC have extraordinary liquidity. The closest other dollar stables are like 10x smaller and that liquidity tends to be concentrated in promotional books in a single exchange, whereas USDC liquidity is dispersed widely across dozens and dozens of surfaces. Building this liquidity has been a nearly decade-long task that we continue. A third layer of network strength comes from the deep integration with the policy and regulatory environment — in many cases, years of effort to build licensing (e.g., USDC is the only large global stablecoin currently available in all of Europe or Japan), and more regimes for stablecoins are coming online, with Circle leading the way in ensuring that USDC is officially recognized, registered, licensed and accepted in the most important markets in the world. On the back of this is the work of building global banking, reserve management and treasury and liquidity management that can operate this on a nearly 24/7 basis in markets and banking systems globally. This globalization effort is a massive investment that we have made over the years. All of these investments by Circle and our global ecosystem of thousands of partners have delivered the net result of providing the world’s most trusted and available digital dollar infrastructure—a utility that any user, developer, or business can freely and easily tap into. And we do not intend to slow down. All of this compounds and shows in the numbers. In Q1 2026, according to third-party analysts (Artemis) who track stablecoin adoption, USDC handled nearly $30T in onchain transactions, representing 80% of all dollar stablecoin transactions on blockchains. USDT handled the remaining 20% of transactions. All of the combined remaining dollar stablecoins handled a total of 0% of transactions (i.e., < 0.5%). While other stablecoins may have some circulation, most of that is through promotions and incentives, the actual usage is extremely limited—because of the extremely limited liquidity and network utility that exists for these coins. But my thoughts on the competitive landscape are not just about the strength of our network—there are also considerations around any new initiative. Several perspectives and positioning have been shared about how something like OUSD improves on something like USDC. 1) Free mint and burn. The argument suggests that existing stablecoins charge burn fees, and payments firms should not need to pay these (despite the fact that the entire payment industry is built on small bps fees on various ingress and egress points on their networks). There are structural market realities built around the fact that some stablecoins impose very large redemption fees and have limited redemption facilities – the impact of this is that stablecoins with strong redemption facilities, good liquidity and no fees become the offramp for their competitor stablecoins. It may seem easy to say one will offer unlimited and free redeems, however market reality likely forces other behavior. This can be addressed – and is addressed by Circle – through contractual mechanisms vs. a blanket fee exemption. 2) Everybody wins and shares. While this sounds good in principle, the reality of the market and market opportunity is quite different. Today, Circle shares the majority of its income with its distribution partners, and we continue to lean hard into expanding those partnerships with leading companies across every sector of the market. However, we also retain significant income that allows us to invest in the massive market infrastructure that makes this such a powerful and valuable utility for the world to build on. Giving away all the income is a recipe for starving an infrastructure, systematically underinvesting and ensuring that your platform will remain limited in scope. Furthermore, Circle believes that the future stablecoin market is likely several orders of magnitude larger than it is today. We’re actively bringing partners into the USDC ecosystem through a diverse and growing set of partnership models that span our work with exchanges, custodians, payments firms, asset issuers and more. We are excited to continue to build with a “big tent mentality” where the entire ecosystem can grow value together. 3) A consortium where everybody has a voice. Perhaps I have a cynical view, but the track record of consortium products achieving scale, P/M Fit or even basic product agility is absolutely dismal, and while there are examples of financial consortia that operate utilities, they are predictably slow moving. Large groups of large companies coordinate poorly, have misaligned incentives, slow things down and rarely create the space for real durable innovation and competitiveness. They also typically, out of their own self-interest, starve the consortium itself on an operating basis. We actually tried this in the early days of USDC, and even with a very small group, ran into endless challenges and complexity. Smaller, tighter strategic collaborations and commercial partnership arrangements with product and platform builders that can drive forward independently will almost always outcompete large consortiums. But oftentimes when these get formed, everyone feels like they should put their logo on the list, kiss the ring, and make noise about openness. But typically those same firms will turn to their operating units and make the best decisions for their customers, which often means partnering with the market leader and building durable win-win partnerships. There’s also been a bunch of commentary on Circle's partnership with Coinbase and what this all means. Our stablecoin partnership with Coinbase remains as strong as ever, and I think we both see that enormous opportunity ahead to expand the USDC network. A final comment: Circle remains committed to supporting a wide range of different products and infrastructures, even when we might compete with different aspects of those partners’ products in other areas of our business. With OUSD, we work closely with many of the founding members, and we expect that those same members will remain large USDC partners and customers. At the same time, as Circle has diversified our product and platform stack, expanding across Arc, CCTP, CPN, StableFX, Agent Stack and many other areas, we continue to expand the partnerships and collaboration with many other stablecoin issuers — dozens of them — to help them launch on Arc, leverage our interoperability infrastructure, get supported in our Wallets and become settlement and FX options on CPN and StableFX. We are huge believers in growth in the stablecoin ecosystem and welcome OUSD as a new member of the community!
显示更多
之前在 Kaito 上有 Talus 奖励的朋友有福了,最近一周涨了 81%(不知道是不是跟最近上的 Agent 聚合功能有关),可以去 streamflow 上领,线性解锁
显示更多
非常值得看的一篇文章 + 听的一期播客, @Jhy256 的基金 NDV 2 年 4 倍,完整的分享了他的方法论「去非共识的地方钓鱼」 新股神 @aleabitoreddit 不停地找 chokepoint, 本质上也是「去非共识的地方钓鱼」 今年涨的也不止 AI, 如果你在 2 月份埋伏了 $HYPE , 现在也快 4 倍了 市场永远有机会, 但你需要提前准备好
显示更多
0
10
43
4
转发到社区
Nvidia AI Factory Ecosystem 标的太多了,急需一个 ETF
. $CRWV 涨了 13%,周末玩 Hyperliquid 又盈利了
戴尔宣布,全球第一台 Vera Rubin NVL72 交付给 CoreWeave 使用 周末搞大新闻,我在 Hyperliquid 上小小的开多了 $CRWV , 另一个逻辑是这段时间 $NBIS 涨的不错,作为龙头的 $CRWV 应该有空间 $DELL $NVDA hyperliquid:native
显示更多
非常值得看的一篇文章 + 听的一期播客, @Jhy256 的基金 NDV 2 年 4 倍,完整的分享了他的方法论「去非共识的地方钓鱼」 新股神 @aleabitoreddit 不停地找 chokepoint, 本质上也是「去非共识的地方钓鱼」 今年涨的也不止 AI, 如果你在 2 月份埋伏了 $HYPE , 现在也快 4 倍了 市场永远有机会, 但你需要提前准备好
显示更多
0
10
43
4
转发到社区
Nvidia AI Factory Ecosystem 标的太多了,急需一个 ETF
Michael Saylor 把充到 Coinbase 的 BTC 取了回来,然后又开始买了
戴尔宣布,全球第一台 Vera Rubin NVL72 交付给 CoreWeave 使用 周末搞大新闻,我在 Hyperliquid 上小小的开多了 $CRWV , 另一个逻辑是这段时间 $NBIS 涨的不错,作为龙头的 $CRWV 应该有空间 $DELL $NVDA hyperliquid:native
显示更多
0
33
73
7
转发到社区
CNBC 爆料,马斯克近期在进行"思想实验",研究将特斯拉并入 SpaceX 生态 实际上,这两家公司已经有大量协同👇 1. 人才:马斯克兼任两家CEO与董事,弟弟 Kimball 也是;SpaceX 董事 Antonio Gracias、Steve Jurvetson 此前都是特斯拉董事; 材料工程副总裁 Charles Kuehmann 一人任职两家公司 2. 工程:两家工程师常一起攻关能源、GPU 算力等卡脖子问题 主要的【交易难点】是估值与股东利益 - SpaceX 上市后市值预计 1.5 万亿,特斯拉当前约 1.6 万亿,体量基本相当 - 法律专家:不会引发反垄断问题,但特斯拉股东想知道"是不是一比一换股、怎么补偿",SpaceX 股东想知道"是不是多花钱了" - 反对阻力很小:马斯克手握 SpaceX 85% 投票权,决定要做就基本能推动 一个有趣的点是,如果真的合并,会让马斯克更容易解锁自己的特别绩效奖金: - 据 S1 招股书,马斯克的特别绩效奖金要求 SpaceX 市值做到 7.5 万亿美元 + 火星住满 100 万人 - 合并可立刻把 SpaceX 市值推到约 3.5 万亿,离目标更近了 - 同样,Tesla 的特别绩效奖金要求市值做到 8.5 万亿美元,合并同样加速了这个目标 我也觉得这两家终将合并为一个 X Group, 看看老马如何考虑吧,希望我的 $TSLA 可以换一些 SpaceX 股票哈哈
显示更多
马斯克的 1 万亿美金薪酬批下来了 Yes, 你没看错,整个加密市值3.5万亿,马斯克接下来的薪酬包1万亿,可以买1000万个BTC,or 3 亿枚ETH 分 12 个阶段解锁,每阶段需同时满足市值门槛与至少一项业绩目标 - 市值目标 : 从当前1.5万亿美金开始,最终目标8.5万亿美金 - 业绩目标: 包括累计交付 2000 万辆汽车、FSD活跃用户达 1000 万、Robotaxi 商业化运营100万辆、Optimus机器人交付 100 万台,以及年度调整后EBITDA达到4000亿美元(连续四季度验证) (很适合作为项目方的解锁条款) 当然马斯克也开始了新的画饼,包括要自建芯片工厂、明年 4 月 1 日发布新的 Roadster, 以及 SpaceX 考虑 IPO 这里面还有一个 Alpha, 他提出「希望找到“某种方式”,让特斯拉的股东也能参与到这家太空探索公司的发展中」。难道是给特斯拉的股东空投 SpaceX 的股票? 马斯克需在未来 7 年半内持续担任 CEO,应该可以专心干活了,希望不要再出其他幺蛾子 期待一下,希望 $TLSA 有机会成为我的退休基金之一哈哈 上一波跌倒 300 的时候买少了,下次回调再加仓
显示更多
再次见识到特朗普喊单的力量, $MU 841 突破前高,瑞银给的目标价 1625,准备拿着不动了 Hyperliquid 目前更适合短线,对于 holder 不是很友好,拿着不动也吃资金费率,所以我平掉之后转到券商里面了 如果哪个交易所可以同时结合传统券商和 Hyperliquid 的优点,绝对受欢迎
显示更多
周日上午刷到这个特朗普夸奖 $MU 的视频,当时已经从收盘 745 涨到了 770 左右,我从 Hyperliquid 上买了一点作为防守,没想到还能涨,看来明天开盘大概率要破 800 了 随着美股券商的封杀,以及未来 CEX 也有可能被 CRS, Hyperliquid hyperliquid:native 的含金量还在上升 建议加密券商可以考虑集成一下, 非交易时间段走 Hyperliquid, 实现 7 x 24 交易
显示更多
何德何能,我能跟这些大牛列在一起😂 欢迎阅读这篇文章《AI 超级周期经济学(一):我们现在在哪里,下个 10 年如何投资?》,对理解 AI 产业的未来会很有帮助👇
显示更多
股票題材研究 TOP 6 KOLs 推薦! 🔥 高質量潛力題材分析與對應股票統整看這些帳號就夠了 1. Serenity @aleabitoreddit 2. qinbafrank @qinbafrank 3. Jukan @jukan05 4. Fiona @nft_hu 5. Macro_Lin @LinQingV 6. Star @starzq 👇 往下看 6 大 KOLs 介紹
显示更多
0
9
75
14
转发到社区
再次见识到特朗普喊单的力量, $MU 841 突破前高,瑞银给的目标价 1625,准备拿着不动了 Hyperliquid 目前更适合短线,对于 holder 不是很友好,拿着不动也吃资金费率,所以我平掉之后转到券商里面了 如果哪个交易所可以同时结合传统券商和 Hyperliquid 的优点,绝对受欢迎
显示更多
周日上午刷到这个特朗普夸奖 $MU 的视频,当时已经从收盘 745 涨到了 770 左右,我从 Hyperliquid 上买了一点作为防守,没想到还能涨,看来明天开盘大概率要破 800 了 随着美股券商的封杀,以及未来 CEX 也有可能被 CRS, Hyperliquid hyperliquid:native 的含金量还在上升 建议加密券商可以考虑集成一下, 非交易时间段走 Hyperliquid, 实现 7 x 24 交易
显示更多
何德何能,我能跟这些大牛列在一起😂 欢迎阅读这篇文章《AI 超级周期经济学(一):我们现在在哪里,下个 10 年如何投资?》,对理解 AI 产业的未来会很有帮助👇
显示更多
股票題材研究 TOP 6 KOLs 推薦! 🔥 高質量潛力題材分析與對應股票統整看這些帳號就夠了 1. Serenity @aleabitoreddit 2. qinbafrank @qinbafrank 3. Jukan @jukan05 4. Fiona @nft_hu 5. Macro_Lin @LinQingV 6. Star @starzq 👇 往下看 6 大 KOLs 介紹
显示更多
0
9
75
14
转发到社区
周日上午刷到这个特朗普夸奖 $MU 的视频,当时已经从收盘 745 涨到了 770 左右,我从 Hyperliquid 上买了一点作为防守,没想到还能涨,看来明天开盘大概率要破 800 了 随着美股券商的封杀,以及未来 CEX 也有可能被 CRS, Hyperliquid hyperliquid:native 的含金量还在上升 建议加密券商可以考虑集成一下, 非交易时间段走 Hyperliquid, 实现 7 x 24 交易
显示更多
0
11
66
7
转发到社区
段永平的 13F 出来了,有点意思 - 终于建仓了 $TSLA , 建仓价 371,大概率是 sell put 进来的。而且量不小 6.34%,一下子成为了 top5 仓位 - 买了一点点 $CRCL , 0.1%, 不知道是哪位朋友 cx 的哈哈 - 翻倍加仓 $GOOG $NVDA $PDD $DIS , 加仓 $MSFT - 小仓位试水了不少 AI 股: $CRDO (站在了光里), $PLTR $CRWD $SNPS $SNOW $INOD - 减了 10% 的 $AAPL , 87% 的 $TSM 13F是上个季度的操作,段永平这种长期持有者的大仓位是可以抄抄作业的,Leopold 这种作业要谨慎抄,可能几天就换一次仓位
显示更多
0
16
198
63
转发到社区